Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1 Search for Worst-Case Forces MICE Video Conference, September 8, 2004 Yury Ivanyushenkov Applied Science Division, Engineering and Instrumentation Department,

Published byAdele Davidson Modified over 8 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "1 Search for Worst-Case Forces MICE Video Conference, September 8, 2004 Yury Ivanyushenkov Applied Science Division, Engineering and Instrumentation Department,"— Presentation transcript:

1 1 Search for Worst-Case Forces MICE Video Conference, September 8, 2004 Yury Ivanyushenkov Applied Science Division, Engineering and Instrumentation Department, RAL

2 2 Aims of work Goal: find maximal (static and dynamical) possible forces in MICE magnetic system. Method: calculation of axial magnetic forces in MICE by using OPERA package (and other codes). Cases to be analyzed: - MICE stages III, IV, V and VI (see next slide): Parameters (proposal): magnetic modes - flip, semi-flip and non-flip; momentum (MeV/c) – 140, 170, 200, 240; beta (cm) – 7, 15, 25, 42; gap focus coil – match coil (mm) - 450 (was 600) ; coil currents - 0 (coil is off or quenched), nominal, max (critical current ?); magnetic shielding – with and without. - Abnormal cases: - dynamical forces during quenches; - anything else?

3 3 STEP I: STEP II STEP III STEP IV STEP V STEP VI By A.Blondel MICE stages

4 4 Model (without shielding) in OPERA Model: -18 coils; - no iron shielding

5 5 255305 1260120 60 200 620 263347 725 250 841 1375138512501260 3660 (SFOFO, 200 MeV/c, beta=42 cm, gap =600 mm) 404 Centre coils: J=64.44 A/mm 2 Focusing coils: J=113.95 A/mm 2 Coupling coils: J=96.21 A/mm 2 End #2 coils: J=67.11 A/mm 2 255 355 202 Matching #2 coils: J=41.46 A/mm 2 2440 202 4541 4721 6041 6161 Matching #1 coils: J=65.06 A/mm 2 End #1 coils: J=65.22 A/mm 2 792 305 Gap=600 MICE magnetic system geometry Note: Geometry and currents from Ulisse before Osaka meeting

6 6 (SFOFO, p=200 MeV/c, beta=42 cm, gap =450 mm) 4.1 83.9 13.9 20.8 235 228 14236 83.9 13.9 20.8 235 228 14 236 All forces are in tonnes ! 147 Centre coils: J=64.44 A/mm 2 Coupling coils: J=96.21 A/mm 2 End #2 coils: J=67.11 A/mm 2 Matching #2 coils: J=75.17 A/mm 2 Matching #1 coils: J=56.30 A/mm 2 End #1 coils: J=61.59 A/mm 2 Focusing coils: J=113.95 A/mm 2 24.37 Forces in MICE magnetic system 14

7 7 2.4 103.5 6.6 22 220 225 15.4236 147 12.55 15.4 4.1 83.9 13.9 20.8 235 228 14236 147 24.37 14 (SFOFO, p=200 MeV/c, beta=42 cm, gap =600 mm) (SFOFO, p=200 MeV/c, beta=42 cm, gap =450 mm) Forces Vs. Gap for p=200 Mev/c

8 8 (SFOFO, p=240 MeV/c, beta=42 cm, gap =450 mm) 2.4 79 9 23.3 336.6 328 21.5340 79 9 23.3 336.6 328 21.5 340 All forces are in tonnes ! 147 Centre coils: J=64.44 A/mm 2 Coupling coils: J=115.45 A/mm 2 End #2 coils: J=67.11 A/mm 2 Matching #2 coils: J=83.07 A/mm 2 Matching #1 coils: J=66.82 A/mm 2 End #1 coils: J=61.59 A/mm 2 Focusing coils: J=136.74 A/mm 2 147 33.38.6 Forces in MICE magnetic system 21.5

9 9 Forces Vs. p for gap=450 mm (SFOFO, p=200 MeV/c, beta=42 cm, gap =450 mm) (SFOFO, p=240 MeV/c, beta=42 cm, gap =450 mm) 2.4 79 9 23.3 336.6 328 21.5340 147 33.38.6 21.5 4.1 83.9 13.9 20.8 235 228 14236 All forces are in tonnes ! 147 24.37 14

