Seattle Public Schools - Ed Tech/REA - 3.29.07 OLD TITLE: Do Grades Prove Proficiency? Comparing Students’ Math GPA and WASL Scores THIS PRESENTATION HAS.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Student Mentoring Taos High School Mary Spears 2010 New Mexico GEAR UP Spring Workshop April 30 – May 1, P.S. & G. Khalsa.

Advertisements

North Elementary School Free/Reduced, AMOs and Percent Proficient data includes Alternate Assessments and Retest One. All EOG Regular Assessment.

Union Elementary School Free/Reduced, AMOs and Percent Proficient data includes Alternate Assessments and Retest One. All EOG Regular Assessment.

Massachusetts School and District Accountability System 2003 Mid-Cycle AYP Determinations State Report December 4, 2003.

Title I/AYP Presentation Prepared by NHCS Title I Department for NHCS PTA September 22, 2010.

Presented to the State Board of Education August 22, 2012 Jonathan Wiens, PhD Office of Assessment and Information Services Oregon Department of Education.

Accountability preview Major Mindshift Out with the Old – In with the New TEPSA - May 2013 (Part 2) Ervin Knezek John Fessenden

FY05 School Year Academic Support Preliminary Data Results (FY05 Fall & Winter Sessions) FY05 School Year Academic Support Preliminary Data Results (FY05.

Oct 1 Accountability Webinar Kim Gilson Senior Consultant Data and Accountability Region 10 ESC

MSP Program Evaluation

Grade 3-8 English Language Arts and Mathematics Results August 8, 2011.

Compass Schools Program Auburn High School School District Profile One High School One Middle School Four Elementary Schools  96% White  1% Hispanic.

1 Predicting Success in Math: The relationship between high school courses and remedial math in college Brandon Lagerquist Northshore School District Paul.

1 Indiana Student Achievement Institute InSAI MEETING 3 SELECTING DATA FIELDS InSAI Raising the bar: Meeting the challenge.

Accountability State and Federal Ratings August 11, 2009 Board Presentation 1.

Tacoma School District - 1 Student Achievement Board Study December 6, 2007 Michael Power Assist. Superintendent Program and Learning Support Tel

9/6/2015 Choices for Studying Choice Dev Davis Macke Raymond.

Student in Context 2-4 Trey Sexson. Part 1: School Information & Demographics  Peakview Elementary  Cherry Creek School District  Established : 1992.

Student Demographics Current Native American1.47%1.11%0.96%0.75%0.60% Asian2.53%1.17%1.02%0.99%1.05% Pacific Islander0.41%0.13%0.20%0.26%0.30%

School Performance Profile and PVAAS.  Federal accountability and PA law dictate that school effectiveness must be measured looking at multiple.

Reynolds Middle School The Path to Success. Who are We? Reynolds Middle School is a culturally diverse inner city middle school located in Lancaster,

Maryland School Assessment (MSA) 2010 Results Leslie Wilson, Assistant State Superintendent Division of Accountability and Assessment July 20, 2010 State.

Seaford School District Annual Parent Meeting 1. Title I Funding and Programs Parent Meeting Agenda Title I Program Presentation Document Review Parent.

Cecilia Sisk Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Schools Fall 2012.

Student Achievement Gains and Gaps in Saint Paul Public Schools Tom Watkins Director of Research, Evaluation and Assessment Saint Paul Public Schools May.

Gail Straus, Assistant Director, Special Services Shelton School District State, School District and individual school results for AYP results can be found.

Andrea Meld, PhD Assessment Analyst, OSPI

10+ Ways to Analyze Data Presenter: Lupe Lloyd Lupe Lloyd & Associates, Inc.

Academic Growth in Math High Poverty Students – WASL and MAP Feng-Yi Hung, Ph.D Director of Assessment and Program Evaluation Clover Park School District.

Eddie Martinez EDUC 533.  An innovation model is an opportunity to present a new way of teaching- with hopes that the new model will improve student.

MCC MCA Data Discoveries. What does Minnesota think is important? What do we want kids to do?  Pass important tests “Be Proficient”  Grow.

Using Data to Develop Your School’s Single Plan Parent Institute December 7, 2005 Presenter: Reyna Corral, Categorical Coordinator.

District 11 CSAP Results School Year D11 Board Presentation August 9,2006.

Citizens of the World Charter School Quarterly Report January 20, 2011.

PASSION, PERSISTANCE AND PIZAZZ: THE PAGE 1 EXPERIENCE PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL COLUMBIA BOROUGH SCHOOL DISTRICT DR. P. DIANE FREY.

How Madden 11 helped improve test scores Forest Park Middle School Longview ISD Bill Bradshaw, Director of Student Services and Aaron.

WCPSS Student Achievement Evaluation and Research Dept. August 19, 2008.

1 AYP for 2007 Haywood County Schools George Chapman Superintendent.

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). What is Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)? As a condition of receiving federal funds under No Child Left Behind (NCLB), all.

