Language Arts/Reading & Math Curriculum Plan Kindergarten Through Sixth Grade 2009-2010 School Year Involved Departments: Elementary Curriculum Federal.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Benchmark Assessments in Literacy
Advertisements

Response to Intervention (RtI) in Primary Grades
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
Reading Intervention “Today a reader, tomorrow a leader.” -Margaret Fuller-
What We’re Learning Building & Improving an RTI System Seven Key Foundations RISS 2009.
North Penn School District Phase III Update Introduction to Response to Instruction and Intervention (RTII): A Schoolwide Framework for Student Success.
*This is a small school district of fewer than 1000 students located in northern Illinois. *The district consists of: an Elementary School (Pre-K--4 th.
Welcome to Third Grade Curriculum Night Our Goal is that by the end of the year all students will score a level 3 or 4 on the Math and Reading End of Grade.
What To Do When A Student Does Not Respond To An Academic Intervention Brian Lloyd Ed. S., NCSP May 2 nd, 2013.
0 1 2 Required Elements: Universal Screening Tier I Tier II and Tier III Progress Monitoring District and School RTI² Teams Fidelity of Implementation.
Deep Training Cohort B June 23, 2005 Aligning Scott Foresman 2004 To Reading First.
RTI Response to Intervention. What are RTI systems? Definition (NCRTI, 2010) RTI programs integrate assessment systems and student interventions Are multi-tiered.
Using Data to Inform Instruction Second Year Teacher Induction March 25, 2010.
Supplemental Reading and Math Instruction Grades K-6.
Response to Intervention North Santiam School District August 25, 2009.
CREEKSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DATA REVIEW FOR FY 2015.
Curriculum Update January What are the big projects? Fall 2013 – Math Common Core Implementation Fall 2014 – English/Language Arts Common Core Implementation.
E. Hale Curran Interventions Parent Information Night October 24, 2012.
English Language Arts Program Update Cambrian School District.
How will classrooms be changing?.  Public Act 12-50: An Act Concerning Requirements for Early Childhood Educators  SB-382: An Act concerning teacher.
Implementation of the North Carolina Read to Achieve Program Parent Guide
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION A schoolwide, systematic, collaborative process in which ALL school resources are seamlessly integrated and singularly focused.
Welcome to Third Grade Curriculum Night Our Goal is that by the end of the year all students will be proficient and prepared for fourth grade.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 ELA MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
Response to Intervention (RTI) at Mary Lin Elementary Principal’s Coffee August 30, 2013.
Title I Parent Meeting Miami Elementary School
0 From TN Department of Education Presentation RTII: Response to Instruction and Intervention.
Chimacum Creek Primary School November 12, School Improvement Plan.
Response to Intervention: Improving Achievement for ALL Students Understanding the Response to Intervention Process: A Parent’s Guide Presented by: Dori.
English Language Arts Single Plan for Student Achievement.
Clare-Gladwin RESD Fall 2013 Alignment for Career and College Readiness.
School-wide Data Team Meeting Winter NSIF Extended Cohort February 10, 2012.
Professional Learning Communities “The most promising strategy for sustained, substantial school improvement is developing the ability of school personnel.
Response to Intervention Franklin Community Schools January 24, 2011.
The Law  Section , paragraph 3… A requirement that a pupil not be promoted from the third grade if the pupil obtains a score on the reading portion.
RtII & Title 1 Dr. Diane Barrie Director of Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment October 4, 2012.
SEVEN RTI FOUNDATIONS MAMLE Fall 2011 Conference Heidi McGinley, RtI Support System Project Director.
Medford Public School District Math Intervention Program Elementary Level K-4.
NASDSE November 14, 2006 Margaret McGlinchey Kim St. Martin.
Lori Wolfe October 9, Definition of RTI according to NCRTI ( National Center on Response to Intervention) Response to intervention integrates assessment.
Class Action Research: Treatment for the Nonresponsive Student IL510 Kim Vivanco July 15, 2009
Read to Achieve Parent Presentation What is Read to Achieve? Read to Achieve was created in legislation and approved by the North Carolina.
Response to Instruction and Intervention. The Big Picture Anita L. Archer, Ph.D. Educational Consultant
Northwest ISD Target Improvement Plan Seven Hills Elementary
The Law  Section , paragraph 3… A requirement that a pupil not be promoted from the third grade if the pupil obtains a score on the reading portion.
Maine Department of Education Maine Reading First Course Session #1 Introduction to Reading First.
Scientifically Researched-Based Interventions (SRBI)
Response to Intervention (RtI) The Third Year Richboro Elementary School.
Response To Intervention “Collaborative Data Driven Instruction at Lewis & Clark Elementary” Owen Stockdill.
Elementary Middle School Expectation and Goal Setting Meeting June 26, 2009.
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
Prevention to Avoid Intervention Tier 1: the most important tier!
Response to Intervention (RtI) Aldine ISD District Staff Development August 18, 2009.
PUSD Reading Intervention Plan Read 180 and System 44 Implementation Plan August 5,2014.
Central Intermediate Bixby Public Schools Goals Update “Greatness is the path we travel!
MASSACHUSETTS TIERED SYSTEM OF SUPPORT Melrose Public Schools July 9, 2013.
Tier III Preparing for First Meeting. Making the Decision  When making the decision to move to Tier III, all those involve with the implementation of.
COMBINING EVIDENCE- BASED PRACTICES AND COMMON CORE REQUIREMENTS: A DESIGN EXPERIMENT LRA, Dallas, December 2013.
Implementation of the North Carolina Read to Achieve Program
Bixby North Elementary
Ahoskie Elementary School
Massachusetts Tiered System of Support
Implementation of the North Carolina Read to Achieve Program
Annual Title I Parent Meeting
English Language Arts Program Update
Response to Intervention = RTI
Parent Information Night
Ahoskie Elementary School
Presentation transcript:

Language Arts/Reading & Math Curriculum Plan Kindergarten Through Sixth Grade School Year Involved Departments: Elementary Curriculum Federal Programs Technology Information by Ron Keefer

Providing Regular, Remediation, & Enrichment components

Details K-6 Targeted Group: All Students Program: Scott Foresman

Objective Provide differentiated instruction within Tier 1 core curriculum time through a combination of homogeneous and heterogeneous groupings through leveled readers and teaching strategies exposing all students to same skills and vocabulary.

