Roger Lane EUROCONTROL Airport R&D Unit Safety Forum

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LO OPERATIONAL SCENARIO. Operational Scenario: Arriving Aircraft 1.Covering all movements at and around the runway including the adjacent taxiways 2.Covering.
Advertisements

Total Airport Management Systems
1 4th FAA - EUROCONTROL AP6 Technical Interchange Meeting (TIM -4) Ground-based Decision Support for Conflict Detection and Resolution.
Flight Crew Activities During a Typical Flight
B.5.3 WP? Aerodrome – Study Runway Status Lights Presented by: Bill Holtzman (USA) on behalf of TOC.
MIT Lincoln Laboratory RWSL OpEval PilotTraining, page 1 Aug 2006 MPK Pilot Training for Continued Operational Evaluation of Runway Status Lights (RWSL)
Best Practices for Taxi Operations at Towered & Non-Towered Airports
1 ICAO Runway Safety ICAO/ASPA Regional Seminar on Safety Management Systems (SMS) Mexico March 2006 Gustavo De León Technical Officer, ATM ICAO-Montreal.
Runway Incursion’s Affect on FAA Approved Pilot Training and Pilot and Flight Instructor Certification and Part 121 Pilot Checking – Andy Edwards – Manager.
Applications from packages I to III
Objective ATC 02.2 ESSIP Plan 2014 Ingrid FEIJT DPS/PEPR
Vincent Chu and Peter Hwoschinsky, FAA Maria Picardi Kuffner, MIT/LL
1 Arrival Scenario 1 November, Scenario Overview Sharing of Flight and Status data via AWIMSharing of Flight and Status data via AWIM –Parking.
Best Practices for Taxi Operations at Towered & Non-Towered Airports
Runway Incursion Avoidance
AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL Presented by S.SUMESWAR PATRO Regd no:
Brussels December 5,20021 New Technologies and Airport Management Presented by Cesare Bernabei Università di Piacenza & Politecnico di Milano January.
Preventing Runway Accidents
1 Runway Incursion Causal Analysis Section 3. 2 PILOTS and VEHICLE OPERATORS must taxi and maneuver their aircraft/vehicles on taxiways and runways in.
CRISTAL ATSAW Project Sep 2007 ASAS TN Christelle Pianetti, DSNA Simona Canu-Chiesa, Airbus.
Integrated Project of the Sixth Framework Programme, Priority 1.4: Aeronautics and Space, sponsored by EC, DG TREN Contract FP Internet:
Direction générale de l’Aviation civile centre d’Études de la navigation aérienne First ASAS thematic network workshop The user’s expectations and concerns.
KLM - Operations at Schiphol: how does ASAS fit? ASAS TN2: final seminar, April, Paris E. Kleiboer Sr. Manager Strategy ATM.
1 Airport mobiles surveillance and control by means of EGNOS METIS Workshop Benefits of EGNOS in Civil Aviation Istanbul 18 November 2009 Pierre GRUYER.
Slide 1 July 2004 – FALBALA/WP5/FOR4/D – CENA, DFS, EEC, NATS, Sofréavia & UoG Mark Watson & Richard Pugh ( NATS) CARE / ASAS Action FALBALA Project Dissemination.
1 Departure Scenario 1 November 14, Scenario Overview Entry of Flight Data into AWIM SystemEntry of Flight Data into AWIM System –Embry Riddle.
1 ATM SEARAST Safety Enhancements 8 – 9 January 2007.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration North Florida FSDO Runway Safety Program- Pilot Deviations Runway Incursions Instructor and Student.
Integrated Project of the Sixth Framework Programme, Priority 1.4: Aeronautics and Space, sponsored by EC, DG TREN Contract FP Internet:
