Baldwin FLEXIBLE CLERICAL AND PROFESSIONAL LEARNING and DIFFERENTIATED SUPERVISION.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
Advertisements

Teacher Evaluation System LSKD Site Administrator Training August 6, 2014.
Special Education and Teacher Evaluations Janelle Smith Dr. Peter Verona O Director of Special Services O Byron CUSD #226 O O Byron.
ESEA: Developing the Paraprofessional Portfolio Prepared by Carolyn Ellis Logan, Consultant Professional Development/Human Rights Department Michigan Education.
Teacher Evaluation & Developing Goals Glenn Maleyko, Executive Director, Ph.D Haigh Elementary September 8, 2014.
Educator Effectiveness ACT 82 Overview 1. ACT 82 Within Act 82, new requirements for Educator Effectiveness have been defined for teachers, principals,
Measuring Principal Effectiveness Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Acting Secretary of Education Measuring Principal.
Differentiated Supervision
Your Mentoring Program: Step by Step including the Danielson Framework North Palos #117 Presenters: Marilyn Marino, NBCT – Mentor Coordinator David Creagan.
Preparation & Development of Professional Portfolio Workshop: Danielson A Presenter: Mrs. Shirley J. Delgado M. A.
Teachscape Overview John Monahan, Instructional Supervisor
An Effective Teacher Evaluation System – Our Journey to a Teaching Framework Corvallis School District.
Teacher Induction Program Why you are here The Allegheny Intermediate Unit offers this program for our staff and those in school districts,
TEACHER DEVELOPMENT, EVALUATION, AND PEER SUPPORT Overview Session for MPS Staff March 10, 2014.
The Danielson Framework ….how does this change things?
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
TAPCo. Full Staff Mtg March 17 th Agenda ● ADVANCE ● Regents.
Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12 August 11, 2014 Differentiated Supervision: The Danielson Framework.
Artifact Brainstorming Domains 1 and 4 Department of Professional & Organizational Development Howard County Public School System, 2014.
Teacher Effectiveness Who begins in ? Teaching Specialists Special Education Teachers English as a Second Language Teachers Gifted Teachers.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Acting Secretary of Educationwww.education.state.pa.us Measuring Educator Effectiveness Educator Effectiveness:
NYC DOE – Office of Teacher Effectiveness A. Reflecting on Good Teaching 1.
Jeffrey Freund. Jeff Freund: Education and Work History Class of 2000 Class of 2004 Elementary Education Middle Level Mathematics.
Act 82 Boot Camp Day 1 July 29 th, 2015 Angela Kirby-Wehr, Educator Effectiveness.
Teacher Evaluation University of New England - EDU 704 Dr. William Doughty Submitted By: Teri Gaston.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Focused Evaluation. Who?  Teachers who completed the Comprehensive cycle  Proficient or distinguished.
Educator Effectiveness Digging into Domain 4. Educator Effectiveness in PA  PDE has been working since 2010 to develop an educator effectiveness model.
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
MSBSD Educator Evaluation
New Teacher Induction.
Differentiated Teacher Supervision and Evaluation Models
Resident Educator Summative Assessment
  NEW JERSEY ALTERNATE ROUTE CAREER AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION CERTIFICATE OF ELIGIBILITY   EDUCATOR  PREPARATION PROGRAM (CTE-CE EPP)
Introduction to the Marzano Teacher Evaluation Model for USD 259
Evaluations (TPGES) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. Bourbon.
Introduction to the Faculty Evaluation System
Dissemination Training
Licensed Educator Professional Growth and Evaluation Process
Rockingham County Public Schools Teacher Evaluation Process
Framework For Teaching (FFT)
An Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Evaluation Orientation Teacher & Licensed Support Staff with NCEES process
A guide for holders of initial and transitional certificates
Educator Effectiveness
Evaluations All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. The most important.
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
Okeechobee County Instructional Evaluation
Evaluation Orientation Teacher & Licensed Support Staff with NCEES process
Changes to the Educator Evaluation System
Teacher Evaluation Training
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
MSBSD Educator Evaluation
Evaluations Evaluations are regulated and required by KDE (KAR’s and KRS’s) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards.
New Teacher Induction Workshop
Teacher Evaluation Process School Year
Overview of Implementation and Local Decisions
Introduction to Core Professionalism
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND APPRAISAL SYSTEM (PDAS) TEACHER ORIENTATION This orientation provides an overview of the elements of the PDAS system and.
HEYWORTH COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS
The best way to predict the future is to create it.
END-OF-YEAR EVALUATIONS
CBSD Differentiated Supervision Review
Bradley County Schools Robert Brittingham Department of Instruction Evaluations & Licensure
Presentation transcript:

Baldwin FLEXIBLE CLERICAL AND PROFESSIONAL LEARNING and DIFFERENTIATED SUPERVISION

Clerical Flexible Days Professional employees may work from home or school to attend to job-related clerical items. For the 2015-2016 school year, the following clerical dates apply: 11/3/15, 1/18/16, and 3/24/16 (3.5 hours per day total of 10.5 hours)

Building Clerical Time First clerical day of the year FLEXIBLE 8/10-18/15 or 8/24 & 25/15 (one day or broken over 2 days, for a total of 7 hours) Last clerical day of the year. 6/6/16

TOTAL:24. 5 hours Clerical Time 17 TOTAL:24.5 hours Clerical Time 17.5 Flexible Hours 14 (7) Building Required Hours

Flexible Professional Learning Days Professional employees who are pre-approved for Professional Learning Plans may work according to the timeline and tentative dates, hours, and location identified on their plan. 8/21 (pm), 11/3, 1/18, and 3/24 (3.5 hours per day) TOTAL of 14 hours of Flexible Professional Learning Time in year 1 and 24.5 in year 2.

Flexible Professional Learning Days Summer work, work from home, work at school on dates you select ... TOTAL of 14 hours of Flexible Professional Learning Time in Year 1 TOTAL of up to 24.5 hours of Flexible Professional Learning Time in Year 2 and beyond.

DISTRICT Professional Learning Days Professional employees attending district directed professional learning: 8/21 (pm), 11/3, 1/18, and 3/24 (3.5 hours per day total of 14 hours)

Differentiated Supervision The differentiated supervision model reflects the work of the committee and provides options for teachers who have: Completed three satisfactory years of teaching in the district, Obtained a Level II certificate, Received a “Satisfactory” summative rating in the previous two years, and Demonstrated “Proficient” or “Distinguished” teaching on the 82-1 document

Differentiated Supervision A professional employee participating in the differentiated supervision model will participate in the “Formal Observation” once during each three year period. The administration will conduct walk-through observations on ALL employees each year.

FORMAL OBSERVATION Formal observations will occur using the PDE endorsed Danielson Framework for Teaching (2007 or later editions). All temporary professional employees, professional employees new to the district, and those in the differentiated supervision model formal observation year will be formally observed using the current electronic observation tool.

PROFESSIONAL LEARNING ACTION PLANS ALL professional staff are required to complete Professional Learning Action Plans Independently, dyads, triads – refer to Differentiated Supervision Models District Directed

Danielson Domains Planning and Preparation (must link with a minimum of two (2) components): Classroom Environment (must link with either component 2a or 2b; special education teachers may use 2d): Instruction (must link with a minimum of two (2) components):

Professional Learning Action Plan ___ Credit for Differentiated Supervision Model ___ Non-Tenured or District First Year Staff (Included in the 426 Portfolio) ___ Flexible Professional Learning Hours (District assigned dates)

DOCUMENTATION Individual Portfolio Danielson Self Reflection Mid-Point Review Final Review