1. Measuring College and Career Readiness
PARCC and NJ ASK RESULTS:
Englewood Cliffs School District Kimberly Dowling
Supervisor of Curriculum and Instruction
October 10, 2016
Measuring College and Career Readiness

2. What has Changed?
Times The PARCC was shortened by 90 minutes total.
60 minutes in Mathematics
30 minutes in ELA
One testing window instead of two
Fewer test sessions and questions
Quicker results for everyone

3. PARCC PERFORMANCE LEVELS
Level 1: Not yet meeting grade-level expectations
Level 2: Partially meeting grade-level expectations
Level 3: Approaching grade-level expectations
Level 4: Meeting grade-level expectations
Level 5: Exceeding grade-level expectations

4. 2016 PARCC GRADE-LEVEL OUTCOMES ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY
Count of Valid Test Scores
Not Yet Meeting
(Level 1)
Partially
Meeting
(Level 2)
Approaching
Expectations
(Level 3)
(Level 4)
Exceeding Expectations (Level 5)
District % >= Level 4
NJ % >= Level 4
PARCC % >= Level 4
Grade 3 55
3.6% (2)
12.7% (7)
20%
(11)
50.9% (28)
63.6%
47.6%
37.2%
Grade 4 76
9.2% (7)
2.6% (2)
23.7% (18)
46.1% (35)
18.4% (14)
64.5%
53.5%
41.5%
Grade 5 48 0%
(0)
18.8% (9)
56.3% (27)
25%
(12)
81.3%
53.2%
40.5%
Grade 6 56
1.8% (1)
12.5% (7)
44.6% (25)
41.1% (23)
85.7%
52.3%
38.7%
Grade 7 43
11.6% (5)
25.6% (11)
62.8% (27)
88.4%
56.3%
41.7%
Grade 8 32
2.3% (1)
4.5%
(2)
34.1% (15)
59.1% (26)
93.2%
55.2%
41.9%

5. 2016 PARCC GRADE-LEVEL OUTCOMES MATHEMATICS
Count of Valid Test Scores
Not Yet Meeting
(Level 1)
Partially
Meeting
(Level 2)
Approaching
Expectations
(Level 3)
(Level 4)
Exceeding Expectations (Level 5)
District % >= Level 4
NJ % >= Level 4
PARCC % >= Level 4
Grade 3 55
1.8% (1)
25.5% (14)
40%
(22)
30.9% (17)
70.9%
51.7%
37.6%
Grade 4 77
10.4% (8)
11.7% (9)
20.8% (16)
45.5% (35)
11.7%
(9)
57.1%
46.6%
32.3%
Grade 5 48
4.2%
(2)
27.1%
(13)
43.8%
(21)
20.8%
(10)
64.6%
47.2%
31.9%
Grade 6 58
3.4%
25.9%
(15)
43.1%
(25)
24.1%
(14)
67.2%
43%
32%
Grade 7 45
2.2%
(1)
8.9%
(4)
20%
37.8%
(17)
31.1%
68.9%
38.7%
28.8%
Grade 8
Algebra 1 43 0%
(0)
4.7%
16.3%
(7)
65.1%
(28)
14%
(6)
79.1%
41.2%
30.8%

6. GRADE 3 2016 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY
Count of Valid Test Scores
Not Yet Meeting
(Level 1)
Partially
Meeting
(Level 2)
Approaching
Expectations
(Level 3)
(Level 4)
Exceeding Expectation (Level 5)
District % >= Level 4
White 17 0%
11.8% (2)
23.5% (4)
64.7% (11)
Asian 32
3.1% (1)
9.4% (3)
21.9% (7)
43.8% (14)
65.6% (21)
Hispanic or Latino 3
33.3% (1)
66.7% (2)
Black or African American 1
100% (1)
Two or More Races
100%(1)
Not Indicated
Male 34
5.9%(2)
20.6% (7)
47.1% (16)
5.9% (2)
52.9% (18)
Female 21
19% (4)
57.1% (12)
23.8% (5)
81% (17)
Students with Disabilities 8
12.5% (1)
25% (2)
37.5% (3)

7. GRADE 4 2016 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY
Count of Valid Test Scores
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Level 4
Level 5
District % >= Level 4
White 25
16% (4)
8% (2)
28% (7)
48% (12) 0%
Asian 42
2.4%(1)
16.7% (7)
47.6% (20)
33.3% (14)
81% (34)
Hispanic or Latino 4
100% (4)
Black or African American 3
33.3%(1)
66.7% (2)
Not Indicated 2
50% (1)
Male 38
13.2% (5)
2.6% (1)
21.1% (8)
55.3% (21)
7.9% (3)
63.2% (24)
Female
5.3% (2)
26.3% (10)
36.8% (14)
28.9% (11)
65.8% (25)
Students with Disabilities 13
38.5% (5)
7.7% (1)
15.4% (2)

