HELCOM objectives in shipping field

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bernt Stedt, HELCOM RESPONSE Chair 24 March 2011, Stockholm
Advertisements

DS-01 Disaster Risk Reduction and Early Warning Definition
BlackSea Region Meeting Varna Points raised by the EU Maritime Strategy of relevance for PlanCoast.
The state of the Gulf of Finland- gaps in our present knowledge
Irish Coast Guard Local Authority oil spill Contingency Plans.
Navigating Risk, Challenge and Opportunity Promise of the Arctic, Seattle, WA Drummond Fraser Transport Canada, Marine Safety & Security May 29, 2013.
Singapore’s Actions Against Oil Pollution
Tankers’ transit route trough the end of Kadetrenden to the Swedish deep-water route. Tankers’ transit route trough the end of Kadetrenden to the Swedish.
Overview Which IMO measure should you choose? Use of four real world examples Factors to consider in choosing an IMO measure Summary of potential difficulties.
An Ocean of Opportunity: An integrated maritime policy for the EU 1 Places of refuge: General legal framework and developments within IMO and the EU Alexandros.
Hot issues for Poland in relation with oil bussiness on the Baltic Sea Robert Cyglicki Coalition Clean Baltic Conference, 2004.
HELCOM proposal on project aiming at BSAP development and implementation Baltic Sea Region Programme Conference May 2007, Hamburg HELCOM.
FPS PUBLIC HEALTH, FOOD CHAIN SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENT « Provinciaal Hof », Bruges, Belgium October MIMAC 2006 : International conference on.
ATC/EMSA/F2 Research&InnovationVertimar Vigo - Spain 1 EMSA: Its role in preventing accidental marine pollution and improving response systems Ana.
| 1 | 1 REDUCING THE IMPACT OF SHIPPING ON THE ENVIRONMENT DECARBONISATION.
Legal aspects of the marine environment protection and oil transportation: example of the Baltic Sea.
The Marine Strategy Framework Directive 17th March 2010, Newcastle North Sea Stakeholders Conference Leo de Vrees European Commission (DG Environment,
W w w. b a l t i c m a s t e r. o r g WORK PACKAGE 2- FINAL RESULTS WP2 Seminar / Baltic Master II Partner Search The 19th of Dec., 2007 Prepared by Jakub.
A PRESENTATION TO THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC SERVICES (NCOP) 24 OCTOBER 2007 BY MPATLISENG RAMAEMA CHIEF DIRECTOR: MARITIME TRANSPORT REGULATION DEPARTMENT.
KENYA PORTS AUTHORITY HEALTH, SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENT
W w w. b a l t i c m a s t e r. o r g Workshop on future co-operation Kalmar, 12 June 2007 Prepared by Jakub Piotrowicz.
Programming of International Development Assistance Donor Sectoral Meeting Ministry of Interior September 17, 2007.
1 Sub-Regional Contingency Plan DENGERNETH Commander Peter Søberg Poulsen Admiral Danish Fleet.
BIMCO driving – Maritime Environmental & Efficiency Management BIMCO seminar – in association with Fathom 2 June , Nor Shipping, Norway.
HELCOM as an International Tool of Environmental Protection of the Baltic Sea Mieczysław S. Ostojski, Ph.D. Mieczysław S. Ostojski, Ph.D. Chairman, Helsinki.
HELCOM – the focal point for environmental information in the Baltic Sea Area Nikolay Vlasov Information Secretary Helsinki Commission (HELCOM)
“EMSA’s Activities on Oil Pollution Preparedness and Response”
MSFD Programme of Measures Consultation Event Anna Donald Head of Marine Planning & Strategy.
1 The statistical approach for monitoring maritime safety used and developed by EMSA Béatrice Comby Project Officer - Production and development of maritime.
Maritime Navigation and Information Services (MarNavIS) Proposal for FP6.
International Regulations to improve Maritime safety to avoid oil spills 29 August 2011 Dr Anita Mäkinen Finnish Transport Safety Agency.
