Large Combustion Plant Indicators

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tinus Pulles How to establish the uncertainties? Particulate Emission Inventory for Europe.
Advertisements

Energy and fuels Environmental impacts World energy consumption Mgr. Matúš Dobeš, 2005.
Said Chehab ALMEE Ramses Amman Workshop June 2010 Enhancement of Energy Efficiency Policies and Renewable Energy Sources in the Mediterranean region, a.
1 Antonio Soria Head of Unit Economics of Energy, Climate Change and Transport Institute for Prospective Technological Studies Joint Research Centre European.
1 Europe’s water – an indicator-based assessment Niels Thyssen.
Electrical Engineering Department, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran M. Poursistani N. Hajilu G. B. Gharehpetian M. Shafiei CHP Systems.
1 policy preparation policy formulation policy execution policy evaluation Indicators The Policy Cycle.
Energy Supply in the European Union Daniel Erni and Stefan HorlacherHelsinki, 5th October 2005.
1 EU Environmental Policy. 2   Treaty of Rome 1957 (Art. 100) – –European Economic Community (EEC)   Single European Act 1981 (Arts.130r, 130s, 130t,100a)
Small-scale District Heating based on Biomass Joakim Lundgren Division of Energy Engineering Luleå University of Technology.
FRANCE RE PRODUCTION 2009/2013 Eurobserver 2014 Wind power energy France has the third wind power production rank in the EC. yearsCapacity MWOUTPUT twh.
National Seminar Role of DER in the EU and Current Status in the Baltic States 6 March 2007 Current Status of Energy Policy on Development of Distributed.
Swedish Renewable Energies Association Christer Söderberg 0710 HYDRO 2007 GRANADA, SPAIN 16 OCTOBER, 2007 SHERPA PROJEKT Christer Söderberg.
TA Project: “Improving Emissions Control” Session 2 Scenarios for Emissions Management Dr Russell C Frost Project Team Leader.
Large Combustion Plants Data reporting – data management and quality assurance processes Daniel Martin-Montalvo Alvarez Industrial Pollution Group Air.
Brussels, Dec 1, Making an inefficient energy system in Europe more efficient Sven Werner, professor Halmstad University, Sweden Partly based on.
Countries of Europe France Spain Italy Germany Which country is this?
Clean Air for Europe TFIAM Conference Small scale combustion installation AMIENS May 2004 André Zuber & Michel Sponar European Commission TFIAM Conference.
Indian Power-plant NO x Emissions from OMI and Inventories David Streets and Zifeng Lu Argonne National Laboratory Argonne, IL AQAST-3 Meeting University.
The Energy Sector in India. Growth of installed capacity for electricity in India.
Agricultural Ammonia and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Indicator: OECD Experience by Takeo MAKINO Directorate for Food, Agriculture, and Fisheries, OECD EEA,
Efficiency in industry through electro-technologies Paul Baudry, EDF / R&D The future of Energy in Enlarged Europe, Warsaw 7-8th october 2004.
Mr Martin Crouch, ERGEG Electricity Regulatory Forum 2009 Florence, 5 June 2009 Status Review of Sustainable Development in the Energy Sector.
Oil and other are the two primary contributors for VOC. Both of them peaked around 1970 and have both been on the decline since The level of pollution.
INTERREG IIIC - REGENERGY Gefördert durch die Europäische Union Promoted by the European Union European District Heating and District Cooling Market Berlin/Leipzig,
Workshop of St Petersburg - 27 th October 2009 Expert sub-group on Emerging Technologies/Techniques EGTEI - Emerging technologies/ techniques for LCPs.
FRANCE RE PRODUCTION 2009/2013 Eurobserver WIND POWER ENERGY France has the third wind power production rank in the EC. yearsCapacity MWOUTPUT twh.
Quality of EPER 2004 data Tinus Pulles This work is partly performed under contract with DG Environment (070402/2006/440841/MAR/C4). within the ETC-ACC.