10 10 (SEMI-FLIP, p=200 MeV/c, beta=42 cm, gap =600 mm) 2.2 100.8 3.6 14 59.5 46 46.797 100.8 3.6 14 59.5 46 46.7 97 All forces are in tonnes ! 146 Centre coils: J=63.81 A/mm 2 Coupling coils: J=93.10 A/mm 2 End #2 coils: J=67.11 A/mm 2 Matching #2 coils: J=34.99 A/mm 2 Matching #1 coils: J=68.33 A/mm 2 End #1 coils: J=64.01 A/mm 2 Focusing coils: J=68.03 A/mm 2 146 39.413.5 Forces in MICE magnetic system 46.7

11 11 (NON-FLIP, p=200 MeV/c, beta=42 cm, gap =600 mm) 1.8 100.6 3.6 13.7 60.3 45 15.751.5 100.6 3.6 13.7 60.3 45 15.7 51.5 All forces are in tonnes ! 146 Centre coils: J=63.81 A/mm 2 Coupling coils: J=93.10 A/mm 2 End #2 coils: J=67.11 A/mm 2 Matching #2 coils: J=34.99 A/mm 2 Matching #1 coils: J=68.33 A/mm 2 End #1 coils: J=64.01 A/mm 2 Focusing coils: J=68.03 A/mm 2 146 26.315.3 Forces in MICE magnetic system 15.7

12 12 Net Force, tonne / Case SFOFO, p=200 Mev/c, beta=42 cm SFOFO, p=240 Mev/c, beta=42 cm SEMI-FLIP, p=200 Mev/c, beta=42 cm NON-FLIP, p=200 Mev/c, beta=42 cm Gap=450 mm Gap=600 mm Gap=450 mm Gap=600 mm Central focus pair000000 Edge focus pair7 from centre 5 towards centre 8.6 from centre 8 towards centre 13.5 towards centre 15.3 towards centre Coupling coil14 from centre 15 from centre 21.5 from centre 23 from centre 46.7 from centre 15.7 towards centre Tracker solenoid24.3 towards centre 12.5 towards centre 33.3 towards centre 17.3 towards centre 39.4 towards centre 26.3 towards centre Summary table for axial magnetic forces

13 13 (SFOFO, p=240 MeV/c, beta=42 cm, gap =450 mm, Focus Coils quenched) 3.4 80.3 12.1 57.5 0 0 21.1 0 80.3 12.1 57.5 0 0 21.1 0 All forces are in tonnes ! Centre coils: J=64.44 A/mm 2 Coupling coils: J=115.45 A/mm 2 End #2 coils: J=67.11 A/mm 2 Matching #2 coils: J=83.07 A/mm 2 Matching #1 coils: J=66.82 A/mm 2 End #1 coils: J=61.59 A/mm 2 Focusing coils: J=0 A/mm 2 147 6.30 Forces in MICE magnetic system: Quenches 21.1 147

14 14 (SFOFO, p=240 MeV/c, beta=42 cm, gap =450 mm, Focus Coils quenched) 3.4 80.3 12.1 57.5 0 0 21.1 0 All forces are in tonnes ! 6.30 Forces in MICE magnetic system: Quenches (2) 21.1 147 (SFOFO, p=240 MeV/c, beta=42 cm, gap =450 mm) 2.4 79 9 23.3 336.6 328 21.5340 33.38.6 21.5

15 15 (SFOFO, p=240 MeV/c, beta=42 cm, gap =450 mm, Coupling Coils quenched) 0.8 77.8 7.8 19 312.7 273 0259.7 77.8 7.8 19 312.7 273 0 259.7 All forces are in tonnes ! 147.3 Centre coils: J=64.44 A/mm 2 Coupling coils: J=0 A/mm 2 End #2 coils: J=67.11 A/mm 2 Matching #2 coils: J=83.07 A/mm 2 Matching #1 coils: J=66.82 A/mm 2 End #1 coils: J=61.59 A/mm 2 Focusing coils: J=136.74 A/mm 2 147.3 43.539.7 Forces in MICE magnetic system: Quenches (3) 0

16 16 Forces in MICE magnetic system: Quenches (4) (SFOFO, p=240 MeV/c, beta=42 cm, gap =450 mm, Coupling Coils quenched) 0.8 77.8 7.8 19 312.7 273 0259. 7 All forces are in tonnes ! 43.539.7 0 147.3 (SFOFO, p=240 MeV/c, beta=42 cm, gap =450 mm) 2.4 79 9 23.3 336.6 328 21.5340 33.38.6 21.5

