Linac2 and Linac3 D. Küchler for the linac team. Planning first preparative meeting for the start-up of Linac2 in June 2013 –this early kick-off useful.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Requirements Specification and Management
Advertisements

1 Commissioning ABT Equipment in the LHC Jan Uythoven ABT TCM 13/01/2015.
<<replace with Customer Logo>>
FESA 3 Implementation Status Stephane Deghaye BE/CO On behalf of the FESA team and many users.
CSCU 411 Software Engineering Chapter 2 Introduction to Software Engineering Management.
Beam commissioning strategy Global machine checkout Essential 450 GeV commissioning System/beam commissioning Machine protection commissioning.
Richard M. Boyce FAC Review – Accelerator Installation October 29-31, Installation – Accelerator Systems Installation Planning.
Project Management and MS Project. The project management triangle: Time Resources Scope.
How to improve operational efficiency ? [R. Alemany] [CERN AB/OP] [Engineer In Charge of LHC] Beam Commissioning Workshop, Evian Jan 2010.
BI SW for LINAC4 On behalf of BE/BI/SW BI software development process Specifications List of BI Systems – Not covered: PSB ring systems Conclusions Lars.
The TIMING System … …as used in the PS accelerators.
> Blueprint Kickoff >. Introductions Customer Vision & Success Criteria Apigee Accelerator Overview Blueprint Schedule Roles & Responsibilities Communications.
FAC, 10/12/06 D. Schultz 1 Readiness for 2007 Startup Linac Injector Controls ARR David Schultz.
LHC Machine Status Report Roberto Saban LHCC June 4 th 2014.
Project Tracking. Questions... Why should we track a project that is underway? What aspects of a project need tracking?
Requirements Review – July 21, Requirements for CMS Patricia McBride July 21, 2005.
Quick Changeover Basics This material is provided by Industrial Solutions, Inc. and is intended for internal use only. Any reproduction or re-use outside.
Consolidation of access systems for the injector Complex ATOP days 4-6 March 2009 P. Ninin & R, Nunes in behalf of the PS and SPS access project teams…
EGEE is a project funded by the European Union under contract IST Testing processes Leanne Guy Testing activity manager JRA1 All hands meeting,
Feedback from MEF  Only possible, if COMMON COORDINATION MEETINGS  Main possible conflict: SAFETY –No “work permits” in the injectors. MEF working on.
1 Kenneth Osborne, 9/14/07 Inter Group communications at the Advanced Light Source. Overview of the different methods of communication between different.
ISM 5316 Week 3 Learning Objectives You should be able to: u Define and list issues and steps in Project Integration u List and describe the components.
Roles Committees Meetings
LHC Access System August 2006 LHC Access System – Status and Planning August 2006 Elena Manola-Poggioli Eva Sanchez-Corral TS-CSE on behalf of the LHC.
Linac-4 current situation and outlook U. Raich, F. Roncarolo, F. Zocca.
Y2K/Focus April 1999 S. Jarp Year 2000 co-ordination AT CERN S.Jarp/IT months left 29 April 1999.
HC Review, May 2005 Hardware Commissioning Review Hardware Commissioning Review Quality Assurance and Documentation of Results Félix Rodríguez Mateos,
Status Report – Injection Working Group Working group to find strategy for more efficient start-up of injectors and associated facilities after long stops.
SPS re-commissioning with beam K. Cornelis PS-SPS days.
Wojciech Sliwinski BE/CO for the RBAC team 25/04/2013.
CERN Raul Murillo Garcia BE-CO LS1 review – TE-EPC feedback BE-CO LS1 review TE-EPC feedback Raul Murillo Garcia on behalf of TE-EPC Daniel Calcoen Stephen.
LS2 Safety Thomas Otto, LS2 Safety Coordinator.
K.Hanke – PS/SPS Days – 19/01/06 K.Hanke - PS/SPS Days 19/01/06 Recommissioning Linac2/PSB/ISOLDE from CCC  remote operation from CCC  upgrades & changes.
Global Design Effort Introduction and goals of the meeting Andrei Seryi, Toshiaki Tauchi Fifth ATF2 Project Meeting December 19-21, 2007.
Session 7: I-LHC Organization: Chamonix Summary Session7; Oliver Brüning 1 -session organized in collaboration with D. Manglunki and all speakers.
BE-CO review Looking back at LS1 CERN /12/2015 Delphine Jacquet BE/OP/LHC Denis Cotte BE/OP/PS 1.
GAN: remote operation of accelerator diagnosis systems Matthias Werner, DESY MDI.
MGT 461 Lecture #27 Project Execution and Control Ghazala Amin.
TE-CRG-CE OMP Meeting 06 / 11 / 2014TE-CRG-CE OMP Meeting.
LS1 Review P.Charrue. Audio/Video infrastructure LS1 saw the replacement of BI and RF analog to digital video transport Was organised in close collaboration.
NA62 Organisation of the work - proposal 2/24/20161PD/DT/PO-MH.
AB/CO Review, Interlock team, 20 th September Interlock team – the AB/CO point of view M.Zerlauth, R.Harrison Powering Interlocks A common task.
Final Report – Injector Re- Commissioning Working Group (IRWG) Working group to find strategy for more efficient start-up of injectors and associated facilities.
LS1 – View from Applications BE-CO LS1 review – 1 December 2015 Greg Kruk on behalf of the Applications section.
– Machine Controls Coordinators (MCC): team and role – Overview of renovations during LS1 – Proposal for after-LS1 Commissioning organization ACCOR PROJECT.
LS1 Mid-Point Status Report of the PSB Low Level RF, Transverse Feedback & High Level RF. Autumn 2013 A. Akroh, M.E. Angoletta, A. Blas, L. Arnaudon, A.
Proton-Driven Plasma Wakefield Acceleration CERN Project Structure Edda Gschwendtner, CERN Lisbon Meeting, 22 June 2012Edda Gschwendtner, CERN2.
Linac4 Project Meeting 1/2011 3/3/2011 M. Vretenar Update on schedule and structure 1.
An introduction to… Lockout Tagout. Aim Every year thousands of workers get killed or injured while performing repairs or maintenance on industrial equipment.
TCR Remote Monitoring for the LHC Technical Infrastructure 6th ST Workshop, Thoiry 2003U. Epting, M.C. Morodo Testa, S. Poulsen1 TCR Remote Monitoring.
AB-CO Exploitation 2006 & Beyond Presented at AB/CO Review 20Sept05 C.H.Sicard (based on the work of Exploitation WG)
1. Baseline – from LMC  Presentation by F. Bordry at LHC Machine Committee 5.10 on LS1 Organisation: 1. Linac4 is not going to be connected.
M. Munoz April 2, 2014 Beam Commissioning at ESS.
LS1 Review BE-CO-SRC Section Contributions from: A.Radeva, J.C Bau, J.Betz, S.Deghaye, A.Dworak, F.Hoguin, S.Jensen, I.Koszar, J.Lauener, F.Locci, W.Sliwinski,
LS1 Day: The Injectors S. Baird EN/MEF Thanks to R Brown, N Gilbert, D McFarlane & V Chohan, IEFC workshop…. LS1 Day: The Injectors 1.
PS Complex Controls Renovation S Baird AB/ABP ATC/ABOC Days: Session Jan 2008.
SPS start up 2014 SPS OP. SPS changes during LS1 New transformers and 18kV cables for MPS. New function generators (FGC’s) with lots of new and different.
Principles of Information Systems Eighth Edition
Status and Plans for InCA
Online check lists Half Sector Test
HF Test station at P5 A.Mestvirishvili.
Software and Systems Integration
LAAWG Status Report – 15th May 2007
EC Activities Status for the LIU
BE-BI Software for LINAC4
PS Booster Hardware Tests & Cold Check-out planning 16th of March 2017
James Ridewood BE-OP-SPS
Managing infrastructure faults to minimize accelerator down time
Vacuum Controls Stephen Schuh Tom Porter 25 October 2006
Reliability, MPS, Operations and Tuning Work Packages
Presentation transcript:

