Sustaining Continuous Improvement

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Baldrige Model of Performance Excellence
Advertisements

Using Baldrige to Create Organizational Alignment & Integration
TQA CONCEPTS & CORE VALUES
2014 Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Baldrige Criteria for Performance Excellence.
2014 Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Introduction to the Baldrige Criteria Baldrige Performance Excellence Program |
2015 Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | 2015 Baldrige Excellence Framework (Health.
Baldrige Performance Excellence Program 2011 Criteria for Performance Excellence Baldrige Performance Excellence Program Steve Bonk PMI
Baldrige National Quality Program 2003 Seven Categories of the Business Criteria l Leadership l Strategic Planning l Customer and Market Focus l Measurement,
Baldrige National Quality Program 2010 Criteria for Performance Excellence Baldrige National Quality Program Steve Bonk PMI Baltimore
2010 AHCA/NCAL National Quality Award Program - Gold Overview - Jeri Reinhardt Ed McMahon Tim Case.
2014 Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Baldrige Education Criteria for Performance Excellence.
Baldrige National Quality Program 2005 Baldrige National Quality Program Be the Best Leader, Lead the Best Organization: How Baldrige Can Help You Harry.
2011 Baldrige Performance Excellence Program American Association of School Administrators Denver, CO February 19, 2011 Measuring What Matters Most The.
Baldrige National Quality Program Information and Analysis: The Foundation for Performance Excellence Harry S. Hertz DAMA - NCR Meeting March 13, 2001.
Slide 4.1 Chapter 4 Managing for Quality and High Performance.
2015 Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | 2015 Baldrige Excellence Framework A systems.
Do You Know ???.
Building Performance Excellence in Health Care James R. Evans Professor of Quantitative Analysis and Operations Management College of Business University.
Leadership and Strategic Planning
Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | 2015
Copyright ©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Managing the Information Technology Resource Course Introduction.
Baldrige Health Care Criteria for Performance Excellence
SM. SM Use of the Georgia Oglethorpe Award Logo is restricted to current Key Investors, Award Recipients,
2015 Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | 2015 Introduction to the Baldrige Excellence.
Creating Sustainable Organizations The Baldrige Performance Excellence Program Sherry Martin HIV Quality of Care Advisory Committee September 13, 2012.
Strategic Planning Module Preview This PowerPoint provides a sample of the Strategic Planning Module PowerPoint. The actual Strategic Planning PowerPoint.
Performance Excellence Awards Status of the Baldrige Enterprise.
Applicant Name RMPEx Site Visit Opening Meeting Team Leader - Team Members –
)Talk about Pat Kinlaw- Transition back to the Baldrige framework- focusing on the leadership category something like:) Now that we have the right people.
District Workforce Module Preview This PowerPoint provides a sample of the District Workforce Module PowerPoint. The actual Overview PowerPoint is 62 slides.
Scoring 1. Scoring Categories 1 – 6 (Process Categories) Examiners select a score (0-100) to summarize their observed strengths and opportunities for.
Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award
A Florida Natural Resource: The Sterling Approach to Performance Excellence A workshop at The Florida Conference on Aging 2001 Doris Reeves-Lipscomb Groups-That-Work.
Application Workshop – Session One April 26, 2011.
2015 Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | 2015 Introduction to the Baldrige Excellence.
BPK Strategic Planning: Briefing for Denpasar Regional Office Leadership Team Craig Anderson Ahmed Fajarprana August 11-12, 2005.
Name of Institution Amity Business School Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award Presented By: Shubham Chandra 108K40 Richa Chaudhary 108K23.
Applicant Name RMPEx Site Visit Opening Meeting Team Leader - Team Members –
2010 AHCA/NCAL National Quality Award Program - Silver Overview - Session One Lance Reynolds Kevin Warren Tim Case.
2008 AHCA/NCAL National Quality Award Program - Step III Overview - Jon Frantsvog Ira Schoenberger Tim Case.
Aligning HR & Business Strategy. “The long-held notion that HR would become a truly strategic function is finally being realized.”
Baldrige National Quality Program Baldrige Background l Results l Baldrige Program Impacts Legal Aid Group March 11, 2002.
Journey to Excellence An Introduction to the Malcolm Baldrige Framework for Excellence.
District Leadership Module Preview This PowerPoint provides a sample of the District Leadership Module PowerPoint. The actual Overview PowerPoint is 73.
Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | 2016
What is a Business..?. Business : An economic system in which goods and services are exchanged for one another or money, on the basis of their perceived.
Mauritius Excellence Awards for Cooperatives 2013 Criteria and Model designed By International Business Excellence Mauritius.
It’s More than a List of Questions: Using the Quality Award Criteria as Your Roadmap to Excellence! Ruta Kadonoff Courtney Bishnoi.
Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award (MBNQA)
1 Chapter 9 Implementing Six Sigma. Top 8 Reasons for Six Sigma Project Failure 8. The training was not practical. 7. The project was too small for DMAIC.
Chapter 1 Market-Oriented Perspectives Underlie Successful Corporate, Business, and Marketing Strategies.
The Philippine Quality Award Program
Visit Mendocino County: Strategic Direction 2017/ /20
Fostering Workforce Partnerships
Leadership and Strategic Planning Dr. EzzElarab Elawoor
MGT 498 TUTORIAL Success trials - mgt498tutorial.com
Creating Priority Objectives
Applicant Name RMPEx Site Visit Opening Meeting
TSMO Program Plan Development
Getting the Most Out of Your Application
MGT 498 Education for Service-- snaptutorial.com.
MGT 498 TUTORIAL Education for Service--mgt498tutorial.com.
MGT 498 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com
Chapter 6 HEALTHCARE MARKETING. Chapter 6 HEALTHCARE MARKETING.
Malcolm Baldrige Award
Building and Sustaining Total Quality Organizations
A Focus on Strategic vs. Tactical Action for Boards
MODULE 11: Creating a TSMO Program Plan
Baldrige Performance Excellence Program | 2019
Presentation transcript:

