THE LUBRECHT REPORT: A MID-WAY ASSESSMENT OF THE 10 -YEAR WILDERNESS STEWARDSHIP CHALLENGE Developed By: The Wilderness Advisory Group April 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Survey of Super LEAs Evaluation Systems Performance Evaluation Advisory Council July 16 th, 2010.
Advertisements

Title One Parent Involvement
Capacity Building Mandate We, the participants…recognize the need to support: …A coordinated effort to involve and assist developing countries in improving.
Fostering Entrepreneurship Education – a EU perspective
The Management of European Structural Funds in Western Scotland ISPA Partners Meeting April 2003 Laurie Russell Strathclyde European Partnership.
CRI- Common Review Initiative Reducing Lender Review Redundancy.
Minnesotas Plan for Monitoring School Improvement Grant Implementation April 21, 2010 Patricia King Jonathan Luknic 1.
Gaining Senior Leadership Support for Continuity of Operations
1. 2 August Recommendation 9.1 of the Strategic Information Technology Advisory Committee (SITAC) report initiated the effort to create an Administrative.
Project THRIVE Goals and Objectives Achieving HR Excellence and Transforming APS The district views this Human Capital project as the primary vehicle to.
STRATEGIES TO HELP YOU MEET YOUR TRAINING NEEDS.  Our goal today is to have discussion on what Facilities Management Departments in our region are doing.
STAFF DEVELOPMENT FOCUSING ON TEAM BUILDING & CONFLICT MANAGEMENT Teresa E. Simpson EDLD: 5345 Human Resource Development – Fall 2008.
Security Education and Awareness Workshop January 15-16, 2004 Baltimore, MD.
1 Welcome to the Title I Annual Meeting for Parents
Arts in Basic Curriculum 20-Year Anniversary Evaluation the Improve Group.
Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Training
Building Trainer Competency for Secondary/Tertiary Systems Don Kincaid, University of South Florida Kimberli Breen, Illinois PBIS Network.
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
Next Generation of Accountability Differentiated Recognition, Accountability, and Support Summer 2012.
August 15, 2012 Fontana Unified School District Superintendent, Cali Olsen-Binks Associate Superintendent, Oscar Dueñas Director, Human Resources, Mark.
1 LBNL Enterprise Computing (EC) January 2003 LBNL Enterprise Computing.
PHAB's Approach to Internal and External Evaluation Jessica Kronstadt | Director of Research and Evaluation | November 18, 2014 APHA 2014 Annual Meeting.
Presentation on CCELP. For more information: Presented to Bay Area Funders By: Members of.
Race to the Top Program Update January 30, State Funding 2.
Milwaukee Partnership Academy An Urban P-16 Council for Quality Teaching and Learning.
Grantwriting. Types of Grants Foundation Grants HancockREADS Grants Hancock Education Fund Grants.
2013 Annual Strategic Action Plan Evaluation. Overview Background Role of SAP Implementation Evaluation process Council feedback Enhancement of SAP.
Quarterly Update Blue Ribbon Commission’s Recommendations of the 2009 Criterion Referenced Competency Test (CRCT) Erasure Investigation Dr. Beverly L.
1 Curriculum and Instruction Report Pocantico Hills School February 28, 2005.
Governance & Leadership Structure Influence Build Connect.
1 Informing a Data Revolution Getting the right data, to the right people, at the right time, on the right format Johannes Jütting, PARIS21 Tunis, 8 Decemeber.
VIRGINIA’S IMPLEMENTATION of the FINAL RULE on WORK ZONE SAFETY and MOBILITY Virginia Department of Transportation’s Instructional and Informational Memorandum-LD-241.
