WORKSHOP ON PROJECT CYCLE MANAGEMENT (PCM) Bruxelles 22 – 24 May 2013 Workshop supported by TAIEX.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Il Project Cycle Management :A Technical Guide The Logical Framework Approach 1 1.
Advertisements

Effectively applying ISO9001:2000 clauses 6 and 7.
The Aged Care Standards and Accreditation Agency Ltd Continuous Improvement in Residential Aged Care.
In Europe, When you ask the VET stakeholders : What does Quality Assurance mean for VET system? You can get the following answer: Quality is not an absolute.
Results-Based Management: Logical Framework Approach
R. MUNYARADZI FOURTH AFCOP ANNUAL MEETING MAY 2011 – NAIROBI, KENYA HOW CAN WE OVERCOME CHALLENGES IN PLANNING FOR OUTCOMES?
SEM Planning Model.
Action Logic Modelling Logic Models communicate a vision for an intervention as a solution to a public health nutrition (PHN) problem to:  funding agencies,
Project Cycle Management (PCM)
Results-Based Management: Logical Framework Approach
ACTION PLANNING FOR POST- QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEWS*
Effectively applying ISO9001:2000 clauses 5 and 8
CASE STUDIES IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Project Human Resource Management
P. Brian Fisher POLS 319 Spr 2013 APPLIED SUSTAINABILITY CLASS 9: PROJECT LOGIC & STRATEGY.
Developing the Logical Frame Work …………….
May 12 th Monitoring and Project Control. Objectives Anticipated Outcomes Express why Monitoring and Controlling are Important. Differentiate between.
Outcomes of the 16 th Regional Disaster Managers Meeting held from 9 th – 11 th August 2010 Presentation to the Pacific Humanitarian Team Monday 6 th December.
Fundamentals of Evaluation for Public Health Programs ROBERT FOLEY, M.ED. NIHB TRIBAL PUBLIC HEALTH SUMMIT MARCH 31,
Certificate IV in Project Management Introduction to Project Management Course Number Qualification Code BSB41507.
Michalis Adamantiadis Transport Policy Adviser, SSATP SSATP Capacity Development Strategy Annual Meeting, December 2012.
Workshop on Implementing Audit Quality Practices March 2006 Building Quality into the Financial Audit Process The NAO’s experience Gareth Caller.
IPA Funds Programme Management sept Bölgesel Rekabet Edebilirlik Operasyonel Programı’nın Uygulanması için Kurumsal Kapasitenin Oluşturulmasına.
Developing Indicators
KEYWORDS REFRESHMENT. Activities: in the context of the Logframe Matrix, these are the actions (tasks) that have to be taken to produce results Analysis.
Unite and Deliver An update Francesco Galtieri UN Development Operations Coordination Office (DOCO), New York JPO Workshop, Maputo, May 2009.
An introduction to the Logical Framework Approach (LFA) Identi- fication Development Formulation and appraisal ApprovalInception Implemen- tation Closure.
1 Analysing the contributions of fellowships to industrial development November 2010 Johannes Dobinger, UNIDO Evaluation Group.
Project Life Cycle – Project Initiation © Ed Green Penn State University All Rights Reserved.
Monitoring and Evaluation of GeSCI’s Activities GeSCI Team Meeting 5-6 Dec 2007.
Regional Training/Consultations on Capacity Development for Sustainable Growth and Human Development in Europe and CIS Application of Capacity Development.
UK Aid Direct Introduction to Logframes (only required at proposal stage)
Mapping the logic behind your programming Primary Prevention Institute
Monitoring and Evaluating in the PHEA Educational Technology Initiative Patrick Spaven.
Information System Project Management Lecture three Chapter one
Preparing proposals for funding RIMC Research Capacity Enhancement Workshops Series : “Achieving Research Impact”
Project Management Learning Program 23 Mar – 3 Aprl 2009, Mekong Institute, Khon Kaen, Thailand Managing for Development Results Results-Oriented Monitoring.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
Strategies for making evaluations more influential in supporting program management and informing decision-making Australasian Evaluation Society 2011.
DEVELOPING THE WORK PLAN
Managing programs that promote personal effectiveness.
ROOTS 1+2 Advocacy toolkit
WEAP Workshop Work Plans/Progress Reports Geoff O’Brien.
Developing Monitoring & Evaluation Frameworks: Process or Product? Anne Markiewicz.
The Logical Framework (Log Frame). Programs & Projects Programs Broad areas of work required to implement policy decisions. Usually focused on a sector.
Session 2: Developing a Comprehensive M&E Work Plan.
S3.1 session day 5 2 Programme management download resources from Approved by the Advisory Group: Programme management Programme and project.
Logical Framework Approach An Evaluation Toolbox Presentation
Developing a Program Logic. What is a Program Logic? A program logic is like a roadmap for a project that sets out how a project will achieve its desired.
1 Home Care Support Outcome Based Specification Workshop 26 th November 2009.
EUROPEAN NEIGHBOURHOOD AND PARTNERSHIP INSTRUMENT - ENPI CROSS-BORDER COOPERATION PROGRAMMES.
© PeopleAdvantage 2013 All Rights Reserved We will Show You How to Easily Conduct Effective Performance Appraisals LCSA Conference 2013.
true potential An Introduction to the Middle Manager Programme’s CMI Qualifications.
Folie 1 Sarajevo, October 2009 Stefan Friedrichs Managing Partner Public One // Governance Consulting Project Management in the Public Sector Monitoring.
Developing a Monitoring & Evaluation Plan MEASURE Evaluation.
Marelize Gorgens The World Bank An M&E strategy Monitoring & Evaluation strategy Master & Execute Money and Energy is a waste of M&E that we do not M&E.
Project Cycle Management
Auditing Sustainable Development Goals
The Logical Framework Approach
Investment Logic Mapping – An Evaluative Tool with Zing
Day 2 The LogFrame.
Asset Governance – Integrated Strategic Asset Management
Session 9 Recap on LFM and IL.
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
CATHCA National Conference 2018
Session 4: Project Management in Humanitarian Context
Integrating Gender into Rural Development M&E in Projects and Programs
How is an M & E framework derived from the logframe?
CEng progression through the IOM3
Presentation transcript:

