1. Instrument Procedure Design and Operational Differences
TERPS vs. PANS-Ops
Instrument Procedure Design and Operational Differences
Presented By
Mr. Guy Gribble
General Manager, International Flight Resources, LLC
Current as of APR 2013

2. TERPS vs. PANS-Ops They Are The Same, Only Different Departures
Holding
Arrival Maneuvering
Approaches
Missed Approaches
PANS-Ops Volume II, Part 1, Section 1, Chapter 3, “Units of Measurement”
TERPS Volume 1, Chapter 2, Paragraph 210, “Units of Measurement”

3. TERPS vs. PANS-Ops They Are The Same, Only Different
Physics, Aerodynamics, Mathematics
Units of Measure
US Customary Units vs. Meters
Conversions ?
Rounding of Numbers
Fix Tolerances and Accuracy
Flight Technical Errors
PANS-Ops Volume II, Part 1, Section 1, Chapter 3, “Units of Measurement”
TERPS Volume 1, Chapter 2, Paragraph 210, “Units of Measurement”

4. TERPS vs. PANS-Ops Who is In Charge Here ? State (Country)
Aeronautical Information Publication, AIP
Flight Check, Maintain
Publish, Revise
Design Criteria
Standard design development
Role of the Procedure Designer
Pilot operational procedures
ICAO, International Civil Aviation Organization
SARPS vs. Documents

5. TERPS vs. PANS-Ops Where Does This Data Come From ? State (Country)
Commercial Provider
WGS-84 Compliant ?
Airport
Country
Somewhere ?
ICAO Annex 11, Paragraph 2.28, “Common Reference System”
ICAO Annex 14, Paragraph 1.3, Common Reference System”
NOAA FAQ’s on WGS-84,

6. NAD 83 datum system is acceptable for GPS positioning
Russia
China
India
NAD 83 datum system is acceptable for GPS positioning
Reproduced with permission of Jeppesen Sanderson, Inc.
Not to be used for navigation.

7. TERPS vs. PANS-Ops Standard Instrument Departure “Normal” Operations
Maintain the Ground Track
Maintain the Required Climb Gradient X X
TERPS, Volume 1, Chapter 2, Paragraph 2e 
PANS-Ops Volume 1, Part 1, Section 2, Chapter 1, Paragraph 1.1.2
PANS-Ops Volume 2, Part 1, Section 3, Chapter 1, Paragraph 1.7 “Abnormal and Emergency Operations”
14 CFR , FAA Airworthiness Standards, Transport Category Airplanes
CS , EASA Certification Specifications for Large Aeroplanes

8. TERPS vs. Pans-Ops vs. FAR 25
Standard Instrument Departure
Vertically Speaking
5 M
MSA
35 Ft ?
MSA
15?
1,500 Feet AFL
Departure End Of Runway
DER
Country survey of obstructions, BGBW, Narsarsuaq, Greenland
14 CFR , FAA Airworthiness Standards, Transport Category Airplanes
CS , EASA Certification Specifications for Large Aeroplanes

9. TERPS vs. PANS-Ops Standard Instrument Departure
If straight out will not work…
Climb faster over obstacle
Turn away from obstacle
Keep in sight, “See and avoid”
Climb in a safe sector away from obstacle
Speed limiting
Combinations of any of the above X X
PANS-Ops Volume 2, Part 1, Section 3, Chapter 2, Para. 2.7, “Procedure Design Gradient”
TERPS Volume 4, Chapter 1, Paragraph “Multiple Climb Gradient Application”
PANS-Ops Volume 2, Part 1, Section 3, Chapter 3, Paragraph 3.3, “Turning Departures”
TERPS Volume 4, Chapter 3, “Departure Routes”

10. TERPS vs. PANS-Ops Standard Instrument Departure
Climb Faster Over Obstacle
MSA
35 Ft ?
.8% MOC
3.3%
2.5% OIS
MSA
5 M
152 Feet per NM OCS
48 Feet per NM ROC
200 FEET PER NM
Requires 350'/NM Until Reaching MSA
PANS-Ops Volume 2, Part 1, Section 3, Chapter 2, Para. 2.7, “Procedure Design Gradient”
TERPS Volume 4, Chapter 1, Paragraph “Multiple Climb Gradient Application”
PANS-Ops Volume 2, Part 1, Section 3, Chapter 3, Paragraph 3.3, “Turning Departures”
TERPS Volume 4, Chapter 3, “Departure Routes”
Maintain 4.3% Until Reaching 1700MSL
DER

