Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1 Supplementation of Low Quality Forages Norman Suverly WSU Okanogan County Extension Educator.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "1 Supplementation of Low Quality Forages Norman Suverly WSU Okanogan County Extension Educator."— Presentation transcript:

1 1 Supplementation of Low Quality Forages Norman Suverly WSU Okanogan County Extension Educator

2 2 Introduction Forage = Beef The ideal supplement should enhance, not inhibit the animal’s ability to digest forage Supplement should complement forage quality

3 3 Basic Beef Nutrition Rumen Stomach (abomasum) Intestines

4 4 Rumen Function Feed Stomach and Intestines Energy Protein

5 5 Considerations when supplementing ruminants Rumen microbes have nutrient requirements –If not met, rumen efficiency is decreased Feed affects rumen microbes before it affects the animal

6 6 Examples of low-quality forage Forages that fall below nutritional levels to provide the necessary animal requirements (<7% CP) –Wheat straw 3.6% CP –Barley straw 4.7% –Grass seed straws 4-12% –Dormant range 2-6%

7 7 Nutrient content of range forage Percent Influence of season on forage quality, Johnson et al., 1998, NDSU

8 8 Ruminal Protein Digestibility Percent % of Protein Influence of season on forage quality, Johnson et al., 1998, NDSU

9 9 Nutrient content of range forages – northern Great Basin Ganskopp and Bohnert 2001, OSU

10 10 Forage nutrient content varies with season Fiber portion of forage (NDF) Digestibility (TDN)Protein content and protein degradability

11 11 Energy vs. protein supplements Energy Corn Wheat Oats Fat Molasses Protein Soybean meal Cottonseed meal Corn gluten meal Feather and blood meal Alfalfa Canola meal Distiller grains Non-protein nitrogen

12 12 Type of Protein Supplement Soybean meal Cottonseed meal Corn Gluten meal Canola meal Urea (48% nitrogen) Biuret Natural Non-Protein Nitrogen Slowly digested Provide VFA’s Quickly digested/dissolved Provides only nitrogen

13 13 DIP and UIP of common protein sources SupplementCP%UIPDIP Alfalfa hay181486 Wheat midds182377 Canola meal393070 Corn gluten meal 476238 Dry distiller grains 3050-6040-50

14 14 Tips for successful protein supplementation Begin your supplementation before weight loss and body condition loss Time supplements to facilitate grazing Supplement form – consider what it is supplying and the cost Self-feeding vs. hand-feeding Mineral considerations –Ca, Mg, P, K, Cu, Zn, Mn, and Na

15 15 Price SBM supplement costs $290/ton and provides 40% CP Canola meal costs $160/ton and provides 35% CP SBM is $.15/ton (290/2000) and will cost $.38/lb of protein CM is $.08/ton (160/2000) and will cost $.25/lb of protein

16 16 Effect of Degradable Protein Supplements on Intake and Digestion of Low-Quality Forage by Beef Cows H. H. Koster et al. (1996) Kansas State University

17 17 Methods Cows fed a diet of: – Low-quality forage –5 levels of ruminally degradable protein Measured diet digestion parameters

18 18 Forage Intake (g/kg BW.75 ) Degradable Protein (grams/day)

19 19 Forage Digestion (%) Degradable Protein (grams/day)

20 20 Total Diet Digestion (%) Degradable Protein (grams/day)

21 21 Implications Supplementing ruminally degradable protein: –Improved digestion of low-quality forage by 15% –Increased forage intake by 55% This represents an improvement of forage utilization by the animal

22 22 Performance of Cows on Native Range When Fed Protein or Corn Supplements D. W. Sanson, D. C. Clanton and I. G. Rush (1990) University of Nebraska

23 23 Methods 135 cows grazing native Sandhills winter range Supplement treatments: –Ear corn –Ear corn + protein supplement –Protein supplement

24 24 Weight Changes of Cows

25 25 Implications Corn supplemented cows lost more weight than protein supplemented cows Corn supplement decreased forage digestion and intake

26 26 Using TDN/CP Ratio for Supplement Selection

27 27 Considerations for using energy supplements Grain vs. fermentable fiber Supplementation with grain at 0.4% of BW Fermentable fiber at.2 to.8 percent If utilizing low quality forages, no more than 0.5% of body weight (5.5 lbs for 1100 lb cow)

28 28 CP, %TDN, %TDN/CP Cattle need4.0-6.0 Dead grass45012.5 Med quality grass hay11524.7 Annual pasture21653.1 Cottonseed meal46761.6 Range cube22803.6 Corn10888.8 Protein to energy ration

29 29 Using TDN/CP Ratios for Supplement Selection Forage TDN/CP > 7 < 4 Protein Energy Supplement

30 30 Nutrient requirements of cattle SeasonCP%TDN% Dry-cow, mid-tri 1100 lbsFall7%49% Cow nursing, post-partumWinter9%56% Heifer, mid-tri 800 lbs,1.5 lb gain Fall9%60% Heifer, post-partum, 950 lbsWinter10%62%

31 31 Situation 1 Forage supply is abundant and protein content of the native range is 5% or less Should select adequate diet (6.5-7 percent) Supplement with protein –.5 to 1 lbs/day; >30% –55 to 70% DIP

32 32 Situation 2 Forage supply is limited and protein content below 5 percent Combination supplement of 20 to 30% CP –Should provide supplemental energy in form of fermentable fiber.

33 33 Situation 3 Forage supply is unlimited and protein content of range is above 5 percent Should select adequate diet (7% or greater) No intervention needed for a dry cow.

34 34 Conclusion Proper supplementation can improve forage digestion and animal performance Provide supplements that complement forage Use resources to help determine proper supplementation

35 35 References DelCurto, T. and D. Bohnert. Fundamentals of Supplementing Low-Quality Forage. Cattle Producer’s Library. CL317. Ganskopp D. and D. Bohnert. 2003. Mineral concentration dynamics of 7 northern Great Basin grasses. J. Range Manage. 56: 174-184. Ganskopp, D. and D. Bohnert. 2001. Nutritional Dynamics of 7 northern Great Basin grasses. J. Range Manage 54:640-647. Herd, D.B. 2003. Tips on Winter Supplementation of Beef Cattle. http://thecattlemanmagazine.com/issues/2003/1103/winterSupp.asp http://thecattlemanmagazine.com/issues/2003/1103/winterSupp.asp Johnson et al. 1998. Influence of season on forage quality. North Dakota State University. Koster, H.H. et al. 1996. Effect of Degradable Protein Supplements on Intake and Digestion of Low-Quality Forage by Beef Cows. Kansas State University. Mathis, C.P. 2003. Protein and Energy Supplementation to Beef Cows Grazing New Mexico Rangelands. New Mexico State University, Circular 564. Mount, D. Supplementing Feed to Grazing Cattle. PowerPoint presentation. http://www.wyorange.net/resources/mount/MountBasicsofSupplementationtoGrazingCattle.p pt Sanson, D.W., D. C. Clanton and I. G. Rush. 1990. Performance of Cows on Native Range When Fed Protein or Corn Supplements. University of Nebraska.


Download ppt "1 Supplementation of Low Quality Forages Norman Suverly WSU Okanogan County Extension Educator."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google