Concept to Implementation Leadership Team Prototype Implementation Plan First Call for Engagement, Formation of Communities of Practice Formation.
1 The Pack Trainer. 2 Objectives Discuss the role of the pack trainer. Describe the required training for Cub Scout leaders. Describe the supplemental.
Navajo Nation Integrated Justice Information Sharing Project NNIJISP Office of the Chief Prosecutor Conference Albuquerque New Mexico October 24, 2008.
Local Implementation Team Update Andrew Schock Longleaf Partnership Council Okefenokee/Osceola Longleaf Implementation Team April 25, 2013.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Federal Support for World-Class Schools Gwinnett County Public Schools 4/18/13.
Developing & Sustaining Community Schools to Build a Systemic Initiative April 8, 2010 Janice Chu-Zhu, Sr. Dir. Natl. Capacity Building Coalition Forum.
A Capacity Building Program of the Virginia Department of Education Division Support for Substantial School Improvement 1.
Needs Assessment: Conducting, Completing and Aligning with the Budget November 9, 2015 Deborah Walker, ESE Worcester Public Schools: Gregg Barres, Manager.
Planning for School Implementation. Choice Programs Requires both district and school level coordination roles The district office establishes guidelines,
Data Integration & Management April 23, :00 – 4:00 PM (EST)
Implementing CDC’s School Guidelines: Challenges And Opportunities Joy Larson Utah Department of Health Tobacco Prevention & Control Program.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
Early Childhood Transition: Effective Approaches for Building and Sustaining State Infrastructure Indiana’s Transition Initiative for Young Children and.
Extension Conference Goals Overview of Re-Envisioning and implementation of Transition Team recommendations Program highlights and opportunities Partnership.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
School Development Implementation and Monitoring “Building a Learning Community”
PRESENTED TO: ENERGY FACILITY CONTRACTORS GROUP SAFETY ANALYSIS WORKING GROUP SAFETY ANALYSIS WORKSHOP BY: CHRIS CHAVES NSR&D PROGRAM OFFICE OF NUCLEAR.
NSF INCLUDES Inclusion Across the Nation of Learners of Underrepresented Discoverers in Engineering and Science AISL PI Meeting, March 1, 2016 Sylvia M.
Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio
HRSA Early Childhood Comprehensive Systems (ECCS) Impact 2016 Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) Barbara Hamilton, Project Officer Division.
Products to Share  Business plan  Brochures for both clients and professionals  Template contracts and other policies and procedures  Placement evaluation.
February 25, Today’s Agenda  Introductions  USDOE School Improvement Information  Timelines and Feedback on submitted plans  Implementing plans.
First Things First Grantee Overview.
Outline Background Purpose Organization Plan Overview
Roles & Responsibilities of an Impressive Program Governance Plan
College-Wide Budget Meeting November 12, 2008
Strategic Management of Human Capital Recruitment Strategy
National Wilderness Stewardship Alliance March 29, 2016
Otis J. Brock, III Elementary School
Title I Annual Meeting Windsor Forest Elementary School
SABER: Systems Approach for Better Education Results SABER-Workforce Development Ireland Sue Leigh-Doyle 29 May 2012 Washington DC THE WORLD BANK.
Statistics Governance and Quality Assurance: the Experience of FAO
Otis J. Brock, III Elementary School
Otis J. Brock, III Elementary School
Title I Annual Meeting School Name: Shuman Elementary School
Comprehensive Planning Highway to Continuous Improvement and Success
Otis J. Brock, III Elementary School
Presentation transcript:

