September 26, 2006 From Organizational Assessment to Organizational Change: The University of Maryland Library Experience M. Sue Baughman Johnnie Love.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Presentation to the Cabinet A Presentation to Stakeholders
Advertisements

The Research Process.
NumericNoExplosionAnswer.
Campus-wide Presentation May 14, PACE Results.
Comprehensive Organizational Health AssessmentMay 2012Butler Institute for Families Comprehensive Organizational Health Assessment Presented by: Robin.
Session 2.3: Skills for Supportive Supervision
CULTURAL COMPETENCY Technical Assistance Pre-Application Workshop.
Personal Assessment of the College Environment (PACE)
Texas City Municipal Police Association 2012 Satisfaction Survey.
SUPERINTENDENT AND BOARD OF EDUCATION MEMBER PERCEPTIONS REGARDING PREFERRED LEADERSHIP BEHAVIORS FOR SUPERINTENDENTS IN WEST VIRGINIA Keith A. Butcher.
Collaboration, Coordination and Cooperation for Action Jacqueline N. Epping State Orientation Meeting 2008.
1 Executive Vice President for Medical Affairs Senior Staff Meeting June 19, 2001 D i v e r s i t y.
Diversity Assessment and Planning with members of the October 14, 2005.
PPA Advisory Board Meeting, May 12, 2006 Assessment Summary.
Organizational Design, Diagnosis, and Development Session 19 Techno-structural Interventions, II Employee Involvement.
ClimateQUAL Survey at University of Illinois Library Library Faculty Meeting November 19, 2014.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
UWM CIO Office A Collaborative Process for IT Training and Development Copyright UW-Milwaukee, This work is the intellectual property of the author.
2010 Performance Evaluation Process Information Session for Staff
UHCL Support Staff Association (SSA) and Professional and Administrative Staff Association (PASA) In consultation with Dr. Lisa M. Penney RAs: Lisa Sublett,
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
United States Fire Administration Chief Officer Training Curriculum Human Resource Development Module 6: Managing the Workforce.
Group Field Instruction Model.  1. Delivery of consistent competency based field instruction and augmented case supervision.  2. Provision of consistent.
1 Copyright © 2000 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved. (1) 11 Evaluating the Performance of Salespeople Module 11 Evaluating the Performance of Salespeople.
Teamwork Chapter 6.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Involving the Whole Organization in Creating or Restructuring a Volunteer Program Louise DeIasi DeCava Consulting.
University Writing Project Faculty Feedback
DISSERTATION DEFENSE Robert Crouch. Purpose of Study Setting of Study Theoretical Framework Research Questions Quantitative: Three Questions Qualitative:
Association for Biblical Higher Education February 13, 2013 Lori Jo Stanfield Evaluator Team Training for Business Officers.
9 th Northumbria International Conference on Performance Measurement in Libraries and Information Services Charles B. Lowry, Ph.D. Executive Director,
Comp 20 - Training & Instructional Design Unit 6 - Assessment This material was developed by Columbia University, funded by the Department of Health and.
Trends in Corporate Governance Dr. Sandra B. Richtermeyer, CMA, CPA President, Institute of Management Accountants (IMA) June 21, 2011.
Presented by Thomas HUMAN RESOURCE DEPARTMENT WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT PLAN OF REACHOUTT.
Step 1: Build a Planning Team
Presented by Thomas. What is HR Department HR Departments are the entities organizations that organize people, report relationships, and work in a way.
SCHOOL BOARD A democratically elected body that represents public ownership of schools through governance while serving as a bridge between public values.
Campus Quality Survey 1998, 1999, & 2001 Comparison Office of Institutional Research & Planning July 5, 2001.
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents Insert School Name/Date.
การพัฒนาสมรรถนะ ของสำนักวิทยบริการสู่ การเป็นองค์กรแห่งการ เรียนรู้และ การ บริการที่เป็นเลิศ รองศาสตราจารย์ ดร. ปพฤกษ์ อุตสาหะวาณิชกิจ คณบดีคณะการบัญชีและการจัดการมหาวิทยาลัยมหาสารคาม.
What could we learn from learning outcomes assessment programs in the U.S public research universities? Samuel S. Peng Center for Educational Research.
Work of the Faculty Leadership Team An Overview. Our Charge Serving to recommend process Serving to set up a strategic plan.
OD Diagnosis and Interventions. The OD Model I Anticipating a need for change II Developing Consultant- Client Relationship III The Diagnostic Process.
Onslow County Schools Division of Media and Instructional Technology This presentation was prepared under fair use exemption of the U.S. Copyright Law.
A Team Members Guide to a Culture of Safety
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation AUTEC School 4-8 March 2012.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Center Grove High School 10 November 2010.
Gallaudet University 2015 There’s No Place Like Home: Assessing Climate Prepared by OAQ/Office of Institutional Research October 20,
Establishing and Maintaining Effective Safety Committees.
Elementary School Administration and Management GADS 671 Section 55 and 56.
March 14, 2009 ACRL 14 th National Conference Seattle, WA ClimateQUAL™: Organizational Climate and Diversity Assessment Presented by Martha Kyrillidou,
August 2, Welcome Who is the TSD Continuous Improvement Team ? What is the work of the TSD Continuous Improvement Team? What is.
ClimateQUAL™: Organizational Climate and Diversity Assessment Sue Baughman Texas Library Association April 2009.
Evaluating for Impact Learning Circle Project Faculty Presentation Name: Ellen RoweTitle: Community & Leadership Development.
ClimateQual Employee Climate Survey Measures staff perceptions Assess the health of a library Comparison to other like libraries Track changes over time.
2015 Survey Information Technology Services February 8, 2016 Climate and Diversity.
Accelerating Progress Towards a More Diverse and Inclusive Harvard Chan School April 17, 2015.
2009 Annual Employee Survey U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development December 29,2009 (updated January 8, 2010)
Organizational Behavior (MGT-502) Lecture-43. Summary of Lecture-42.
Management The acts of getting people together to accomplish desired goals and objectives.
[Presentation location] [Presentation date] (Confirm ABT logo) Building Bridges and Bonds (B3): An introduction.
Mid Michigan Community College Prepared by President Christine Hammond March 31, 2016 PACE Survey Results Summary.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
Building Teams and Empowering Members 1. Empowerment Empowerment is not bestowed by a leader, it is the process of an individual enabling himself to take.
9th Northumbria International Conference on
ClimateQUAL at Illinois
Chapter 8 Quality Teamwork
ClimateQUAL at Illinois
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
HR AUDIT (An Early Evaluation System) (An Early Evaluation System) S.Jayaprakash., M.Sc (IT), PGD.HRM, DLL & AL.
Presentation transcript:

