MOCK ACTION RESEARCH PROPOSAL PRESENTATION Beverly Houston-Stoute Week 5 Discussion 1 ASHFORD UNIVERSITY EDU 671 Dr. Ansoff.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview of the action research process
Advertisements

FINDING OUT WHAT PEOPLE THINK “Quizzing the community.” Data Gathering techniques including Interviews, Surveys & Questionnaires
CONSUMER RESEARCH Chapter 2.
Spelling and Writing By: Andrea De Los Santos. Introduction There are many ways to teach spelling; however, there are only a few methods that work on.
Chapter Four. Writing the Proposal  What does the intended reader/audience need to understand better about the topic?  What does the audience know little.
Chapter 3 Preparing and Evaluating a Research Plan Gay and Airasian
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
CS Spring 5/3/ Presenter : Yubin Li Professor : Dr. Bamshad Mobasher Week 6: Descriptive Research.
Chapter 1 Assessment in Elementary and Secondary Classrooms
Principles of Assessment
Development of Evaluation Instruments based on ICT Skills Standards for Teachers (ISST) 7th May, 2014.
Professional Portfolios
Adapted from Growing Success (Ontario Schools) by K. Gibson
Thinking about assessment…
Effects of an integrated education program in the holistic community health management on outcome measures among students enrolled in Certificate of Public.
Developing a Pedagogical Model for Evaluating Learning Objects Dr. Robin Kay and Dr. Liesel Knaack University of Ontario Institute of Technology Oshawa,
Does the use of math journals improve students retention and recall of math facts and formulas?
1 How can self-regulated learning be supported in mathematical E-learning environments? Presenters: Wei-Chih Hsu Professor : Ming-Puu Chen Date : 11/10/2008.
Presenter-Dr. L.Karthiyayini Moderator- Dr. Abhishek Raut
Critical Thinking and Knowledge of Subject Matter
Classroom Assessments Checklists, Rating Scales, and Rubrics
Interventions ARC Chairperson Training Special Education Regulation 1997 Special Education Regulations …providing incentives for whole-school.
Evaluating a Research Report
PROPONENTS: Isabelita R. Hizon, Ed. D. Susan O. Habacon INQUIRY-BASED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING PROGRAM (ICLP) FOR MANAGING LARGE CLASSES AND ITS EFFECT ON.
Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 4: Reflecting and Adjusting December 2013.
Follow-Up: Objectives, Reflections, Readings Nov. 20.
Cooperative Learning Statistical Significance and Effect Size By: Jake Eichten and Shorena Dolaberidze.
Standard 1: Teachers demonstrate leadership s. Element a: Teachers lead in their classrooms. What does Globally Competitive mean in your classroom? How.
Implementing Effective Assessment Adapted from a lecture given by Damian Cooper (in Dufferin-Peel 2011)
Paper III Qualitative research methodology. Objective 1.4 Discuss ethical considerations in qualitative research.
A High School Mathematics Action Research Project: What is standards-based grading and how can it benefit our students? Renee Cholkar Mathematics Lead.
Writing Workshop with ELLs in mainstream first grade classes An Effective pedagogical practice for Few Good teachers? A Qualitative Study Jayne Sherman.
Helmingham Community Primary School Assessment Information Evening 10 February 2016.
GENERAL METHODS AND TECHNIQUES OF TEACHING
Welcome! Seminar – Monday 6:00 EST HS Seminar Unit 1 Prof. Jocelyn Ramos.
ASSESSMENT and EVALUATION (seeing through the jargon and figuring out how to use the tools)
What strategies can be shared throughout our school to improve student achievement? 1 With other teachers at my school, I can plan to implement strategies.
Mock Action Research Proposal Presentation Nena Williams Ashford University May 14, 2015.
Technology Help or Hinderance? DOMINIQUE JOHNSON EDU671: FUNDAMENTALS OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH INSTRUCTOR: FREDERICK ANSOFF 2 JUNE 2014.
Reading Literacy. The purpose of my study will be to describe why young children need to focus on reading in kindergarten and how to improve reaching.
Mock Action Research Proposal Presentation Tara S. Burch EDU671: Fundamentals of Educational Research Professor Kathy Hoover September 3, 2015.
Educational Psychology Jeanne Ormrod Eighth Edition © 2014, 2011, 2008, 2006, 2003 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Developing Learners.
Action Plan Amanda Foster aaa. Area of focus Variables:
Mock Action Research Proposal Presentation Kimberly Jose EDU 671 Instructor Tony Valley.
Students Learning Effectively through Creative Resource Classes and Creativity in the Classroom Ashanti Banks Ashford University Professor Miller EDU.
Mock Action Research Presentation Marie Baker EDU 671 Fundamentals of Educational Research Instructor: Kathy Hoover October 15, 2015.
Mock Action Research Proposal Presentation EDU 671 Fundamentals Of Educational Research By Valerie L. Brown.
Action Research Proposal: Improving Confidence in the Workplace Rebecca Jackson EDU 671: Fundamentals of Educational Research Dr. Miller January 21, 2016.
Mock Action Research Proposal Presentation Sharelius Holmes Dr. Miller EDU 671: Fundamental of Educational Research March 3, 2016.
EDU671: Fundamentals of Educational Research (MRD1414A) Ashford University Instructor: Dr. Kathleen Lunsford May 11th, 2014.
The impact of intervention groups on first grade reading benchmark scores Megan Romer EDU: 671 Fundamentals of Educational Research Dr. Shelia Thomas October.
Focus Questions What is assessment?
TEACHING INFANTS PRIMARY COLORS BY: ASHLEY S. HUSER EDU 671:FUNDAMENTALS OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH INSTRUCTOR NEWTON MILLER JANUARY 20, 2016.
MOCK RESEARCH PROPOSAL Sharon Gray Ashford University EDU671.
AN OUTLINE FOR AN ACTION RESEARCH REPORT By Andrea Schwalm.
Shauntel Dorsey EDU 671: Fundamentals of Educational Research Dr. Miller Shauntel Dorsey EDU 671: Fundamentals of Educational Research Dr. Miller.
Hey my name is Tony Burroughs and this my official action research proposal.
Derryn Beasley EDU 671: Fundamentals of Education Research Instructor: Frederick Ansoff May 22 nd, 2014.
HOW TO DEVELOPE BETTER LISTENING SKILLS Lorie Terry EDU 671 Dr. Goss July 20, 2016.
Chapter 1 Assessment in Elementary and Secondary Classrooms
Research and Evaluation
What is MAP? There by, bringing about differentiated testing.
Integrating Google Classroom to Teach Writing in Taiwan
What is MAP? You may be familiar with paper and pencil assessments where all your child is asked the same questions and spend a fixed amount of time taking.
Teaching and Educational Psychology
Introduction and Literature Review
GENERAL METHODS AND TECHNIQUES OF TEACHING
Background on Provincial Report Cards
Implementing the Routines
PSSC Parent Information Evening
Presentation transcript:

MOCK ACTION RESEARCH PROPOSAL PRESENTATION Beverly Houston-Stoute Week 5 Discussion 1 ASHFORD UNIVERSITY EDU 671 Dr. Ansoff

THE PURPOSE OF MY STUDY IS TO MEASURE DIFFERENCES IN TEST SCORES BETWEEN COMPUTER VERSUS ON PAPER. TO UTILIZE THE RECORDED DATA TO MODIFY MY TEACHING METHODS THAT WILL PROMOTE STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT WHEN TAKING STANDARDIZE TEST BY BOTH OPTIONS. AREA OF CONCERN Versus

ACTION RESEARCH PROPOSAL HOW CAN I ADAPT MY TEACHING METHODS TO PROMOTE STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT WHEN TAKING STANDARDIZED TESTING ON THE COMPUTER OR PAPER?

MY CLASS CONSISTS OF MULTIRACIAL 1 ST GRADE STUDENTS, AGES 5-6 AND VARYING INCOME LEVELS. NONE WITH ANY KNOWN SPECIAL NEEDS. Class Description/Independent Variables Dependent Variables Identical computer and paper test Varied computer and paper test

STUDENTS CAN VERBALIZE NUMBER CARDINALITY BUT WHEN TESTED ON PAPER OR COMPUTER SCORES DECLINE STUDENTS ARE NOT PERFORMING TO THEIR ABILITY ON STANDARDIZED TEST TEACHING METHODOLOGY The Problem

“ ” ETHICAL ISSUES Ethical issues that may arise out of my research could be my failing to receive parental consent, a parents concern for their childs’ data being used in an unethical manner, inconsistent data recording, and/or my inability to read and analysis the data I receive correctly.

LITERATURE REVIEW Most literature on the subject of differences in student performance on computer and paper test show no significant difference in the methods. Dependent variables, that were mentioned, states there was the necessity for the test to be identical. In the literature review articles noted that different test were not administered and could warrant different results. The results important to this study is that past data shows no differences in the test.

MIXED METHOD DATA COLLECTION Using a mixed-methods design allow me to use both qualitative and quantitative sources. A single method would not provide me with different avenues of information that help guide my research. A mixed method approach provide me with qualitative data such as everyday data, observation and interviewing, as well as, quantitative data from test, report cards and Likert scales.

DATA ANALYSIS Previous data showed a reoccurring confirmation that no significance is shown from students taking a paper and pencil test or computer. This information will lead me to evaluating my teaching instructions to try new techniques that will ensure students can reflect on the material, activities and test to better relate to either method of testing

SOLUTION Try new teaching strategies (peer tutoring, student- teacher time etc..) Implement more paper and computer testing Integrate sample standardized test

DESIRED OUTCOME Each student will achieve higher scores on quizzes, test and standard tests.