8. GRADE 5 2016 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY
Count of Valid Test Scores
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Level 4
Level 5
District % >= Level 4
White 16 0%
25% (4)
62.5% (10)
12.5% (2)
75% (12)
Asian 24
12.5% (3)
50% (12)
37.5% (9)
87.5% (21)
Hispanic or Latino 4
25% (1)
50% (2)
25%(1)
75% (3)
Black or African American
Male 19
31.6% (6)
52.6% (10)
15.8% (3)
68.4% (13)
Female 29
10.3% (3)
58.6% (17)
31% (9)
89.7% (26)
Students with Disabilities 3
66.7% (2)
33.3% (1)

9. GRADE 6 2016 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY
Count of Valid Test Scores
Not Yet Meeting
(Level 1)
Partially
Meeting
(Level 2)
Approaching
Expectations
(Level 3)
(Level 4)
Exceeding Expectation (Level 5)
District % >= Level 4
White 17 0%
5.9%
(1)
23.5%
(4)
58.8% (10)
11.8% (2)
70.6% (12)
Asian 35
5.7%
(2)
40%
(14)
54.3% (19)
94.3% (33)
Black or African American 4
25% (1)
50% (2)
75% (3)
Male 27
3.7% (1)
18.5% (5)
44.4% (12)
33.3% (9)
77.8%
(21)
Female 29
6.9% (2)
44.8% (13)
48.3% (14)
93.1% (27)
Students with Disabilities 6
16.7% (1)
33.3% (2)
50% (3)

10. GRADE 7 2016 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY
Count of Valid Test Scores
Not Yet Meeting
(Level 1)
Partially
Meeting
(Level 2)
Approaching
Expectations
(Level 3)
(Level 4)
Exceeding Expectation (Level 5)
District % >= Level 4
White 21 0%
19%
(4)
42.9% (9)
38.1% (8)
81% (17)
Asian 18
11.1%
(2)
88.9% (16)
100% (18)
Hispanic or Latino 4
25%
(1)
75%
(3)
Male 23
17.4% (4)
30.4% (7)
52.2% (12)
82.6% (19)
Female 20 5%
20%
75% (15)
95% (19)
Students with Disabilities 7
57.1% (4)
42.9% (3)

11. GRADE 8 2016 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY
Count of Valid Test Scores
Not Yet Meeting
(Level 1)
Partially
Meeting
(Level 2)
Approaching
Expectations
(Level 3)
(Level 4)
Exceeding Expectation (Level 5)
District % >= Level 4
White 16 0%
6.3% (1)
50% (8)
37.5% (6)
87.5% (14)
Asian 21
23.8% (5)
76.2% (16)
100% (21)
Hispanic or Latino 6
33.3% (2)
66.7% (4)
100% (6)
Black or African American 1
100% (1)
Male 23
4.3% (1)
39.1% (9)
56.5% (13)
95.7% (22)
Female
9.5% (2)
28.6% (6)
61.9% (13)
90.5% (19)
Students with Disabilities 5
20% (1)
40% (2)

12. GRADE 3 2016 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES MATHEMATICS
Count of Valid Test Scores
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Level 4
Level 5
District % >= Level 4
White 17 0%
5.9% (1)
35.3% (6)
41.2% (7)
17.6% (3)
58.8% (10)
Asian 32
21.9% (7)
37.5% (12)
40.6%(13)
71.8% (25)
Hispanic or Latino 3
66.7% (2)
33.3% (1)
100%
(3)
Black or African American 1
100% (1)
Not Indicated
Two or More Races
Male 34
2.9% (1)
20.6% (7)
44.1% (15)
29.4%(10)
73.5% (25)
Female 21
33.3% (7)
66.7% (14)
Students with Disabilities 8
12.5%(1)
50% (4)
12.5% (1)
25% (2)
37.5% (3)