11. TERPS vs. PANS-Ops Standard Instrument Departure
Turn Away From Obstacle
≈ 2 NM
Initial Climb Area
≈ 3.5 KM
Area 1
500' '
15˚ Splay
Take-Off Run Available= Runway available for ground run (No clearway)
Rule of Thumb: 10%increase in TOGW= 20%increase in TO Distance
PANS-Ops Volume 2, Part 1, Section 3, Chapter 3, “Departure Routes”
TERPS Volume 4, Chapter 1, Paragraph 1.6, “Initial Climb Area”
14 CFR , , EU-Ops 1.495
ICAO Annex 6, Part 1, Attachment C, Para. 5, “Take-off Obstacle Clearance Limitations”

12. TERPS vs. PANS-Ops Standard Instrument Departure
Turn Away From Obstacle
≈ 2 NM
Initial Climb Area
≈ 3.5 KM
Area 1
500' '
15˚ Splay
Take-Off Run Available= Runway available for ground run (No clearway)
Rule of Thumb: 10%increase in TOGW= 20%increase in TO Distance
PANS-Ops Volume 2, Part 1, Section 3, Chapter 3, “Departure Routes”
TERPS Volume 4, Chapter 1, Paragraph 1.6, “Initial Climb Area”
14 CFR , , EU-Ops 1.495
ICAO Annex 6, Part 1, Attachment C, Para. 5, “Take-off Obstacle Clearance Limitations”

13. X TERPS vs. PANS-Ops Standard Instrument Departure, TERPS
Keep in Sight and Tell Pilot to "See and Avoid" X
Visual Climb Over Airport
PANS-Ops Volume 2, Part 1, Section 3, Chapter 5, “Published Information for Departures”
TERPS Volume 4, Chapter 4, “Visual Climb Over Airport”
PANS-Ops Volume 2, Part 1, Section 3, Chapter 4, “Omnidirectional Departures”
TERPS Volume 4, Chapter 2, “Diverse Departures”
15˚ MAX
Hazard Beacons on top of hill to the east clearly visible or Take Off Minimums
600/1
Take Off Minimums
800/2

14. No Departure Turns East
TERPS vs. PANS-Ops
Standard Instrument Departure, TERPS
Climb in a Safe Sector
25 or 46 NM X
Diverse Departure Evaluation
Take-Off Run Available= Runway available for ground run (No clearway)
Rule of Thumb: 10%increase in TOGW= 20%increase in TO Distance
15˚ MAX
No Departure Turns East

15. X TERPS vs. PANS-Ops Standard Instrument Departure, PANS-Ops
Climb in a Safe Sector
PANS-Ops Volume 2, Part 1, Section 3, Chapter 5, “Published Information for Departures”
TERPS Volume 4, Chapter 4, “Visual Climb Over Airport”
PANS-Ops Volume 2, Part 1, Section 3, Chapter 4, “Omnidirectional Departures”
TERPS Volume 4, Chapter 2, “Diverse Departures" X

16. X TERPS vs. PANS-Ops Standard Instrument Departure, PANS-Ops
Climb in a Safe Sector
No Turns Eastbound X
PANS-Ops Volume 2, Part 1, Section 3, Chapter 5, “Published Information for Departures”
TERPS Volume 4, Chapter 4, “Visual Climb Over Airport”
PANS-Ops Volume 2, Part 1, Section 3, Chapter 4, “Omnidirectional Departures”
TERPS Volume 4, Chapter 2, “Diverse Departures”

17. TERPS vs. PANS-Ops Standard Instrument Departure
“Minimum Safe Altitude”, MSA TERPS
25NM terrain only, no guarantee of navaid reception
TERPS Volume 1, Chapter 2, Paragraph 221, “Minimum Safe/Sector Altitudes”
Aeronautical Information Manual, Paragraph 5-4-5c “Minimum Safe/Sector Altitude”
Reproduced with permission of Jeppesen Sanderson, Inc. Not to be used for navigation.

