Doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0800r8 Submission November 2010 D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Slide 1 P802.11v report to EC on request for conditional approval.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: /04 Submission August 2010 D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Slide 1 P802.11REVmb Report to EC on meeting the terms of Conditional.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /0872r4 Submission November 2010 S.McCann (RIM), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Slide 1 P802.11u report to EC on request for conditional approval.
Page 1Version 1.0 IEEE closing report – November 2009 Plenary IEEE Ethernet Working Group November Plenary Report 20 November 2009 David J.
802.16m Closing Report May 13, 2010 Bangalore, India Session # m-10/
802.16m Closing Report November 11, 2010 Dallas, Tx Session # IEEE m-10/0035.
Doc.: /05 Submission September 2010 D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Slide 1 P802.11REVmb Report to EC on meeting the terms of Conditional.
Doc.: IEEE /0715r0 Submission July 2009 Stephen McCann (RIM) Slide 1 P802.11u Report to EC on Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot Date: Authors:
Doc.: Submission September 2009 D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Slide 1 P802.11v Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor.
Doc.: 11-11/0962r2 Submission July 2011 Michael Montemurro (RIM), Bruce Kraemer (Marvell) Slide 1 P802.11ae Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go.
Doc.: Submission July 2010 D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Slide 1 P802.11REVmb Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor.
Doc.: IEEE /0872r2 Submission July 2010 S. McCann (RIM), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Slide 1 P802.11u report to EC on request for conditional approval.
Doc.: IEEE /0726r1 Submission July 2013 Rich Kennedy (BlackBerry)Slide 1 P802.11af Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot.
Doc.: IEEE 11-12/0179r3 SubmissionGraham Smith (DSP Group), Slide 1 P802.11aa Status report to EC in support of approval to proceed to RevCom Date:
Doc.: IEEE 11-12/0179r1 SubmissionGraham Smith (DSP Group), Slide 1 P802.11aa Status report to EC on in support of approval to proceed to RevCom Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0674r0 Submission June 2009 Bruce Kraemer, Marvell; Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation Slide 1 P802.11n report to EC on request for.
Doc.: Submission July 2009 D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Slide 1 P802.11v Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor.
Doc.: IEEE /1187r0 Submission September 2015 Slide 1 IEEE ah Closing Report for September 2015 Date: Authors: Yongho Seok and.
Doc.: Submission July 2011 D. Denteneer (Philips), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Slide 1 P802.11s report to EC on request for approval to proceed to.
Doc.: Submission July 2010 D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Slide 1 P802.11v report to EC on request for conditional approval to proceed.
Doc.: IEEE /1468r1 Submission July 2013 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide November 2013 Motions to 802 EC Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0777r0 Report July 2016 Yongho Seok (NEWRACOM)Slide 1 Date: Authors: P802.11ah Report to EC on Approval to forward draft.
P802.11aq Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot
IEEE TGv March 2010 Agenda Date: Authors: March 2010
November 2008 doc.: IEEE /1437r1 July 2011
P802.11u Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot
P802.11s report to EC on request for approval to proceed to RevCom
November 2008 doc.: IEEE /1437r1 July 2011
July 2010 doc.: IEEE /0872r1 July 2010 P802.11u report to EC on request for conditional approval to proceed to RevCom Date: Authors:
P802.11s Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot
P802.11p Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot
November 2008 doc.: IEEE /1437r1 July 2010
P802.11s report to EC on request for approval to proceed to RevCom
November 2008 doc.: IEEE /1437r1 July 2010
P802.11u Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot
P802.11n report to EC on request for approval to proceed to RevCom
P802.11s Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot
P802.11n report to EC on request for approval to proceed to RevCom
November 2010 doc.: IEEE /0872r3 November 2010
November 2008 doc.: IEEE /1437r1 July 2010
P802.11w report to EC on request for approval to proceed to RevCom
P802.11ae Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot
P802.11aa Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot
P802.11u Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot
November 2008 doc.: IEEE /1437r1 July 2010
P802.11p Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot
P802.11aq Report to EC on approval to forward draft to RevCom
P802.11aq Report to EC on approval to forward draft to RevCom
P802.11v Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot
P802.11z conditional approval report to ExCom
November 2008 doc.: IEEE /1437r1 July 2010
P802.11z conditional approval report to ExCom
P802.11z Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot
November 2008 doc.: IEEE /1437r1 July 2010
P802.11z conditional approval report to ExCom
P802.11ae Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot
P802.11w report to EC on request for approval to proceed to RevCom
November 2010 doc.: IEEE /0872r4 November 2010
P802.11w report to EC on request for approval to proceed to RevCom
P802.11w report to EC on request for approval to proceed to RevCom
P802.11z Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot
P802.11z Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot
November 2010 doc.: IEEE /0800r9 November 2010
November 2008 doc.: IEEE /1437r1 November 2010
June 2009 r2doc.: IEEE /0674r0 doc.: IEEE /0674r0 April 2010
P802.11u Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot
November 2008 doc.: IEEE /1437r1 July 2010
P802.11z Report to EC on Conditional Approval to go to Sponsor Ballot
November 2010 doc.: IEEE /0800r9 November 2011
P802.11aq Report to EC on approval to forward draft to RevCom
January 2012 doc.: IEEE /0179r1 Jan 2012
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /0800r8 Submission November 2010 D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Slide 1 P802.11v report to EC on request for conditional approval to proceed to RevCom Date: Authors:

doc.: IEEE /0800r8 Submission November 2010 D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Slide 2 D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Slide 2 Summary This document contains the report to the IEEE 802 Executive Committee in support of a request for conditional approval to send IEEE P802.11v to RevCom. The IEEE 802 EC granted conditional approval to P802.11v to proceed to RevCom at its July 2010 closing meeting. Sponsor recirculation ballot on P802.11v had closed; however an additional recirculation ballot is underway to address Assigned Number issues discovered subsequently in industry interoperability testing Working Group approval –Vote results to be provided

doc.: IEEE /0800r8 Submission November 2010 D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Slide 3 IEEE 802 Sponsor Ballot Results – P802.11v DraftOpenedClosed Day s Ballot Type PoolApproveDisapproveAbstainReturn D Initial [81%]25 [19%]6 [4%]137 [85%] D st Recirc [84%]22 [16%]6 [4%]141 [88%] D nd Recirc [87%]18 [13%]6 [4%]146 [91%] D rd Recirc [92%]11 [8%]6 [4%]147 [91%] D th Recirc [94%]8 [6%]7 [5%]148 [92%] D th Recirc [97.87%] 3[2.1%]7 [5%]148 [92%] D th Recirc [97.9%] 3[2.1%]7 [5%]150 [93%] D th recirc [97.9%] 3[2.1%]7 [5%]150 [93%] D15.0 (uncha nged) th Recirc [97.9%] 3[2.1%]7 [5%]151 [93%]

doc.: IEEE /0800r8 Submission November 2010 D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Slide 4 Mandatory Coordination Coordination EntityDraftDateStatus IEEE-SA Editorial (MEC)D7.0Oct 09Meets all editorial requirements. Quantities, Units and Letter Symbols (SCC14) Not required Terms and Definitions (SCC10) Not required Registration Authority Committee (RAC) Not required

doc.: IEEE /0800r8 Submission November 2010 D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Slide 5 Comments by Ballot – P802.11v DraftBallot Not Required Satisfied Known Unsatisfied Assumed Unsatisfied Total D7.0Initial D9.0Recirc D10.0Recirc D11.0Recirc D12.0Recirc D13.0Recirc D14.0Recirc D15.0Recirc D15.0 (uncha nged) Recirc Total

doc.: IEEE /0800r8 Submission November 2010 D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Slide 6 CommenterD7.0D9.0D10.0D11.0D12.0D13.0D14.0D15.0 unch Total R. Roy (SRA) 4* 4 R. Miller (AT&T) H. Worstell (AT&T) Total Unsatisfied Comments by Commenter *Assumed unsatisfied, no response to repeated s to commenter

doc.: IEEE /0800r8 Submission November 2010 D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Slide 7 Unsatisfied comments The composite of all unsatisfied comments and the resolutions approved by the ballot resolution committee during sponsor ballot is attached. –Double click on the icon to the right to open this. A copy of the unsatisfied comments presented using MyBallot access database report format is available here: 08%20TGv%20D15.0%20Report.pdf. (It is a large file, approx 20MB.) 08%20TGv%20D15.0%20Report.pdf

doc.: IEEE /0800r8 Submission November 2010 D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Slide 8 TGv Timeline Recirculation (Draft Underway) Open Close Recirculation (Draft 16.0 Unchanged) Revcom (Continuous Process)2011-Jan

