Navigating the Performance Review Process

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Performance Appraisals
Advertisements

(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
Performance Management
Manager Performance Evaluation
Performance Management Guide for Supervisors. Objectives  Understand necessity of reviews;  To define a rating standard across the Foundation for an.
UMW Administrative and Professional Faculty Performance Evaluation Process.
Performance Assessment Process: The Employee’s Perspective May 2014.
1 © 2006 by Smiths Group: Proprietary Data Smiths Group Online Performance Review Tool Training.
Tips for Employees on Preparing Self- Evaluations.
Performance Development Plan (PDP) Training
Annual Self Assessment Workshop for Employees
Performance Evaluation Process June 19th and June 26 th.
NON-UNIT EMPLOYEE EVALUATION PROCESS
Title IX Information Navigating your way through Title IX.
Performance Management Open Information Session Spring 2009.
Performance Management 2010  Performance Management Cycle  Organizational Success  Shared Responsibilities  Setting Goals and Expectations.
Performance Management Open Information Session for Individual Contributors.
Staff Performance Evaluation Process
SuccessFactors: Phase 2 Annual Review Process Presented by: Patricia Kelly / VeLonda Dantzler Human Resources Management.
Performance Excellence Update Colorado College In The Loop November 15, 2012.
WLUSA/OSSTF Annual Performance Review Process Human Resources & WLUSA| 2015.
TTI Performance Evaluation Training. Agenda F Brief Introduction of Performance Management Model F TTI Annual Performance Review Online Module.
1. Orientation to the Performance Planning, Feedback and Development (PPFD) Process for Confidential Staff
Module 3: RECAP – Conversation A summary of Results and Behaviors RECAP Canadian Manager Enhanced FY15 CMP…A One Sysco Approach AGREE.ACHIEVE.RECAP.
2015/16 Staff Performance Appraisals Webinar for ANR Supervisors Spring 2016.
Mid-Year Performance Review Process University System of New Hampshire System Office | 5 Chenell Drive, Suite 301, Concord, NH
HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Appraisal Training for Central Office and Campus-Based Non-Teacher Employees September 2013 HOUSTON INDEPENDENT.
NAM Talent Development & Performance Management Brought to you by your friendly Human Resources Team! Success Factors Performance Management System Training.
December 13,  Current policy  Required employees to complete Individual Development Plans (IDPs) for Milestone and Exemplary Merit increases.
District Validation Review (DVR) Nonpublic School Preparation Information Division of Special Education.
Performance Management 2016 Conducting Performance Evaluations Office of Human Resources.
Preparing and Delivering Effective Performance Reviews
The Performance and Staff Development Program
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROCESS
UCPEA Supervisor Performance Evaluation Training
UCPEA Supervisor Performance Evaluation Training
Performance Management
Butler University Goal and Performance System (GPS) Human Resources
Performance Management
Polices, procedures & protocols
TOPS TRAINING.
Hiring Manager onboarding
Performance Review Tool Updates College of Engineering
Performance Evaluation Process
The following training presentation is for all employees and is taken upon joining the company team. Quality Management System (QMS) Training Proprietary.
Performance Evaluation
Merit Increase Pay Guidelines
Salary Increases FY18 and
Kristan Williams Soave HR Dept
“Leadership Workshop Series” PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT & PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL April 20, Sep-18.
My UI Career Process improvement for more meaningful and
at Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi
Performance Management System
2016 File Maker pro training for Summer program hiring
End of Year Performance Review Meetings and objective setting for 2018/19 This briefing pack is designed to be used by line managers to brief their teams.
Online Performance Evaluation Tool
Indian Policies and Procedures (IPPs) OASIS December 7, 2017
Performance Review for County Educators
Employee Performance Management System
Performance Review for County Educators
Employee Performance Management System (EPMS)
2018 SMU Staff Performance Review Training
Professional Review Panel
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Loyola’s Performance Management Process For Employees
Kristan Williams Soave HR Dept
Performance Management End-of-Year Review
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Special Education District Validation Review (DVR) Team Member Training and School Preparation Information
Dean of Engagement Evaluation
Presentation transcript:

Navigating the Performance Review Process August 22, 2016 Danielle Haslett, MOD, PHR

What We’ll Discuss Today The performance review process from start to finish Supervisor and employee responsibilities Writing self-evaluations and effective goals Understanding merit increases Having a productive review meeting Getting your past due review completed Q&A with the Panel

The Performance Review Process At a Glance Records Office Distributes salary review addendums to department Department Administrator Sends salary review addendums to supervisors Supervisor Completes performanc e evaluation & meets with employee Sends completed evaluation form to Department Administrator Reviews/approves salary & performance review forms; Sends to SOM HR SOM HR Reviews/approves salary & performance review forms; Sends to Records Office Processes performance and salary review forms

The Performance Review Process The Basics Staff evaluations are conducted annually based on date of hire Performance evaluation forms are located on the Human Resources/Employee Relations website under the tab Performance Planning and Evaluation http://www.case.edu/finadmin/humres/erelations/perfguide.html Non-exempt employees – Secretarial/Clerical, Research Assistant I, Technicians, Maintenance and Service Staff Evaluation Exempt employees who have direct supervisory responsibilities – Managers and Supervisors Evaluation Exempt employees who do not supervise others – Professional Staff Evaluation Please note: The MS Word version is preferred for comments.  If the pdf version is used and you must toggle to read the entire comment, the entire comment will not be printed and therefore submitted into the employee's file. Merit increases are determined by overall level of performance, SOM annual guidelines and the department’s/grant’s budget