18. TERPS vs. PANS-Ops Standard Instrument Departure
“Minimum Sector Altitude”, MSA PANS-Ops
TERPS Volume 1, Chapter 2, Paragraph 221, “Minimum Safe/Sector Altitudes”
Aeronautical Information Manual, Paragraph 5-4-5c “Minimum Safe/Sector Altitude”
PANS-Ops Volume 1, Part 1, Section 1, Chapter 1, “Definitions: Minimum Sector Altitudes”
PANS-Ops Volume 2, Part 1, Section 4, Chapter 8, “Minimum Sector Altitudes (MSA)”
ICAO Annex 4, "Definitions" and Appendix 2 Item #171, 172
Reproduced with permission of Jeppesen Sanderson, Inc. Not to be used for navigation.

19. TERPS vs. PANS-Ops
Standard Instrument Departure
“Minimum Safe Altitude”, MSA PANS-Ops
TERPS Volume 1, Chapter 2, Paragraph 221, “Minimum Safe/Sector Altitudes”
Aeronautical Information Manual, Paragraph 5-4-5c “Minimum Safe/Sector Altitude”
PANS-Ops Volume 1, Part 1, Section 1, Chapter 1, “Definitions: Minimum Sector Altitudes”
PANS-Ops Volume 2, Part 1, Section 4, Chapter 8, “Minimum Sector Altitudes (MSA)”
ICAO Annex 4, "Definitions" and Appendix 2 Item #171, 172
Reproduced with permission of Jeppesen Sanderson, Inc. Not to be used for navigation.

20. TERPS vs. PANS-Ops TERPS vs. PANS-Ops Holding Timing PANS-Ops
>14,000 = 1.5 Minute
≤ 14,000 = 1 Minute
PANS-Ops Volume 1, Part 1, Section 4, Chapter 3, Paragraph 3.3 “Flight Procedures for Racetrack and Reversal Procedures”
FAA’s Instrument Procedures Handbook, FAA-H A Chapter 3, Page 3-25, “High Performance Holding”
PANS-Ops Volume 1, Part 1, Section 6, Chapter 1, Paragraph “Time/Distance Outbound”
FAA’s Aeronautical Information Manual, Chapter 5, Section 3, Para “Holding”
TERPS

21. TERPS vs. PANS-Ops TERPS vs. PANS-Ops Holding Speeds PANS-Ops
>34,000 = IMN.83
>20,000 ≤ 34,000 = 265 KIAS
>14,000 ≤ 20,000 = 240 KIAS
≤ 14,000 = 230 KIAS
>14,000 = 240
>6,000≤ 14,000 = 220 KIAS
≤ 6,000 = 210
265
230/210KIAS
200 KIAS
PANS-Ops Volume 2, Part 2, Section 4, Chapter 1, “Conventional Holding Criteria”
FAA Order A, “Holding Pattern Criteria”, Chapter 1, Chapter 3
PANS-Ops Volume 1, Part 1, Section 4, Chapter 3, Para , “Shuttle”
Transport Canada, AIM RAC 10.0, Paragraph 10.9 “Shuttle Procedure”
NATS UK, AIP Enroute 1.5 “Holding, Approach and Departure Procedures” Chapter 3, Paragraph 3.6 “Shuttle Procedure”
TERPS

22. TERPS vs. PANS-Ops Holding Evaluated Airspace
PANS-Ops Volume 2, Part 2, Section 4, Chapter 1, “Conventional Holding Criteria”
PANS-Ops Volume 2, Part 3, Section 3, Chapter 7, “RNAV Holding Criteria”
FAA Order A, “Holding Pattern Criteria”, Chapter 1

23. TERPS vs. PANS-Ops X X XX XX Arrivals and Maneuvering Procedures
Definitions and Use of
Entry Procedures
Evaluated Airspace
Obstacle Clearance
Speeds
Selection of Turn X XX
PANS-Ops Volume 1, Part 1, Section 4, Table I-4-1-2, “Speeds for Procedure Calculation in Knots”, Category C/D Speeds for Initial Approach
PANS-Ops Volume 1, Part 1, Section 4, Table I-4-1-3, “Rate of Descent in the Final Approach Segment, w/o FAF”
TERPS Volume 1, Chapter 2, Paragraph #234, “Initial Approach Segment Based on a PT”
FAA’s AIM Chapter 5, Paragraph 5-4-9, “Procedure Turn and Hold-in-lieu of Procedure Turn”