Sustaining Continuous Improvement 2015 Examiner Training Facilitator Guide Sustaining Continuous Improvement

Important Questions Are you processes consistently effective? Do your approaches address your organization’s needs? How good are your results? Is your organization learning, innovating, and improving? “What got you here won’t get you there”

Steps to Maturity

What is Performance Excellence

Baldrige Impacts

Baldrige Program Mission: To improve the competitiveness and performance of U.S. organizations for the benefit of all U.S. residents Develops and disseminates Baldrige Framework Manages the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award Promotes performance excellence Provides global leadership in the learning and sharing of successful strategies and performance practices, principles, and methodologies

Baldrige Community Foundation for the Malcolm Baldrige CV Department of Commerce Foundation for the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award Board of Overseers National Institute of Standards and Technology ASQ (Contractor) Board of Examiners Judges Examiners Baldrige Award Recipients Cooperating Organizations Professional Societies Trade Associations Alliance for Performance Excellence

About MAAPE One of 31 state and regional programs across the country. Mission: To be the catalyst for performance excellence in all sectors of the tri-state economy. 501c(3) nonprofit corporation No government funding Pathway to the national program for organizations in PA, NJ, and DE

COMPONENTS OF THE BALDRIGE FRAMEWORK 2015 Examiner Training Facilitator Guide COMPONENTS OF THE BALDRIGE FRAMEWORK

Systems Perspective managing all the parts of your organization as a unified whole to achieve your mission. ensuring that your plans, processes, measures, and actions are consistent. ensuring that the individual parts of your organization’s management system work together in a fully interconnected, unified, and mutually beneficial manner.

