Oregon Reading First Summary Outcomes at the End of Year 1: Students at Benchmark (On Track) © 2005 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Chapter 9 Fluency Assessment Jhanyce A. Acosta. What? * Fluency Assessment -a method of listening to students read aloud in order to gathering their data,

Advertisements

Why Take PLAN? PLAN shows your strengths and weaknesses in English, mathematics, reading, and science. PLAN lets you know if you’re on target for college.

1 Oregon Reading First: Three-Year Report Preliminary Impact Evidence Oregon Reading First Center LLSSC Meeting, November 29, 2006.

DIBELS Part I SEDL 368. To access the materials, you will need to go to Download.

Using MAP for College and Career Readiness

1 Module 2 Using DIBELS Next Data: Identifying and Validating Need for Support.

Extending RTI to School-wide Behavior Support Rob Horner University of Oregon

Early Literary Success: Effective Intervention for Kindergarten Students at Risk for Reading Difficulties Washington Education Research Association 22nd.

Cohort A Project-wide Data “Our goals can only be reached through a vehicle of a plan, in which we must fervently believe, and upon which we must vigorously.

1 Achieving a Healthy Grade- Level System in Beginning Reading Content developed by Carrie Thomas Beck.

Graduate School of Education Leading, Learning, Life Changing Graduate School of Education Leading, Learning, Life Changing Data Review: Multnomah County.

1 Data-Based Leadership Cohort B March 2, 2006 (C) 2006 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching and Learning.

1 Next Steps District/School Expectations and Support Needs (C) 2005 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching and Learning.

Action Planning Spring 2008 Statewide Coaches’ Meeting Oregon Reading First.

1 Cohort B Q2: How are we doing?. 2 Reviewing Outcomes  What percent of students are reaching benchmark goals in each grade level?  What percent of.

1 Reading First Internal Evaluation Leadership Tuesday 2/3/03 Scott K. Baker Barbara Gunn Pacific Institutes for Research University of Oregon Portland,

Oregon Reading First: Statewide Mentor Coach Meeting February 18, 2005 © 2005 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching and Learning.

Oregon Reading First (2009)1 Oregon Reading First Webinar Data-based Action Planning Winter 2009.

One More Piece of the RTI Puzzle: Zones of Growth for Students Receiving Tier 2 Instructional Supports Hank Fien, Ph.D. Center for Teaching and Learning.

1 Cohort B Institute on Beginning Reading III February 1 and 2, 2006 Achieving Healthy Grade-Level Systems in Beginning Reading.

Oregon Reading First (2010)1 Oregon Reading First Regional Coaches’ Meeting May 13, 2010.

1 National Reading First Impact Study: Critique in the Context of Oregon Reading First Oregon Reading First Center May 13, 2008 Scott K. Baker, Ph.D. Hank.

Oregon Reading First (2009)1 Oregon Reading First Regional Coaches’ Meeting May 2009.

Oregon Reading First (2008)1 Oregon Reading First Conference Call Data-based Action Planning Winter 2008.

Oregon Reading First (2010)1 Winter 2010 Data Based Planning for Instructional Focus Groups.

1 Oregon Reading First: Cohort B Leadership Session Portland, Oregon May 27, 2009.

Analysis Of Spring 09 Enrollment. Percent Enrolled / All Students Spring CSU Channel Islands.

1 Project-wide Reading Results: Interpreting Student Performance Data and Designing Instructional Interventions Oregon Reading First February, 2004 Institute.

1 Q2: How are we doing? Cohort A (C) 2006 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching and Learning.

Oregon Reading First (2007)1 Oregon Reading First Coaches’ Meeting Spring 2007 IBR Preparation April 25 and 26th, 2007.

Cohort B Leadership Session March 3, 2008 Agenda.

1 Application of Model to Sample Data Set / Data Review and Analysis Breakout Sessions © 2005 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching and.

Reading Maze General Outcome Measurement TES Data Meeting April, rd and 4 th Grades Cynthia Martin, ARI Reading Coach.

School Improvement Specialist Meeting

Grade-level Benchmark Data Meetings

Schoolwide Reading Improvement Model - RTI Name:___________________________ Grade:___________________________ School:__________________________ CONSULTING.

Interpreting DIBELS reports LaVerne Snowden Terri Metcalf

Project MORE Independent Evaluation Completed by The Center for Evaluation Services Bowling Green State University Updated 11/12.

Linking Behavior Support and Literacy Support Rob Horner and George Sugai University of Oregon and University of Connecticut OSEP TA Center on Positive.

Hawthorne Elementary Board Report 2008 – 2009 Kennewick School District.