24. TERPS vs. PANS-Ops 45/180 45/180 80/260 80/260 Base Turn Teardrop
Arrivals and Maneuvering Procedures
Racetrack
Base Turn
Turn point
Entry Sector
80/260
45/180
Holding
In lieu of
Teardrop
10 NM Limit
80/260
45/180
PANS-Ops Volume 1, Part 1, Section 4, Chapter 3, “Initial Approach Segment”
FAA’s AIM Chapter 5, Paragraph 5-4-9, “Procedure Turn and Hold-in-lieu of Procedure Turn”
FAA’s Instrument Procedures Handbook, FAA-H A Chapter 5, Page 5-39, “Course Reversals”
TERPS Volume 1, Chapter 2, Paragraph #235, “Initial Approach Segment Based on a PT”

25. TERPS vs. PANS-Ops Arrivals and Maneuvering Procedures, TERPS
Entry Procedure
PANS-Ops Volume 1, Part 1, Section 4, Chapter 3, Para. 3.3 “Flight Procedures for Racetrack and Reversal Procedures”
TERPS Volume 1, Chapter 2, Paragraph #234, “Initial Approach Segment Based on a PT”

26. TERPS vs. PANS-Ops Arrivals and Maneuvering Procedures, PANS-Ops
Entry Sector Defined
PANS-Ops Volume 1, Part 1, Section 4, Chapter 3, Para. 3.3 “Flight Procedures for Racetrack and Reversal Procedures”

27. TERPS vs. PANS-Ops Arrivals and Maneuvering Procedures, PANS-Ops
"Omni-Directional" Defined
PANS-Ops Volume 1, Part 1, Section 4, Chapter 3, Para “Entry”

28. TERPS vs. PANS-Ops Evaluated Airspace Intermediate Segment, TERPS
31 different templates
PANS-Ops Volume 2, Part 2, Section 4, Chapter 1, “Conventional Holding Criteria”
PANS-Ops Volume 2, Part 3, Section 3, Chapter 7, “RNAV Holding Criteria” 
FAA Order A, “Holding Pattern Criteria”, Chapter 1
FAA Order A, “Holding Pattern Criteria”, Chapter 1, Chapter 3

29. TERPS vs. PANS-Ops Evaluated Airspace Intermediate Segment, PANS-Ops
4.6 km
(2.5 NM)
1 min./45-180
Procedure turn area
Secondary area
4.6 km
(2.5 NM)
PANS-Ops Volume 2, Part 1, Section 4 Chapter 5 Paragraph 5.4.3, “OCA/H for Non-precision Approach (Straight In)” and Figure I-4-5-3b
PANS-Ops Volume 2, Section 2, Chapter 3, Paragraph “Area”
PANS-Ops Volume 2, Section 2, Chapter 4, Paragraph “Area”

30. TERPS vs. PANS-Ops Evaluated Airspace Final Segment, Non-Precision
All = 14.29˚ SPLAY
VOR = ˚ SPLAY
NDB = 10.3˚ SPLAY
PANS-Ops Volume 2, Section 2, Chapter 3, Paragraph “Area”
PANS-Ops Volume 2, Section 2, Chapter 4, Paragraph “Area”

31. TERPS vs. PANS-Ops Approach Procedures 350 No Final Approach Fix 300
Precision Approach
TERPS Volume 1, Chapters 4, 5, 6, 7, VOR's= additional 50' lower.
PANS-Ops Volume 2, Part 2, Section 1, Chapter 1, Paragraph “Obstacle Clearance on the precision Segment Application of Basic ILS Surfaces”
PANS-ATM, Chapter 6, Paragraph 6.5.3

32. TERPS vs. PANS-Ops Arrivals and Maneuvering Procedures Speeds
PANS-Ops Volume 1, Part 1, Section 4, Table I-4-1-2, “Speeds for Procedure Calculation in Knots”, Category C/D Speeds for Initial Approach
PANS-Ops Volume 1, Part 1, Section 4, Table I-4-1-3, “Rate of Descent in the Final Approach Segment, w/o FAF”
TERPS Volume 1, Chapter 2, Paragraph #234, “Initial Approach Segment Based on a PT”
FAA’s AIM Chapter 5, Paragraph 5-4-9, “Procedure Turn and Hold-in-lieu of Procedure Turn”

33. TERPS vs. PANS-Ops Arrivals and Maneuvering Procedures Speeds
PANS-Ops Volume 1, Part 1, Section 4, Table I-4-1-2, “Speeds for Procedure Calculation in Knots”, Category C/D Speeds for Initial Approach
PANS-Ops Volume 1, Part 1, Section 4, Table I-4-1-3, “Rate of Descent in the Final Approach Segment, w/o FAF"
TERPS Volume 1, Chapter 2, Paragraph #234, “Initial Approach Segment Based on a PT”
FAA’s AIM Chapter 5, Paragraph 5-4-9, “Procedure Turn and Hold-in-lieu of Procedure Turn”