2014 MAAPE Examiner Training Facilitator Guide Baldrige Framework This is the Baldrige Framework. The Core Values and Concepts, which is the first component we’ll discuss, are positioned at the base of the Framework. That is to signify that the Core Values are the foundation of the entire Framework. Framework, pg. 1

Components of the Framework 2016 Examiner Training Facilitator Guide Components of the Framework Core Values and Concepts Criteria for Performance Excellence Organizational Profile Categories Scoring System [Review the information provided on the slide.] PROCESS RESULTS Framework, pg. 1 and pgs. 30 - 35

Core Values and Concepts 2015 Examiner Training Facilitator Guide Core Values and Concepts Systems Perspective Managing for Innovation Visionary Leadership Management by Fact Customer-Focused Excellence Societal Responsibility Ethics and Transparency Valuing People Delivering Value and Results Organizational Learning and Agility Focus on Success These are the Core Values and Concepts from the Business / Nonprofit Framework. There are slight differences in other versions, e.g., “customer-driven excellence“ is replaced by “student-centered excellence” in the Education Framework and “patient-focused excellence” in the Health Care version. Also, in the Health Care version, “Societal Responsibility” is expanded to “Societal Responsibility and Community Health.” Slight differences across the three versions of the Framework reflect Sector differences Framework, pgs. 39 – 43

Core Values and Concepts 2015 Examiner Training Facilitator Guide Core Values and Concepts [Ask Examiners to turn to page 41 to see how Core Values are embedded in the Categories.] This is the Business / Nonprofit version of this diagram. If you’ll look at this chart on page 41 in your Framework booklet, you’ll see that the Core Values are aligned with the Process Categories in which they are most prominent. (They may also play a role in other Categories.) Then, in turn, those processes are aligned with the related results. So if an Applicant gets it right, the Core Values will flow through their key processes to their results. Framework, pg. 41

2015 Examiner Training Facilitator Guide Linkages Key relationships within the Criteria and Application Critical to alignment and integration Three types: Linkage between the Profile (Key Factors) and processes Linkage between processes Linkage between processes and results [This topic continues on the next slide.] [This slide includes an automatic animation that will be activated when you show the slide.] [This slide also includes a manual animation. CLICK as indicated below.] [Review the first two bullets on the slide.] [CLICK to review an additional bullet.] [Review the additional bullet.]

2015 Examiner Training Facilitator Guide Examples of Linkages Organizational Profile P.2a3 What key sources of comparative and competitive data are available … ? Category 4 4.1a2 How do you select and effectively use key comparative data … ? [This slide includes two manual animations. CLICK as indicated below.] [The “Organizational Profile” box will appear on the slide when you show it. As you review the following points, CLICK to reveal the other two boxes when indicated.] Here is an example of linkages in the Criteria: It starts in the Organizational Profile, with the Applicant’s answer to “What key sources of comparative and competitive data are available? [CLICK to reveal the second box.] When you get to this question in 4.1, the answer to the question “How do you select and effectively use key comparative data?” should align with the answer to that question in the Organizational Profile (a Key Factor) and the information from the Profile should help you to evaluate their approach. [CLICK to reveal the third box.] When you get to Category 7 and are trying to understand the comparisons that are or are not provided for results, you should think back to what you learned about comparisons in the Organizational Profile and in Item 4.1. Category 7 All Items: How do these results compare … ?

2015 Examiner Training Facilitator Guide Examples of Linkages Organizational Profile P.1b2 What are your key market segments, customer groups, and stakeholder groups … Category 3 3.1a1 ... How do your listening methods vary for different customers, customer groups, or market segments? [This slide includes two manual animations. CLICK as indicated below.] [The “Organizational Profile ” box will appear on the slide when you show it. As you review the following points, CLICK to reveal the other two boxes when indicated.] Here is another, similar example: We’re starting in the Organizational Profile again. [CLICK to reveal the second box.] What’s the relationship between this question from Category 3 and the one from the Profile? The Profile questions ask what the segments and groups are, while Category 3 asks how your listening methods vary for those groups. You need to know what the segments and groups are before you can evaluate how the Applicant tailors listening approaches for each one. [CLICK to reveal the third box.] What about this question in Category 7? Again, the idea of groups and segments appears again; this time for results. The Applicants’ answers to the earlier questions should help you to evaluate how well the Applicant has segmented the results in 7.2a(1). Category 7 7.2a(1) … How do these results differ by product offerings, customer groups, and market segments … ?