HELCOM Baltic Sea Action Plan – progress on the eve of the 2013 Ministerial Meeting Monika Stankiewicz HELCOM Executive Secretary Baltic Marine Environment.
Risk reduction and response scenarios BE-AWARE II Final Conference, November, Ronneby, Sweden Co-financed by the EU – Civil Protection Financial.
Annual Forum of the EUSBSR and the revision of the EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region (EUSBSR) DG REGIO – D1 Competence Centre Macro-Regions and European.
Investigating Shipping Pollution Violations Pacific Module 3: Domestic Enforcement.
HELCOM Baltic Sea Action Plan Northern Dimension and the oceans and the seas Mieczysław Ostojski, Prof. WSS Chairman Helsinki Commission 15th Baltic Sea.
1 GOFREP – an example of transnational cooperation in enhancing maritime safety and marine environment protection XII RS International Seminar St.Petersburg,
1 Oil Transfer on the Baltic Sea – Conflicts and Solutions. CCB Conference 2004, May 2004, Nelijärve, 22 May 2004, Nelijärve, Estonia Estonia May.
Kiev / 27 January 2016 Giuseppe Russo / Senior Project Officer Department B: Safety and Standards / Technical cooperation TRACECA Maritime Safety and Security.
Workshop on Agricultural Nutrient Reduction,Vilnius September 2004 HELCOM- on the way to nutrient load reduction Kaj Forsius HELCOM.
Anchorage, Alaska December 10 th, The Arctic Waterways Safety Plan Martin Robards PhD Martin Robards.
OPRC Level 3 Causes, Fate and Effects of Spilled Oil.
9th Annual Colloquium of the IUCN Academy of Environmental Law – South Africa Nengye LIU, PhD Candidate, Faculty of Law, Ghent University Prevention.
Regional Marine Pollution Emergency Response Centre for the Mediterranean Sea, Malta A REGIONAL STRATEGY FOR PREVENTION OF AND RESPONSE TO MARINE POLLUTION.
Agenda item 4: Draft Offshore Action Plan Gabino Gonzalez, Programme Officer 4th Meeting of the EcAp Coordination Group Athens, Greece, 9-10 October 2014.
Kiev (Ukraine) / 27 January 2016 Giuseppe Russo / Senior Project Officer Department B: Safety and Standards TRACECA II Project 2nd Project Steering Committee.
The Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) The key and only legislation completely focused on the marine environment Clear ecosystem based thinking.
- Proposed actions, targets and indicators to reach the objectives
Tim Wilkins Helsinki 7th March 2006
Theme 3 – Physical loss and damage to the seafloor
Progress Report of The Russian Federation Project
Baltic Sea cooperation for reducing ship and port emissions through knowledge- & innovation-based competitiveness BSR InnoShip Baltic Sea cooperation for.
USCG Roles & Responsibilities During a Ship Fire
COASTAL STATE RESPONSIBILITY (IMO) – HYDROGRAPHY
Regional experiences, case of the Mediterranean Sea
DG MARE, European Commission
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Annex III Annex I Qualitative descriptors Characteristics
Hydrographic awareness and the benefits of hydrography
Regulating Arctic Shipping Unilateral, Regional and Global Approaches
DG ENV/MSFD 2018 call for proposals
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
ECONOMICS IN THE WFD PROCESS
Investigating Shipping Pollution Violations
HELCOM Baltic Sea Protected Areas
HELCOM and the Baltic Sea
European Environment Agency
DG Environment, Unit D.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
Regulating ship waste from a European perspective
HELCOM Meeting May 2019 OSPAR’s monitoring and assessment in reducing discharges of radioactive substances to the North-East Atlantic Kinson Leonard (Vice.
Presentation transcript:

HELCOM objectives in shipping field Tadas Navickas Professional Secretary HELCOM

Contents Introduction Examples of HELCOM objectives, indicators and actions accidental pollution pollution by ship generated waste Further steps