34. TERPS vs. PANS-Ops X X XX XX Visual Approaches and Visual Maneuvering
Definition of
Use for
Evaluated Airspace
OCA/ROC
Speeds
Visual Aids and Cues X XX X XX
ICAO Document #9157, “Aerodrome Standards” Chapter 5, Paragraph 5.3.6, “Circling Guidance Lights”
FAA Order JO B, 08/20/10 Visual Guidance Lighting Systems” Definitions#18, “Lead-in Lighting System”
FAA Information for Operators # /25/11 “Pilots Roles and Responsibilities During Visual Approaches”

35. TERPS vs. PANS-Ops X X "Visual" vs. Circle-to-Land Definition of
Use for
Evaluated Airspace
OCA/ROC
Speeds
Visual Aids and Cues
MDA vs. Descent Point X X
PANS-Ops Volume 2, Part 1, Section 4, Chapter 7, Appendix “Visual Manoeuvering Using Prescribed Track”
TERPS Volume 1, Chapter 2, Section 6 “Circling Approach”
AIM Chapter 5, Paragraph “Charted Visual Flight Procedures”

36. TERPS vs. PANS-Ops Circling Approaches and Maneuvering 300‘AFL 1.7 NM
“C” 2.68 NM
“D” 3.49 NM
1.7 NM
2.3 NM
14 CFR , , ,
TERPS Volume 1, Chapter 2, Section 6, “Circling Approach”
TERPS Volume 1, Chapter 3, Paragraph and Table 3-9
PANS-Ops Volume 2, Part 1, Section 4, Chapter 5, Paragraph 5.4.6, “Protection of Visual Segment of the Approach Procedure”
TERPS Volume 1, Chapter 2, Section 5, Paragraph #253, “Visual Descent Point”
“C” 4.2 NM
“D” 5.28 NM

37. TERPS vs. PANS-Ops Circling Approaches and Maneuvering Pans-Ops TERPS
Acft Cat Min Vis MOC/HAA Max Speed/ºAOB x Radius + Straight
C NM / 591 ft 180 KIAS/20º = 4.20 NM
D NM 394/ 689 ft 205 KIAS/20º = 5.28 NM
TERPS
OEA Radius +
Acft Cat Min Vis ROC/HAA Max Speed/ºAOB Straight=CAR*
C ½ SM / 450 ft KIAS/20º = 2.68 NM
D SM 300/ 550 ft KIAS/20º = 3.49 NM
With Change #21 and later, At 1000’MSL, ISA Standard and 25KTS of added wind. Visibility in Statue Miles
OEA= Obstacle Evaluated Area, CAR= Circling Area Radius (1.3NM Minimum)
TERPS Volume 1, Chapter 2, Section 6 “Circling Approach”
TERPS Volume 1, Chapter 3, Paragraph and Table 3-9
PANS-Ops Volume 2, Part 1, Section 4, Chapter 7
PANS-Ops Volume I, Part I, Chapter 1, Definitions

38. TERPS vs. PANS-Ops Circling Approaches and Maneuvering Pans-Ops TERPS
Acft Cat Min Vis MOC/HAA Max Speed/ºAOB x Radius + Straight
C NM / 591 ft 180 KIAS/20º = 4.20 NM
D NM 394/ 689 ft KIAS/20º = 5.28 NM
TERPS
OEA Radius +
Acft Cat Min Vis ROC/HAA Max Speed/ºAOB Straight=CAR*
C ½ SM / 450 ft KIAS/20º = 2.68 NM
D SM 300/ 550 ft KIAS/20º = 3.49 NM
With Change #21 and later, At 1000’MSL, ISA Standard and 25KTS of added wind. Visibility in Statue Miles
OEA= Obstacle Evaluated Area, CAR= Circling Area Radius (1.3NM Minimum)
TERPS Volume 1, Chapter 2, Section 6 “Circling Approach”
TERPS Volume 1, Chapter 3, Paragraph and Table 3-9
 PANS-Ops Volume 2, Part 1, Section 4, Chapter 7
PANS-Ops Volume I, Part I, Chapter 1, Definitions

