Reflections on applying for TDAP and institutional designation Haymo Thiel Principal.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Foundation Trust Status for UHL Foundation Trust Project Director.
Advertisements

Auditing, Assurance and Governance in Local Government
Higher Education Review January Higher Education Review – What is it? External Review of how effectively Kent manages: Academic Standards Quality.
Corporate Services Grants Programme 2015 – 2017 Stephen Morgan Head of Community Engagement
Accreditation and its relationship to quality assurance Sarah Butler Assistant Director, Development and Enhancement Group Quality Assurance Agency for.
The Periodic Review Report at the Community College: Opportunities for Collaborative Institutional Renewal Valarie Avalone, Director of Planning Dr. Michael.
External Examiners Preview Demonstrations Academic Services & Student Systems Presented by Daniel Chandler, Project Officer, Academic Services & Matthew.
International Federation of Accountants International Education Standards for Professional Accountants Mark Allison, Executive Director Institute of Chartered.
UNIVERSITY OF BALLARAT RISK MANAGEMENT OVERVIEW OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF POLICIES AND PROCEDURES John Gavens Managing Principal.
Manager Orientation Budgeting & Forecasting. 2 UFundamentals Today’s Agenda New Budget Model Principles Overview of budgeting and forecasting Timelines.
SBOE Idaho Incubation Fund Workshop Office of Technology Transfer.
Westminster City Council and Westminster Primary Care Trust Voluntary Sector Funding 2009/10 Voluntary Sector Funding Eligibility, Application Form Funding,
Corporate Services Grants Programme 2013 – August 2012.
HND Social Services Sector Briefing Session 23rd March 2007.
The Issues of Budgetary Reform Unit 3. PFM Reform – Change Management Module 3.2. Preparing and managing a reform programme.
The REF assessment framework and guidance on submissions Linda Tiller, HEFCW 16 September 2011.
Audit Advisory Committee Public health transition update 22 January 2013.
QAA Summative Review Staff Briefing Leeds College of Art 8 September 2010.
On-line briefing for Program Directors and Staff 1.
 M EETING A GENDA ◦ Introductions ◦ Review of Section , Florida Statutes ◦ Summary of Activities to Date ◦ Review of First DRAFT ◦ Unresolved Issues.
Overview of Thesis Submission and Examination Helen Buckley, Research Student Administrator, Graduate Studies Office (GSO).
Overview of Thesis Submission and Examination Helen Buckley, Research Student Administrator, Graduate Studies Office (GSO).
HEQC NATIONAL REVIEW OF ACADEMIC & PROFESSIONAL PROGRAMMES IN EDUCATION INSTITUTIONAL PREPAREDNESS WORKSHOP 24 & 26 April 2006.
Southend Together Secretariat 21 st February Developing Southend Together’s Sustainable Community Strategy
Outsourcing Due Diligence Through Robust Accreditation.
[Hayes, Dassen, Schilder and Wallage, Principles of Auditing An Introduction to ISAs, edition 2.1] © Pearson Education Limited 2007 Slide 5.1 Client Acceptance.
1 International Education Standards for Professional Accountants Mark Allison, Executive Director Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland and Technical.
February, MansourahProf. Nadia Badrawi Implementation of National Academic Reference Standards Prof. Nadia Badrawi Senior Member and former chairperson.
December Why Program-for-Results (PforR)? Development Effectiveness and Client Demand – PforR responds to client demand that could not be fully.
Preparing to Apply for Taught Degree Awarding Powers: Quality Assurance and Enhancement Dr Nick Holland – Academic Registrar Conservatoire for Dance and.
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
North Carolina Council on Developmental Disabilities
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
Audit of predetermined objectives
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
Towards REF 2020 What we know and think we know about the next Research Excellence Framework Dr. Tim Brooks, Research Policy & REF Manager, RDCS Anglia.
School Community Council Roles and Responsibilities
Risk Management and the role of the Audit Committee
14th CAS meeting Performance reporting Presentation by SAI-SA
Webinar on the Exposure Draft of CAS Continuing Education Policy
Fair Go Rates System Dr Ron Ben-David Chairperson
Thursday 2nd of February 2017 College Development Network
Quality Assurance and Enhancement at The University of Edinburgh
REPARIS Workshop Vienna
Accreditation 2016 Session 1.
Public Health England – Our progress under the Sendai Framework
ACCJC 18-Month Follow-up Report
Standards and Assessment
The role of the Passport Indicators in Monitoring PFM Strategy
Roles and Responsibilities of an External Examiner
North Carolina Council on Developmental Disabilities
Accreditation and its relationship to quality assurance
Athena SWAN Getting Started and the Departmental Application Process
Fair Go Rates System Dr Ron Ben-David Chairperson
WHAT TO EXPECT: A CROWN CORPORATION’S GUIDE TO A SPECIAL EXAMINATION
Safety Management System Implementation
External Examiners’ Workshop
Taught Degree Awarding Powers and the British School of Osteopathy
Assessment of Quality in Statistics GLOBAL ASSESSMENTS, PEER REVIEWS AND SECTOR REVIEWS IN THE ENLARGEMENT AND ENP COUNTRIES Mirela Kadic, Project Manager.
North Carolina Council on Developmental Disabilities
Academic Program Review Comprehensive Report
HLC TEAMS Work Plan Expectations Important Dates
Taught Postgraduate Program Review
Tax & Payments to Governments
Understanding Impact Stephanie Seavers, Impact Manager.
System Safety Regulation
GC University Lahore Quality Enhancement Cell
Audit.
Budgeting Conversation
HMPPS Innovation Grant Programme (2020 – 2022)
Presentation transcript:

Reflections on applying for TDAP and institutional designation Haymo Thiel Principal

TDAP Started process in autumn 2012 – Engaged a consultant Series of meetings with staff and students Reported to Board on potential to succeed Visited QAA in February 2013 – Give notice of intent to apply Compiled CSA Report – Submitted to QAA in March 2014

CSA Comprehensive BIS Guidance (2004) – Process – Criteria informed structure of the CSA Superseded by BIS Guidance 2015 Produced a 78 page document – Descriptive – Critical/reflective – Keyed in supporting evidence Hyperlinks (450)

CSA Introduction to application – Institution, reasons for making application Governance and academic management – Board, management structures, financial sustainability, risk management Academic standards and quality – Regulatory framework Student experience – Resources, student support and progression Academic staff – Qualifications, scholarship and research Summary of the case

CSA Appendices – Student data – Institutional structures and committees – Preliminary preparations for TDAP Replacement costs – Mapping document – Letters of support

Submission Supporting evidence to CSA text – Web – Institution’s portal – Designed the portal and keyed in at the end CSA including appendices Access to portal Electronic submission to QAA

Reflections One person to write the CSA with a good knowledge of the institution – Ownership – Planning/structure – Gather evidence but only works as one ‘story’ – Institutional not programmes – Focus is on standards, quality and regulation/assurance Review against the QAA Quality Code We made use of QAA Institutional Review in 2012 Time and space – month project Drafts – Keep to a minimum

For the institution Lots of communication to staff and students – What is TDAP and why – Progress along the way Sense of the institution moving forward and achievement Exciting and historic

Scrutiny period October 2014 to July 2015 Meetings based on academic calendar Timetable – Mid-point meeting – Board of Governors, Management and Academic Committees, Periodic Review, Assessment Boards – End- more detail on preparations for TDAP implementation

Final stages Draft scrutiny report – September 2015 Report to ACDAP – November 2015 Half day visit of the ACDAP Panel – January 2016 ACDAP recommendation to QAA Board – March 2016 QAA advice to BIS via HEFCE – April 2016 Award made by Privy Council………

Institutional designation Began in September 2014 – Same time as scrutiny for TDAP began Very little guidance – Superseded by BIS Guidance 2015 HEFCE with focus on financial sustainability, data reporting, corporate governance and risk management – HEFCE Memorandum of Assurance and Accountability

Institutional designation Finance department and Governors – Relatively little input from academics Training for governors Set up an internal audit committee and implement systematic risk management procedures Appoint internal auditors Develop a student record system Develop reporting systems (HESA) Develop an estates strategy Develop an Access Agreement

Institutional designation Met with HEFCE in February 2015 Submitted application to HEFCE in April 2015 Application 45 page document with extensive appendices – No supporting evidence – 6 month project

Institutional designation Visits from HEFCE over summer 2015 Report of team to HEFCE Board – September 2015 Letter from SoS (BIS) – January 2016 Order of Designation laid – Into force March 2016

Reflections Much shorter process than TDAP – Designated before TDAP Had less of a collegiate feel TDAP application made ID application much easier HEFCE review team over summer 2015 – Quiet period – Respond quickly – Fewer people involved

Benefits Matured as an HEI and part of the sector – Change in outlook, accessibility to grants and potential for investment – Cultural change for the whole institution Look at our systems and processes – Change and improve Remained on good terms with our validating partner – In process of separation and transition arrangements for students Mixed economy model Feeling of progress and moving forward – Looking beyond TDAP and designation (and name change) We intend to admit students on our own degrees with direct HEFCE funding from September 2017 – 5 years!