13. GRADE 4 2016 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES MATHEMATICS
Count of Valid Test Scores
Not Yet Meeting
(Level 1)
Partially
Meeting
(Level 2)
Approaching
Expectations
(Level 3)
(Level 4)
Exceeding Expectation (Level 5)
District % >= Level 4
White 25
20% (5)
12% (3)
36%
(9)
28%
(7) 4%
(1)
32% (8)
Asian 43
2.3% (1)
4.7% (2)
14% (6)
60.5% (26)
18.6% (8)
79.1% (34)
Hispanic or Latino 4 0%
100% (4)
Black or African American 3
33.3%(1)
66.7% (2)
Not Indicated 2
50% (1)
Male 39
7.7% (3)
12.8% (5)
25.6% (10)
46.2% (18)
53.8% (21)
Female 38
13.2%(5)
10.5%(4)
15.8% (6)
44.7% (17)
60.5% (23)
Students with Disabilities 13
30.8%(4)
23.1% (3)
38.5% (5)
7.7% (1)

14. GRADE 5 2016 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES MATHEMATICS
Count of Valid Test Scores
Not Yet Meeting
(Level 1)
Partially
Meeting
(Level 2)
Approaching
Expectations
(Level 3)
(Level 4)
Exceeding Expectation (Level 5)
District % >= Level 4
White 16 0%
50% (8)
50%
(8)
Asian 24
4.2% (1)
12.5% (3)
41.7% (10)
83.3% (20)
Hispanic or Latino 4
25% (1)
50% (2)
25%
(1)
Black or African American
(2)
Male 19
5.3% (1)
31.6% (6)
36.8% (7)
21.1% (4)
57.9% (11)
Female 29
3.4% (1)
3.4% (1)
24.1% (7)
48.3% (14)
20.7% (6)
69% (20)
Students with Disabilities 3
33.3% (1)

15. GRADE 6 2016 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES MATHEMATICS
Count of Valid Test Scores
Not Yet Meeting
(Level 1)
Partially
Meeting
(Level 2)
Approaching
Expectations
(Level 3)
(Level 4)
Exceeding Expectation (Level 5)
District % >= Level 4
White 17
5.9% (1)
11.8% (2)
41.2% (7)
35.3% (6)
Asian 36 0%
16.7% (6)
47.2% (17)
36.1%(13)
83.3% (30)
Hispanic or Latino 1
100% (1)
Black or African American 4
50% (2)
Male 28
3.6%(1)
21.4% (6)
39.3% (11)
35.7%(10)
75% (21)
Female 30
3.3% (1)
6.7% (2)
30% (9)
46.7% (14)
13.3% (4)
60% (18)
Students with Disabilities 6
16.7%(1)
16.7% (1)
33.3% (2)
50% (3)

16. GRADE 7 2016 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES MATHEMATICS
Count of Valid Test Scores
Not Yet Meeting
(Level 1)
Partially
Meeting
(Level 2)
Approaching
Expectations
(Level 3)
(Level 4)
Exceeding Expectation (Level 5)
District % >= Level 4
White 22
4.5% (1)
13.6%(3)
31.8% (7)
45.5% (10)
50% (11)
Asian 19 0%
31.6% (6)
68.4% (13)
100% (19)
Hispanic or Latino 4
25% (1)
50% (2)
25%
(1)
Male 24
4.2% (1)
8.3% (2)
29.2% (7)
58.3% (14)
Female 21
9.5% (2)
47.6% (10)
33.3% (7)
81% (17)
Students with Disabilities 8
12.5%(1)
37.5% (2)
50% (4)

17. GRADE 8 2016 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES MATHEMATICS ALGEBRA I
Count of Valid Test Scores
Not Yet Meeting
(Level 1)
Partially
Meeting
(Level 2)
Approaching
Expectations
(Level 3)
(Level 4)
Exceeding Expectation (Level 5)
District % >= Level 4
White 16 0%
12.5% (2)
37.5% (6)
50% (8)
Asian 21
71.4% (15)
28.6% (6)
100% (21)
Hispanic or Latino 5
100% (5)
100%
(5)
Black or African American 1
100% (1)
Male 23
4.3% (1)
13.0% (3)
60.9% (14)
21.7% (5)
82.6% (19)
Female 20
5% (1)
20% (4)
70% (14)
75% (15)
Students with Disabilities
20% (1)
80% (4)

18. = 2015
= 2016
Grade 3
Grade 4
Grade 5
Grade 6
Grade 7
Grade 8

19. Math Cohort Comparison
=2015
= 2016
Current
Grade 4
Current
Grade 5
Current
Grade 6
Current
Grade 7
Current
Grade 8

20. = 2015
= 2016
Grade 3
Grade 4
Grade 5
Grade 6
Grade 7
Grade 8

21. ELA Cohort Comparison = 2015 = 2016 Current Grade 4 Current Grade 5

22. 2016 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES ELA Grade 3
Did Not Meet or Partially met Expectations
Approached Expectations
Met or Exceeded Expectations
Literary
18.2% (10)
25.5% (14)
56.4% (31)
Informational Reading
20% (11)
21.8% (12)
58.2% (32)
Vocabulary
12.7% (7)
65.5% (36)
Written Expression
30.9 (17)
9.1% (5)
60% (33)
Writing Conventions
10.9% (6)
70.9% (39)