September 26, 2006 From Organizational Assessment to Organizational Change: The University of Maryland Library Experience M. Sue Baughman Johnnie Love Charles Lowry Maggie Saponaro

Outline  Background and Context - Lowry  The Individual-Team-Organization (ITO) Survey - Baughman  The Organizational Culture and Diversity Assessment (OCDA) - Saponaro  Barriers and Enablers to Assessment - Love  Concluding Remarks - Lowry

Background and Context  Organizational Development  (COD) Continuous Organizational Development  Teamwork, learning, leadership, measurement  "Working Paper #1 on Team Management: The Vision of a Team-Based Organization"

Background and Context  Milestones—committing the people resources  Directorate for Planning  Assistant Dean for Organizational Development  Coordinator of Personnel Programs  Facilitators Team  Manager, Staff Learning and Development  Manager, Management Information Systems & LARC

 Commercially-available instrument  Focuses on three components: individual, team, organization  Measures perception of frequency that behaviors occur  Uses Likert Scale to rank 52 statements ITO Survey

 Identify learning and training needs for teams  Generate baseline data to gauge change over time  Identify areas for team and organizational development Goals for Using the ITO Survey

These statements are examples of the issues members of teams are asked to consider: Almost Usually Frequently Occasionally Seldom Almost Always Never )My co-workers and I communicate clearly and effectively. 2)My team has effective leadership. 3)My team solves problems in a timely fashion. 4)I am happy to contribute to the accomplishments of the organization’s mission and goals. ITO Survey Sample Statements

