1. 1 Cohort B Q2: How are we doing?

2. 2 Reviewing Outcomes  What percent of students are reaching benchmark goals in each grade level?  What percent of students have a deficit in benchmark skill areas for each grade level?

3. 3 What reports can we use to answer these questions?

4. 4 First Grade Example

5. 5 How are K-3 students performing at the end of the year on essential components of beginning reading instruction? Table 1 Taking Stock: Reviewing Outcomes for K-3 Students Spring 2006 Grade/Benchmark Goal Measure Percent at Established (Low Risk) Spring 2006 Percent at Deficit Spring 2006 Kindergarten-PSF Kindergarten-NWF First Grade-ORF Second Grade-ORF Third Grade-ORF

6. 6 First Grade Example

7. 7 How are K-3 students performing at the end of the year on essential components of beginning reading instruction? Table 1 Taking Stock: Reviewing Outcomes for K-3 Students Spring 2006 Grade/Benchmark Goal Measure Percent at Established (Low Risk) Spring 2006 Percent at Deficit Spring 2006 Kindergarten-PSF Kindergarten-NWF First Grade-ORF251/402 62% 69/402 17% Second Grade-ORF Third Grade-ORF

8. 8 Activity 1 Materials Needed breakout forms school histograms: Spring 2005 Oregon Reading First project-wide data Directions Break into grade level teams and complete items A and B A.Using the grade level Spring histograms, complete Table 1. B.Discuss end-of-year (Spring 2006) K-3 performance on the essential components of beginning reading instruction using the information from Table 1.

9. 9 Activity 1 (continued) C. Compare school outcomes to project-wide outcomes. How does our school compare?

10. 10 Insert project-wide data- histograms here: K-PSF K-NWF 1-ORF 2-ORF 3-ORF

11. 11 Evaluating Support  How effective were the grade-level Winter to Spring Instructional Support Plans (CSI Maps)?

12. 12 What report can we use to answer this question?

13. 13 Summary of Effectiveness Report

14. 14 At Risk IntensiveStrategicBenchmark Time 1: ( e.g., Winter) Time 2: (e.g., Spring) 1. Some Risk 2. Low Risk At Risk Some Risk 3. Low Risk At Risk Some Risk 4. Low Risk DIBELS Summary of Effectiveness Reports 4 Ways to Achieve Adequate Progress

15. 15 Evaluating Support: Winter to Spring 2006  What was the total percent of students that made adequate progress?  What percent of intensive students made adequate progress  What percent of strategic students made adequate progress?  What percent of benchmark students made adequate progress?

16. 16 How effective were the grade-level, Winter to Spring Instructional Support Plans (CSI Maps) Table 2 Evaluating Winter to Spring 2006 Grade-Level Instructional Support Plans: Percent of Students Making Adequate Progress Towards DIBELS Benchmark Goals Grade/Bench mark Goal Measure Total percent of students at each grade that Made Adequate Progress Include actual numbers of students, e.g., 121/155 or 78%. Percent of Intensive Students that made Adequate Progress Include actual numbers of students, e.g., 1/5 or 20%. Percent of Strategic Students that made Adequate Progress Include actual numbers of students, e.g., 25/50 or 50%. Percent of Benchmark Students that made Adequate Progress Include actual numbers of students, e.g., 95/100 or 95%. Winter to Spring 2006 Winter to Spring 2006 Winter to Spring 2006 Winter to Spring 2006 Kindergarten- PSF

17. 17 What was the total percent of students that made adequate progress?

18. 18 How effective were the grade-level, Winter to Spring Instructional Support Plans (CSI Maps) Table 2 Evaluating Winter to Spring 2006 Grade-Level Instructional Support Plans: Percent of Students Making Adequate Progress Towards DIBELS Benchmark Goals Grade/Bench mark Goal Measure Total percent of students at each grade that Made Adequate Progress Include actual numbers of students, e.g., 121/155 or 78%. Percent of Intensive Students that made Adequate Progress Include actual numbers of students, e.g., 1/5 or 20%. Percent of Strategic Students that made Adequate Progress Include actual numbers of students, e.g., 25/50 or 50%. Percent of Benchmark Students that made Adequate Progress Include actual numbers of students, e.g., 95/100 or 95%. Winter to Spring 2006 Winter to Spring 2006 Winter to Spring 2006 Winter to Spring 2006 Kindergarten- PSF 71/82 87%

19. 19 Evaluating Support: Winter to Spring 2006  What was the total percent of students that made adequate progress?  What percent of intensive students made adequate progress  What percent of strategic students made adequate progress?  What percent of benchmark students made adequate progress?

20. 20 How effective were the grade-level, Winter to Spring Instructional Support Plans (CSI Maps) Table 2 Evaluating Winter to Spring 2006 Grade-Level Instructional Support Plans: Percent of Students Making Adequate Progress Towards DIBELS Benchmark Goals Grade/Bench mark Goal Measure Total percent of students at each grade that Made Adequate Progress Include actual numbers of students, e.g., 121/155 or 78%. Percent of Intensive Students that made Adequate Progress Include actual numbers of students, e.g., 1/5 or 20%. Percent of Strategic Students that made Adequate Progress Include actual numbers of students, e.g., 25/50 or 50%. Percent of Benchmark Students that made Adequate Progress Include actual numbers of students, e.g., 95/100 or 95%. Winter to Spring 2006 Winter to Spring 2006 Winter to Spring 2006 Winter to Spring 2006 Kindergarten- PSF

21. 21 What percent of intensive students made adequate progress?

