Level 1 HSE M S Audit Insert Title here Closing Presentation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EMS Checklist (ISO model)
Advertisements

Major Accident Prevention Policy (MAPP) and Safety Management System (SMS) in the Context of the Seveso II Directive.
[Organisation’s Title] Environmental Management System
INTRODUCTION TO ISO Joan Kithika. OUTLINE DEFINITIONS WHY ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT? LEGAL OVERVIEW HOW TO MANAGE THE ENVIRONMENT-AN ENVIRONMENTAL.
Environmental Management System (EMS)
SIEP HSE Management System
OHSAS
ISO General Awareness Training
What SMS means for an Operator’s relationship with the CAA
BS EN ISO 14001:2004 Madlen King BSc MSc MIEMA EMS Lead Assessor Lloyd’s Register Quality Assurance Ltd BS EN ISO 14001:2004.
Safety & Safety Documentation 2 3 Safety in three Questions Why ? Providing a safe workplace is a legal and moral obligation on every undertaking, and.
???? HSE MS Audit ??? 2001 SIEP EP-HSE.
© 2013 BOS Solutions Ltd. Revised: Mar 15,2013 Version 2 – BOS HSE MSpg. 1 The BOS HSE Management System Brad Whitaker, MSPH, CSP BOS Solutions HSE Director.
Accelerated EMS Session 4 – 28 January 2008.
Self Assessment Feedback Logistics R Us GOLD Member.

Ship Recycling Facility Management System IMO Guideline A.962
Level 1 HSE MS Audit Insert date here Opening Presentation Insert Title here.
Occupational Health and Safety
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Reviewing Management System and the Interface with Nuclear Security (IRRS Modules 4 and 12) BASIC IRRS TRAINING.
1 20/10/2004 Petroleum Development Oman Xxxxxxxxxxx (Audit Title) HSE MS Audit Xxxxxx (Period)
MSE/4- PRE START UP xxxxxxxxxxxxx Expansion Project (Additional Compressor System) PRE-START UP AUDIT.
Health and Safety Policy
4.3 Document control 4.4 Review of requests, tenders and contracts
Insert Contractor Name HSE Letter of Assurance and HSE Capability Questionnaire Verification Insert month, year Opening Meeting.
ISO DOCUMENTATION. ISO Environmental Management Systems2 Lesson Learning Goals At the end of this lesson you should be able to:  Name.
CLEAN AUDIT PROGRAMME - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 2012/13 07 January 2014 Community Development.
PDO xxxxxxxxx PRE-START-UP AUDIT.
ISO Registration Common Areas of Nonconformances.
1 City of Shelby Wastewater Treatment Division Becomes State’s Second Public Agency to Implement a Certified Environmental Management System CERTIFICATION.
ISO Most Common Problems May 25, 2000 Underwriters Laboratories Inc. May 25, 2000 Underwriters Laboratories Inc.
MINE SAFETY MANAGEMENT PLAN. DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF MINES SAFETY DGMS n It is recommended that mines be required to put in place Mine Safety Management.
© Imperial College LondonPage 1 Health and safety audit Imperial College’s methodology Julia Cotton College Safety Auditor.
Safety Management Standards. Introduction Health and Safety Procedures (which identify the risks, hazards and ways of mitigating these) are weak in that.
Verification, Validation and Internal Audits - Jose Jimenez Federal Facilities Program Manager – EPA Region III.
International Safety Rating System
Environmental Management Division 1 NASA Headquarters Environmental Management System (EMS) Michael J. Green, PE NASA EMS Lead NASA Headquarters Washington,
CNOOC SES Ltd. VQHSE MS Vendor QHSE Management System

Pipeline Safety Management Systems
IMS Implementation Project
UNDERSTANDING ISO 9001:2008.
Compliance with Technical Standards
Briefing for Heads of units
ISO 14001: 2004 Environmental Management Review Presentation
Landpower Project Zero Harm Learning Series Module:. #7a Module Title:
Health and Safety Policy
External Verification Report 2014/15
Understanding the Principles and Their Effect on the Audit
Prepared by Rand E Winters, Jr. ASR Senior Auditor October 2014
Flooding Walkdown Guidance
Landpower Project Zero Harm Learning Series Module:. #7a Module Title:
INTRODUCTION TO Compliance audit METHODOLGY and CAM
MOSH Leading Practices Adoption System
OHS Staff Introduction Training
ISO 14001:2015 Revision Explaining the Key Changes
EMS Checklist (ISO model)
Closing Presentation Date
2019 Meeting 1 Northern Ontario Safety Group.
E&P HSE Audit Process (Simplified)
ISO management systems
How to conduct Effective Stage-1 Audit
THE INSPECTION SYSTEM AND THE SCHOOL EXTERNAL EVALUATION
Briefing to the Portfolio Committee on Police Audit outcomes of the Police portfolio for the financial year 13 October 2015.
Good practices for risk assessment and control activities
Data Security and Protection Toolkit Assurance 2018/19
Risk Management NDS Forum June 23rd 2010.
Contingency Planning for Accidental Surface Water Pollution​ GROUP HSE RULE (CR-GR-HSE-705) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This rule sets specific requirements to be.
Emergency & Crisis Management​ GROUP HSE RULE (CR-GR-HSE-701)
Management commitment and responsibility Safety accountability of managers Appointment of key safety personnel SMS Implementation Plan Coordination.
Presentation transcript:

Level 1 HSE M S Audit Insert Title here Closing Presentation Insert date here Insert Title here Closing Presentation

Emergency Actions

Agenda Introduction Objective, Scope, Audit Methodology Audit Results Noteworthy Items Findings Audit Conclusion & Follow-up Questions

Introductions Audit Team: Name Position Title Ref. Ind

Thanks Audit Team thanks: Insert directorates, departments, sites (PDO & contractors)

Audit Objective 2011 Level 1 HSE MS Assurance Plan approved by the IAC & BAC includes the Level 1 HSE MS Audit for xxx to Assess the adequacy & effectiveness of the implementation of the HSE MS for xxx in PDO & Where weaknesses are identified, to provide recommendations on what is expected and needed to demonstrate adherence to the PDO’s HSE Policy and Standards and international best practices

ToR - Standards HSE Audit carried out against the PDO HSE Management System, with reference to the requirements of the following: Laws and regulations of the Sultanate of Oman PDO HSE MS, standards and procedures Relevant contractor standards and procedures

ToR - Scope The scope covered operations and activities within PDO Operations, including those of contractors (and sub-contractors), Worksite Hazards-Health, Safety, and Environmental aspects were considered with main focus on Lifting and Heavy Machinery. The findings are based on audit evidences from a sampling of the system- not every part of the business has been audited.

Programme Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 Day 6 Day 7 Day 8 Day 9 Day 10 Introduction & Opening Muscat Interviews Day 1 MuscatF Muscat Travel to Site Site Induction &Opening Site Visits Interviews Day 2 Site Visits Interviews Day 3 Site Visits Interviews Day 4 Site Visits Interviews Day 5 Interviews Site Feedback Return to Muscat Day 6 Friday Day 7 Review Observation Additional Tests at Muscat Day 8 -Compile observations -Test Observations Day 9 Challenge and formalize findings Day 10 Day 11 Peer Review Implications Recommendations -No Surprise meeting -CAM -Prepare Presentation Day 12 Thursday Day 13 Day 14 Day 15 Friday Closing Meeting Friday

Control Acceptability Matrix (CAM) for the risk area. Audit Deliverables The key deliverable of this HSE audit is an Audit Report, written on an exception basis to include: Audit Findings & their classification based on the RAM or if necessary on the Rating Level table . Control Acceptability Matrix (CAM) for the risk area. Agreed actions with due dates aimed at remediation of the control weakness identified in the Audit Findings. 02 January 2019

Classification of findings - Risk Assessment matrix Footer: Title may be placed here or disclaimer if required. May sit up to two lines in depth. 02 January 2019

ToR - Finding Classification Finding Rating Definition Serious (S) The Audit Finding is likely to cause a significant undesirable effect on the achievement of PDO’s objectives and is likely to have a notable impact on the HSE Objectives of the Company, therefore warranting immediate reporting to senior management. High (H) The Audit Finding is likely to cause a significant undesirable effect on the achievement of the entity’s objectives and has the potential to have a notable impact on the HSE objectives of the entity, therefore warranting reporting to the entity’s management. Medium (M) The Audit Finding is likely to cause an undesirable effect on the achievement of the entity’s objectives. Low (L) The weakness is likely to have an insignificant undesirable effect on the achievement of one of the entity’s objectives, but its correction would enhance the risk-based control framework. Non-Compliance (C) A non-compliance to a specific external legal or other regulations applicable to the entity. This slide is hidden by default You can choose to delete the cyan box, or to change the size (I.e. so that it includes Serious). The message here is that in the presentation the LOW findings will not be discussed

Strengths and best practices List strengths and best practices you’ve observed during the audit here

Finding Summary-Severity Rating List the summary of findings here and their severity

Findings and Ratings Give briefing on each finding

Overall assessment of Risk Control Controls Acceptable None, or a few Low and/or Medium rated findings are reported which indicate that a “once-off” rather than process or system structural weaknesses is present or that general enhancement of the controls, process or system framework is not needed. (note: few = 2 or less) Controls Need Improvement Some Medium and / or one or more High rated findings are reported for the controls of HSE Elements which indicate a weakness in key controls / barriers or in a part of the process or system structural framework. (note: some = 3 or more) Controls Need Major Improvement Three or more High and/or one or more Serious rated findings are reported on the controls of HSE Elements indicating failures in key controls / barriers or across a significant part of the process or system structural framework.

Control Assessment Matrix (CAM) Control Acceptability Matrix - Overall Assessment (CAM) Risk & Control Areas HSE MS Elements Leadership & Commitment Policy & Strategic Objectives Org, Res, Resources, Std & Doc HEMP Planning & Procedures Implementation & Operations Assurance-Monitoring & Audits Review Lifting & Hoisting   F1(S) Heavy Machinery F2(S) Portable Equipment F3(M) Competence Management and training. F4(H) Emergency preparedness and response F5(H) Working at height F6(M) F7(H) Toxic Gases F8(M)

Summary This audit supports PDO’s current efforts and actions to manage the HSE Risks and to fully implement and effectively sustain the PDO HSE-MS. Draft report will be available within 5 working days after this meeting; Follow – up coordinator shall submit action plan within 21 working days thereafter.   These shall also be recorded, including action parties, in Fountain and the progress reported to IAC and BAC.

Questions 02 January 2019

Back-up slide Rising to the challenge