The IED/ELVs as seen through the Eyes of a User of Combustion Plant Dr Tim Rotheray.
E-PRTR data review May 2010, TFEIP/EIONET meeting, Larnaca, Cyprus Katarina Mareckova, Stephan Poupa, Nicole Mandl, Katrin Seuss, ETC ACC (Umweltbundesamt,
EUROPEAN TOPIC CENTRE ON AIR AND CLIMATE CHANGE Comparison of EU and MS reference approach Energy workshop 24/25 June 2003 Bernd Gugele (EEA/ETC) Energy.
Variability in emission parameters of ozone precursors’ emissions in the GAINS model TFIEP/TFMM Workshop on Uncertainties in emission inventories and atmospheric.
Public Name: François Bruggemans Dept: New Business - Heating Carbon footprint of heating systems Lowering GHG emissions by the use of heat pumps.
IMPRESAREO & APMoSPHERE: Emission mapping with little spatial data Dr Chris Dore.
Main flexibility tools for the adoption of high emission standards for LCPs set in the new Industrial Emissions Directive Gerard Lipinski Coordinator of.
Jussi helske1 Workshop on the learning of EC approaches and experience in Licensing of New NPP’s Existing in European Union countries procedures.
LCPs – Large Combustions Plants – what ist a large combustion plant?  > 50 MW rated thermal input  Irrespective of type of fuel, age and branch  Heat.
Eurostat Latest developments at EU level and relation with Eurostat's energy statistics United Nations Oslo Group on Energy Statistics Aguascalientes (Mexico),
October 2, Context of Austrian & EU regulations on LCPs (I)  before 1980: principle of neighbourhood protection  1980: Implementation of first.
European Innovation Scoreboard European Commission Enterprise and Industry DG EPG DGs meeting, May 2008.
THE FUTURE OF NUCLEAR POWER IN EUROPE THE BULGARIAN CONTEXT Milko Kovachev Chairman Bulgarian WEC Committee.
1 Co-benefits of CO 2 Reduction in a Developing Country: Case of Thailand Ram M. Shrestha and Shreekar Pradhan Asian Institute of Technology Thailand INTERNATIONAL.
ENERGY SOURCES IN POLAND PRESENTATION PREPARED BY THE STUDENTS OF GIMNAZJUM No 3 IN TARNOBRZEG JANUARY 2011.
Methodological Choice and Key Categories Analysis
National air emissions inventory: the residential sector
Country profiles 2nd Eionet NRC workshop on Industrial Pollution.
Methodological Choice and Key Categories Analysis
CENERG 3rd TEMATIC WORKSHOP
Biomethane Roadmap in Germany
RENEWABLE ENERGY POTENTIAL OF INDIA A REVIEW
Fulfilled the student of group ФЭ14-01B Zhuk Aleksey
The role of renewable energy sources in Austria Günter Pauritsch Workshop on renewable energy sources Sofia, 21 December 2011 Austrian Energy Agency.
Photo credit: Radha Muthiah
The European Environment Agency and emissions from international maritime transport John van Aardenne, Air and Climate Change Programme February.
Europe’s Environmental Problems
EEA Annual Work Programme
Methodology for policy evaluation on Large Combustion Plants
E-PRTR informal data review 2014
Coal – security of coal supply considerations of EURACOAL
Three policy scenarios for CAFE
EU: First- & Second-Generation Immigrants
Experience from LCP quality assurance process
General comments (1) Price level needs to be specified (recommended: € 2000). Operation and maintenance costs (O+M) should be splitted into fixed (depending.
Steinar Larssen NILU and ETC/ACC
FLUE GAS SCRUBBERS LIMESTONE SCRUBBING AT LOW TEMPERATURE DESIGNED FOR 90% REMOVAL COMMERCIALLY PROVEN, COST = $200/KW (vs. $1000/KW for ENTIRE.
EUROPEAN TOPIC CENTRE ON AIR AND CLIMATE CHANGE
Z.Klimont, J.Cofala EMEP Centre for Integrated Assessment Modelling (CIAM) Variability in emission parameters of ozone precursors’ emissions in the GAINS.
DG ENV C3 Industrial Emissions, Air Quality and Noise 20 January 2012
Cédric Van Styvendael Housing Europe President
Large Combustion Plants dataflow management
Presentation transcript:

Large Combustion Plant Indicators 2nd Eionet NRC workshop on Industrial Pollution

LCP = at least 50 MW rated thermal input Large Combustion Plants LCP = at least 50 MW rated thermal input LCP Directive (2001/80/EC) sets limits on SO2, NOx, and dust from LCPs Replaced by IED (2010/75/EU) in 2016, continues emission limits and inventory reporting requirements

Indicator 1 (Drivers): number of LCPs, capacity, fuel consumption Two LCP indicators Indicator 1 (Drivers): number of LCPs, capacity, fuel consumption Indicator 2 (Pressures): LCP emissions of SO2, NOx and dust, and fuel consumption DPSIR model Drivers Pressures State Impact Responses

How has the large combustion plant sector evolved? LCP indicator 1 How has the large combustion plant sector evolved? How is the LCP sector distributed across Europe?

The number of LCPs has increased by 31% between 2004 and 2013 Ind1, Q1: Evolution of LCPs The number of LCPs has increased by 31% between 2004 and 2013 Installed capacity increased by 18% Fuel mix stable, but biomass increasing Other solid fuels (coal) 57% of fuel consumption in 2013

Ind1, Q1: Evolution of LCPs

4 countries (Germany, Italy, Poland, UK) dominate LCPs in Europe: Ind1, Q2: Distribution of LCPs 4 countries (Germany, Italy, Poland, UK) dominate LCPs in Europe: 54% of capacity in 2013 61% of total fuel input in 2013 Sweden + Finland = 30% of EU28 biomass input, but less than 2% of total fuel consumption

Ind1, Q2: Distribution of LCPs

Ind1, Q2: Distribution of LCPs Note: some countries did not provide sector information

Has the environmental performance of LCPs improved? LCP Indicator 2 What progress is being made in reducing emissions from LCPs across the European Union? Has the environmental performance of LCPs improved?

Analysis of SO2, NOx and dust emissions by capacity class Ind2, Q1: Progress in reducing LCP emissions Analysis of SO2, NOx and dust emissions by capacity class Between 2004 and 2013, emissions from LCPs in the EU-28 have decreased by: 71% for SO2 40% for NOx 69% for dust

Indexed EU-28 LCP emissions from 2004 Ind2, Q1: Progress in reducing LCP emissions Indexed EU-28 LCP emissions from 2004

In 2013, of a total of 3 448 LCPs, 50% of emissions came from just: Ind2, Q1: Progress in reducing LCP emissions A small number of plants contribute disproportionately to LCP emissions In 2013, of a total of 3 448 LCPs, 50% of emissions came from just: 50 plants for SO2 87 plants for NOx 33 plants for dust

Ind2, Q2: Environmental performance of LCPs Implied emission factors per pollutant (tonnes/TJ), split by capacity class Implied emission factors per pollutant (tonnes/TJ), split by fuel type (single-fuelled LCPs only)

Ind2, Q2: Environmental performance of LCPs The environmental performance of LCPs improved significantly for LCPs in all capacity classes between 2004 and 2013 Smaller LCPs have higher implied emission factors (IEFs) for each fuel type, but overall lower IEFs

Ind2, Q2: Environmental performance of LCPs

Highest IEFs for liquid fuels and other solid fuels Q2: Environmental performance of LCPs The environmental performance of LCPs improved between 2004 and 2013 for all fuel-pollutant combinations except NOx emissions from biomass Highest IEFs for liquid fuels and other solid fuels Lowest IEFs for natural gas

Ind2, Q2: Environmental performance of LCPs

27 plants had data considered errors – removed or modified data Data corrections 27 plants had data considered errors – removed or modified data Countries will be consulted on these corrections Gap-filling Croatia’s data 2004-2009?

Thank you for your attention Katrina Young katrina.young@aether-uk.com