1 OPTICS OF MICE STEP V.0 Ulisse Bravar University of New Hampshire 26 June 2005.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Emittance definition and MICE staging U. Bravar Univ. of Oxford 1 Apr Topics: a) Figure of merit for MICE b) Performance of MICE stages.

Advertisements

FIGURE OF MERIT FOR MUON IONIZATION COOLING Ulisse Bravar University of Oxford 28 July 2004.

“Amplitude Cooling” in Step III & IV Timothy Carlisle.

Cooling channel issues U. Bravar Univ. of Oxford 31-Mar-2004.

1 26 Nov 2010 SOLID ABSORBERS Solid absorbers will provide first cooling demonstration –This is important for a number of reasons! Can use only solids.

Progress on the MICE Cooling Channel Solenoid Magnet System

Changing the absorbers: how does it fit in the MICE experimental programme? Besides the requirement that the amount of multiple scattering material be.

23 October 2005MICE Meeting at RAL1 MICE Tracker Magnets, 4 K Coolers, and Magnet Coupling during a Quench Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.

Alain Blondel MICE: Constraints on the solenoids 2.Field Homogeneity: or ? this will be dictated by the detector requirements. TPG will be.

OPTICS UPDATE Ulisse Bravar University of Oxford 3 August 2004.

MICE Collaboration meeting at LBNL: 9 ~13 th Feb, 2005 Force reaction analysis Stephanie Yang Feb 10 th, 2005.

18 June 2004AFC meeting1 MICE  functions and so on Work in progress…. Observation by Ulisse Bravar at CERN meeting that beam not matched in baseline (Proposal.

Downstream transversal sizes Rikard Sandström University of Geneva MICE detector meeting.

10 October 2006 MICE CM-16 at RAL 1 Distributed versus Lumped Coupling Magnets Michael A. Green and Soren Prestemon Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley.

MICE Magnetic forces James Rochford Elwyn Baynham AFC working group meeting RAL 23 April 2004.

M.apollonioCM17 -CERN- (22/2 - 25/2 2007)1 Single Particle Amplitude M. Apollonio – University of Oxford.

MICE analysis meeting - (6/4/2006) 1 Update on MICE – step III M. Apollonio – University of Oxford.

9 June 2006MICE CM-15 Fermilab1 Progress on the MICE Cooling Channel and Tracker Magnets since CM-14 Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.

2/7/2002 RolMUCOOL/MICE1 20b. Gaseous Energy Absorber, 21a. High Pressure RF Cavities New Money for New Approaches DOE Small Business Innovation Research.

I.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=. i.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=

1 OPTICS OF STAGE III Ulisse Bravar University of Oxford 6 October 2004.

M.apollonioAM STEPIII – sizes and positioning m.apollonio, Oxford.

MICE CM - Fermilab, Chicago - (11/06/2006) 1 A (short) history of MICE – step III M. Apollonio – University of Oxford.

Beamline-to-MICE Matching Ulisse Bravar University of Oxford 2 August 2004 MICE performance with ideal Gaussian beam JUNE04 beam from ISIS beamline (Kevin.

1. Optical matching in MICE Ulisse Bravar University of Oxford 2 June 2004 Constraints Software MICE proposal mismatch MICE Note 49 (September 2004, Bob.

24 Nov 2009PC Analysis PC Schedule 2009 Tuesdays fortnightly Proposed dates: 13 October  27 October  CM25 4 – 6 November  24 November 8 December.

30 June 2004MICE VC1 MICE  functions Since last VC report: –New Mike Green configurations for decreased spacing between focus and matching coils of 400mm,

1 Superconducting Magnets for the MICE Channel Michael A. Green Oxford University Physics Department Oxford OX1-3RH, UK.

I.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=. i.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=

12 March 2006NFMCC Meeting, IIT, Chicago1 Progress on the MICE Cooling Channel and Tracker Magnets Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.