SOM Merit Increase Guidelines 2016 – 2017 (Effective dates July 1, 2016 through June 1, 2017) Performance Level Merit Increase Vacation Raise Significantly Above Standards up to 3% up to 7 days Well Above Standards up to 2% up to 5 days Meets Standards up to 1.5% up to 4 days Below Standards 0% 0 days Significantly Below Standards

Conducting the Performance Review At the review meeting: Supervisor reviews the evaluation form with employee (in person) Supervisor and employee discuss performance and establish goals Supervisor and employee sign the review If an employee disagrees with statement(s) in the review, an employee may submit a rebuttal to be filed with the review. Employees may also schedule a meeting with SOM HR Manager or Employee Relations. Evaluations must be submitted prior to payroll cutoff for merit increases to be included in the next pay If a review is past due, the next pay will include back pay to the effective date of the salary review addendum (Section IV of the evaluation form)

Supervisor Responsibilities Before the Review Meeting Monitoring when reviews are due Scheduling review meetings Obtaining review forms from the HR website Reviewing SOM merit increase guidelines Obtaining budget approval for requested merit increase Completing the review form and identifying next year’s goals Determining overall level of performance Average of the ratings throughout the review Not strong = 1 Very Strong = 5 Well below standards = 1 Consistently and significantly above standards = 5 Supervisors should notify the employee of the upcoming review and a date should be decided upon by both the supervisor and employee.

Supervisor Responsibilities During and After the Review Meeting Discussing performance with employee – strengths and areas of improvement Engaging in a constructive and honest discussion with employee and answering questions regarding past performance and future performance expectations Considering employee feedback and suggested goals Informing employee of the recommended merit increase Sending the review document to the Department Administrator or SOM HR prior to the effective date of the review Supervisors who have concerns discussing performance issues with an employee may contact SOM Human Resources (Danielle Haslett – 368-2334 or danielle.haslett@case.edu) or Employee Relations

Employee Responsibilities Know when your review is due Be aware of your goals and be ready to discuss your progress What is the status of each goal? Did you meet or exceed expectations of the goal? Review the evaluation form to be ready to discuss performance Examples of how you met or exceeded expectations Know what areas of your performance you need improvement A self-evaluation or a summary of accomplishments may be prepared and sent to your supervisor prior to the review meeting

How to Write a Self-Evaluation Identify work performed, strengths and achievements Identify obstacles – Internal and External Are alternative strategies to achieving your goals needed? What to submit? Prepare a summary of your work, accomplishments, etc. Complete the review form as a self-evaluation

How to Write Goals Goals should align with business/research plans, job responsibilities and performance expectations Goals should be SMART! Specific Measurable Attainable Relevant Timely

Writing Goals: Example 1 Expectation: Complete experiments to support the current research studies within the lab. Goal #1: Perform at least one experiment to support the research project per week; this includes collecting relevant data, analyzing data and presenting data to the lab team. Goal #2: Prepare analysis of research data. Goal #3: Prepare data and a summary of the analysis for the project by July 31st. Are these goals SMART? Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Relevant, Timely

Writing Goals: Example 2 Expectation: Develop and maintain the office’s standard operating procedures (SOP’s). Goal #1: Write SOP’s for the administrative operations within the office. Goal #2: Develop an internal training program to cross-train all office staff on SOP’s. Submit for approval by August 1st for October 1st roll-out. Goal #3: Update SOP’s as needed. Are these goals SMART? Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Relevant, Timely

Recommending Goals Goals can and should be recommended by both supervisor and employee Your supervisor may have already included goals within your evaluation – this does not mean you should not recommend goals! Goals should be related to: performance expectations business/research plans professional development

Examples of Questions to Ask During the Review Meeting How does my performance compare to your expectations? What do I need to do, specifically, in order to meet or exceed your expectations? I am interested in career growth, are there opportunities to take on new responsibilities to help my growth? I’ve had trouble with X, do you have suggestions on how I can improve my approach/technique or for a different approach? I felt that I made an improvement in this area, can you explain how I did not meet/exceed the expectations so that I can work on this for next year?

What If Your Review is Past Due? Talk to your supervisor – Remind them of your review date Submit a self evaluation to your supervisor to start the process Talk to your department administrator Contact School of Medicine Human Resources office Call 216-368-2334 E-mail: SOM-humanresources@case.edu

Obtaining Past Reviews Employees and supervisors may request copies of past reviews Who to contact? Department administrator HR Records Office (hrrecords@case.edu) School of Medicine Human Resources (SOM-humanresources@case.edu)

Ask the Panel Robin Bissell (Office of Grants and Contracts) Jean Holbert (Animal Resource Center) Corrie Zimerla (Pathology) Carolyn Washick (University Employee Relations)

Thank you! For questions regarding the performance review process, contact SOM Human Resources (Danielle Haslett) 368-2334 danielle.haslett@case.edu SOM-humanresources@case.edu