Shipping in numbers 2005 figures : 1800 AIS equipped vessels in the Baltic at any moment 54 th. AIS equipped vessels passed the Skaw 40 th. passed Kiel Canal 56 th. vessels passed Gotland 40 th. entered/left the Gulf of Finland one of the most intensely trafficked shipping areas in the world

Shipping in numbers

Pressures on the environment Accidental pollution Pollution by ship-generated waste Air pollution Transportation of non-indigenous organisms Effects of offshore activities

HELCOM objectives in maritime field Maritime activities carried out in an environmentally friendly way Indicators, targets, management objectives Actions No new introductions of non-indigenous species Negligible illegal pollution No accidents with significant environmental impact Adequate preparedness to react to shipping accidents Minimum air pollution from ships Offshore activities are carried out in “zero discharge” regime

Accidents in the Baltic Pollution of: the seawater and seabed (including possible effects to spawning grounds etc.); atmosphere (e.g. in the case of fire) shores (recreational areas and wildlife habitats can be seriously affected) killing of the sea birds and mammals

Proposed objective Accidental pollution No accidents with significant environmental impact Environmental significance of accidents: assessed on case by case basis take into account local situation and damage HELCOM Recommendation 12/9 “Follow-up studies in connection with major oil spills” additional discussion on the assessment of the significance could be needed

Proposed indicators Accidental pollution Measurable pressure (environmental impacts) of accidental pollution Amount of contaminated beaches (accidental pollution) Number of oily birds (accidental pollution) Number of accidents with significant environmental impact Number of shipping accidents Number of shipping accidents with pollution Number of successful emergency/response operations Measuring progress of HELCOM actions: Safety of navigation measures Emergency assistance Responding to accidental pollution

Examples of further steps Safety of navigation Full use of the AIS opportunities: automatic warnings, reminders etc to authorities analysis of accidents/traffic in risk areas further routing measures based on AIS info Systematic and updated guidance and information to vessels e.g. Baltic Transit Guide AIS based warning systems Safe passage through the Danish straits e.g. enhanced use of the pilots Improved PSC (both ships and crew)

Proposed objectives Emergency and response preparedness Adequate emergency capacity available in all sub-regions of the Baltic Response capacities are sufficient to minimise the negative environmental impacts of small, medium and large oil spills - relevant indicators under development Seagoing response vessels in the HELCOM area

Examples of further steps Emergency and response preparedness Three tear approach in emergency and response planning: sub regional assessment of the risks identification of missing resources coordinated steps to fill the gaps Technical response issues: responding at night/in bad visibility responding in bad weather conditions responding to spills of heavy oils

Illegal discharges Size of illegal spills during 2000-2004: >1 m3 – 1643 1-10 m3- 121 10-100 m3 – 25 >100 m3 - 2

Proposed objective Illegal discharges Negligible illegal pollution - number of instances and the amount of pollutants should continue on the downward trend and be close to zero in mid-term

Proposed indicators Illegal discharges number of illegal (both observed and estimated) discharges abundance of marine litter amounts of wastes delivered to ports number of polluters identified/convicted Measurable pressure (environmental impacts) of ship generated waste Effectiveness of actions of HELCOM countries

Examples of further steps Illegal pollution Unified implementation of the Baltic Strategy: mandatory delivery “no special fee” Improved enforcement: combination of AIS and oil drift data satellite surveillance (cooperation with EMSA) improved international cooperation in investigation and collection of evidence

Further steps Developing the Baltic Action Plan Finalisation of the full set of objectives and indicators Adjusting reporting Creation of ”progress display” system: easily understandable accessible for wide public Developing actions to achieve agreed targets and objectives Involvement of stakeholders – crucial

Thank you For more information please contact: Helsinki Commission (HELCOM) Katajanokanlaituri 6 B FI-00160 Helsinki Finland www.helcom.fi