CM-18 June Magnet Conductor Parameters and How They affect Conductor Selection for MICE Magnets Michael Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Berkeley.

1 Progress on the MICE Cooling Channel Magnets Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 28 June 2005.

4th April MICE – Magnetic Shield Configuration H Witte, J Cobb Oxford University University of Oxford, Clarendon Laboratory, Parks Road, Oxford,

1 Effect of staging on module connection and support arrangement Yury Ivanyushenkov RAL.

M.apollonioam M. Apollonio University of Oxford update on STEP III.

CMPB Alain Blondel 14 April STATUS OF MICE.

04/01/2006MICE Analysis Meeting1 MICE phase III M. Apollonio, J. Cobb (Univ. of Oxford)

M.apollonio/j.cobbMICE UK meeting- RAL - (9/1/2007) 1 Single Particle Amplitude M. Apollonio – University of Oxford.

MICE magnetic measurements Sequence of events and MICE hall movements Alain Blondel – 10-April 2012 revision from 13 December 2012.

Timothy Carlisle, Oxford CM 28. Step 3 Matching Step 3  Step 3 rematched for 830 mm spool piece  Calc. B(z) & BetaFn with the following:  Minimize.

MICE RFCC Module Update Allan DeMello Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MAP Winter Collaboration Meeting at JLab, Virginia February 28, 2011.

MICE CM15 wrap-up Alain Blondel 11 June MICE News Collaboration meeting 8-11 June 2006 at Fermilab complete review of the project. for those who.

Emittance measurement: ID muons with time-of-flight Measure x,y and t at TOF0, TOF1 Use momentum-dependent transfer matrices to map  path Assume straight.

MICE collaboration meeting Alain Blondel 27 – Welcome to the 10th MICE collaboration meeting. 1.Global neutrino factory situation 2.Possible.

MICE: The International Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment Ulisse Bravar University of Oxford ICHEP ‘04 1 MICE: The International Muon Ionization Cooling.

The status of the construction of MICE Step IV K. Long, on behalf of the MICE collaboration.

Results from Step I of MICE D Adey 2013 International Workshop on Neutrino Factories, Super-beams and Beta- beams Working Group 3 – Accelerator Topics.

1 Layout and Installation MICE Collaboration Meeting, RAL, October 27-29, 2004 Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw, Paul Drumm, Matthew Hills, Yury Ivanyushenkov,

Some Thoughts on Magnetic Measurements for MICE Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Berkeley CA 94720, USA.

MICE magnetic measurements: AFC considerations Alain Blondel see a previous discussion for reference in CM35 (Feb 2013 slides by V. Blackmore, A. Blondel.

1 Forces Yury Ivanyushenkov RAL. 2 Goal: find maximal (static and dynamical) possible forces in MICE magnetic system. Method: calculation of axial magnetic.

MICE at STFC-RAL The International Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment -- Design, engineer and build a section of cooling channel capable of giving the.

MICE RFCC Module Update Allan DeMello Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE CM29 at RAL, UK February 17, 2011.

11 Nov 2008PC Analysis PC Schedule 2008 Tuesdays fortnightly 9 September  23 September  2 October  CM22  11 November  25 November 9 December.

MICE RF Workshop Alain Blondel MICE = critical R&D for neutrino factory and muon collider 1 neutrino factory: accelerate muons and store to produce.

PID PC 7th Sept MICE MAGNETIC FIELDS & SHIELDS J. H. Cobb & H. Witte Oxford University Magnet fields for MICE (VI) calculated including magnetic.

1 Search for Worst-Case Forces MICE Video Conference, September 8, 2004 Yury Ivanyushenkov Applied Science Division, Engineering and Instrumentation Department,

Progress in the construction of the MICE cooling channel and first measurements Adam Dobbs, EPS-HEP, 23 rd July 2011.

ch/~bdl/lepc/lepc.ppt 1 MICE Status and Plans Rikard Sandström Université de Geneve International Scoping Study CERN,

Re-tuning MICE June 1 st 2010 Tim Carlisle. Intro At the moment MICE coil currents optimized for: central Pz = 0 RF No LH2 want to rematch M1 & M2 in.