Derby High School Connecticut Academic Performance Test Derby High School 2011 Connecticut Academic Performance Test Disaggregated Data Analysis.

Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]

Needs Assessment Authors Stefanie Stockton Kristen Schmidt Melissa Browne EDUC. 533, Dr. Pyatt.

Kansas State Department of Education Kansas Student Population Trends (Percent of K-12, September Unaudited Enrollment, Public Schools) 1.

Measuring College and Career Readiness

SLEDS data for Bloomington High School Graduates from the Classes of 2008 and 2009 (Outcomes in 2014 and 2015) REA March 2017.

The Excellence Gap.

RIVERVIEW EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER

76% African American 14% Latino 9% Asian 1% White 51% Low-Income

Urban Charter Schools in California March 2015

Urban Charter Schools IMPACT in Minnesota March 2015

Urban Charter Schools IMPACT in Colorado March 2015

Urban Charter Schools IMPACT in New York March 2015

Urban Charter Schools Impact in Washington DC March 2015

Urban Charter Schools IMPACT in Michigan March 2015

Essential Skills Update Oregon State Board of Education March 8, 2012

Urban Charter Schools IMPACT in Georgia March 2015

Urban Charter Schools IMPACT in Pennsylvania March 2015

African American.

Urban Charter Schools IMPACT in Missouri March 2015

ED-315 Project Multiplication.

Urban Charter Schools IMPACT in New Mexico March 2015

Bloomington Public Schools Districtwide Achievement Report

Exploring Effective Practices & Embracing Solutions

Education Briefings for Candidates for Office In 2008

Education Briefings for Candidates for Office In 2008

School Profile Andy Dekaney High School

Academic Excellence Indicator System Report

Exploring Effective Practices & Embracing Solutions

Monarch Academy, Aspire Public Schools (CA)

Presentation transcript:

Seattle Public Schools - Ed Tech/REA OLD TITLE: Do Grades Prove Proficiency? Comparing Students’ Math GPA and WASL Scores THIS PRESENTATION HAS BEEN CHANGED! NEW TITLE: WASL Patterns in Meeting Standard

Seattle Public Schools - Ed Tech/REA WASL Patterns in Meeting Standard WERA Conference March 29, 2007 Julie McNalley, PhD Seattle Public Schools Dept. of Education Technology/Research, Evaluation and Assessment

Seattle Public Schools - Ed Tech/REA What paths do students take in passing the WASL? Do students show predictable WASL testing patterns (passing or not passing) as they move through the grade levels? What does this suggest about where we need to focus instruction?

Seattle Public Schools - Ed Tech/REA The Cohort Students who were in 10 th grade in 2006 Students who took the WASL Students who have scores at all three grade levels in math or in reading Students who attended a Seattle comprehensive high school in 10 th grade

Seattle Public Schools - Ed Tech/REA Cohort Demographics: Reading 1435 students 47% boys, 53% girls 27% Asian, 16% African American, 7% Hispanic, 1% Native American, 49% white 6% Special Education (2006) 2% Bilingual (2006) 23% Free and reduced lunch eligible (2006)

Seattle Public Schools - Ed Tech/REA Cohort Demographics: Math 1565 students 47% boys, 53% girls 28% Asian, 16% African American, 7% Hispanic, 1% Native American, 48% white 6% Special Education (2006) 3% Bilingual (2006) 24% Free and reduced lunch eligible (2006)

Seattle Public Schools - Ed Tech/REA Math: 4 th – 7 th Grade 4 th grade 7th grade Met=902 (58%) Not met=663 (42%) 699 (77%) 203 (23%) 65 (10%) 598 (90%) 764 (49%) 801 (51%) N=1565

Seattle Public Schools - Ed Tech/REA Math: 7 th – 10 th Grade 7th grade 10th grade Met=764 (49%) Not met=801 (51%) 733 (96%) 31 (4%) 317 (40%) 484 (60%) 1050 (67%) 515 (33%) N=1565

Seattle Public Schools - Ed Tech/REA Putting it all together

Seattle Public Schools - Ed Tech/REA WASL Math: 2006 Cohort

Seattle Public Schools - Ed Tech/REA

Reading: 4 th – 7 th Grade 4 th grade 7th grade Met=1101 (77%) Not met=334 (23%) 882 (80%) 219 (20%) 54 (16%) 283 (84%) 936 (65%) 499 (35%) N=1435

Seattle Public Schools - Ed Tech/REA Reading: 7 th – 10 th Grade 7th grade 10th grade Met=936 (65%) Not met=499 (35%) 935 (99%) 1 (1%) 365 (73%) 134 (27%) 1300 (91%) 135 (9%) N=1435

Seattle Public Schools - Ed Tech/REA WASL Reading: 2006 Cohort

Seattle Public Schools - Ed Tech/REA

Conversations What stands out to you in these data? What questions do these data raise for you? What are the implications of these data for instruction?