23. 2016 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES ELA Grade 4
Did Not Meet or Partially met Expectations
Approached Expectations
Met or Exceeded Expectations
Literary
17.1% (13)
26.3% (20)
56.6% (43)
Informational Reading
19.7% (15)
21.1% (16)
59.2% (45)
Vocabulary
34.2% (26)
48.7% (37)
Written Expression
19.7 (15)
22.4% (17)
57.9% (44)
Writing Conventions
10.5% (8)
72.4% (55)

24. 2016 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES ELA Grade 5
Did Not Meet or Partially met Expectations
Approached Expectations
Met or Exceeded Expectations
Literary
18.8% (9)
12.5% (6)
68.8% (33)
Informational Reading
10.4% (5)
22.9% (11)
66.7% (32)
Vocabulary
8.3% (4)
27.1% (13)
64.6% (31)
Written Expression
0% (0)
6.3% (3)
93.6% (45)
Writing Conventions
91.7% (44)

25. 2016 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES ELA Grade 6
Did Not Meet or Partially met Expectations
Approached Expectations
Met or Exceeded Expectations
Literary
12.5% (7)
10.7% (6)
76.8% (43)
Informational Reading
8.9% (5)
17.9% (10)
73.2% (41)
Vocabulary
16.1% (9)
25% (14)
58.9% (33)
Written Expression
1.8% (1)
5.4% (3)
92.9% (52)
Writing Conventions

26. 2016 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES ELA Grade 7
Did Not Meet or Partially met Expectations
Approached Expectations
Met or Exceeded Expectations
Literary
16.3% (7)
9.3% (4)
74.4% (32)
Informational Reading
4.7% (2)
18.6% (8)
76.7% (33)
Vocabulary
6.8% (3)
23.2% (10)
69.8% (30)
Written Expression 0%
100% (43)
Writing Conventions
2.3% (1)
97.7% (42)

27. 2016 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES ELA Grade 8
Did Not Meet or Partially met Expectations
Approached Expectations
Met or Exceeded Expectations
Literary
4.5% (2)
15.9% (7)
79.5% (35)
Informational Reading
4.7% (2)
11.4% (5)
84.1% (37)
Vocabulary
2.3% (1)
81.8% (36)
Written Expression 0%
95.5% (42)
Writing Conventions
6.8% (3)
90.9% (40)

28. 2016 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES Mathematics - Grade 3
Did Not Meet or Partially met Expectations
Approached Expectations
Met or Exceeded Expectations
Major Content
7.3% (4)
20% (11)
72.7% (40)
Supporting Content
5.5% (3)
29.1% (16)
65.5% (36)
Reasoning
9.1% (5)
16.4% (9)
74.5% (41)
Modeling
12.7% (7)
78.2% (43)

29. 2016 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES Mathematics - Grade 4
Did Not Meet or Partially met Expectations
Approached Expectations
Met or Exceeded Expectations
Major Content
24.7% (19)
50.6% (39)
Supporting Content
22.1% (17)
53.2% (41)
Reasoning
16.9% (13)
26% (20)
57.1% (44)
Modeling
15.6% (12)
58.4% (45)

30. 2016 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES Mathematics - Grade 5
Did Not Meet or Partially met Expectations
Approached Expectations
Met or Exceeded Expectations
Major Content
14.5% (7)
23% (11)
62.5% (30)
Supporting Content
20.8% (10)
18.8% (9)
60.4% (29)
Reasoning
16.7% (8)
Modeling
8.3% (4)
72.9% (35)

31. 2016 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES Mathematics - Grade 6
Did Not Meet or Partially met Expectations
Approached Expectations
Met or Exceeded Expectations
Major Content
12.1% (7)
22.4% (13)
65.5% (38)
Supporting Content
15.5% (9)
62.1% (36)
Reasoning
10.3% (6)
20.7% (12)
70% (40)
Modeling
72.4% (42)

32. 2016 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES Mathematics - Grade 7
Did Not Meet or Partially met Expectations
Approached Expectations
Met or Exceeded Expectations
Major Content
13.3% (6)
17.8% (8)
68.9% (31)
Supporting Content
15.6% (7)
71.1% (32)
Reasoning
8.9% (4)
31.1% (14)
60% (27)
Modeling
22.2% (10)
6.7% (3)