 1998 – 3 teams from public services plus a few other librarians  25 out of 36 librarians participated  69% return rate  Paper-based survey  2000 – same group of participants as in 1998  31 out of 40 librarians participated  78% return rate  Paper-based survey  2003 – 16 teams from public and technical services  119 librarians and staff out of 171 participated  70% return rate  Web-based survey  Use Excel and SPSS for data analysis ITO Survey - Administration

 1998  Identified needs for training in team development  Developed team mission statements & workplans  2000  Identified skill development areas that were incorporated into the Learning Curriculum  Created the Assistant Dean for Organizational Development position  Formed the Facilitators Team to support teams  2003  Identified training needs in the areas of leadership and decision-making  Identified rewards and recognition as areas to focus organizational attention ITO Survey - Results

 1999 – Need Identified  Diversity Committee saw need for training in diversity issues  Library Administration suggested development of an assessment  UMD Industrial/Organizational Psychology Department chosen to administer survey  2000 – Survey Administered  Survey Goals:  Examine current management practices and policies as related to diversity  Provide a baseline against which future progress could be measured  2004 – Survey Repeated  Expanded to address issues of team development and climate The OCDA

OCDA - Development Role of I/OP in 2000/2004 Surveys  Conducted extensive literature reviews  Developed and administered focus group sessions  Developed survey instruments  Administered survey and analyzed results  Produced final reports  Reported results at all-staff meetings (2004 survey)  Conducted follow-up sessions with targeted divisions (2004 survey)

OCDA - Administration  Focus groups - 17% participation in 2000 (19.4 % in 2004)  Gather qualitative information regarding perceptions of organizational climate  Written survey items based upon focus group themes  Written Survey % participation in 2000 (71.1% in 2004)  Questions covered ten areas, including organizational commitment and perception of fair interpersonal treatment  Survey offered multiple times of day/days of the week  Survey by mail option offered

 Recommendations for Action  Managerial training  Standardization of Procedures  Recruitment and selection of ethnic minorities for managerial positions  Empowerment and trust  Mentoring and diversity training  Selected Interventions  Monthly all-staff meetings  Development of the Learning Curriculum  Administration strengthens support for professional development  Coordinator of Personnel Programs position created OCDA Results (2000)

OCDA Results (2004)  Survey Results  Improvement in a number of areas including:  Libraries’ support of diversity  Employees kept well-informed  Libraries have non-discriminatory practices  Employees are fairly treated  Increase in Organizational Withdrawal from 2000 to 2004  Consistent ethnic/division differences - warranting additional assessment  Interventions and Next Steps  All-Staff Meetings to discuss survey results  Written report distributed to all staff  Small-group meetings with lead researcher  Additional focus groups to examine survey results  IMLS National Leadership Grant proposal to automate the survey  Submitted January, 2006

“Enablers” and “Barriers”  Two types:  Tangible  Intangible

Tangible “Enablers” & “Barriers”  Easily observable  Manageable  Easily transformed

Intangible “Enablers” & “Barriers”  Abstract  Not easy to identify  Have ability to create a positive or negative impact on a given change process

Research shows…  “Enablers” & “Barriers” are: 1. Time 2. Culture 3. Structure  Catalysts to the “Enablers” and “Barriers”:  Trust  Risk Taking

UM Tangible “Enablers” and “Barriers”  Organizational Framework  Assessment Process  Learning Curriculum  Performance Management  Communication Vehicles  Library Staff  Staff (TRIAD)  Diversity Team  Facilitators Team  Leadership Skill Development  Team Development Management Human Resources

UM Intangible “Enablers” and “Barriers”  Attitude and/or “Buy-In”  Role Clarity  Job Satisfaction  Climate for Change  Morale  Communication

The UM Libraries found:  Leadership skills  Role clarification  Team purpose  Climate and organizational purpose  Job satisfaction  Communication  Collaboration  Supervisory skill development

Conclusions  Acculturation and change  Constant tinkering

September 26, 2006 From Organizational Assessment to Organizational Change: The University of Maryland Library Experience M. Sue Baughman - Johnnie Love – Charles Lowry – Maggie Saponaro –