Updates on Oklahoma’s Accountability System Jennifer Stegman, Assistant Superintendent Karen Robertson, API Director Office of Accountability and Assessments

Academic Performance Index API 22

Weighted average 30% 10% 60% 33.3% Academic Performance Index (API) Component Diagram OSTP – Oklahoma School Testing Program CRT – Criterion-Referenced Test EOI – End-of-Instruction Test AP – Advanced Placement 3

Point Contributions for High School and K-12 Districts 4

Point Contributions for Elementary and Middle Schools, K-6 and K-8 Districts 5

Adequate Yearly Progress AYP 7

AYP Federal Law Includes all students Focus on four criteria: 1. Math achievement 2. Reading achievement 3. Participation in state testing 4. Attendance and graduation rates 78

Math Performance Target Reading Performance Target *95% of Students Tested **Additional Indicator Performance Target Made Adequate Yearly Progress For each student group, did the school site or district meet the required performance targets? yes Did Not Make Adequate Yearly Progress no AYP Determinations *Participation rates calculated separately for math and reading. **Attendance or graduation rate, as applicable. 89

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Components ComponentMeasureBenchmarks Math Performance Target Math api Reading Performance Target Reading api Percent of Students Tested Students tested Enrollment (Day of Test) 95%95% Additional Indicator Graduation Rate (High School) 67.8%67.8% Attendance (Elementary & Middle School) 91.2%91.2% 9 13

10 Student Groups 1)All Students 2)Regular Education Students 3)Black 4)American Indian 5)Hispanic 6)Asian 7)White 8)Other 9)Economically Disadvantaged 10)English language learners (ELL) 11)Students with Individualized Education Programs (IEP) Race/Ethnicity and Economically Disadvantaged subgroups are disaggregated from ALL Students 14