Linac2 and Linac3 D. Küchler for the linac team

Planning first preparative meeting for the start-up of Linac2 in June 2013 –this early kick-off useful as there were many open questions to solve –this early kick-off was problematic as some people were not interested that early in time or already forget the schedule when actual work had to start linac specialists and representatives of the different equipment groups invited (not all showed up) Linac3 only briefly mentioned, as it was only second priority (not a lead beam for physics)

Planning schedule fixed in December 2013 some fine tuning was needed later on to adapt to external requests (e.g. access system commissioning) start-up of Linac2 and Linac3 staggered as many people had to work on both machines as the linacs are the first machines to start the availability of water, electricity, access and the controls define a hard edge

Coordination by the technical coordinator for the hardware phase in cooperation with the equipment groups and there local coordination by the machine coordinator for the commissioning and the start-up with beam sometimes it seemed that the global schedule defined by us was not integrated in the local schedule of the equipment groups

Commissioning during the commissioning short meetings every Monday morning to discuss the status meetings for the dry run preparation and debriefing the commissioning was done by the linac specialists with the help of some of the equipment specialists a check list was prepared but hardly used informations were exchanged verbally or by (nearly) all the progress was tracked in the elogbook

Commissioning hardware commissioning period is only lightly coordinated for safety specific points – so for example TE-EPC are given the full period to test power convertors, but this is not planned in detail except for EIS devices RF commissioning impacted by its definition as an EIS-M (and newly included into the Access System) –dramatic reduction on the amount of testing time available –now much tighter co-ordination and higher flexibility from the RF personnel needed

Commissioning most beam diagnostic systems (hardware, controls software and applications) could only undergo limited testing before the beam was available – hence a lot of the beam commissioning time was spent on the diagnostics procedure for the change between operation modes out of date, short addendum written to have some base procedure has to be re-written based on the experiences gained after LS1 the CCC enters the game when the beam is handed over to PSB respectively LEIR

Tests many vertical tests during the dry runs as the linacs are the first machines during the start- up a lot of basic control tests had to be done (working sets, knobs, applications …) to find and remove general bugs dedicated test for the SIS watchdog and for the interlock chassis (written procedure available)

The bad bits equipment groups did not request test time for renovated equipment before the start (which was needed as seen later) responsibilities between operation, equipment specialists and controls was not always clear development of some software components started very late (RF FESA class), inability to control the machine remotely led to lost time BCT settings were designed overcomplicated, much time lost to get the set-up properly and to have a working ppm copy method (BCT’s needed for the watchdog)

The bad bits the scheduling of the access system commissioning should have been done from the beginning with the input from OP (would have avoided some confusion) the conditions for handover from Shutdown to Operation were discussed too late (e.g. who would “sign off” that EIS were ready, that shielding was reinstalled correctly, …?)

The good bits good support of CO within the ACCOR project dry runs where not always successful but very useful to make some progress (all specialists at one place at the same time) We made it nearly in time!

Conclusion The essential element is communication between all the partners all the time to be able to define and follow a schedule that works including all the necessary steps from the availability of the central services until the delivery of the beam.