(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Compliance Monitoring Orientation. Monitoring Components Focus Site Review/Fiscal Monitoring SPAM.
Advertisements

Roles and Responsibilities. Collaborative Efforts to Improve Student Achievement Guidelines for developing integrated planning and decision making processes.
Early Childhood Special Education Part B, Section 619* Part C to B Transition by Three Jessica Brady, Noel Cole Michigan Department of Education Office.
Office of Special Education & Early Intervention Services Getting Ready at the Local Level Preparing for the Service Provider Self-Review.
A Multi-Year Improvement System and Schedule
5/2010 Focused Monitoring Stakeholders May /2010 Purpose: Massachusetts Monitoring System  Monitor and evaluate program compliance with federal.
Special Education Compliance Monitoring Cohort 3 Onsite monitoring
1 FY11 Title I Common Program Review Findings Julia Foodman & Matthew Nixon Title I Technical Assistance & Networking Session May 23, 2011.
Final Determinations. Secretary’s Determinations Secretary annually reviews the APR and, based on the information provided in the report, information.
Special Education Monitoring – IDEA Grant
1 Determinations EI/ECSE SPR&I Training ODE Fall 2007.
Special Education Accountability Reviews Let’s put the pieces together March 25, 2015.
Special Ed. Administrator’s Academy, September 24, 2013 Monitoring and Program Effectiveness.
1 Overview of IDEA/SPP Early Childhood Transition Requirements Developed by NECTAC for the Early Childhood Transition Initiative (Updated February 2010)
Monitoring Accommodations in South Dakota Linda Turner Special Education Programs.
Verification Visit by the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) September 27-29, 2010.
Title I Technical Assistance Training Federal and State Programs.
FY12 Title I Common Program Review Findings Title I Technical Assistance Session May 11, 2012.
Systems Performance Review & Improvement (SPR&I) Training Oregon Department of Education Fall 2007.
Illinois State Board of Education Innovation and Improvement Division January 13, 2010 An Introduction to the 21 st Century Community Learning Center Self.
2014 ALACASE CONFERENCE Preschool Indicators 2014 EI Preschool Conference.
A Review of the Special Education Integrated Monitoring Process BIE Special Education Academy September 12-15, 2011 Tampa, Florida.
OSEP National Early Childhood Conference December 2007.
Welcome to the Regional SPR&I trainings Be sure to sign in Be sure to sign in You should have one school age OR EI/ECSE packet of handouts You.
STATE MONITORING VISIT Montgomery County Schools Week of April 18, 2016.
BIE Special Education Academy September 2011 Tampa Bay, Florida Presenter: Donald Griffin Education Specialist, Special Education Bureau of Indian Education.
An Introduction to the State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report.
Letter of Explanation Copy of Data Disproportionality Initial Eligibility 60-day Timeline Early Childhood Transition Secondary Transition Corrected and.
Complaints Information Santina Thibedeau March 5, 2009.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Special Education Self Review (SESR) Activity Three: Corrective.
1 NCLB Title Program Monitoring NCLB Title Program Monitoring Regional Training SPRING 2006.
Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Ronald Tomalis, Secretary of Educationwww.education.state.pa. us Compliance Monitoring for Gifted Education COMPLIANCE MONITORING.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
REEVALUATION: BEST PRACTICES M-DCPS EXCEPTIONAL STUDENT EDUCATION CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN BEESS 037.
Coordinated Review Effort (CRE) School Year Karen Franklin, SNS Distance Learning October 1, 2015.
Improvement Planning Mischele McManus Infant/Toddler and Family Services Office of Early Childhood Education and Family Services July 20, 2007
Presented by: Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability June 10, 2008 Monitoring For Results.
Cyclical Monitoring Presented to State and Local Task Force.
Noncompliance and Correction (OSEP Memo 09-02) June 2012.
1 Title IA Coordinator Training Preparing for Title IA Monitoring
12/15/2015LCBE/gcm Department of Exceptional Children Mid Year Update Leslie County Schools.
ESEA FOR LEAs Cycle 6 Monitoring Arizona Department of Education Revised October 2015.
The IEP Process MAASE New Administrators Workshop October 2010.
Presented By WVDE Title I Staff June 10, Fiscal Issues Maintain an updated inventory list, including the following information: description of.
+ Compliance Monitoring Results Octorara School District 2009.
In accordance with the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and Chapters 14 and 15 of the State Board Regulations, PDE provides general supervision.
Special Education Performance Profiles and SPP Compliance Indicator Reviews Office for Exceptional Children.
1 Early Intervention Monitoring Wyoming DDD April 2008 Training.
PSRC EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN Compliance issues and suggestions that will help with case management.
An Introduction to CIMS (and why it matters) An Introduction to CIMS (and why it matters) Council For Exceptional Children March 2015 Grand Rapids.
An Introduction to CIMS (and why it matters) An Introduction to CIMS (and why it matters) CEC Presentation March 2014 Grand Rapids, MI 1.
What’s New for Transition to Special Education Services? Paula E. Goff, Part C Coordinator May 23, 2013.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA General Supervision.
March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.
Top Ten Policy Tips for Special Education Carol Ann M. Hudgens, Ed.S Section Chief: Policy, Monitoring and Audit Exceptional Children Division April 2015.
SPECIAL EDUCATION PROCEDURES TO ADDRESS NON-COMPLIANT FINDINGS RELATED TO CHILD FIND Presenter Jim Kubaiko, Director Special Education.
“All kids get to go to school and get a fair chance to learn. That’s the idea behind IDEA. Getting a fair chance to learn, for kids with disabilities,
11/23/2016LCBE/gcm Department of Exceptional Children School Year Information Leslie County Schools.
BUILDING BLOCKS TO EVALUATE MEASURABLE PROGRAM OUTCOMES
Special Education Reviews: A new paradigm for LEAs
SPR&I Regional Training
St. John the Baptist School System Special Education Chairperson’s Meeting September 8, 2016.
Roles and Responsibilities
Roles and Responsibilities
Brielle Elementary School Special Education Monitoring Summary
SECN – Transition Role Group Meeting
TEXAS DSHS HIV Care services group
Kinnelon School District Department of Special Services
Special Ed. Administrator’s Academy, September 24, 2013
Presentation transcript:

(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and IDEA Review (Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and Gifted Education Review

Comprehensive Monitoring System

ON-SITE REVIEW SELECTION OEC works in partnership with the Office of Federal Program’s Program Audit Compliance Tracking System (PACTS). LEAs are selected randomly, based on the PACTS cohort system.

LEA Team Required Membership Suggested Membership General education staff Special education staff Curriculum supervisors or coordinators Gifted coordinator EMIS coordinator Superintendent Treasurer CCIP Coordinator State Support Team (SST) representative ODE representative Suggested Membership Related service providers School psychologists

The focus of the IDEA Review is to examine the LEA’s: Decision-making process for making least restrictive environment (LRE) decisions, as documented in an IEP; Child Find process; Delivery of services and alignment with IEPs; Evaluation and placement process for children with disabilities transitioning from preschool to kindergarten; Accuracy of data reported to ODE including Dec. 1 Child Count; Compliance with statutory requirements for Individual Education Programs (IEPs) and Evaluation Team Reports (ETRs); Fulfillment of IDEA Part B fiscal requirements; and. Other issues as identified through analysis of the district’s data.

Gifted Education Review Ensure that LEAs are compliant with Am. Sub. HB1, and the statutory regulations regarding gifted education in Ohio Focuses on: Gifted education budget and expenditures Review of Written Education Plans (WEPs) and Written Acceleration Plans (WAPs) Provision of equitable services across the district Student contact time associated with services Assignment and qualifications of gifted staff and Professional development for regular education teachers providing gifted services

PREPARING FOR REVIEW Designate a lead contact person Designate a LEA contact for special education, gifted education, and fiscal and preschool components of the review

Parent Meetings Identify a location for public and individual meetings with parents. Mail parent public meeting notice to all LEA’s parents/guardians of students with disabilities Retain a copy of the public notice to the parent in the student’s special education file. Post parent public meeting notice on LEA’s website at least two weeks before the parent public meeting

Documents and Student Records Review Secure a room for OEC team to conduct on-site activities Notify team leader of document and record review location Assemble all required documents according to the OEC Documents Required for On-site Review Submit to review team leader OEC Documents Required Prior to On-site and Ensure that all Required On-site Documents are available to review team on the first day of the review