WORKSHOP ON PROJECT CYCLE MANAGEMENT (PCM) Bruxelles 22 – 24 May 2013 Workshop supported by TAIEX

What is a Project?  A project is any set of inter-related activities established to achieve specific results which together achieve the project purpose - all within specified time and budgetary constraints.  Inputs-activities-results-outcomes (purpose & overall objective)

Session Focus Logical Frameworks Setting Objectives and Indicators

K.I.S.S.  The Lord ’ s Prayer 54 words  10 Commandments 297 words  American Declaration of Independence 300 words  EU Directive for exporting Duck Eggs words

LOGICAL FRAMEWORKS  Hierarchy of Objectives  Assumptions  Objectively Verifiable Indicators  Means of Verification                

The logframe approach – process and product Stakeholder analysis – identify who has an interest and who needs to be involved Objectives analysis – identify solutions Problem analysis – identify key problems, causes and opportunities; determine causes and effects Activity scheduling – set a workplan and assigning responsibility Resourcing – determine human and material inputs Developing the logframe – define project structure, logic, risk and performance management Options analysis – identify and apply criteria to agree strategy                

THERE HERE 7. What do we need to get there? What detailed activities and resources are needed? 6. How will we know if we’ve got there? How will we monitor and evaluate? 5. What may stop us getting there? And what can we do to get around these obstacles? 4. What needs to be put in place? And how will we do that? 3. Where do we want to be? 2. Where are we now? What are the problems? What are the possibilities? 1. Who are ‘we’? Who has an interest? Who should be involved? Project Planning: The 7 Key Questions

Overall Objective Purpose Results Activities Parties’ Interests

Level of Interest  Improved level of services  Legislation complies with Acquis  Departmental Unit established  Knowledge and skills of key staff upgraded  Study tour to EU member state

Objectives – what you want. Organised in a hierarchy by asking either: “What will that get me?” or “How will I get that?”

Greater WHY WHY WHAT HOW The Hierarchy Overall Objective HOW Purpose Results Activities WHAT

OVERALL OBJECTIVE PURPOSE RESULTS ACTIVITIES If The Logic of the Framework Deliver Achieve Contribute Then

If … Then relationship So what is a hypothesis? A prediction about a cause and effect relationship involving uncertainty If I get a bus at 7.00 am Then I will get to the workshop on time

Hierarchy of Objectives/Project Structure Overall Objective Project Purpose Results Activities Inputs High level programme objective to which the project contributes The sustainable change we are trying to achieve and that will continue once the project is over usually with an identified institution. What needs to be put in place for change to occur: what we can deliver. Activities executed by the project to produce the results. Physical and non-physical resources necessary to undertake activities. Plan Down Implement up Outside our control Within our control

Sort into a chain of If…Then  Development of domestic “legislation” related to the acquis.  Certification for Departmental services.  Improvement in provision of services.  Ensure appropriate capacity of department staff for “legislative” work.

Key Questions  What long term change (impact) are we contributing to?  What immediate change (outcomes) do we want?  What things do we need to put in place to get that change?  What kinds of actions must we take to get those things?

Output Categories  Human Capacity  Systems  Knowledge, Information, Policy  Infrastructure  Materials, Documents, Website  Awareness, Engagement

Outcomes Results Activities Inputs Impact Financial human and material resources Actions undertaken to transform inputs into outputs ‘Expect to see’ The end products or deliverables of the activities; within team control ‘Want to see’ Immediate effects on clients ‘Hope to see’ Long-term improvements in society Implementation Results The results chain

Exercise 1 - Objectives Take a look at the project fiche you have and, using the “if, then” approach review the relationship of;  Activities to results  Results to purpose  Purpose to objective Now answer the following questions:  Are they sufficient to achieve the Results; Purpose; Objective?  If not, what would you change/add? Work in groups, then feedback to plenary

A Project as a Journey If you were taking a bus journey how would you know you had arrived at your destination?

Indicators / Targets  Tell us how we will recognise success  Force us to clarify what we mean by our objectives  Provide a basis for Monitoring, Review and Evaluation

What do you think about this? Overall Objective: “To strengthen institutional capacity in the area of road transport.” Indicator: 1. Department of Road Transport will be a better functioning organisation. 2. Department of Road Transport will have a clear strategic vision of its future work.

And this? Sub Objective: “Systematise Department of Road Transport functions.” Indicator: “the Department will have a document listing all of its current functions, an organisational chart, work flows, critical posts/functions, and job descriptions”

And this? Output: “Presentation of the Policy Advice Paper.” Indicators: 1. Awareness raised. 2. Knowledge transferred.

Exercise 2 - Indicators In groups of 4 - Take a look at the Fiche you have and try to identify likely Indicators at  Sub-objective level Then look at one of the Sub Objectives and try to identify likely Indicators at - Activity level against the Outputs given