doc.: IEEE /0800r8 Submission November 2010 D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Slide 9 November 2010 S.McCann (RIM), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Slide EC Motion – Conditional Approval to send P802.11v to RevCom Request the IEEE 802 Executive Committee for conditional approval to forward P802.11v D16.0 to RevCom. Moved: Bruce Kraemer 2 nd : –Yes No Abstain WG vote on the Motion Passed: xx y, x n, x a

doc.: IEEE /0800r8 Submission November 2010 D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Slide 10 CommenterD7.0D9.0D10.0D11.0D12.0D13.0D14.0D15.0 unch Total H. Worstell (AT&T) Total Unsatisfied Comments 7 comments are expanded to 933 comments on the same subjects, and are re-iterated in subsequent ballots

doc.: IEEE /0800r8 Submission November 2010 D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Slide 11 Comments by Ballot – All other commenters

doc.: IEEE /0800r8 Submission November 2010 D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Slide 12 Project Scope This amendment provides Wireless Network Management enhancements to the MAC, and PHY, to extend prior work in radio measurement to effect a complete and coherent upper layer interface for managing devices in wireless networks.

doc.: IEEE /0800r8 Submission November 2010 D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Slide 13 Project Purpose The purpose of this document is to provide amendments to the IEEE PHY/MAC layers that enables management of attached stations in a centralized or in a distributed fashion (e.g. monitoring, configuring, and updating) through a layer 2 mechanism. While the k Task Group is defining messages to retrieve information from the station, the ability to configure the station is not in its scope. The proposed Task Group will also create an Access Port Management Information Base (AP MIB).

doc.: IEEE /0800r8 Submission November 2010 D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Slide 14 Technical Issue -1 Essence of the issue in the 7 (4055) comments is a difference of opinion on interpretation of the PAR scope –Comment # : ….Multiple BSSID Support is outside that scope, and is not an authorized change to the Standard. –The Ballot Resolution Committee provided the following response: –Disagree….The TGv PAR includes the indicated feature, as the scope indicates "Wireless Network Management, "to extend prior work" "to effect a COMPLETE upper layer interface". The PAR does not indicate that it is limited to extending prior work in radio measurement. The PAR requires the group to both extend prior work and to provide a complete interface. –Multiple BSSID - Enables the AP to manage/reduce the RF resources consumed by beacon frames. Note that the base multiple BSSID capability is added by TGk, and is extended by TGv.

doc.: IEEE /0800r8 Submission November 2010 D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Slide 15 Technical Issue -2 Essence of the issue in the 7 (4055) comments is a difference of opinion on interpretation of the PAR scope –Comment # : …. SSID List extension is outside that scope, and is not an authorized change to the Standard.. –The Ballot Resolution Committee provided the following response: –Disagree….The TGv PAR includes the indicated feature, as the scope indicates "Wireless Network Management, "to extend prior work" "to effect a COMPLETE upper layer interface". The PAR does not indicate that it is limited to extending prior work in radio measurement. The PAR requires the group to both extend prior work and to provide a complete interface. –SSID LIST - Enables the station to send fewer Probe Request frames, reducing the RF resources used, enabling improved radio management.

doc.: IEEE /0800r8 Submission November 2010 D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell) Slide 16 Comment Expansion Each of 7 Draft 7.0 comments, for example –# : The PAR for TGv authorized the Task Group to make certain changes to the Standard, "to extend prior work in radio measurement to effect a complete and coherent upper layer interface for managing devices in wireless networks." Multiple BSSID Support is outside that scope, and is not an authorized change to the Standard. Has a proposed resolution of –Delete this phrase, and all refs to Multiple BSSID Support in the document and Becomes multiple Draft 9.0 Comments, each of which restate and expand the comment, and indicate specific text changes (# becomes 106 comments), for example: –Delete the figure at page 300 line 1 and all other references to Multiple BSSID Support –Delete the figure at page 299 line 33 and all other references to Multiple BSSID Support –Delete the paragraph at page 299 line 18 and all other references to Multiple BSSID Support –Delete the figure at page 299 line 1 and all other references to Multiple BSSID Support –Delete the paragraph at page 298 line 56 and all other references to Multiple BSSID Support –Delete the figure at page 298 line 40 and all other references to Multiple BSSID Support –Delete the paragraph at page 298 line 29 and all other references to Multiple BSSID Support –etc