Goal Provide instruction at appropriate levels within the core curriculum so that all students can participate successfully.

Details K-1 Targeted Group: All Students Program: Reading Mastery

Objective Provide additional 35 minutes per day of direct instruction on grade level through homogeneous groupings on phonemic awareness and decoding to all students within Tier 1 as a targeted intervention to provide an alternative instruction program to meet the needs of all students during the important time of students acquiring the foundation for reading.

Goal Provide an alternative program so that students receive instruction in a different format meeting the needs of students so that all students progress at grade level.

Details: Grade 2 Targeted Group: Students Performing at Or Below Grade Level Program: Reading Mastery

Objective Provide additional 35 minutes per day of direct instruction through homogeneous grouping on grade level on phonemic awareness and decoding to students within Tier 1 as a targeted intervention to provide an alternative instruction program to meet the needs of students during the important time of students acquiring the foundation for reading.

Goal Provide a continued alternative program so that students receive the support needed to maintain growth in acquisition of reading skills at grade level.

Additional Grade 2 Targeted Group: Students Performing above Grade Level Program: Corrective Reading

Objective Provide additional 35 minutes per day of direct instruction above grade level on phonemic awareness and decoding through homogeneous grouping to students within Tier 1 as a targeted intervention to provide an alternative instruction program to meet the needs of students that have acquired the basic foundation for reading.

Goal Provide continued alternative program to accelerate growth in reading above grade level

Grades 3-6 Targeted Group: All Students Program: Corrective Reading

Objective Provide additional 35 minutes per day of direct instruction at or above grade level on phonemic awareness, decoding, and comprehension through homogeneous grouping to students within Tier 1 as a targeted intervention to provide an alternative instruction program to meet the needs of students that have acquired the basic foundations for reading.

Goal Provide continued alternative program to : 1. Keep students who are struggling with reading at least at grade level 2. Allow students that are successfully acquiring reading skills above grade level to continue at an accelerated rate.

Grades 4-6 Targeted Group: Students who complete Corrective Reading Program: Decodable Novels

Objective Provide additional 35 minutes per day of directed reading above grade level with assessments on comprehension

Goal Provide additional reading practice to continue reading growth at an accelerated rate

Additional Considerations for K-6 Grades K-6 Targeted Group: All Students Program: Scott Foresman Objective: Provide differentiated instruction within Tier 1 core curriculum time through a combination of homogeneous and heterogeneous groupings through differentiated teaching strategies exposing all students to the same skills. Goal: Provide instruction at appropriate levels within the core curriculum so that all students can participate successfully.

Grades: K-6 Targeted Group: Students Performing at or Below Grade Level Program: Scott Foresman Objective: Provide additional 35 minutes 2 days per week through homogeneous grouping on grade level for those students not performing on grade level or struggling with specific skills within Tier 1 as a targeted intervention to provide ad additional instruction time to meet the needs of individual students. Goal: Provide additional instruction time to bring students up to grade level and/or maintain grade level performance.

Grades K-6 Targeted Group: Students Performing Above Grade Level Program: Study Island Objective: Provide additional 35 minutes 2 days per week through homogeneous grouping above grade level for those students performing on or above grade level within Tier 1 as a targeted enrichment to provide an additional instruction time to meet the needs of individual students. Objective: Provide additional 35 minutes 2 days per week through homogeneous grouping above grade level for those students performing on or above grade level within Tier 1 as a targeted enrichment to provide an additional instruction time to meet the needs of individual students. Goal: Provide additional instruction time to allow students performing above grade level to accelerate acquisition of skills.

COMMITTEE FORMULATION Targeting all students Program: Dibels for K-2 and 4Sight for 3-6 Form Committee to develop a standard data report for individual students, classroom teachers, building principals and district and develop a staff development plan on these reports. Goal: Provide a uniform data report that can be used for directing instructional delivery and instructional programs to maximize student success.

Continued.. Form committees to investigate comprehensive remediation and enrichment programs within Tier 2 in both math and reading, select remediation and enrichment programs, and develop program implementation. Goal: Pilot selected programs for targeted students to gather data on program effectiveness and make a recommendation for purchase and implementation for

Continued.. Form a committee to investigate the replacement of the math core curriculum and make a recommendation for District purchase. Form a committee to investigate the replacement of the math core curriculum and make a recommendation for District purchase. Goal: Goal: Purchase a curriculum that is aligned to standards and benchmarks that will meet the needs of all students. Purchase a curriculum that is aligned to standards and benchmarks that will meet the needs of all students.

Continued.. Form a committee to investigate and recommend the selection of a summer school program. Goal: Goal: Provide a summer school program that is available for all students not performing at grade level in math and reading.

Thank you for your participation and attention. Robin Martin, Principal CNP Elementary School and Springfield Elementary School August 27, 2009