COUNTY COUNCIL MEETING July 29, 2015 Summit County 2015 Climate Action Plan.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Writing the Cambridge Climate Protection Plan MCAN Climate Training Day May 3, 2003 Tufts University.
Advertisements

EESE O&E Committee Update & Next Steps May 14, 2010.
M ontgomery County Climate Protection Plan 2010 Update March 25, 2010.
July 18, 2013 David Gilford, Assistant Director Energy and Climate Change Action Lab: The New York City Perspective.
Madison’s Sustainable Design and Energy Committee: Notes from Portland, Oregon October 3, 2005.
State and Local Initiatives to Combat Global Warming AB A Framework for Change James N. Goldstene California Air Resources Board October 22, 2008.
Integrated Municipal Energy Services Committee EESE Board Statute: Encourage Municipalities to increase investments in energy efficiency and sustainable.
Energy Efficiency and Arizona’s Energy Future Jeff Schlegel Southwest Energy Efficiency Project (SWEEP) April
Connecticut’s Energy Future Removing Barriers to Promote Energy Sustainability: Public Policy and Financing December 2, 2004 Legislative Office Building.
EU Roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050
Green Economy Initiative Derek Eaton UNEP UNCEEA, June 2010.
Energy Security and Low Carbon Development in South Asia
April 29, 2015 Lucinda Smith Climate Action Plan Process.
1 Energy Efficiency and Conservation in Thailand Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency (DEDE) Ministry of Energy 6 th January 2005.
America’s Water Upmanu Lall water.columbia.edu.
First Discussion of Climate Change Steering Committee Recommendations to COG Board of Directors Agenda Item #6 February 27, 2008.
1 Washington Action on Climate Change Hedia Adelsman, Department of Ecology September 25, 2009.
11. 2 Public Transportation’s Role in a Greenhouse Gas Reduction Strategy Kevin Desmond King County Metro Transit Division Seattle, WA On behalf of the.
Climate Policy Development Tom Peterson The Center For Climate Strategies August 25, 2005.
Office of Air and Radiation Progress, Challenges, and Opportunities July 2006.
Transportation Sector Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Background & Strategies Local Government Climate Change Summit Washington, DC April 10, 2008 Paul Bubbosh,
Capital District Regional GHG Inventory CDTC Planning Committee Meeting 10/1/2014 GHG emissions (MTCDE)
The Pioneer Valley Clean Energy Plan. Pioneer Valley region of western Massachusetts 69 communities 650,000 people 15 colleges and the University of Massachusetts-Amherst.
National Capital Region Climate Change Report OVERVIEW Joan Rohlfs, Chief, Air Quality Planning Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments October.
Potential EESE Board GHG Emission Targets for the NH Climate Action Plan NH EESE Board Goal Team Sub-Committee Friday, October 16, 2009.
National Capital Region Climate Change Report Presentation for the Bowie City Council Stuart A. Freudberg Director, Environmental Programs Metropolitan.
Regional Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory 5 TH MID-ATLANTIC REGIONAL PLANNING ROUNDTABLE NOVEMBER 7 TH, 2008 Robert Graff Delaware Valley Regional Planning.
CLIMATE CHANGE POLICY United The United States of America Schwartz, Swallow, and Wu Global Energy Consulting, Inc.
March 2010 Samantha Putt del Pino Co-Director, Business Engagement in Climate and Technology The Next Practice Advantage 1.
Washington State: Climate Initiative
Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs Massachusetts Clean Energy and Climate Plan for 2020.
 Introduction to the role of Government  The October 2008 “Bailout” Bill  The Federal Stimulus Package and Beyond  Case Study: Palm Desert  The Green.