22. 22 How effective were the grade-level, Winter to Spring Instructional Support Plans (CSI Maps) Table 2 Evaluating Winter to Spring 2006 Grade-Level Instructional Support Plans: Percent of Students Making Adequate Progress Towards DIBELS Benchmark Goals Grade/Bench mark Goal Measure Total percent of students at each grade that Made Adequate Progress Include actual numbers of students, e.g., 121/155 or 78%. Percent of Intensive Students that made Adequate Progress Include actual numbers of students, e.g., 1/5 or 20%. Percent of Strategic Students that made Adequate Progress Include actual numbers of students, e.g., 25/50 or 50%. Percent of Benchmark Students that made Adequate Progress Include actual numbers of students, e.g., 95/100 or 95%. Winter to Spring 2006 Winter to Spring 2006 Winter to Spring 2006 Winter to Spring 2006 Kindergarten- PSF 6/7 86%

23. 23 Evaluating Support: Winter to Spring 2006  What was the total percent of students that made adequate progress?  What percent of intensive students made adequate progress  What percent of strategic students made adequate progress?  What percent of benchmark students made adequate progress?

24. 24 How effective were the grade-level, Winter to Spring Instructional Support Plans (CSI Maps) Table 2 Evaluating Winter to Spring 2006 Grade-Level Instructional Support Plans: Percent of Students Making Adequate Progress Towards DIBELS Benchmark Goals Grade/Bench mark Goal Measure Total percent of students at each grade that Made Adequate Progress Include actual numbers of students, e.g., 121/155 or 78%. Percent of Intensive Students that made Adequate Progress Include actual numbers of students, e.g., 1/5 or 20%. Percent of Strategic Students that made Adequate Progress Include actual numbers of students, e.g., 25/50 or 50%. Percent of Benchmark Students that made Adequate Progress Include actual numbers of students, e.g., 95/100 or 95%. Winter to Spring 2006 Winter to Spring 2006 Winter to Spring 2006 Winter to Spring 2006 Kindergarten- PSF

25. 25 What percent of strategic students made adequate progress?

26. 26 How effective were the grade-level, Winter to Spring Instructional Support Plans (CSI Maps) Table 2 Evaluating Winter to Spring 2006 Grade-Level Instructional Support Plans: Percent of Students Making Adequate Progress Towards DIBELS Benchmark Goals Grade/Bench mark Goal Measure Total percent of students at each grade that Made Adequate Progress Include actual numbers of students, e.g., 121/155 or 78%. Percent of Intensive Students that made Adequate Progress Include actual numbers of students, e.g., 1/5 or 20%. Percent of Strategic Students that made Adequate Progress Include actual numbers of students, e.g., 25/50 or 50%. Percent of Benchmark Students that made Adequate Progress Include actual numbers of students, e.g., 95/100 or 95%. Winter to Spring 2006 Winter to Spring 2006 Winter to Spring 2006 Winter to Spring 2006 Kindergarten- PSF 27/34 79%

27. 27 Evaluating Support: Winter to Spring 2006  What was the total percent of students that made adequate progress?  What percent of intensive students made adequate progress  What percent of strategic students made adequate progress?  What percent of benchmark students made adequate progress?

28. 28 How effective were the grade-level, Winter to Spring Instructional Support Plans (CSI Maps) Table 2 Evaluating Winter to Spring 2006 Grade-Level Instructional Support Plans: Percent of Students Making Adequate Progress Towards DIBELS Benchmark Goals Grade/Bench mark Goal Measure Total percent of students at each grade that Made Adequate Progress Include actual numbers of students, e.g., 121/155 or 78%. Percent of Intensive Students that made Adequate Progress Include actual numbers of students, e.g., 1/5 or 20%. Percent of Strategic Students that made Adequate Progress Include actual numbers of students, e.g., 25/50 or 50%. Percent of Benchmark Students that made Adequate Progress Include actual numbers of students, e.g., 95/100 or 95%. Winter to Spring 2006 Winter to Spring 2006 Winter to Spring 2006 Winter to Spring 2006 Kindergarten- PSF

29. 29 What percent of benchmark students made adequate progress?

30. 30 How effective were the grade-level, Winter to Spring Instructional Support Plans (CSI Maps) Table 2 Evaluating Winter to Spring 2006 Grade-Level Instructional Support Plans: Percent of Students Making Adequate Progress Towards DIBELS Benchmark Goals Grade/Bench mark Goal Measure Total percent of students at each grade that Made Adequate Progress Include actual numbers of students, e.g., 121/155 or 78%. Percent of Intensive Students that made Adequate Progress Include actual numbers of students, e.g., 1/5 or 20%. Percent of Strategic Students that made Adequate Progress Include actual numbers of students, e.g., 25/50 or 50%. Percent of Benchmark Students that made Adequate Progress Include actual numbers of students, e.g., 95/100 or 95%. Winter to Spring 2006 Winter to Spring 2006 Winter to Spring 2006 Winter to Spring 2006 Kindergarten- PSF 38/41 93%

31. 31 Activity 2 Materials Needed breakout forms Summary of Effectiveness Reports: Winter to Spring 06 Oregon Reading First Project-Wide Outcomes Directions Break into grade level teams and complete items A-B: A.Using the grade-level Summary of Effectiveness Reports, complete Table 2. B.For each grade, discuss the total percent of students making adequate progress towards the spring benchmark goals. Discuss what the data indicate for benchmark, strategic, and intensive students.

32. 32 Activity 2 (continued) C. Compare your school’s percent of students making adequate progress to Oregon Reading First’s project-wide data.

33. 33 Insert Project-Wide Summary of Effectiveness Reports K123K123