Bull Run Middle School 2016-2017 School Advisory Meeting, 6:30 – 8:00 p.m. Library.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
When Students Can’t Read…
Advertisements

MEMORIAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
TEAM MADRAS: Are YOU on the team? Madras Middle School Professional Development Plan Proposal by Donna Eskut - July 2013 Presented to Madras.
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Student Achievement Annual Progress Report Lakewood School District # 306.
School Governance for Parents: Advisory Committees How ELAC and SAC Can Help Your School Develop a Better Balanced Scorecard.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
N.C.A. Quality Assurance Review Commendations and Recommendation Status Red Rock Day School January 27, 2011.
Assistant Principal Meeting August 28, :00am to 12:00pm.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 ELA MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. April 4, 2006.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
BACK TO SCHOOL Welcome Back! Evaluation Task Force Findings.
Office of School Improvement Updates Division Liaison Meeting The College of William and Mary December 3, 2012.
BEGINNING EDUCATOR INDUCTION PROGRAM MEETING CCSD Professional Development Mrs. Jackie Miller Dr. Shannon Carroll August 6, 2014.
The Leadership Challenge in Graduating Students with Disabilities Guiding Questions Joy Eichelberger, Ed.D. Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance.
August 2, Welcome Who is the TSD Continuous Improvement Team ? What is the work of the TSD Continuous Improvement Team? What is.
Office of Service Quality
Quality Review Updates for Presented by Mary Barton, SATIF CFN 204 Assistant Principals’ Conference September 2, 2011.
Teaming/Data/Interventions RtI Infrastructure: Teaming RtI Partnership Coaches meeting January 6, 2011 Terry Schuster, RtI Partnership Lead Coach.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
School Governance Council Meeting February 18, 2016 River Eves Elementary School NEIL PINNOCK, PRINCIPAL MATTHEW DONAHOE, ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL.
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Quality Comprehensive Improvement System Key School Performance Standards.
APS Teacher Evaluation System Preparing for Implementation May 2012.
New Hanover County Schools
School Counseling Advisory Council Meeting
School Governance Council Meeting February 9, 2016
Hope-Hill ES.
Title I Annual Parent Meeting
Comprehensive Planning
Southmoreland Primary Center
Parkview High School Counseling Department Spring Advisory Council Meeting Tuesday, May 10th , 2016.
Division Liaison Update
School Governance Council Meeting February 18, 2016
Otis J. Brock, III Elementary School
Pompositticut and Center Schools
English Language Arts Program Update
Gary Carlin, CFN 603 September, 2012
Implementation of Data-Based Decision-Making in an Urban Elementary School Doug Marston Jane Thompson Minneapolis Public Schools March 26, 2009.
DISTRICT ACCREDITATION QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW
Otis J. Brock, III Elementary School
Title I Annual Parent Meeting
District Education Improvement Council (DEIC)
Title I Annual Parent Meeting
Welcome to <School Name> School
Otis J. Brock, III Elementary School
Roles and Responsibilities
School Health Advisory Council SHAC Overview October 12, 2017
Advisory Council October 20, 2015
Mary Rowlandson Elementary School
Annual Title I Meeting and Benefits of Parent and Family Engagement
Title I Annual Parent Meeting
Challenger Middle School SAC / PTO Meeting
Bull Run Middle School Advisory Meeting, October 27, 2016.
February 21-22, 2018.
Gateway High School-Alt.Ed Annual Title 1 Parent Workshop
Colorado Department of Education
An Overview April 2012.
Title I Annual Meeting Pinewood Elementary, August 30, 2018.
Welcome to Your New Position As An Instructor
State of the School Title I Meeting Folwell School, Performing Arts Magnet October 9, /8/2019.
Otis J. Brock, III Elementary School
Title I Annual Meeting Sol C. Johnson High School September 6, 2018
Sylvan Hills Middle School
District Mission & Vision Cluster Mission & Vision
Title I Annual Parent Meeting
Comprehensive K-12 Counseling Plan
Presentation transcript:

Bull Run Middle School 2016-2017 School Advisory Meeting, 6:30 – 8:00 p.m. Library

Agenda for Today Welcome Vision Mission Statement Purpose of Advisory Council Advisory By-Laws Election of Officers Open Floor Principal’s Time Accomplishments of Advisory Bull Run Middle School Data Profile Strategic Plan Overview Budget Updates School Membership New Business

Bull Run Middle School Vision Soaring To Excellence- “Every Student Learning at High Levels Every Day”

Bull Run Middle School Mission Mission Statement: The Bull Run Middle School community strives to ensure that every student can read, write, speak, and think at high levels across the curriculum to ensure they are prepared to successfully function at the next level.