Mn/DOT and Economic Development ACEC Annual Meeting March 2, 2010.
ALACHUA COUNTY COMMISSION QUARTERLY RETREAT ENERGY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR IMMEDIATE INVESTIGATION AND IMPLEMENTATION BY THE ALACHUA COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY.
Overview of San Diego Climate Action Plan Nicole Capretz Director of Environmental Policy iMayor’s Office.
1 Energy Efficiency Programs For Local Governments & Community Partners Christina Prestella Program Manager, Government & Community Partnerships PG&E September.
Enabling Results: Monitoring and Evaluation in the U.S. ENERGY STAR Program September 28, 2012Ashley M. King Environment Officer.
1 Louisiana: Our Energy Future 2009 American Recovery & Reinvestment Act.
Findings from the Multi-Sector Working Group Future Greenhouse Gas Reduction Strategies in the Metropolitan Washington Region Presentation to the WRTC.
1 Climate Change: Impact on Transportation (And Transportation Impact on Climate Change) August 14, 2008 Mike Clifford Metropolitan Washington Council.
1 Growing Cooler: The Evidence on Urban Development and Climate Change Smart Growth America, The Urban Land Institute.
HRM Council Environment & Sustainability Standing Committee July 7, 2011.
CAPP – GHG emissions Pipelines need to be constructed because they use significantly less energy to operate and have a lower carbon footprint than tanker.
Insert presentation title on the slide master A view from the front line Andy Deacon Head of Local Delivery Energy Saving Trust.
DISPATCHING DIRECT USE Achieving Greenhouse Gas Reductions & Energy Savings.
1 DRAFT DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE For NPC Resource Study Discussion Only NPC Demand Task Force – Residential and Commercial Findings & Recommendations January.
11 Regional Renewable Energy Study Review of Findings and Forecasts Presented to: Climate, Energy and Environment and Policy Committee Metropolitan Washington.
CLEER works to accelerate the transition to a clean energy economy, increase energy independence and reduce the impacts of climate change. (from 2008.
Climate Policy and Green Tax Reform in Denmark Some conclusions from the 2009 report to the Danish Council of Environmental Economics Presentation to the.
Unit 2 DEVELOPMENT OF THE LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN (LRTP) LCTCC Educational Program.
King County-Cities Climate Collaboration July 2015 Update to the GMPC
Presentation Overview EECAP summary Plan development process GHG inventory results Policy recommendations EAP implementation.
WGA TRANSPORTATION FUELS FOR THE FUTURE INITIATIVE Vehicle Efficiency Committee Report Summary John Boesel Transportation Fuels for the Future Workshop.
Los Angeles County Community Choice Aggregation Regional CCA Task Force Meeting October 28, 2015.
SAUSALITO COMMUNITY GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY Years 2005 and 2010.
Sausalito City Council May 7, 2013 Plan Bay Area Draft EIR.
Kenya’s INDC: Actions in the Energy Sector
2017 Annual Report sustainability team For Discussion.
Capital Region Clean Energy Communities Program
REFLECTED IN JAMAICA’S ENERGY POLICY
Transition towards Low Carbon Energy Monday 12th June 2017
Amanda Wheat, USAID GCC Washington, DC | February 24, 2016
EU climate policies delivering
ADB’s experience with financing renewable energy projects
Town Facilities Benchmarking and GHG Emissions Update
Anna Garcia Air Innovations Conference August 2004
Newton Citizens Climate Action Plan
Mayors’ Commission on Climate Change
Mayors’ Commission on Climate Change
Presentation transcript:

COUNTY COUNCIL MEETING July 29, 2015 Summit County 2015 Climate Action Plan

Project Overview  Greenhouse gas (GHG) emission inventory update for Summit County  Build on 2012 effort  Business-as-usual forecast  Roadmap for climate action and GHG reduction  Review of existing goals and programs  Analysis of reduction opportunities  A plan for action

Stakeholder Group  Diverse group of residents, technical experts, and other interested parties  3 in-person group meetings  Several follow-up discussions  Groups Roles  Technical expertise/oversight  Sounding board/voice of the community  Implementation support

Contents Overview  Executive Summary  Emissions Trends & Forecast (GHG inventory)  Framework for Climate Action  Emissions Reduction Goal  Critical Elements of Success  External Factors  Emissions Reduction Strategies  Playbook for Implementation

Emissions Trends by Source

Emissions Forecast & Goal 15% in 15 years 7.72 million MTCO2e (or equivalent of ~9 cars per County resident)

Framework for Climate Action Energy Efficiency & Supply Transportation & Land Use Other Cross-Cutting Efforts Reduction Strategies Monitoring Progress Social Mobilization & Outreach Financial Tools Collaboration & Partnerships Critical Elements of Success 15% reduction in 15 years Emissions Reduction Goal

Analysis Summary: All Strategies Implemented

Energy Costs: The Big Picture  $200 million/year: estimated average annual spending on energy by Summit County businesses and residents  $272 million: estimated total costs to implement all of the strategies  $264 million: estimated total savings/avoided costs from implementing all strategies  $58 million: estimated Summit County 2015 budget

Analysis Summary: All Strategies Implemented

How can implementation be funded? County & Local Government Households & Businesses Others  Bonds  Tax increment financing  Consumer grants, loans, and direct installs  Community Choice Aggregation  Funding program development and delivery  Self-funded  Mortgage/Home equity  Traditional bank loans or consumer lending  Energy efficiency loans  Property Accessed Clean Energy (PACE) Programs  On-bill tariffs or financing  Sponsorships and donations  User fees and revenue  Regional, State and Federal grants  Development exactions

Implementation Initiative  Types of Initiatives  Programs  Outreach campaigns & resources  Supporting plans & policies  Projects & investments  Plan identifies potential timing & roles

Implementation Responsibilities  Most initiatives led by Summit County or Summit Community Power Works  Additional County staffing may be necessary for full implementation  Stakeholder Group to continue provide ongoing input and serve as technical resource

Next Steps  County Council review and adoption (July)  Implementation begins (August) Questions?

For reference during Council meeting as needed (not to be presented) Additional Slides

Analysis Methodology  Business as Usual (BAU) Forecast Growth rate of approximately 2% each year  Adjusted Business as Usual (ABAU) Forecast  Includes expected reductions as a result of federal standards Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFÉ) standards for vehicular mileage improvements EPA Clean Power Program to reduce carbon intensity of power plants  Costs & Savings Incorporates County and utility data wherever available Also reflects regional and national best practices

Strategy Example

Analysis Summary: All Strategies Preliminary Results – Please do not cite or publish Emissions Reduction Strategy Potential Cumulative Emissions Reduction Economic Value ($ per MTCO2e reduced) E1: Distributed Renewable Energy 430,000-$280 E2: Above Code Construction 360,000$150 E3: Summit Community Power Works 335,000$85 E4: Outdoor Heating and Snowmelt Systems 115,000$150 E5: Increased Energy Consumption Data 80,000$17 E6: Building Recommissioning and Tune-ups 70,000$130 E7: Engaging Second Homeowners and Lodging Properties 48,000$90 TL1: Regional Transit Expansion 84,000-$10 TL2: Sustainable Development Patterns 56,000-$10 TL3: Agriculture, Livestock, and Land Use Management Practices 35,000-$7 TL4: Pedestrian and Bicycle Infrastructure Improvements 17,000-$12 TL5: Alternatively Powered Vehicles 6,000-$163 O1: Recycling Program Expansion 31,000-$155 O2: County Leading by Example 13,000$45 O3: Supporting Others’ Climate Response Efforts 10,000$99

Implementation Costs & Savings: Above Code Construction Example  Who pays?  Building owners Higher cost of construction on a per square foot basis (~$1/sq. ft., $230,000 annually) Costs may ultimately be passed along to occupant  County Ongoing program administration and incentives (~$32,000 annually)  Total estimated cost through 2030 = $3.4 million  Who saves?  Utility bill payers Building owners or occupants Avoided costs due to more efficient buildings  Total estimated cost savings through 2030 = $57.3 million