Workshop 1 Self-Assessment Committee (SAC)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quality Assurance / Institutional Effectiveness and Course Syllabi Requirements of the Commission for Academic Accreditation UAE Ministry of Higher Education.
Advertisements

1 Dr. M. Feroze Ahmed Dr. M. Feroze Ahmed Ph.D., FBAS, FIE, MASCE Vice-Chancellor, Stamford University Bangladesh
THIS WORKSHOP WILL ADDRESS WHY THE FOLLOWING ARE IMPORTANT: 1. A comprehensive rationale for funding; 2. Measurable objectives and performance indicators/performance.
Program Review: The Foundation for Institutional Planning and Improvement.
Quality Enhancement Cell Dr. Dawar Hameed Mughal Director.
Window-1: [ Self-Assessment Exercise
Graduate Program Review Prof. Emad Ali. Major Review Steps Self-study Report External evaluation Apply actions for improvement.
Sharifah Hapsah Shahabudin Vice Chancellor 11 th Malaysian Education Summit 2007 Malaysian Education: Winning in the Global Race 11 th Malaysian Education.
The Program Review Process What is Instructional Program Review?
FOLLOW UP SITE VISIT Dr Robert Schofield Dr Arthur Brown Advisors to the Quality Assurance and Accreditation Project Republic of Egypt.
Using Electronic Portfolios to Assess Learning at IUPUI. Trudy Banta, et. al. Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis 2007.
Basic Workshop For Reviewers NQAAC Recognize the developmental engagements Ensure that they operate smoothly and effectively” Ensure that all team members.
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Developmental Reviews at King Saud University and King Faisal University.
2006 BYU Reaffirmation of NWCCU Accreditation Executive Accreditation Committee February 12, 2006.
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
What could we learn from learning outcomes assessment programs in the U.S public research universities? Samuel S. Peng Center for Educational Research.
Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.
Dr. Amina M R El-Nemer Lecturer Maternity and Obstetric Nursing Dep. IQAP Manager Program Specification.
THE QUALITY ASSURANCE AND ACCREDITATION Project Outcomes and Activities.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Peer Reviewer - Basic Workshop 2 Prof Hala Salah Consultant in NQAAP Prof Hussein El-Maghraby Member, NQAAP.
Dr. Salwa B. El-Magoli 16/1/2007Dr.Salwa B. El-magoli Cairo: 16/1/2007 Quality Assurance and Accreditation (The Egyptian Experience) Dr. Salwa B. El-Magoli.
Quality Assurance System in Higher Education Institutions(HEIs) Professor Dr Mesbahuddin Ahmed Head of Quality Assurance Unit UGC, Bangladesh.
Professor Sanjoy Kumar Adhikary Quality Assurance specialist QA Unit, UGC 28 July,
February, MansourahProf. Nadia Badrawi Implementation of National Academic Reference Standards Prof. Nadia Badrawi Senior Member and former chairperson.
SZABIST INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH DEPARTMENT QUALITY ENHANCEMENT CELL.
QA Unit, UGC 7 October, It is not the strongest of the species that survive nor the most intelligent but the one most responsive to change -Charles.
Assessment and Evaluation of CAREER Educational Components Center for Teaching Advancement and Assessment Research.
Introduction to IQAC Khawza I Ahmed, Director IQAC.
HLC Criterion Four Primer Thursday, Oct. 15, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
1 Establishing a New Gallaudet Program Review Process Pat Hulsebosch Office of Academic Quality CUE – 9/3/08: CGE – 9/16/08.
Academic Program Review Workshop 2017
AQIP Categories Category One: Helping Students Learn focuses on the design, deployment, and effectiveness of teaching-learning processes (and on the processes.
SAC Meeting Dr. Ahmed Tazmeen Additional Director NSU ahmed
Establishment of Institutional Quality Assurance Cell at SUB
Self-Assessment Exercise: Concept & Procedure
Development of Key Performance Indicators: Lebanese Case Study
Quality Assurance in Higher Education
Office of Planning & Development
The assessment process For Administrative units
Accreditation External Review
Faculty of Engineering at Shoubra Associate Prof. Hanan Eltobgy
Department of Political Science & Sociology North South University
Program Quality Assurance Process Validation
CURRICULUM DESIGN Part 2 of 2 PROGRAM EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES PROGRAM OUTCOMES COURSE OUTCOMES.
SCHOOL and DISTRICT ACCREDITATION
DRAFT Standards for the Accreditation of e-Learning Programs
Institutional Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC)
Programme Review Dhaya Naidoo Director: Quality Promotion
Alabama Teacher Mentoring Program
Preparing for Higher Education Review (HER)
Improving the First Year: Campus Discussion March 30, 2009
Guidelines for Self-Assessment at Program Level
Quality Assurance System in Higher Education Institutions(HEIs)
Sam Houston State University
Faculty Development Dr Samira Rahat Afroze.
Program Review Workshop
Understanding and Preparing for Accreditation
Self-Assessment Exercise
February 21-22, 2018.
Sam Houston State University
Institutional Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) at north south university
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Anuradha Karunasena, Windhya Rankothge, Colin N. Peiris
Faculty performance for Institutional achievement
Anuradha Karunasena, Windhya Rankothge, Colin N. Peiris
GC University Lahore Quality Enhancement Cell
TLQAA STANDARDS & TOOLS
Program Modification “Academic Year 2019” Assumption University
Presentation transcript:

Workshop 1 Self-Assessment Committee (SAC) by Self-Assessment Committee (SAC) Department of Biochemistry & Microbiology North South University

Overview of the Project Five Year Project: One Year of Self-Assessment and Proposing an Improvement Plan Four Years of Implementation of the Improvement Plan Funded by The World Bank and North South University Coordinated nationwide by University Grant Commission (UGC) Monitored and coordinated at NSU by the Institutional Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC)

What is Self-Assessment? Self-Assessment (SA) is a systematic process of evaluating the various aspects of an academic program to ensure quality and meet the desired standard. For the purpose of improvement, SA collects information and evidences from the stakeholders (i.e. students, alumni, faculty, employer, etc.), reviews those, and identifies the weaknesses to enhance quality of teaching, learning, and education. (Paraphrased from the Self-Assessment Manual provided by the UGC) The process of Self-Assessment can be described as a simple four-step process: Identifying the Strengths of the Department Pinpointing the Weaknesses within the Department Proposing an Improvement Plan through a comprehensive Improvement Plan Report Implementation of the Improvement Plan

Self-Assessment Criteria and Standards Governance Mission, Vision, and Objectives Intended Learning Outcomes (ILOs) Code of conduct for faculty, staff, and students Accountability & transparency through proper documentation Student Handbook Feedback from the stakeholders (e.g. students, alumni, employers, etc.) Curriculum Content Design and Review Well-defined Program Curriculum and Course Syllabi Balanced system for periodic course evaluation and review Student Admission, Progress, and Achievements Entry requirements for students Admission procedure Progress and achievement of the students

Self-Assessment Criteria and Standards Physical Facilities Classroom facilities (projector, desktop, DVD player, speakers, etc.) Library facilities (books, journals, e-learning materials, etc.) Laboratories Medical facilities Other facilities (e.g. Fitness center, Cafeteria, Clean restrooms, etc.) Teaching–Learning and Assessment Organized lesson plan for EACH lecture to be delivered Integration of technology into lectures Skill development through lab work, presentations, class-projects, etc. Assessment of student performance Student Support Services Academic guidance and counseling Co-curricular & extra-curricular activities (e.g. Reviving our LSC ) Career & Placement Alumni services Community services

Self-Assessment Criteria and Standards Staff and Facilities Entry requirements for Academic and Non-academic Staffs Recruitment process Staff development through periodic training Peer observation and evaluation Monitoring performance using Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) Research and Extension Faculty members conducting research in their areas of expertise Involving undergraduate and graduate students in research work Available research fund and facilities Publishing research work in renowned journals Process Management and Continuous Improvement A qualified and dedicated Self-Assessment Committee (SAC) Feedback from the stakeholders Periodic assessment and suggestions for improvement Implementation of the Improvement Plan

Summarized ACTIVITY SCHEDULE by the SAC TIMELINE Workshop 1 (Briefing the Department about the Self-Assessment process) Thu Oct 27, 2016 Collect Course Syllabi and Lecture Plans from DB&M Faculty Members Thu Nov 10, 2016 Collect Online Survey Data from Faculty, Students, Alumni, etc. Thu Nov 17, 2016 Workshop 2 (Presenting the Online Survey Results) Thu Dec 8, 2016 FINALS WEEK + SEMESTER BREAK (Sun Dec 11th 2016 – Sun Jan 8th 2017) Self-Assessment Report (SAR) Draft submission Mon Jan 16, 2017 Scheduling and completion of the External Peer Review Thu Mar 2, 2017 FINALS WEEK + SEMESTER BREAK (Sun Apr 2nd 2017 – Mon May 1st 2017) Workshop 3 (Presenting the Comprehensive Improvement Plan) Thu May 18, 2017 Implementation of the Improvement Plan Next 4 years