THE LUBRECHT REPORT: A MID-WAY ASSESSMENT OF THE 10 -YEAR WILDERNESS STEWARDSHIP CHALLENGE Developed By: The Wilderness Advisory Group April 2010

Presentation Overview Background Current Status Looking Back – The First Five Year Looking Ahead – The Next Five Years

Background The 10-Year Wilderness Stewardship Challenge (10YWSC) has the stated goal of having all wildernesses managed to a minimum stewardship level by 2014 The target date coincides with the 50 th anniversary of the Wilderness Act The minimum stewardship level is reached when a wilderness scores 60-points or higher of a total possible 100-points on ten elements Elements include fire planning, recreation site inventory and baseline workforce The 10YWSC was approved by Chief Dale Bosworth and the National Leadership Team in the fall of 2003

Percent of Wildernesses Meeting Standard - National

Average Score - National

Average Score by Element - National

Percent of Wildernesses Meeting Standard – Regional (FY 2009 data)

Average Score – Regional (FY 2009 data)

Percent of Wildernesses Meeting Standard – Regional

Average Score – Regional

Number of Wildernesses by Progress Classes – National (FY 2009 data)

Number of Wildernesses by Progress Classes – Regional (FY 2009 data)

Progress Needed to Make the Challenge

Looking Back – The First Five Years What Has Worked Well: Regional Coordination Setting a Specific Timeframe for Making Progress Focusing on Progressing in a Single Element Concentrating on Lagging Wilderness Areas Dedicating Professionals to Make Progress Hiring detailers Bringing in Trainers Creating Strike Teams Having Region/Forest resource specialists work directly with wilderness personnel Increasing Cooperation between Wilderness Programs

Looking Back – The First Five Years What Has Worked Well: (cont.) Functional Integration Supporting Specialists to Work Directly with Wilderness Personnel Line Officer Leadership and Commitment Emphasizing the Challenge as a Priority Leadership Accountability for Meeting the Challenge Bold Action by Leadership

Looking Back – The First Five Years What Has Worked Well: (cont.) Creative Use of Resources Focusing Funding on the Challenge Creating a Challenge Grant at the Regional Level Applying Outfitter/Guide generated funds for Element 7 (Outfitters/Guides) Applying Inventorying & Monitoring funds for specialists to work on plans and monitoring Using Volunteers Training

Looking Back – The First Five Years What Has Worked Well: (cont.) Strength of Existing Programs Relying on Dedicated & Experienced Wilderness Personnel Revisiting and Adapting pre-10YWSC efforts

Looking Back – The First Five Years What Has Not Worked Well: Lack of Functional Integration Inadequate Line Officer Leadership and Commitment Insufficient Resources Boots on the Ground Funding Training Partnerships and Volunteers

Looking Back – The First Five Years What Has Not Worked Well: (cont.) Inadequate Policy Limitations in the structure of the Challenge

Looking Ahead – The Next Five Years Recommendations: Priority Actions for the Chief Require each Regional Forester to develop, and submit to the Chief, a Regional Strategy to meet the 10YWSC Organize and fund strike teams Establish internal grant funds Provide funds to supplement NFF grant program Conduct assistance reviews for the Regions Develop video for the Chief

Looking Ahead – The Next Five Years Recommendations: (cont.) Innovative Strategies for National Wilderness Leadership Increase communication between WWSR Director and the field Designate National 10YWSC Lead Conduct national leveling calls Conduct national calls to support individual elements of the 10YWSC Improve educational resources for implementing the 10YWSC

Looking Ahead – The Next Five Years Recommendations: (cont.) Strategies for Regional Leadership Develop region-wide approaches to meet the 10YWSC Charter Regional Wilderness Council to facilitate integration; Charter Regional, Zone or Forest WAGs composed of specialists from all resources; Charter integrated regional teams around specific elements (Strike Teams) or to assist units in most need; Develop integrated region-wide funding strategies around specific elements; Hold funding aside to allow competition from individual forests to make progress on the Challenge; Hold funding aside for model forests to make progress on specific elements; Create and fill a Regional 10YWSC Coordinator;

Looking Ahead – The Next Five Years Recommendations: (cont.) Strategies for Regional Leadership Develop region-wide approaches to meet the 10YWSC (cont.) Identify regional Subject Matter Experts (SME) to assist other units; Incorporate meeting 10YWSC in region-wide Business Plans, emphasis areas, and program direction; Conduct region-wide training and meetings to share lessons learned; Hold region-wide leveling calls for consistency in scoring; Create and fill regional internship positions on units of most need; Utilize Enterprise Teams to complete plans, coordinate with specialists, and complete evaluation and/or monitoring; Create and fill regional detail positions that could spend time in the region assisting where most needed and/or focus on specific elements; Develop regional forum for sharing successes/Regional support group (web based, video conferencing, conference calls);

Looking Ahead – The Next Five Years Recommendations: (cont.) Strategies for Regional Leadership Develop region-wide approaches to meet the 10YWSC (cont.) Identify and support staff with ability to focus on Wilderness; Include more specific budget advice related to the Challenge from the Regions and Forests; Require Forests and Districts to develop work plans specific to 10YWSC; Look at other opportunities for funding for the Challenge such as Stimulus; Include progress on the Challenge in annual line officer performance reviews; Require training for all wilderness managers; Encourage training for non-wilderness staff; and Adopt models of successful staffing