Durham Villas Planned Unit Development TSM10-0001 & REZ10-0001 Morris Bud Keeney Butte County Board of Supervisors December 11, 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Applicants Rob & Judi McCarthy, SLO County Permit #DRC
Advertisements

PARKS: Major Policy Topics  Park development guidelines  Joint use of park and recreation facilities  Park accessibility  Park acquisition priorities.
Proposed Modification of Policies for Rural Employment Centers Policy 6.3 of the Future Land Use Element of the Alachua County Comprehensive plan CPA
Planning Issues in Agriculture Laws and Regulations Lecture 6 Lecture 6.
October 4, 2004 Detrich B. Allen City of Los Angeles Environmental Affairs Department 1 Siting New Development Detrich B. Allen General Manager Environmental.
8/29/20151 Docket Z (Easter Mountain, LLC) A Request to Rezone 556 Acres From RU-4 to SR-2 Cochise County Board of Supervisors October 25, 2011.
Sector Planning Process Alachua County Commission July 8 th,
Lassen Lodge Hydroelectric Project Public Scoping Meetings November 5, 2014 (Sacramento and Red Bluff) State Water Resources Control Board Division of.
Douglas P. Carstens Chatten-Brown & Carstens LLP, Hermosa Beach L EGAL A SPECTS OF C LIMATE C HANGE & U SING CEQA TO S UPPORT B ETTER P ROJECTS.
Community Development Department GRAND HAVEN DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT City Council June 3, 2014.
Rural Residential Zoning District & Subdivision Exemptions Southampton County Board of Supervisors Presented by Jay Randolph November 28, 2005.
Draft Equine Ordinance POD
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING February 19, 2008.
Planning Area Standards May 18, Outline of today’s meeting Introductions Recap of previous community meetings Planning Area Standards Discussion.
JUNE 19, 2012 BCC APPEAL HEARING ON BZA #SE , April 5, 2012 APPLICANT/APPELLANT: TONY RAHBANY.
Public Hearing Modifications to the Gated Community Ordinance Board of County Commissioners Presented by the Orange County Public Works Department February.
Presentation to the Placer LAFCO Commission September 10, 2014.
Butterfly Village (PLN080209) Monterey County RMA- Planning Director July 30, 2008.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING December 2, 2008.
Community Development Department Special Exceptions for: Automotive parts (e.g. accessories and tires) and Automotive, Recreational Vehicle, and Boat Dealers.
Oakmont at Gainesville, LLP CPA Location Map.
A 1,240 Acre Master Development Plan Proposal, West of Willcox, AZ. Cochise County Board of Supervisors August 23, 2011 Docket MDP / Z
Community Development Department GRAND HAVEN DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT Planning & Land Development Regulation Board May 21, 2014.
Public Hearings February 24, Case: LUP Project: Wedgefield K-8 School PD / LUP Applicant: Tyrone Smith, OCPS Planning & Governmental Relations.
Amherst County Comprehensive Plan (Update)
Community Development Department FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT SMALL-SCALE LU-MIN & ZONING MAP AMENDMENT RZ-OTH
NEWPORT POINTE COUNTY FILES: GP# , RZ# , SD# , AND DP# BOARD OF SUPERVISORS HEARING June 4, 2013.
Winery Ordinance Update Scoping Meeting for the Environmental Impact Report County of Santa Barbara July 16, 2014.
Community Development Department APPLICATION #2457 GRAND HAVEN PUD AMENDMENT APPLICATION #2411 GRAND HAVEN NORTH: SMALL SCALE FLUM AMENDMENT APPLICATION.
Jefferson County Agricultural Preservation and Land Use Plan Jefferson County’s Comprehensive Plan: Process and Strategies Presented to: Dane County Officials.