(one of the) Request from MPB

The MAP 3-Year Plan Mark Palmer Fermilab September 26, 2014.

CM Nov 2009 DOES MICE NEED STEP III ? Somewhat hard to understand MICE Schedule… –If the gods are (un)kind it’s possible that SS1, SS2 & FC1 are.

MICE news Alain Blondel 20 – NEWS 1.CERN’s SPSC at Villars: recommandations 2.MICE step Upcoming gateway steps 4.RF from LBNL (Mike)

MICE at Step IV without SSD

Why do we need to know the fields / map the magnets?

Effect of Reduced Focus Coil Current on Step IV and Step VI

Impact of Magnet Performance on the Physics Program of MICE

DESIGN OPTIONS FOR ORBIT CORRECTORS IN D2 and Q4

Area of a rectangle Tuesday, 05 February 2019 Definition:

Presentation transcript:

1 OPTICS OF MICE STEP V.0 Ulisse Bravar University of New Hampshire 26 June 2005

2  - STEP I: spring 2006 STEP II: summer 2006 STEP III: winter 2007 STEP IV: spring 2007 STEP V: fall 2007 STEP VI: 2008 MICE Steps ……………

3 STEP V STEP V.0 Should get 5-10 MV RF acceleration (limited by dark current) Shorter, less expensive, no coupling coil, (very limited optics flexibility) does this work in flip, RFoFo, non flip modes? These are mostly optics questions MICE Step V.0 (1)

4 MICE Step V.0 (2) Spectrometers and AFC modules same as in all other MICE configurations. NO coupling coil. 2 RF cavities rather than 4. RF dimensions do not change: length of one cavity = 43 cm. Spacing between AFC modules reduced: LH to LH distance 2.75 m 1.35 m

5 Optics Goals (1) Find optic solutions for all MICE steps and configurations. i.e. choose currents for all 18 MICE coils to match the   function as desired. z (m)   (m) r (m) p = 200 MeV/c   = 42 cm

6 Optics Goals (2) Solutions for flip/non-flip/semi-flip operating modes: a)p = 140, 170, 200, 240 MeV/c; b)   = 7, 15, 25, 42 cm in the middle of the LH 2. Assume B = 4 T in spectrometer for p = 200, 240 MeV/c. Scale B with p for p < 200 MeV/c. Finding an optic solution means:   has the desired value and a minimum in the middle of the LH 2 absorber;   has the desired value and d   / dz = 0 in the two spectrometers; B is constant within 1% in the two spectrometers; J, B SURFACE and coil forces are within limits.

7 Optics of StepV.0 Fix the distance between the two AFC modules. Distance should be as small as possible, to reduce   increase in the RF section. Smallest distance = 1.35 m. Once distance is fixed, absence of coupling coil implies there can be only ONE flip and ONE non-flip optic solution for StepV.0. To improve performance, new optics software using routine CONMIN.F90 from NASA AMES.

8 Non-flip Mode (1) B z field: p = 200 MeV/c   min = 7 cm, 4 cm from center of LH J FC = 125 A mm -2 z (m)   (T )

9 Non-flip Mode (2) Beta function: p = 200 MeV/c   min = 7 cm, 4 cm from center of LH J FC = 125 A mm -2 z (m)   (m)

10 Flip Mode (1) B z field: p = 200 MeV/c   min = 14 cm, 11 cm from center of LH J FC = 194 A mm -2 z (m)   (T )

11 Flip Mode (2) Beta function: p = 200 MeV/c   min = 14 cm, 11 cm from center of LH J FC = 194 A mm -2 z (m)   (m)

12 Conclusions Optic solutions for Step V.0 now available. Work needed: A) do these solutions really work? i.e. determine cooling and scraping! B) are the currents, peak B-fields, RF E- fields and forces within tolerances?