33. 2016 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES Mathematics - Grade 8- Algebra 1
Did Not Meet or Partially met Expectations
Approached Expectations
Met or Exceeded Expectations
Major Content
16.3% (7)
2.3% (1)
81.4% (35)
Supporting Content
9.3% (4)
18.6% (8)
72.7% (31)
Reasoning
62.8% (27)
Modeling
4.7% (2)
25.6% (11)
69.8% (30)

34. QUESTIONS TO GUIDE PARCC DATA REFLECTION
How will we use PARCC data to identify strengths and gaps that exist in curriculum and instruction?
How will we use PARCC data to inform the conversations of our educators?
What can we learn about where additional professional resources are needed to meet the learning needs of all students? I

35. Using PARCC Data Effectively
Using data to drive instruction in the classroom
Flex Grouping
Writing in Mathematics
Cross Curricular Units of Study
Viewing the data from previous years to drive instruction
Utilizing PARCC online resources
Practice tests
Example questions
View responses with scores
View rubrics and use the same ones in the classroom
PARCC Sample Responses/ All Grade Levels

36. Using PARCC Data Effectively
Utilizing online programs
Study Island
Online practice, immediate feedback. built-in remediation, customizable assessments to promote individual instruction, students are engaged with a variety of modes (practice, game, and printable worksheets)
Tenmarks
Comprehensive, standards based curriculum
Scaffolded lessons, guided practice, assignments, assessments and interventions

37. How We Are Using the Data?
Each teacher in grades 4-8 received a copy of their individual class lists with each child’s score, overall performance, and performance in each sub category for both ELA and Mathematics.
Score
Overall Performance
Literacy
Informational Reading
Vocabulary
Written Expression
Writing Conventions
743
3-Approached Expectations
774
4-Met Expectations
811
5-Exceeded Expectations
732
739
744
790
758
760
771
770
819
731
788
721
2-Partially Met Expectations
769
762

38. NJ ASK: Grade 4 Grade 4: Total General Education Special Education
Partially Proficient
Proficient
Advanced Proficient
Total
3.8% (3)
25.6% (20)
70.5% (55)
78 Students
Partially Proficient
Proficient
Advanced Proficient
Total
3.1% (2)
21.5% (14)
75.4% (49)
65 Students
Partially Proficient
Proficient
Advanced Proficient
Total
7.7% (1)
46.2% (6)
13 Studentds

39. NJ ASK: Grade 4 Demographic Groups Partially Proficient Proficient
Advanced Proficient
Total
Female
2.6% (1)
28.2% (11)
69.2% (27)
39 Students
Male
5.1% (2)
23.1% (9)
71.8% (28)
White 0%
46.2% (12)
53.8% (14)
26 Students
African American
33.3% (3)
66.7% (2)
3 Students
Asian
2.3% (1)
11.4% (5)
86.4% (38)
44 Students
Hispanic
75% (3)
25% (1)
4 Students
Other
100% (1)

40. 5 Year Comparison – Grade 4
2012
2015 AP
72.2% P
27.8% PP 0% AP
77.4% P
22.6% PP 0%
2013
2016 AP
71.7% P
26.4% PP
1.9% AP
70.5% P
25.6% PP
3.8%
2014 AP
80.3% P
19.7% PP 0%

41. NJ ASK: Grade 8 Grade 8: Total General Education Special Education
Partially Proficient
Proficient
Advanced Proficient
Total
8.5% (4)
34% (16)
57.4% (27)
47 Students
Partially Proficient
Proficient
Advanced Proficient
Total
4.8% (2)
31% (13)
64.3% (27)
42 Students
Partially Proficient
Proficient
Advanced Proficient
Total
40% (2)
60% (3) 0%
5 Students

42. NJ ASK: Grade 8 Demographic Groups Partially Proficient Proficient
Advanced Proficient
Total
Female
13.6% (3)
36.4% (8)
50% (11)
22 Students
Male
4% (1)
32% (8)
64% (16)
25 Students
White
21.1% (4)
47.4% (9)
31.6% (6)
19 Students
African American 0%
100% (1)
1 Students
Asian
9.5% (2)
90.5% (19)
21 Students
Hispanic
66.7% (4)
33.3% (2)
6 Students

43. 5 Year Comparison – Grade 8
2012
2015 AP
50% P
47.2% PP
2.8% AP
38.5% P
51.3% PP
10.3%
2013
2016 AP
56.7% P
43.3% PP 0% AP
57.4% P
34% PP
8.5%
2014 AP
42.6% P
46.8% PP
10.6%