Runway Incursion Causal Categories OPERATIONAL ERROR (OE) - A human error caused by a tower controller. There are over 8000 tower controllers in the U.S.
“ A location on an aerodrome movement area with a history or potential risk of collision or runway incursion, and where heightened attention by pilots/drivers.
The European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation Brian Flynn Directorate of Network Management Head Network Operations unit EUROCONTROL What.
SSAP The European Strategic Safety Action Plan (SSAP) The History & Rationale.
ASAS Crossing and Passing Applications in Radar Airspace (operational concept and operational procedure) Jean-Marc Loscos, Bernard Hasquenoph, Claude Chamayou.
1 TCRP report 62,2000, Improving public transportation access to large airports, Chapter 4-Examples of Successful Airport Access Systems around the World.
Page 1 July 28, 2003 Richmond Facility ATN 2003 IEE London Raytheon Integrated Data Link–RIDL
Second ATM R&D projects Co-ordination and networking meeting 14 Nov 2007 Advanced Remote Tower - ART A concept study of Enhanced functionalities during.
Aerodrome Operations under Limited Visibility Conditions
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
Working Together Preventing Runway Incursions (an integrated approach)
Capt. Mattias Pak VP Aviation Safety
ATM Conference Oslo 24 May 2016
Patuxent River Navy Flying Club Bi-Monthly Safety Briefing October 11, 2016 Dave Kirk PRNFC Safety Officer.
2017 Safety Forum Runway Incursion scenarios
(Mexico City, 22 to 25 October 2002)
Gustavo De León Technical Officer, ATM ICAO-Montreal
Estonian Air (IATA: OV, ICAO: ELL) was the flag carrier of Estonia, and it was founded 1. December 1991, and operations were ceased 8. November They.
Spring Safety Stand Down Day
DJ de Nysschen Wonderboom Air Traffic Control
Performance Based Navigation: Navigation Specifications
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
Milano-Linate Runway Incursion 8th October 2001
Runway Incursion JJ Johnson May 2011
Runway Safety Nets James Fee Manager | Runway Safety Group
AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE
Ground System implication for ASAS implementation
Oslo Airport Gardermoen
(Mexico City, 22 to 25 October 2002)
The air traffic controller’s perspective on runway incursion hazards and mitigation options Session 2 Presentation 1.
The pilot and airline operator’s perspective on runway incursion hazards and mitigation options Session 2 Presentation 2.
Protecting your landing against overruns
FAA and JPDO ASAS Activities
The air traffic controller’s perspective on runway incursion hazards and mitigation options Session 3 Presentation 3.
The pilot and airline operator’s perspective on runway incursion hazards and mitigation options Session 3 Presentation 1.
The pilot and airline operator’s perspective on runway incursion hazards and mitigation options Session 2 Presentation 2.
DATA PROCESSING TECHNIQUES FOR CONFLICT DETECTION ON AIRPORT SURFACE
Sybert Stroeve, Henk Blom, Marco van der Park
This project is Co-funded by
Air Traffic Control the Netherlands
Addison Airport (ADS) Runway Incursion Risk Areas
Presentation transcript:

New Airport Safety Nets for Controllers- from Concept to Implementation Roger Lane EUROCONTROL Airport R&D Unit Safety Forum Brussels June 2016

80% of Humans are caused by accidents ! Prevention 80% of Humans are caused by accidents !

Not all airports accidents are predictable !

Timeline for new Airport Safety Nets 2006 – 2009 EUROCONTROL Project (ITWP) developed the initial concept and performed 2 Real Time Simulations. Studied actual Airport Incidents and Controller tasks 2010 – 2016 SESAR continued the development of the concept in P06.07.01 and performed many V2 and V3 Validations, including in January the first live trial using real surveillance data and traffic at Riga Airport 2016 – 2017 The Safety Nets are also being integrated into the EUROCONTROL A-SMGCS Specification document that is being updated by the EUROCONTROL A-SMGCS Task Force. 2017 – 2020 The Airport Safety Nets and A-SMGCS Routing are now part of the European Implementation - Pilot Common Project (PCP) and 21 major European airports have been identified to implement them.

A-SMGCS RMCA (Previously named RIMS or Level 2) CATC (new) CMAC (new) Some Acronyms A-SMGCS RMCA (Previously named RIMS or Level 2) CATC (new) CMAC (new)

A-SMGCS Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control Systems RIGA Tower Electronic Flight Strips A-SMGCS Screen

Runway Monitoring and Conflict Alerting (RMCA) Alerts are triggered based only on the mobiles position – it has proved very hard to tune with no false alerts

Why do we need new safety nets? Not all airports have RMCA (ATCOs often work alone on their position) The ones with RMCA are still having incidents RMCA is triggered at the last moment Based only on surveillance LUXEMBOURG – 21/1/2010 B744 lands on Vehicle OSLO – 25/2/2010 AFL A320 Departs from TWY M

CATC – Conflicting ATC Clearances Covers the situation where a controller forgets they have given one clearance to a mobile and then try to give another clearance which could lead to an incident or worse accident.

Example of a CATC ZURICH AIRPORT 15 March 2011 two Airbus A320s nearly collide on take off It was found that both aircraft had been cleared for take off on, respectively, runway 16 and runway 28, by the same controller after he had forgotten about the first clearance he had issued.

Example of a CATC LOS ANGELES- 1 Feb 1991 – US Air B737 lands and hits a Metroliner because the Controller was distracted and forgot about the Metroliner that was already lined up on the same runway. 34 Dead

CONFLICTING ATC CLEARANCES (CATC) – An indicator (small Orange line) on the EFS and Radar Label menu shows that a LINE UP (or TOF) clearance should not be given to AFL2683 as an aircraft on 2.5 mile final has a LANDING clearance on the same runway

CONFLICTING ATC CLEARANCES (CATC) – If the ATCO inputs the clearance then there is an additional warning window asking him or her to confirm their intention. Cancelling closes the window.

CMAC (Conformance Monitoring Alerts for Controllers) Covers the situation where there is a non conformance to procedures or instructions. Examples are Flight Crew not doing what they have been instructed to, like lining up / taking off without a clearance, taxiing the wrong way or entering a closed runway or taxiway.

No Taxi clearance Alert

TWY CLOSED Alert

ROUTE DEVIATION Alert and RWSL

ROUTE DEVIATION Alarm

ROUTE DEVIATION False Alert

NO TAKE OFF Alarm

RUNWAY INCURSION (Vehicle with no clearance to ENTER)

Requirements for Future Safety Nets ? A-SMGCS Surveillance – RIGA validation confirmed the need for accuracy and reliability Airport Safety Nets - Current RMCA (+ New CMAC and CATC) Routing Service EFS (Electronic Flight Strips) Capable of inputting the necessary clearances (e.g. PUSH, TAXI, HOLD, LINE UP, Conditional Line Up, TAKE OFF. LAND, CROSS, ENTER) ATCO Training Timely input on the EFS essential to avoid false alerts

Summary 2006 – ITWP Project Launched 2007 – ITWP Workshop 2007 – ITWP RTS (CATC and CMAC) 2008 – ITWP Workshop 2008 – ITWP RTS (CATC and CMAC) 2009 – ITWP Functional and HMI Requirements 2009 – SESAR 1 Launched P06.07.01 2011 – ITWP+INATMIG Prototype V2- RTS (CATC ) 2012 – ITWP+INATMIG Prototype V2- RTS (CMAC ) 2016 – SESAR STEP 1 OSED SPR and INTEROP 2012 – DLR V3- RTS (CATC ) 2013/5/ – ITWP Integrated V2- RTS (CATC and CMAC +D-TAXI and AGL) 2015/6 – 4 x V3- Integrated RTS (CATC and CMAC ) 2016 – V3- LIVE and SHADOW MODE (CATC and CMAC with D-TAXi and AGL )

Prevention Safety is no Accident

Questions ?

- Frankfurt International - Dusseldorf International List of PCP Airports Dublin Airport - London Heathrow - London Gatwick London Stansted - Manchester Ringway - Amsterdam Schiphol - Frankfurt International - Munich Franz Josef Strauss Berlin Airport - Dusseldorf International - Madrid Barajas Barcelona El Prat - Palma de Mallorca - Zurich Kloten - Oslo Gardermoen - Stockholm Arlanda - Copenhagen Kastrup - Vienna Schwechat - Nice Cote d’Azur -- Paris Orly - Paris CDG