Probation and Community Justice Program Overview

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Community-Based Reentry Programs Using Electronic Technology
Advertisements

COMPAS is the Pathfinder ! NYS Probation Officers Association Annual Conference August 9, 2012 Presenters: Sharon Lansing, DCJS Nancy Andino, DCJS Gary.
Residential Community Supervision Programs
Drug Offender Sentencing Alternative (DOSA): Treatment and Supervision
May 1, Division of Parole and Probation Tony DeCrona, Interim Chief Kim Madris, Deputy Chief Tony DeCrona, Interim Chief Kim Madris, Deputy Chief.
The Implementation and Impact of Drug Courts Drug Courts and the New Technology of Offender Change Nov. 10, 2010 Lecture James M. Byrne, Professor.
MILWAUKEE COUNTY’S PRETRIAL RELEASE DECISION PROCESS & PRETRIAL SERVICES RE-DESIGN PRESENTED TO THE MILWAUKEE COUNTY COMMUNITY JUSTICE COUNCIL JULY 24,
Overview of Managing Access for Juvenile Offender Resources and Services Antonio Coor DMHDDSAS
HOPE Probation H awaii’s O pportunity P robation with E nforcement October 2012 Judge Steven S. Alm First Circuit Court, Honolulu, Hawai`i
The Implementation and Impact of Drug Courts Drug Courts and the New Technology of Offender Change James M. Byrne, Professor March 26,2015.
Elmore County Drug and DUI Court
Drug Court ♦The alternative to incarceration  History žHow and why the experiment evolved  Main Features of Drug Court žCooperation within the adversarial.
Redesigning the Front End of the System Options for Analysis, Goal-Setting, and Change August 23, 2013.
Chapter 8 Residential Intermediate Sanctions. Introduction Intermediate Sanctions are sentencing options between prison and probation that provide punishment.
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY 2011 PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT PLAN AUGUST 30, 2011.
Probation and Parole in the United States Your presenter:
NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE SERVICES OFFICE OF PROBATION AND CORRECTIONAL ALTERNATIVES OFFICE OF PROBATION AND CORRECTIONAL ALTERNATIVES.
Pretrial, Probation and Parole
Probation, Parole, and Intermediate Sanctions
TREATMENT COURTS Inns of Court Presentation By John Markson & Elliott Levine October 17, 2012.
Welcome to unit What’s New? Announcements Questions - Concerns.
Evidence-Based Reentry Practices in a Jail Setting
The Need For Evidence Based Sentencing Chief Justice William Ray Price, Jr.
Chapter 2 Pretrial Release and Diversion. Pretrial Services Pretrial Services is a department with two overlapping functions: Assisting the court with.
Community-Based Corrections for Juveniles
EL PASO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE SERVICES Dr. Henry Sontheimer Department Director & Criminal Justice Planner.
AJ 50 – Introduction to Administration of Justice Chapter 10 – Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
Chapter 12 Probation and Community Corrections. JUSTIFICATION Reintegration Preparing offenders to return to the community unmarred by further criminal.
Immediate Sanction Probation Pilot Project Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission June 8, 2015.
Corrections Chapter Twelve Reading
Presentation on the Phase 1 Report on the Home Confinement Program Orange County, Florida August 6, 2013.
Connecticut Department of Correction Division of Parole and Community Services Special Management Unit Parole Manager Frank Mirto October 14, 2015.
Chapter 4 Community Corrections: Diversion and Probation 1.
Yavapai County Jail Planning Services Presentation to: Yavapai County Board of Supervisors January 6, 2016.
ADULT REDEPLOY ILLINOIS Mary Ann Dyar, Program Administrator National Association of Sentencing Commissions August 7, 2012.
Improving Outcomes for Young Adults in the Justice System Challenges and Opportunities.
Kaplan University Online CJ101 Unit 8 Introduction to the Criminal Justice System.
Community Corrections What happens when a prisoner is released?
Court Services A Continuum of Behavioral, Therapeutic and Supervision Programs.
Corrections Also known as community-based corrections Community corrections: Refers to a wide range of sentences that depend on correctional resources.
DELAWARE OFFICE OF DEFENSE SERVICES DELAWARE CRIMINAL JUSTICE COUNCIL THE STATE OF DELAWARE PUBLIC DEFENSE COUNSEL AT PRETRIAL Hon. J. Brendan O’Neill,
Carson City, Nevada Alternative Sentencing April 4, 2016 Budget Workshop.
BCJ 3150: Probation and Parole
BCJ 3150: Probation and Parole
Pretrial, Probation and Parole
Evidence Based Practices in Napa County Probation
Department of Juvenile Justice
BCJ 3150, Probation and Parole
Challenges in Determining Whether Treatment Programs are Effective
Why Does Housing Matter with the Justice Involved Population?
FY17: Briefing on Jail Bed Contingency Funds
Summit County Probation Services
10 Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS
Eighth Judicial District Court Mental Health Court Program
Chapter 4 Probation: How Most Offenders Are Punished
Community Justice Services a Division of the
Understanding the Criminal Justice System
Maryland Juvenile Services Long Term Trends FY 2007 – FY December 2016
Metro Region Juvenile Services Long Term Trends: Counties of Montgomery and Prince George’s DJS Office of Research and Evaluation, January 2017.
Baltimore City Juvenile Services Long Term Trends
Criminal Justice Process: Sentencing & Corrections
10 Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
Eastern Region Juvenile Services Long Term Trends: Counties of Caroline, Cecil, Dorchester, Kent, Queen Anne’s, Somerset, Talbot, Wicomico, and Worcester.
Central Region Juvenile Services Long Term Trends: Counties of Baltimore, Carroll, Harford, and Howard DJS Office of Research and Evaluation, January 2017.
Immediate Sanction Probation Pilot Project Status Update
Southern Region Juvenile Services Long Term Trends: Counties of Anne Arundel, Calvert, Charles, and St. Mary’s DJS Office of Research and Evaluation, January.
Western Region Juvenile Services Long Term Trends: Counties of Allegany, Frederick, Garrett and Washington DJS Office of Research and Evaluation, January.
Prince George’s County Juvenile Services Long Term Trends
DRUG COURTS IN ILLINOIS
Presentation transcript:

Probation and Community Justice Program Overview May 18, 2017

Mandated Services These three functions are the mainstay of departmental operations and represent the largest part of the budget: Intake-Persons in Need of Supervision and Juvenile Delinquency Investigation- Family (predispositional) and Criminal Courts (preplea or presentence) Supervision-court ordered Orders and Conditions of Probation (Adjudicated youth in Family Court and adults in Criminal Court) Rules as to how these mandates are carried out are promulgated by OPCA 2016 Monthly Metrics: 617 Criminal Cases Supervised, 31 Family Court Cases Supervised, 75 Open Investigations, 105 Open PINS/JD Intake and SOS cases

Enhanced Supervision and Sentencing Options (ESSO) PreTrial Release Under Supervision (RUS) Program Facilitates release for incarcerated individuals who meet eligibility criteria. Ties to the community are evaluated via an inmate interview, collateral contacts and a validated Failure to Appear risk instrument. Recommendations for release can be ROR, RUS (to Probation, to Day Reporting or with Electronic Monitoring), Reduce Bail, Continue Bail 2016 Metrics: 175 Interviews Conducted, Average of 16 individuals a Month RUS

Greatest Risk Caseloads (formerly known as Intensive Supervision Probation ) Misdemeanor and Felony cases that score as Greatest Risk of Recidivism and Violent Recidivism on the validated Risk and Need Instrument Characteristics: lengthy legal history, history of noncompliance, past failed substance abuse treatment episodes, criminal thinking, few prosocial peers/supports, criminal associates/peers 2 Reduced Caseloads which require increased reporting and collateral contacts Department has operated reduced caseloads (ISP) since 1985-began for felony level offenses to deter from prison, then incorporated misdemeanors Metrics: 2 caseloads approx. 25-35 each

Drug Court (ICTC and FDC) Designed to break the cycle of addiction and criminal behavior for High and Greatest Risk offenders Provides judicial oversight, probation supervision, substance abuse/mental health treatment, employment/education services etc in a Team approach 3 phased program starting with the most intensive oversight and services on the front end followed by gradual reduction as advance through the program Graduated responses are integral to the program-swift, certain and fair 2016 Metrics: 2 Caseloads of 25-35 each, new admissions- FDC/46 and ICTC/34, Graduates-FDC/21 and ICTC/19

Service Work Alternative Program (SWAP) Supervised community service program commenced in1985-currently 24 work sites throughout the county Eligibility-non-violent probationer with no history of SO behavior Used as a graduated response at PSI and supervision stages and as an option for noncompliance in Drug Court Number of hours ordered to complete is commensurate with the level of conviction or by law for multiple DWI offender 2016 Metrics: 33 successful completions, approximately 35 participants on roster on a monthly basis with additional 11 per month via Drug Court sanctions. Overall program-3,506 hours performed.

Electronic Monitoring Program Electronic Transmitter bracelet with GPS tracking of movement Court Ordered participation-Pretrial stage to ensure defendant is remaining in the court jurisdiction and at the Supervision stage as a tool to enhance community based supervision Parameters can be set for Inclusion and Exclusion Zones in the community and time in/time out periods in the home setting 2016 Metrics: 18 adults in the program for average duration of 55 days, Daily cost=$7

Day Reporting Program Began in 2001 as a full day structured program offering education in substance abuse, healthy relationships, impact of crime, GED instruction and employment services In 2008, Program was shortened to present day1:30 pm ending Services provided by a combination of outside agencies (contractual and voluntary) and Probation staff Referral types: Pretrial Release, Condition of Probation sentence, Family Treatment Court, Drug Courts, Probation Officer and Parole Officer 2016 Metrics: 207 Referrals, 60% Successful Completion rate, 40 received GED services and 10 passed exam, 100 job placements, 117 received employment services

Questions?