17 17 (SFOFO, p=240 MeV/c, beta=42 cm, gap =450 mm, Detector Magnets quenched) 0 0 0 0 0 283.6 314.8 31.3340.7 0 0 0 283.6 314.8 31.3 340.7 All forces are in tonnes ! 0 Centre coils: J=0 A/mm 2 Coupling coils: J=115.45 A/mm 2 End #2 coils: J=0 A/mm 2 Matching #2 coils: J=0 A/mm 2 Matching #1 coils: J=0 A/mm 2 End #1 coils: J=0 A/mm 2 Focusing coils: J=136.74 A/mm 2 0 031.2 Forces in MICE magnetic system: Quenches (5) 31.3

18 18 (SFOFO, p=240 MeV/c, beta=42 cm, gap =450 mm, Detector Magnets quenched) 0 0 0 0 283.6 314.8 31.3340.7 All forces are in tonnes ! 0 031.2 31.3 Forces in MICE magnetic system: Quenches (6) (SFOFO, p=240 MeV/c, beta=42 cm, gap =450 mm) 2.4 79 9 23.3 336.6 328 21.5340 33.38.6 21.5

19 19 Net Force, tonne / Case Normal mode Coils quenched: Focus coilsCoupling coils Detector magnets Central focus pair0000 Edge focus pair8.6 from centre 039.7 from centre 31.2 towards centre Coupling coil21.5 from centre 21.1 from centre 031.3 from centre Tracker solenoid33.3 towards centre 6.3 from centre 43.5 towards centre 0 Summary table for axial magnetic forces: Quench cases SFOFO, p=240 Mev/c, beta=42 cm, gap=450 mm

20 20 Forces in MICE magnetic system: Effect of shielding disks 2.4 103.5 6.6 22 220 225 15.4236 147 12.55 15.4 (SFOFO, p=200 MeV/c, beta=42 cm, gap =600 mm) 5.0 103.6 6.7 22 220 225 15.4236 139.9 2.6 515.4 Without shielding disks With shielding disks

21 21 Conclusions Conclusions (preliminary): so far, the highest net forces on modules are created in SEMI-FLIP mode (but the highest net force on the edge focus pair is in case of NON- FLIP mode) -> it seems there is no a single worst case for all the modules; for FLIP mode forces are the highest for 240 MeV/c; both the edge focus pair and the tracker solenoid (but not the coupling coil) are sensitive to the value of the gap; forces change when some of coils are quenched; shielding disks change forces on the detector module

22 22 Next steps New set of currents for various MICE stages and magnetic modes has been recently released by Ulisse Bravar. Proposal for the next steps: agree on parameter space for force cases; get from Ulisse a complete set of currents (and geometries) for all stages and magnetic modes; ask John Cobb to make a quick scan of parameter space by using his code to indicate the worst cases; check worst cases with OPERA including shielding in the model; collect recommendations from the Collaboration on abnormal cases and include these cases into the analysis; dynamical cases – ask for help from magnet experts; anything else ?

Download ppt "1 Search for Worst-Case Forces MICE Video Conference, September 8, 2004 Yury Ivanyushenkov Applied Science Division, Engineering and Instrumentation Department,"

Similar presentations

Emittance definition and MICE staging U. Bravar Univ. of Oxford 1 Apr. 2004 Topics: a) Figure of merit for MICE b) Performance of MICE stages.

Emittance definition and MICE staging U. Bravar Univ. of Oxford 1 Apr Topics: a) Figure of merit for MICE b) Performance of MICE stages.
MICE Absorber cryostat Forces and power dissipation - for normal operation and during a magnet quench Elwyn Baynham James Rochford MICE Meeting November.

MICE Absorber cryostat Forces and power dissipation - for normal operation and during a magnet quench Elwyn Baynham James Rochford MICE Meeting November.
Magnet quench during a training run Magnet electrical circuit schematic PROGRESS ON THE MODELING AND MODIFICATION OF THE MICE SUPERCONDUCTING SPECTROMETER.

Magnet quench during a training run Magnet electrical circuit schematic PROGRESS ON THE MODELING AND MODIFICATION OF THE MICE SUPERCONDUCTING SPECTROMETER.
Cooling channel issues U. Bravar Univ. of Oxford 31-Mar-2004.

