Bluetooth and WLAN coexistence in dense deployment scenarios

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Submission doc.: IEEE /XXXXr0 Month Year John Doe, Some CompanySlide 1 Insert Presentation Title Here Date: YYYY-MM-DD Authors: Notice: This document.
Advertisements

Submission doc.: IEEE /0065r0 July 2015 Alaa Mourad, BMW GroupSlide 1 Coexistence Management in the 2.4GHz ISM Band in the automotive enviroment.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0081r0 October 2015 Alaa Mourad, BMW GroupSlide 1 Wireless Coexistence in the Automotive Environment – System Model Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0071r0 August 2015 Alaa Mourad, BMW GroupSlide 1 Coexistence Management in the 2.4GHz ISM Band in the Automotive Environment.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0073r0 September 2015 Alaa Mourad, BMW GroupSlide 1 Wireless Coexistence in the Automotive Environment – Interest group.
Doc.: IEEE Submission doc. : IEEE March 2009 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE /229r0 Submission 07/2000 Jim Lansford, MobilianSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Doc.: IEEE /164r0 Submission March 2001 Steve Shellhammer, Symbol Technologies Jim Lansford, Mobilian Corporation Slide 1 IEEE P Working.
Doc.: IEEE /129r0 Submission September 2010 Junho Jo/Jihyun Lee, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 IEEE System description Notice: This document.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0033r0 February 2016 Alaa Mourad, BMWSlide 1 Automotive Wireless Coexistence, Feb.9th Teleconference Agenda Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0043r0 March 2016 Alaa Mourad, BMWSlide 1 Wireless Coexistence in the Automotive Domain – Testing Scenarios Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0061r0 Slide 1Igal Kotzer, General Motors March 2016 Automotive Environment Interference Evaluation Proposal Date:
Wi-Fi Network Signal Strength Field Data
PAR Comment Responses Date: Authors: November 2016
Wireless Coexistence in the Automotive Domain – Study group proposal
Automotive Wireless Coexistence, March 1st Teleconference Agenda
Testing for wireless coexistence: Methods and tools
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Studies in WAC SG Date: Authors: September 2016
September 2015 Opening Report
Wi-Fi Measurements in Vehicle
IEEE systems Inter-Vehicle Measurements
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Global Availability of 5GHz Spectrum for Automotive Use
Wi-Fi Bluetooth Automotive Coexistence Use Cases
IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
June 2006 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Proposed Scenarios for Usage Model Document.
IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
In-band interference effects on UWB
IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
March, 2000 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Applications for Consideration] Date Submitted:
TG2 July 2017 Berlin Meeting Agenda
Submission Title: [802.11n Liaison Report May 2009]
802.11af Liaison Report Date: Authors: March 2011
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
March 2018 Opening Report Date: Authors: March 2018
July, 2010 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [DSA, promising access mechanism for future.
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Possible Effects of FCC rules to design
Dynamic Multi Level RF Power
Coexistence problem of s Congestion Control
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Auto SG July 2016 Opening Report
Auto SG July 2016 San Diego Meeting Agenda
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 July 2015
Coexistence problem of s Congestion Control
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Submission Title: [Frame and packet structure in ]
Impact of IEEE n Operation On IEEE Performance
March 2016 Election Results
Auto SG July 2016 Closing Report
WAC SG November 2016 Opening Report
Examples of deployment scenarios
Freedom to use 40MHz at 5GHz
Impact of IEEE n Operation On IEEE Performance
January 2001 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: Coexistence with (Bluetooth)
Discussion on Evaluation Metrics for
ISO15118 – Charging Communication
Comment Resolutions Author:
Possible Action Items Date: Author:
Possible Action Items Date: Author:
S1G Coexistence Simulation Update
March 2019 Liaison Report Date: Authors: March 2019
Discussion on Evaluation Metrics for
<month year> doc.: IEEE <030158r0> <March 2003>
Comments to IEEE /68 Date: Authors: September 2009
July 2018 Sub 1 GHz Interest Group
July 2018 Sub 1 GHz Interest Group
Presentation transcript:

Bluetooth and WLAN coexistence in dense deployment scenarios Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 March 2017 Bluetooth and WLAN coexistence in dense deployment scenarios   Date: 2017-03-14 Authors: Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE 802.19. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Alaa Mourad, BMW Group John Doe, Some Company

Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 March 2017 Abstract This document presents Wi-Fi and Bluetooth measurements targeting dense deployment scenarios Two typical Bluetooth applications in automobiles are considered: Music Streaming using A2DP profile (ACL) Hands-free calling using HFP profile (SCO) Evaluate the performance of Bluetooth applications under simultaneous WLAN interference on the three WLAN non- overlapped channels Alaa Mourad, BMW Group John Doe, Some Company

Measurements parameters and devices Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 March 2017 Measurements Setup The test setup-shown in the figure- below was established in a lab Three WLAN networks (AP and station) in addition to Bluetooth connection Bluetooth sniffer was positioned near BT1 Measurements parameters and devices Measurement setup Alaa Mourad, BMW Group John Doe, Some Company

Packet error rate and retransmission rate Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 Music Streaming (1) March 2017 Bluetooth power level was fixed at 4 dBm WLAN power level was changed between 0-24 dBm with 3 dB step size WLAN traffic load was changed between 10-50 Mbps with 10 Mbps step size, in addition to the maximum achieved Packet error rate and retransmission rate Alaa Mourad, BMW Group John Doe, Some Company

Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 Music Streaming (2) March 2017 Bluetooth channels histogram as a function of WLAN traffic load for different WLAN power level WLAN power Level 18 dBm WLAN power Level 24 dBm Alaa Mourad, BMW Group John Doe, Some Company

Achieved WLAN throughput Vs. Set WLAN throughput Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 Music Streaming (3) March 2017 The Bluetooth effect on WLAN is small, especially for low WLAN traffic loads Similar effect on all the three WLAN channels (1,6 and 11) Achieved WLAN throughput Vs. Set WLAN throughput Alaa Mourad, BMW Group John Doe, Some Company

Hands-Free Calling (1) Same test setup like in case of music streaming Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 Hands-Free Calling (1) March 2017 Same test setup like in case of music streaming Hands-Free Calling uses SCO link, which does not support any retransmissions Packet error rate Alaa Mourad, BMW Group John Doe, Some Company

Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 Hands-Free Calling (2) March 2017 Bluetooth channels histogram as a function of WLAN traffic load for WLAN power level of 24 dBm WLAN power Level 24 dBm Alaa Mourad, BMW Group John Doe, Some Company

Achieved WLAN throughput Vs. Set WLAN throughput Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 Hands-Free Calling (3) March 2017 The Bluetooth effect on WLAN is insignificant, and smaller than music streaming case Similar effect on all the three WLAN channels (1,6 and 11) Achieved WLAN throughput Vs. Set WLAN throughput Alaa Mourad, BMW Group John Doe, Some Company

Observations and Conclusions Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 March 2017 Observations and Conclusions The Bluetooth performance will be strongly effected in WLAN dense deployment scenarios, like automotive environment In this study, only the non-overlapped WLAN Channels (1,6 and 11) were considered, the Bluetooth performance will be worse in case other channels are used as well Music streaming is more resilient than HFP to WLAN interference as a result of retransmissions The Bluetooth effect on WLAN is insignificant. Only a small decrement in throughput is observed when networks function with high throughput Alaa Mourad, BMW Group John Doe, Some Company