1. VILLA AMADOR VICINITY MAP

3. CASE SPECIFICS Subject properties encompass 54.383 ± acres –Entails 10 parcels of land –Located south of Amador Avenue, west of Valley Drive, and northeast of Burn Lake Current zoning is M-1/M-2 (Industrial Standard) and PUD (Planned Unit Development) –6 parcels encompass 36.98 ± acres and zoned M-1/M-2 Includes existing industrial development –4 parcels encompass 17.44 ± acres and zoned PUD These parcels were annexed into CLC in 1978 with initial zoning of Planned Community District (PC) Intent of use of subject properties was not identified in the annexation process Properties are currently vacant Applicant is seeking a zone change to PUD for 54.383 ± acres and is also seeking concept plan approval for the PUD known as Villa Amador –Concept plan identifies 3 Planning Parcels: Parcel 1 encompasses 7.311 ± acres and proposes industrial redevelopment Parcel 2 encompasses 18.263 ± acres and proposes industrial uses Parcel 3 encompasses 28.808 ± acres and proposes a mobile home park

4. CASE SPECIFICS TRANSPORTATION: Planning Parcels 1 & 2 (industrial area) proposes primary access from Pioneer Place (minor local roadway) that connects to Amador Avenue Planning Parcel 3 (mobile home park) proposes primary access from Valley Drive –Planning Parcel 3 does not have direct access to Valley Drive* –Access must be obtained from CLC through a vacant City owned parcel Parcel is presently utilized as for utilities and drainage facilities –Secondary access is proposed from Pioneer Place

5. CASE SPECIFICS Development Standards for Planning Parcels 1 & 2: Proposes that permitted uses be the same as the uses in 2001 Zoning Code, as amended for M-1/M-2 zoning district –Minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet –Maximum building height of 60-feet –Minimum lot width of 60-feet –Minimum lot depth of 70-feet –Minimum front setback of 15-feet –Minimum side/rear setback of 15 or 0-feet On-lot ponding required for all post-development run-off at time of commercial/industrial development Phase 1 identifies a phasing plan for parking, landscaping, and outdoor lighting requirements for redevelopment of existing industrial building –Parking requirements will be on intended land use (no business center application) –Minimum area of 10% of total parking area shall be landscaped with each phase of redevelopment –Outdoor lighting: once 55% of entire building is redeveloped then entire development shall comply with Outdoor Lighting Ordinance

6. CASE SPECIFICS Development Standards for Planning Parcel 3: Intended to be developed as a mobile home park –Minimum space size of 3500 square feet –Maximum building height of 35-feet –Minimum space width of 39-feet –Minimum space depth of 90-feet –Minimum front/rear setback of 10-feet –Minimum side setback of 5-feet Proposes a range of 165 to 200 units All streets within mobile home park will be privately maintained –Streets will be constructed to lesser width than of a minor local roadway per CLC Design Standards All common areas, parks, landscaping, and open space will be privately maintained A 10-ft landscape buffer will be provided in addition to setback requirements between MHP and adjacent industrial uses A 10-ft landscape buffer will be provided in addition to setback requirements between the MHP and adjacent SF-residential properties to the south

7. CASE SPECIFICS PUBLIC BENEFITS: Applicant will install a bus shelter for the bus stop located on Amador Avenue west of Pioneer Place; Applicant proposes pedestrian trails and bikeways within Villa Amador to Burn Lake to facilitate connectivity; and Applicant will work with both Facilities and Public Works Department to expand CLC Burn Lake Park Project as well as the CLC drainage facility adjacent to Burn Lake

8. REVIEW TIMELINE February 10, 2010 DRC Meeting –PW Department has concern regarding the allowance of primary access to Valley Drive via the City-owned parcel PW requests letters of support from adjacent property owners as well as a TIA –Applicant did not want to a postponement from DRC based on PW concerns –DRC recommended denial to Planning & Zoning Commission February 23, 2010: Public Works provides conditional approval with 6 conditions: 1.Until such time that it is decided that City parcel can be used as a roadway access to development subdivision, the Design Engineer shall designate it as “proposed access” on the concept plan; 2.TIA shall be provided at the time of Final Site Plan submittal; 3.Use of City parcel as a roadway/public ROW is contingent upon the review of the TIA and further discussions with PW Department to determine the feasibility of utilizing the City parcel due to existing City infrastructure. If it is decided that the City parcel can be used a roadway, the Design Engineer must work with the adjacent property owners to ensure that there are no adverse impacts to their property/business. The developer is responsible for replatting the parcel as public ROW; 4.Upon Final Site Plan submittal, the Design Engineer shall provide written confirmation that the Design Engineer has notified the property owners adjacent to the City parcel of the potential use of the City parcel as public ROW; 5.If the City parcel cannot be used for primary access to the private subdivision based on the listed conditions, the Developer must designate another access point as their primary access and find another secondary access; and 6.There must be an agreement with the City to use the City’s detention facility.

9. REVIEW TIMELINE February 23, 2010: Public Works provides conditional approval with 6 conditions. –Depsite PW Department conditional approval, DRC recommendation of denial still stood –CD staff concurred with DRC recommendation despite PW conditional approval: A PUD is a zoning district; by approving a concept plan, a zone change on the land occurs and the property owner has the vested right to develop the property in accordance with the concept plan. February 23, 2010: Planning and Zoning Commission –DRC recommendation to P&ZC is denial –Comments/concerns from surrounding property owners against the development –P&ZC recommends conditional approval with the 6 conditions by Public Works Department February 24/25, 2010: Applicant modifies concept plan –Applicant wants to include phasing plan for redevelopment of PP 1 –Modified concept plan must be reconsidered by P&ZC in its totality April 27, 2010: Planning & Zoning Commission –P&ZC must hear the case in its totality again due to modified concept plan request –Comments/concerns from surrounding property owners –P&ZC recommends denial to the City Council

10. CITY COUNCIL OPTIONS 1.Vote “YES” to approve the Ordinance. This action reverses P&ZC recommendation on April 27, 2010. Subject property is rezoned to PUD and concept plan for Villa Amador is approved. 2.Vote “NO” to deny the Ordinance. This actions affirms P&ZC recommendation on April 27, 2010. Current zoning remains in place. Industrial development can continue on properties zoned M- 1/M-2. 3.Modify the Ordinance and vote “YES.” 4.Table/Postpone the Ordinance and direct staff accordingly.