Cooling channel issues U. Bravar Univ. of Oxford 31-Mar-2004.
Action Who Progress made status Implement central repository for drawings -- need detector information to add to official drawing WL Progress on-going.

Action Who Progress made status Implement central repository for drawings -- need detector information to add to official drawing WL Progress on-going.
On MICE Coordinate System Yury Ivanyushenkov RAL.

On MICE Coordinate System Yury Ivanyushenkov RAL.
October, 2003 P. Fabbricatore and S. Farinon Spectrometer magnets – Possible layout of cryostat in the end region In order to define the cryostat layout.

October, 2003 P. Fabbricatore and S. Farinon Spectrometer magnets – Possible layout of cryostat in the end region In order to define the cryostat layout.
Progress on the MICE Cooling Channel Solenoid Magnet System

Progress on the MICE Cooling Channel Solenoid Magnet System
Changing the absorbers: how does it fit in the MICE experimental programme? Besides the requirement that the amount of multiple scattering material be.

Changing the absorbers: how does it fit in the MICE experimental programme? Besides the requirement that the amount of multiple scattering material be.
23 October 2005MICE Meeting at RAL1 MICE Tracker Magnets, 4 K Coolers, and Magnet Coupling during a Quench Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.

23 October 2005MICE Meeting at RAL1 MICE Tracker Magnets, 4 K Coolers, and Magnet Coupling during a Quench Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.
Alain Blondel MICE: Constraints on the solenoids 2.Field Homogeneity: 10 -2 or 10 -3 ? this will be dictated by the detector requirements. TPG will be.

Alain Blondel MICE: Constraints on the solenoids 2.Field Homogeneity: or ? this will be dictated by the detector requirements. TPG will be.
OPTICS UPDATE Ulisse Bravar University of Oxford 3 August 2004.

OPTICS UPDATE Ulisse Bravar University of Oxford 3 August 2004.
MICE Collaboration meeting at LBNL: 9 ~13 th Feb, 2005 Force reaction analysis Stephanie Yang Feb 10 th, 2005.

MICE Collaboration meeting at LBNL: 9 ~13 th Feb, 2005 Force reaction analysis Stephanie Yang Feb 10 th, 2005.
Tracker Solenoid Module Design Update Steve VirostekStephanie Yang Mike GreenWing Lau Lawrence Berkeley National LabOxford Physics MICE Collaboration Meeting.

Tracker Solenoid Module Design Update Steve VirostekStephanie Yang Mike GreenWing Lau Lawrence Berkeley National LabOxford Physics MICE Collaboration Meeting.
18 June 2004AFC meeting1 MICE  functions and so on Work in progress…. Observation by Ulisse Bravar at CERN meeting that beam not matched in baseline (Proposal.

18 June 2004AFC meeting1 MICE  functions and so on Work in progress…. Observation by Ulisse Bravar at CERN meeting that beam not matched in baseline (Proposal.
1 G4MICE studies of PID transverse acceptance MICE video conference 2006-05-24 Rikard Sandström.

1 G4MICE studies of PID transverse acceptance MICE video conference Rikard Sandström.
Downstream transversal sizes Rikard Sandström University of Geneva 2007-02-16 MICE detector meeting.

Downstream transversal sizes Rikard Sandström University of Geneva MICE detector meeting.
10 October 2006 MICE CM-16 at RAL 1 Distributed versus Lumped Coupling Magnets Michael A. Green and Soren Prestemon Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley.

10 October 2006 MICE CM-16 at RAL 1 Distributed versus Lumped Coupling Magnets Michael A. Green and Soren Prestemon Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley.
1 RAL Integration Issues MICE Collaboration Meeting, Osaka, August 1-3, 2004 Elwyn Baynham, Paul Drumm, Yury Ivanyushenkov, Tony Jones RAL.

1 RAL Integration Issues MICE Collaboration Meeting, Osaka, August 1-3, 2004 Elwyn Baynham, Paul Drumm, Yury Ivanyushenkov, Tony Jones RAL.
MICE Magnetic forces James Rochford Elwyn Baynham AFC working group meeting RAL 23 April 2004.

MICE Magnetic forces James Rochford Elwyn Baynham AFC working group meeting RAL 23 April 2004.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google