$150K Chicago/ANL seed funding for Braidwood site investigation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CONSTRUCTION DRILLING INC.
Advertisements

15 March 2004Cal Poly Meeting Status of Midwest  13 Effort Status of Braidwood site General strategy and layout of experiment Civil construction estimate.
Henderson Mine Site. Henderson Mine Central Campus Shaft Collar Elev 10,400 ft Shaft Bottom Elev 7,500 ft LA Ramp Primary Access Ramp 3600 ft Central.
Laughton, February 2004Draft - Basis of Estimate for Review 1 Theta 13 Midwest Site Basis of Estimate for Underground Construction Input based on Preliminary.
21 March 2004 Overview of Braidwood Reactor Experiment Introduction to Braidwood site General strategy and layout of experiment Underground construction.
Braidwood Status Report Jonathan Link Columbia University APS Study, Reactor Working Group February 7&8, 2004.
Dick McDonald Risk April 16, LCLS Conventional Facilities Dick McDonald Deputy Systems Manager.
3/2011 CFS BTR Global Design Effort 1 Americas Region Civil Design Tom Lackowski.
John Osborne GS/SE March 2013
DH in Hybrid-A and ILD 2014/9/5 Yasuhiro Sugimoto 1.
July 28, 2004Tim Bolton NUFACT OSAKA 1 Reactor  13 in the USA Will discuss  Physics case for a “medium” sin 2 2  13 ≤0.01 reactor experiment.
June 2004 Andrea Gaddi, PH-CMI USC Installation Commissioning Task Force 1st Run Meeting, June 3rd, 2004.
Construction and Installation of the CLIC Experimental Area
Global Design Effort - CFS for Asian Single Tunnel Configuration Design Progress Masanobu Miyahara KEK.
Topic B2 Sub-structure groundworks
Global Design Effort - CFS ILC Global Systems Meeting 1 ILC GLOBAL SYSTEMS MEETING CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES AND SITING GROUP Status and Overview.
General meeting LAGUNA LAGUNA – Fréjus site
Laughton 7/04 Long Baseline Neutrino Program Tunneling Chris Laughton, Fermilab.
NuMI NuMI Overview NBI 2002 S. Childress (FNAL) 14 March ‘02 NuMI / MINOS Overview.
Under The Earth. Introduction Why Underground? Reserve is deep, uneconomical to remove the overburden Underground: All kinds of design you can imagine.
1 Alternative assembly option of ILD Y.Sugimoto 2010/10/18 ILD Integration
WP2 Superbeam Work Breakdown Structure Version 2 Chris Densham (after Marco Zito version 1 )
ILC experimental area - How to ‘develop’ CFS details for TDP (cavern size, number of shafts, HVAC, EL spec etc) ? - KEK site specific issues CFS V.Kuchler.
LHC scheduling applied to CLIC and ILC TILC09 & GDE AAP review – Tsukuba April 2009 K. Foraz K. Foraz - CERN TILC09 & GDE AAP review – Tsukuba April 2009.
Global Design Effort - CFS ILC10 Beijing, March, Single-Tunnel Accelerator Configuration Of Asian Region Atsushi Enomoto (KEK)
EUROn Safety 13/06/2012M. Dracos1. Safety workshop 13/06/2012M. Dracos2 A first two days safety workshop has been organized at CERN last May (
19 January 2006VELO installationEddy Jans 0 VELO-installation meeting CERN, January 17, 2006 preparation IP8-area SX8 moving SX8 -> IP8.
3/20/11 ALCPG11 Global Design Effort 1 CFS Detector Hall Considerations Tom Lackowski.
ILC D RAFT P ROJECT S CHEDULE K LYCLUSTER 500GeV K Foraz & M Gastal ILC Mechanical & Electrical Review and CFS Baseline Technical Review Many thanks to.
ME444 ENGINEERING PIPING SYSTEM DESIGN
General Infrastructures Services Department Civil Engineering planning for LSS4 Option, presented at review workshop 30/7/ months Planning and Resources:
Deep Underground Science and Engineering Laboratory at Homestake1 Richard DiGennaro, LBNL DUSEL Project Manager 20 June 2008 Facility Planning for DUSEL.
Construction Schedule for Baseline and Hybrid A’ Configuration 1 5 th September, 2014 J-POWER MDI-CFS Meeting - Ichinoseki City, JAPAN.
FHI 32: FCC tunnel layout and transferline update Tuesday, 9 February 2016 CE Updates: Comparison of 100km Intersecting and Non-Intersecting options New.
March 22, –  Design Concept & Hall Layout  Access Tunnel  Top heading Tunnel  Displacement of detector hall by push-pull operation.
MDI 9 th Meeting - 22 nd January 2016 FCC Experimental Caverns - Feasibility and Excavation C. Cook (GS), J. Osborne (GS),
Infrastructure and Operation meeting 20 th January 2016 Amberg’s Report Summary : Comparison of 100km Intersecting and Non-Intersecting options C. Cook.
M EGATON M ODULAR M ULTI -P URPOSE N EUTRINO D ETECTOR Ventilation Cooling Mark A. LaurentiMarch 2002 Modular Configuration.
Survey Meeting John Osborne, CERN 8 February 2016
Mike Andrews May 10, Week 54 NuMI Activities Initial test controls on the MI65 RAW exchange skid Complete hydrostatic test of the MI65 exchange.
 All civil engineering projects like dams, reservoirs etc. constructed on earth crust and constructed by material obtained from the crust.  So it is.
Accelerator Tunnel Layout (G01) Nick Gazis Senior Mechanical Engineer Review of ESS Accelerator Conventional Facility Design.
SECONDARY BEAM HANDLING AND INFRASTRUCTURE DESIGN STATUS BRUNO FERAL (CERN/EN) DIAMANTO SMARGIANAKI (CERN/EN) Project Leader: I.Efthymiopoulos (Cern/EN)
Construction Beam Tunnel
Symbols and Room Finishes
DIAPHRAGM WALLS.
Siting/Conventional Facilities Jonathan Hunt PIP-II Machine Advisory Committee 9 March 2015.
1 Update of detector hall in mountain regions Y.Sugimoto in Granada.
Civil Construction in the US Chris Laughton, Fermilab
Experimental Hall in Mountain Regions
FCC Underground Infrastructure
Detector Hall Design and Cost Information CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES
Yasuhiro Sugimoto 2012/2/1 ILD integration meeting
Innovative tunnel waterproofing technology
Francois and Lau EATM 17 July 2012
VELO-installation meeting CERN, January 17, 2006
Experimental hall design in Japanese site
October 2004 Through September 2005
Interaction Region Alternative Layouts
Curriculum for Excellence
5th FCC Infrastructure & Operation meeting
Detector hall in mountain regions
Detector Hall Tom Lackowski ILD Workshop 2011 LAL, Paris
A very first look at siting issues
Building Drawings.
Detector hall in mountain regions
Extract from today’s talk given to DCB
RDR Baseline Layouts for Interaction Region
8-10 April 2014 CFS-ADI Joint Meeting
CSC Electronics Installation and Commissioning Oct ‘06
Presentation transcript:

$150K Chicago/ANL seed funding for Braidwood site investigation Possible uses: Underground construction estimate (DONE) 2 bore holes to full depth Surface building and infrastructure design Surface detector movement - detector engineering (ANL) - engineering of surface transport (FNAL)

Underground Construction Estimate 12 March 2004

Near & Far Shaft Layouts 2 Alimak-type Elevators Ref. John Dreyzehner # 847-998-4646 2 Pumps (under crane each 100gpm @ 425’ head) Ref. Bill Willcox, Godwin Pumps #708-889-1560 Cable Trays, Ventilation and Piping to determine Not to Scale

Far Shaft and Detector Room Plan Excavation by Drill & Blast Support as excavated by rock bolts Support at convenience (~1 week) by reinforced shotcrete (10cm) Water Control by weep holes on 5x5 m grid Not to Scale

Far Detector Room Section Excavation Drill & Blast 12 x 14 x 15 m long Support as excavated Rock Bolts every 1.8 m 5 x 3.0m & 8 x 1.2m 10 cm reinforced shotcrete Water Control Weep holes 5x5 m grid in dry Hydroguard over moist/wet fractured zones ~ 30 m of 30cm strips Finish-Out Shell only with embedded rails, drainage, ventilation and utility run supports Not to Scale

Running Tunnel Section Excavation (supported dimension) Drill & Blast 8 x 8.5 x 300 m long Support as Excavated Rock Bolts every 1.8 m 5 x 2.5 m long 1.5 m spacing Support Delayed 10 cm reinforced shotcrete everywhere Water Control Weep holes 5x5 m grid in dry Hydroguard over moist/wet fractured zones ~ 300 m of 30cm strips Finish-Out Shell only with drainage, ventilation and utility run supports Not to Scale

Near Detector Room Excavation Support Finish-out Drill and Blast 32 x 12 x 14 m Support 3m bolts on 1.5m center 1.8 m spacing 10cm reinforced shotcrete Finish-out 30 cm concrete floor Pipe & cable racks Ventilation duct Tunnel Refuge Not to Scale

Estimate provides detailed cost and schedule for project. Bottom line: Cost $34.6 M (without contingency) Time 39 months Comments: Estimate does not include permanent surface buildings, but seems rather complete for underground work (e.g., includes decommissioning of shafts at end of project). 300m tunnel section adds $9.1 M to cost and 9 months to schedule Sequential construction of shafts almost doubles construction time. Design may be modified to reduce cost 10-20%. (CL) Site investigation can reduce contingency (2 bore holes = contingency lowered to 25% from recommended 40%. (CL)