1 Docket Z (Jantz) A Request to Rezone 9 Parcels from SR-43 to RU-4. Board of Supervisors, January 8, 2013.
Community Development Department COUNTRY CLUB HARBOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL-2 AND PARKS & GREENWAYS ZONING DISTRICTS REZONING APPLICATION #2511.
LAFCO’s and CEQA Discussion Problem The City of San Garbanzo prepared an EIR in connection with a regional commercial project “Big Box Mall” to be located.
1 Completing the CEQA Checklist Terry Rivasplata.
Planning Commission Public Hearing: SUB Proposed 6-lot Subdivision at Bland Circle December 2, 2015.
Central Valley Flood Protection Board Meeting – Agenda Item No. 9A CVFPB MEETING – October 25, 2013.
LOCATIONAL AND SUPPLEMENTAL CRITERIA FOR UTILITY SCALE PHOTOVOLTAIC SOLAR FACILITIES.
Planning and Zoning Division Jefferson County RZREHARING To amend existing Planned Development zone district to allow for mini-warehouse storage.
“ Grand Landings North” Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning City Council Public Hearing March 3, 2015.
Community Development Department FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT LU-MIN & RZ-OTH
Planning and Zoning Division Jefferson County RZREHARING To amend existing Planned Development zone district to allow for mini-warehouse storage.
White Hill Middle School Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Ross Valley School District Community Meeting November 1, 2011.
Prepared by: Alex Fisch Planning Services Division.
“State Road 100 MPC Lots” Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning City Council Public Hearing November 17, 2015.
Community Development Department FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT SMALL-SCALE LU-MIN-07-03a & ZONING MAP AMENDMENT RZ-OTH
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 1 – ANNEXATION, PLANNING AREA, AND DENSITIES 11/07/2013.
Joy Patterson, Principal Planner City of Sacramento March 16 th, 2016 For the 2016 Planning Academy.
Environmental Scoping Meeting April 9, Meeting Outline Overview of the Proposed Project Purpose of the Scoping Meeting Environmental Review Process.
G & A Lloyd, LLC ZOM Location Map. G & A Lloyd, LLC ZOM Aerial.
Planning and Zoning Division Jefferson County RZ Sevens Residential Memory Care ODP Case Manager: Russell D Clark.
Hillsborough County Public School Siting MPO SCHOOL TRANSPORTATION WORKING GROUP
1 Villa Laguna MXD3 Site Plan Review. 2 Request: The applicant is requesting site plan review of a proposed mixed-use project pursuant to the recently.
VILLA AMADOR VICINITY MAP. CASE SPECIFICS Subject properties encompass ± acres –Entails 10 parcels of land –Located south of Amador Avenue, west.
The Plaza at Santa Monica Project PUBLIC SCOPING MEETING
Jefferson County SA Red Rocks Site Approval
Butte County Board of Supervisors December 6, 2016
Scoping Meeting April 20th 6:00 pm
Update on Special Event Facilities Butte County Code Section
Overview of the Draft EIR
Butte County Board of Supervisors
“Palm Coast 145, LLC” Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning Planning and Land Development Regulation Board December 21, 2016.
LEE FARM ADDITION – GDP AMENDMENT
Jefferson County Planning Commission Hearing April 10, 2013
Palm Coast 145, LLC Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning City Council Public Hearing September 5, 2017.
Ordinance 661 Consistency Rezone Project
MPO School Transportation Working Group
Tam O’Shanter Rezoning
Planning Commission Meeting: August 3, 2016
Draft Equine Ordinance
Camarillo Springs Project Draft EIR Scoping Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Durham Villas Planned Unit Development TSM & REZ Morris Bud Keeney Butte County Board of Supervisors December 11, 2012