Grade-level Data Team Meetings.

B-ELL Leadership Session May 26, 2009 Jorge Preciado University of Oregon © 2009 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching and Learning.

Suspension Data Fall 2009 Compared to Fall Number of Students Suspended – Grade Level.

Data Analysis MiBLSi Project September 2005 Based on material by Ed Kameenui Deb Simmons Roland Good Ruth Kaminski Rob Horner George Sugai.

NJ ASSESSMENTS CYCLE II REPORT GRADES 3-8 and 11 October 30, 2008 Haddonfield Public Schools.

EOY DIBELS Benchmark Data for Intervention Programs Oregon Reading First Schools June, 2009 © 2009 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching.

RtI Team 2009 Progress Monitoring with Curriculum-Based Measurement in Reading -DIBELS.

Tallassee Elementary Summary of Effectiveness DIBELS Report Data Meeting May 9, 2012 Presenter: Cynthia Martin, ARI Reading Coach.

Setting ambitious, yet realistic goals is the first step toward ensuring that all our students are successful throughout school and become proficient adult.

The State of the School Fall Goals What do we want children to know and be able to do with text in this school? We want our children to know how.

1 Linking DIBELS Data to Differentiated Instructional Support Plans 32 nd Annual COSA Seaside Conference June 23, 2006 Hank Fien, Ph.D. Center for Teaching.

1 Oregon Reading First Institute on Beginning Reading: Evaluating and Planning Spring, 2006 Cohort A (C) 2006 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center.

DATA REFLECTION: Providing Generally Effective Instruction Oregon Reading First Cohort B Project Level Data Erin Chaparro, Ph.D. Jean Louise Mercier Smith,

FES State of the Schools. Reading – 85% of FES students will meet or exceed state standards on the MCA-II in reading. We will improve scores on DIBELS.

Extending an RTI Approach to School-wide Behavior Support Rob Horner University of Oregon

Bixby North Elementary

Brassfield 5th & 6th Grade Center Bixby Public Schools

State and District Testing Calendar

An Inefficient System According to the District Court’s ruling in the ongoing trial: A “disastrous” 14 – 25 percent of students fail to graduate from high.

Data-Based Leadership

Q3: How do we get there? Cohort A

Slides for Trainers The following images are available for training purposes. They are the copyrighted material of the DIBELS Data System, Center on Teaching.

Reading Goals and Reading Growth A Proposal for Cohort A

Extending RTI to School-wide Behavior Support

Reading Goals and Reading Growth A Proposal for Cohort A

Oregon Reading First Summary Outcomes at the End of Year 1: Students at Benchmark (On Track) (C) 2005 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching.

World’s Best Workforce

Program Effectiveness in DERF: State-Level Action Plan

SUMMARY REPORT: TITLE III IMPROVEMENT PLANS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION TITLE III DIRECTORS FALL MEETING SEPTEMBER 26, 2011.

Data-based Decisions: You try it

Presentation transcript:

Oregon Reading First Summary Outcomes at the End of Year 1: Students at Benchmark (On Track) © 2005 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching and Learning

Students On Track in the Fall Who Stayed On Track in the Spring

Students At Risk in the Fall Who Got On Track by the Spring

DIBELS Summary of Effectiveness Reports 4 Ways to Achieve Adequate Progress

Percent of Kindergartners Who Made Adequate Progress from Fall to Spring (2003-04)

Percent of First Graders Who Made Adequate Progress from Fall to Spring (2003-04)

Percent of Second Graders Who Made Adequate Progress from Fall to Spring (2003-04)

Percent of Third Graders Who Made Adequate Progress from Fall to Spring (2003-04)

Percent of Kindergartners who Made Adequate Progress Fall to Spring (2003-04) by District

Percent of First Graders who Made Adequate Progress Fall to Spring (2003-04) by District

Percent of Second Graders who Made Adequate Progress Fall to Spring (2003-04) by District

Percent of Third Graders who Made Adequate Progress Fall to Spring (2003-04) by District

Percent of Kindergartners who Made Adequate Progress Fall to Spring (2003-04) by School

Percent of First Graders who Made Adequate Progress Fall to Spring (2003-04) by School

Percent of Second Graders who Made Adequate Progress Fall to Spring (2003-04) by School

Percent of Third Graders who Made Adequate Progress Fall to Spring (2003-04) by School

Adequate Progress in First Grade: The Relation Between ORF and SAT-10

Adequate Progress in First Grade: The Relation Between ORF and SAT-10

Percent of First Graders Who Made Adequate Progress from Fall to Spring (2003-04)

Average Percent Making Adequate Progress By Context