Bull Run Middle School Advisory Council’s Purpose Purpose: The purpose of the Bull Run Middle School Advisory Council is to assist in developing the School Plan. Recommendations will be made regarding the total school program, budget and facilities. The resulting plan will reflect the needs of the students, staff and community. The Council will also from time to time identify areas of concerns that may indirectly impact the School Plan that require review and recommendations.

Election of Officers Officer Selection: The members of the Council will elect officers. Nominations and elections will be held at the beginning of each school year. Officers may serve successive one-year terms. Replacement of Officers: An election will be held at the earliest possible meeting to replace officers who must resign before their term expires. A replacement officer may be nominated for a successive term. Officers may be recalled by a three-fourths vote of the Council membership.

BRMS School Data Profile

Strategic Plan Overview STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE (MEASURE) IMPROVEMENT STRATEGY 1.1.02a Each year, all schools will meet or exceed all ESEA Annual Measurable Objectives (AMO) in reading and mathematics, as defined by the Virginia Department of Education (VDOE). 1. Implementation of a Structure of Interdisciplinary Teaming and Thematic Instruction at the Middle School Level 1.1.02b Each year, all schools will demonstrate growth and improvement in student achievement by increasing their pass rates on state assessments for all students and groups of students. 2. Standards Based Learning and Assessment Techniques

Strategic Plan Overview: Improvement Strategy 1 Interdisciplinary Teams of teachers will use student assessment data to establish interventions for attendance, behavior, and academic improvement through a pre-intervention process. Students and parents will be involved in the process. Interdisciplinary Teams will be created at each grade level with teachers working with a focused group of students, with a common schedule and a common planning time. Staff will meet in a collaborative learning team based on assignment of students and coordinate major test, projects and assignments. Teachers will collaborate so topics align across content areas. Development of interdisciplinary units will occur on teams.

Strategic Plan Overview: Improvement Strategy 1 4. Teachers on an interdisciplinary team will combine their expertise to the process of integrated planning, teaching and assessment of the core subjects. Teachers will also share a common planning time to engage in the process on interdisciplinary teaching and learning. 5. The concept of a flexible schedule will be implemented to allow teachers to adjust schedule, groups of students, and develop intervention, remediation, and enrichment opportunities for students. Teachers will also create time for team building activities and programs.

Strategic Plan Overview: Improvement Strategy 2 Teachers will work in collaborative learning teams to increase knowledge and skills of the five key components to classroom assessment quality. Teachers will continue to develop the assessment process as a technique to improving student achievement. The effectiveness of formative, interim, and summative classroom assessment practices will require ongoing monitoring and review through the collaborative learning team process and discussions with the leadership team.

Strategic Plan Overview: Improvement Strategy 2 The staff will participate in on-going school based professional development with a focus on developing the skill and craft of quality classroom assessment. Under the Keys to Quality Classroom Assessment, Staff will Incorporate Key Assessment Quality #5 as a strategy (Student Involvement) to close the achievement gap of ELL and SWD.

Grading Smarter Not Harder – Myron Dueck School Wide Staff Development related to standards based grading and assessment techniques.

School Data Report as a review for current planning

SOAR/PBIS SOAR Program-Bull Run's Positive Behavior, Intervention and Support (PBIS) program is named SOAR, which stands for Success through Organization, Attitude and Respect. The program uses tiered interventions and positive support to improve student behavior in the classroom, hallways, cafeteria, and on the bus. Teachers and staff review and reinforce behavioral expectations with students throughout the school year. The SOAR program uses a variety of strategies and interventions to promote positive student behavior.

Budget Overview Budget Breakdown: $ 8,129,631 for personnel costs for 99 employees Flexible Funds(Instructional Supplies, Operational expenses, Substitute Costs, Library Books, Technology Costs, etc.) $ 630,320 Personnel Costs: 94% of total allocation Review Revised Budget, fixed allocations, supplements

Future Meeting Dates and Topic September 22, 2016 October 27, 2016-School Communication and Employee Recognition November 17, 2016 December 15, 2016 January 26, 2017 February 23, 2017 March 23, 2017 April 27, 2017 May 25, 2017