Applications:  Tentative Subdivision Map: Phased Tentative Subdivision Map to divide a ±118 acre property into 141 single-family residential parcels ranging in size from 5,284 SF to 212,152 SF, and various lettered lots for open space and community uses.  Rezone: Rezone the ±118 acre property from A-5 to Planned Unit Development (PUD). Note: The property is zoned VLDR (Very Low Density Residential – one-acre minimum effective December 8, 2012.

Aerial

Surrounding Land Uses

Adopted Zoning

TSM

Proposed Project  Divide a +/-118 acre property into 141 single-family residential parcels ranging in size from 5,284 SF to 212,152 SF, and various lettered lots for agricultural, open space and community uses.  140 residential lots are proposed to have a range of one-story single-family homes that will incorporate high energy efficiency, rooftop photovoltaic electricity generation, and accessibility features intended to meet the needs of active senior residents.  Maintenance of ±58-acres of the existing almond orchard in production intended to help minimize the loss of prime agricultural lands, provide passive open, and minimize issues regarding the compatibility between the proposed residential development with the industrial uses and the UPRR to the west of the subject property.

Analysis General Plan & D2N Plan  Subject property is designated Very Low Density Residential (VLDR, 0.2 to 1 du/ac) in the General Plan.  Project is within the “Urban Reserve” portion of Durham as identified in the 1992 Durham-Dayton-Nelson (D2N) Plan and the Area and Neighborhood Plans Element of the General Plan.  An Urban Reserve Policy has been adopted “in recognition of the need to balance competing land uses such as agricultural versus residential.”

Analysis (Continued) D2N Urban Reserve Policy Statement:  All property located in the planning area shall be managed as an “URBAN RESERVE,” not permitting rural residential development and uses on parcels less than 3 acres until such time as they are needed for development and adequate services are available to serve this area; and  Any proposal for a General Plan Amendment, rezoning or subdivision which would permit parcels of less than 3 acres to be created for residential use shall be coordinated with all public agencies which provide utility and public services for extension of water, sewer, circulation, drainage and shall be required to submit plans prior to or concurrently with the adoption.

Analysis Flood Zones

Analysis (Continued) Density Bonus  Applicant has proposed that Durham Villas PUD be an active senior (age 55+) community (i.e. senior citizen housing development).  Butte County is required to grant a density bonus under Government Code in exchange for restricts on occupancy of the homes under the Civil Code to qualifying residents.  The density bonus provided is an increase of 20% over the maximum allowable residential density under the Zoning Ordinance and General Plan.  The maximum density for the property under this scenario is 141 units.

Analysis (Continued) Community Services District (CSD)  The project would form a CSD, subject to approval by the Butte Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO).  The CSD is intended to provide: Wastewater collection, treatment and disposal; Domestic and fire suppression water supply system; Park ownership and maintenance; Community center ownership and maintenance; and Ownership and maintenance of public open space and the elevated pedestrian/bike path.

CEQA Initial Study – Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration  In compliance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15073(a), an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) was prepared and circulated for a 30-day public review.  The Initial Study prepared for this project determined that there may be potential environmental impacts to the following areas: -Agriculture -Air Quality -Biological Resources -Cultural Resources -Greenhouse Gas Emissions -Hydrology/Water Quality -Land Use Planning -Noise -Transportation/Traffic -Utilities/Service Systems

Public Comments Public Comments to the Planning Commission:  Numerous public comments were received. Substantive comments included:  Potential impacts to groundwater quality as a result of treated effluent released by the proposed community wastewater system;  Traffic impacts / traffic safety;  Loss of identified prime agricultural lands, including impacts to surrounding agricultural operations;  Project would result in greenhouse gas emissions in excess of the thresholds of significance in the CEQA Guidelines;

Public Comments (Continued)  Impacts to Durham’s community character and quality of life from this level of growth.  Butte County Air Quality Management District commented after the PC Hearing that the Draft IS/MND’s “air quality analysis is insufficient to make a determination regarding significant impacts.”  Under the CEQA fair argument standard, an EIR must be prepared whenever it can be fairly argued, based on substantial evidence in the administrative record, that a project may have a significant adverse effect on the environment.

Recommendation Planning Commission: Deny the Durham Villas Planned Unit Development project (Tentative Subdivision Map TSM and Rezoning REZ for Morris “Bud” Keeney) based upon water supply, agricultural impacts, land use conflicts with adjacent properties; traffic safety; and public services issues. Staff: Find, on the basis of substantial evidence in the record, a fair argument has been raised that the Durham Villas Planned Unit Development may have an significant adverse environmental impact requiring the preparation of an EIR pursuant to the requirements of CEQA. Based upon this finding, remand this project to DDS Staff for the preparation of an EIR to be considered by the Planning Commission.