Interviews with LEA personnel With the OEC team leader: Select LEA personnel who will participate in the interviews Determine the district/building-level administrative personnel who will participate in the interview sessions. Secure a location and schedule time for the two interview sessions. (Each interview will take approximately 2 ½ hours) Notify OEC team leader of location and time the interviews will be conducted

Parent Public Meeting and Individual Meetings with Parents ON-SITE ACTIVITIES Parent Public Meeting and Individual Meetings with Parents A parent public meeting will be facilitated by OEC where parents will have the opportunity to express support or concerns for special education services in the LEA. There also will be time scheduled for individual meetings with parents if requested. LEA will: Have a representative at the parent public meeting, who will introduce the review team and be available at the end of the parent public meeting for closing remarks. LEA representative will not be present during the parent meeting. Provide copies of Whose Idea is This? at the parent meeting.

Student Record and Document Review A sample of student special education records will be selected to review, based on OEC review team’s analysis of the LEA’s current SPP Indicator data and other related LEA data. OEC’s record selection may be random across grade levels, disability categories, buildings or may be targeted. LEA will: Make available all OEC requested student records on Day 1 of the review. Provide additional documentation or evidence of policies, procedures or practices, as requested by the review team. Verify and/or update student addresses, only if individual cases of non-compliance are identified by the ODE team.

Interviews with LEA Personnel Interviews will be conducted separately with: Team(s) of special education teachers, regular education teachers and related service providers who are providing services to those students whose records were reviewed on-site. A team of LEA administrators LEA will: Identify LEA personnel with assistance from the OEC team leader who will participate in the review interviews Provide additional documentation or evidence of policies, procedures or practices as requested by OEC to substantiate interview responses Allow up to 2 ½ hours for each interview Identify a location for the interviews that allows OEC use of laptop computers

REVIEW EXIT MEETING OEC will conduct an exit meeting with the LEA administrative team including LEA special education contact, superintendent, and other representatives identified by OEC. The group will discuss expectations for corrective action process, timelines, and the SST‟s role in providing professional development and technical assistance to the LEA. A representative from the SST is required to attend the LEA’s Exit Meeting.

POST-ON-SITE ACTIVITIES Summary Report OEC will send the LEA the on-site summary report within 90 days of the on-site review: Findings of non-compliance in the LEA. (any compliance level less than 100 percent in student records, data verification, document reviews and interviews The root cause(s) of the non-compliance in the LEA Parent Notification of Findings OEC will mail written notification to parents/guardians if findings of non-compliance are identified for individual students during the record review Copies of the parent notification letter(s) will be sent to the LEA via email

Corrective Action The LEA must demonstrate two separate parts of a “two pronged test”: Evidence of Correction of Individual Cases of non-compliance Evidence of Systemic Correction that indicates that the changes in the system have yielded significantly improved outcomes for children and students with disabilities in the focused area The LEA must: Develop a corrective action plan (CAP) Within 30 school days from the date of the LEA summary report Correct all identified non-compliance

The Corrective Action Plan Examine the root cause of non-compliance to assist with developing and implementing policies, procedures and practices to ensure 100 percent compliance and ongoing compliance. Address all findings of LEA non-compliance using the template provided for the CAP Review and revise LEA policies, procedures, practices or forms to ensure 100 percent compliance which may include: establishing internal controls to ensure ongoing compliance, staff training, increased supervision; changing staff assignments or adding staff and other resources Work with OEC staff and a SST representative in developing a CAP Submit a signed, electronic version of the CAP to OEC Lead Consultant for approval within 30 days from the date of the LEA Summary Report

Implementation of OEC Approved Corrective Action Plan Begin implementation of the approved CAP immediately in order to meet the regulatory requirements of IDEA of 100 percent compliance Verification of Correction and Implementation of Regulatory Requirements After LEA implementation of the CAP, OEC will: Review a sample of records to verify that the LEA is now correctly implementing the specific regulatory requirements Retain an open finding of non-compliance in the LEA, if the sample record review detects continued non-compliance Review another sample of records to verify correction of the continued non-compliance Factor continued and ongoing non-compliance after one year into the annual LEA Determination Ongoing non-compliance could result in consequences under OEC‟s policy for progressive sanctions