Teacher Evaluation Process

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NC Educator Evaluation System Process Orientation
Advertisements

Lee County Human Resources Glenda Jones. School Speech-Language Pathologist Evaluation Process Intended Purpose of the Standards Guide professional development.
Annual Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide.
North Carolina Educator Effectiveness System Training Script.
McRel’s Evaluation System Training Session 1 May 14, 2013 Herbert Hoover Middle School.
C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST
1.  Why and How Did We Get Here? o A New Instructional Model And Evaluation System o Timelines And Milestones o Our Work (Admin and Faculty, DET, DEAC,
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
Human Resources Dr. Walter Jackson, III Assistant Superintendent
Teacher Evaluation Process Component 1: Training Before participating in the evaluation process, all teachers, principals and peer evaluators must complete.
Differentiated Supervision
Teacher PDP for the School Year
NC Educator Evaluation System Training for New Administrators Mary Keel, Ed.D Tara Patterson, MSA Robin Loflin Smith, Ed.D.
ADMN 6130 Class 5 The faithful teacher is eager to find out every imperfection in the instruction, always on the alert for improvement, dissatisfied with.
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System Process and Online Tool Updates Kim Simmons NCDPI Robert Sox NCDPI Lou Cicchinelli McREL October 17, 2012.
TCS Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide the.
State Board Mission, Goals, and Policies
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
ADEPT 1 SAFE-T Judgments. SAFE-T 2 What are the stages of SAFE-T? Stage I: Preparation  Stage I: Preparation  Stage II: Collection.
North Carolina Principals Council Fall 2012 Kimberly Simmons NCDPI Jennifer Preston NCDPI.
NC Educator Effectiveness System NC Educator Effectiveness System Orientation and Training Southern School of Energy and Sustainability.
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Department of Public Instruction Looking Ahead:
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
N.C. Educator Evaluation System (NCEES) Teacher Evaluation Process January 28, 2013.
Standards IV and VI. Possible Artifacts:  School Improvement Plan  School Improvement Team  North Carolina Teacher Working Conditions Survey  Student.
STANDARD V AND WRAP-UP: NC TEACHER CANDIDATE EVALUATION TRAINING GWU TRAINING SESSION.
Principals and Assistant Principals New to the NCEES Process September 28, 2012 North Carolina Educator Evaluation System.
GEA TOOL KIT PRESENTATION STAR ORULLIAN – EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR GRANITE EDUCATION ASSOCIATION.
NCEES Train the Trainer September 25, 2012 North Carolina Educator Evaluation System.
School Counselor Evaluation RubricEvaluating with Fidelity Linda Brannan, M.Ed, NBCT K-12 Student Support Services Consultant NC Department of Public Instruction.
1 NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT: PROCESS North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Department of Public Instruction.
HARDING UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL TRANSFORMATION “RAM STYLE”
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System Jessica Garner
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Rubrics Principal Evaluation Model Examples. Note… In the state examples given the Principal/Asst. Principal is evaluated by the “Superintendent” or “Designee”
The North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Process November 1, 2012
1 NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS REVIEW Welcome Introductions Agenda.
Lenoir County Public Schools New North Carolina Principal Evaluation Process 2008.
Page 1 Teacher Evaluation Process & Instrument Dale Ellis Bill Long Jed Stus.
Process for Evaluating Teachers. Principal’s Responsibility ManageKnowIdentifyEnsureSupervise.
School Counselor Evaluation Rubric Evaluating with Fidelity Overview of the Evaluation Process and the School Counselor Evaluation Rubric NCDPI Webinar.
Iredell-Statesville Schools Orientation to the North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Instrument & Process
EISD Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System T-TESS
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
Support Staff Evaluation Process Training Validation Study
North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Process
Principal Evaluation Process
Rockingham County Public Schools Teacher Evaluation Process
Evaluation Orientation Teacher & Licensed Support Staff with NCEES process
Teacher Evaluation Process
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
What component is the greatest barrier for you as an evaluator?
Evaluation Orientation Teacher & Licensed Support Staff with NCEES process
NCEES Process: End-of-Year for Teacher Evaluations
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System
Evaluation with Fidelity Western Region Educators August 2012
The North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Process August 2, 2012
Support Staff Evaluation Process Training Validation Study
Overview of Implementation and Local Decisions
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND APPRAISAL SYSTEM (PDAS) TEACHER ORIENTATION This orientation provides an overview of the elements of the PDAS system and.
Steps in the TDES Evaluation Process
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
Evaluation Information
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Presentation transcript:

Teacher Evaluation Process For more information regarding the evaluation process, go to http://ncees.ncdpi.wikispaces.net/ Component 2: Orientation Within two weeks of teacher’s first day, the principal will provide: A. The Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina Teachers; B. Teacher Evaluation Policy ID Number: TCP-C-004 ; and C. A schedule for completing evaluation process. Component 3: Teacher Self-Assessment Using the Rubric , the teacher shall rate their performance and reflect on his or her performance throughout the year. STEP 1: Training and Orientation STEP 2: Self-Assessment, Goal Setting and Pre-Conference Component 4: Pre-Observation Conference Before the first formal observation, the principal meets with the teacher to discuss: self- assessment, professional growth plan a written description of the lesson(s) to be observed. Goal: To prepare principal for the observation. Component 1: Training Before participating in the evaluation process, all teachers, principals and peer evaluators must complete training on the evaluation process. STEP 4: Summary Evaluation and Goal Setting STEP 3: Observation Cycle (Administrative and Peer) Component 8: PD Plans Individual Growth Plans-“Proficient” or better Monitored Growth Plans-At least 1 “Developing” Directed Growth Plans-“not Demonstrated” or “Developing” rating for 2 sequential yrs. Component 5: Observations A. Formal observation: 45 min. or entire class period B. Probationary Teachers: 3 formal by principal and 1 formal by peer C. Career Status Teachers: Evaluated annually. During the renewal year: 3 total- 1 must be formal Observations shall be noted using the Rubric. Time: 1 min The first distinction we need to make is between an observation and an evaluation. This language comes directly from page 17 of the Teacher Evaluation Process manual. In Step 3, during observations, the principal and peer (in the case of a probationary teacher) shall *note* the teacher’s performance in relationship to the applicable Standards on the Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina Teachers. The data gathered during this step will inform decisions that are made about a teacher’s performance in Step 4. Ratings are not actually given until Step 4, Summary Evaluation and Goal Setting. Component 7: Summary Evaluation Conference and Scoring the Teacher Summary Rating Form- Prior to end of school Principal conducts summary evaluation conference with teacher to discuss components of the evaluation. At the conclusion: A. Give rating for each Element in Rubric B. Comment on “Not Demonstrated” C. overall rating of each Standard D. Provide teacher with opportunity to add comments to the Summary Rating Form E. Review completed Teacher Summary Rating Form with teacher and F. Secure the teacher’s signature on the Record of Teacher Evaluation Activities and Teacher Summary Rating Form. Component 6: Post-Observation Conference The principal shall conduct a post-observation conference no later than ten school days after each formal observation. Discuss and Document strengths and weaknesses on the Rubric.