2015 Examiner Training Facilitator Guide Examples of Linkages Organizational Profile Key Customer Groups/Segments Organizational Profile Key Customer Requirements Category 3 Product Offerings (Requirements) [This slide includes four manual animations. CLICK as indicated below.] [The “Key Customer Groups and Segments” box will appear on the slide when you show it. As you review the following points, click to reveal the other four boxes when indicated.] This example is more complex, but when we break it down, you ‘ll see that the concept are the same: It starts with understanding your key customers groups and segments. [CLICK to reveal the second box.] Then you determine customer requirements in Category 3 for these customer groups and segments. [CLICK to reveal the third box.] The requirements that result from that Category 3 process are listed in the Organizational Profile. [CLICK to reveal the fourth box.] They are also used to determine process requirements in Category 6. [CLICK to reveal the fifth box.] As Processes are better aligned with Customer Requirements, Product and Process Outcomes should improve. Category 6 Process Requirements and Measures Category 7 Product and Process Outcomes

Process (ADLI) Approach: How do you accomplish your organization’s work? How effective are your key approaches? Deployment: How consistently are your key approaches used in relevant parts of your organization? Learning: How well have you evaluated and improved your key approaches? Have improvements been shared within your organization? Integration: How do your approaches align to your current and future organizational needs?

Organizational Profile 2015 Examiner Training Facilitator Guide Organizational Profile There are two “Items” in the Profile: P.1 Organizational Description a. Organizational Environment b. Organizational Relationships P.2 Organizational Situation a. Competitive Environment b. Strategic Context c. Performance Improvement System There are two “Items” in the Organizational Profile. (An “Item” is just a section of the Profile or a Category.) The Organizational Description focuses on what’s important within the organization – the factors affecting the organization’s environment and its key stakeholders. The Organizational Situation focuses on the external environment – competitive factors, what’s strategically important, and the performance improvement system.

Basic Information Product and service offerings Mission, Vision, and Values Workforce Profile Facilities, technologies & equipment Regulatory requirements Organizational Structure Customers and stakeholders Suppliers and partners Competitive environment Key strategic challenges and advantages

Criteria at a Glance Leadership Strategy Customers How do your senior leaders lead the organization? How do you govern your organization and fulfill your society responsibilities? Strategy How do you develop your strategy? How do you implement your strategy? Customers How do you obtain information from your customers? How do you engage customers by serving their needs and building relationships?

Criteria at a Glance Measurement, Analysis and Knowledge Management How do you measure, analyze and then improve organizational performance? How do you manage your information and organizational knowledge assets? Workforce How do you build an effective and supportive workforce environment? How do you engage your workforce to achieve a high-performance work environment?

Criteria at a Glance Operations How do you design, manage, and improve your key product and work processes? How do you ensure effective management of your operations?

Outcomes (LeTCI) Levels: What is your current performance? Trends: Are the results improving, staying the same, or getting worse? Comparisons: How does your performance compare with that of other organizations and competitors, or with benchmarks? Integration: Are you tracking results that are important to your organization? Are you using the results in decision making?

Criteria at a Glance Results What are your product performance and process effectiveness results? What are your customer-focused performance results? What are your workforce-focused performance results? What are your senior leadership and governance results? What are your results for financial viability?

Delaware’s One-Stop Partner Programs What if: Each partner completed the Org Profile and shared it across the system? Shifted thinking from vertical to horizontal? Identified work systems in addition to work processes? Identified and leveraged “Best Practices” across the network? Looked for alignment and integration opportunities across the network Shared client and referral information as appropriate?

Questions