39. TERPS vs. PANS-Ops Circling Approaches and Maneuvering Pans-Ops TERPS
Acft Cat Min Vis MOC/HAA Max Speed/ºAOB x Radius + Straight
C NM / 591 ft 180 KIAS/20º = 4.20 NM
D NM 394/ 689 ft 205 KIAS/20º = 5.28 NM
TERPS
OEA Radius +
Acft Cat Min Vis ROC/HAA Max Speed/ºAOB Straight=CAR*
C ½ SM / 450 ft KIAS/20º = 2.68 NM
D SM 300/ 550 ft KIAS/20º = 3.49 NM
With Change #21 and later, At 1000’MSL, ISA Standard and 25KTS of added wind. Visibility in Statue Miles
OEA= Obstacle Evaluated Area, CAR= Circling Area Radius (1.3NM Minimum)
TERPS Volume 1, Chapter 2, Section 6 “Circling Approach”
TERPS Volume 1, Chapter 3, Paragraph and Table 3-9

40. TERPS vs. PANS-Ops Circling Approaches and Maneuvering Pans-Ops TERPS
Acft Cat Min Vis MOC/HAA Max Speed/ºAOB x Radius + Straight
C NM / 591 ft KIAS/20º = 4.20 NM
D NM 394/ 689 ft 205 KIAS/20º = 5.28 NM
TERPS
OEA Radius +
Acft Cat Min Vis ROC/HAA Max Speed/ºAOB Straight=CAR*
C ½ SM / 450 ft KIAS/20º = 2.68 NM
D SM 300/ 550 ft KIAS/20º = 3.49 NM
With Change #21 and later, At 1000’MSL, ISA Standard and 25KTS of added wind. Visibility in Statue Miles
OEA= Obstacle Evaluated Area, CAR= Circling Area Radius (1.3NM Minimum)
TERPS Volume 1, Chapter 2, Section 6 “Circling Approach”
TERPS Volume 1, Chapter 3, Paragraph and Table 3-9

41. TERPS vs. PANS-Ops Circling Approaches and Maneuvering Pans-Ops TERPS
Acft Cat Min Vis MOC/HAA Max Speed/ºAOB x Radius + Straight
C NM / 591 ft KIAS/20º = 4.20 NM
D NM 394/ 689 ft KIAS/20º = 5.28 NM
TERPS
OEA Radius +
Acft Cat Min Vis ROC/HAA Max Speed/ºAOB Straight=CAR*
C ½ SM / 450 ft KIAS/20º = 2.68 NM
D SM 300/ 550 ft KIAS/20º = 3.49 NM
With Change #21 and later, At 1000’MSL, ISA Standard and 25KTS of added wind. Visibility in Statue Miles
OEA= Obstacle Evaluated Area, CAR= Circling Area Radius (1.3NM Minimum)
TERPS Volume 1, Chapter 2, Section 6 “Circling Approach”
TERPS Volume 1, Chapter 3, Paragraph and Table 3-9

42. TERPS vs. PANS-Ops Circling Approaches and Maneuvering Pans-Ops TERPS
Acft Cat Min Vis MOC/HAA Max Speed/ºAOB x Radius + Straight
C NM / 591 ft 180 KIAS/20º = 4.20 NM
D NM 394/ 689 ft 205 KIAS/20º = 5.28 NM
TERPS
OEA Radius +
Acft Cat Min Vis ROC/HAA Max Speed/ºAOB Straight=CAR*
C ½ SM / 450 ft KIAS/20º = 2.68 NM
D SM 300/ 550 ft KIAS/20º = 3.49 NM
With Change #21 and later, At 1000’MSL, ISA Standard and 25KTS of added wind. Visibility in Statue Miles
OEA= Obstacle Evaluated Area, CAR= Circling Area Radius (1.3NM Minimum)
TERPS Volume 1, Chapter 2, Section 6 “Circling Approach” 1.5SM =1.3NM, 2.0SM=1.74NM
TERPS Volume 1, Chapter 3, Paragraph and Table 3-9

43. Reproduced with permission of Jeppesen
Sanderson, Inc. Not to be used for
navigation.

44. Reproduced with permission of Jeppesen
Sanderson, Inc. Not to be used for
navigation.

45. Greece South Korea Japan Canada Mexico Venezuela Azores Germany
Reproduced with permission of Jeppesen Sanderson, Inc. Not to be used for navigation.
Azores
Germany
Saudi Arabia

46. TERPS vs. PANS-Ops Missed Approach Procedures Missed Approach
Requires 3.7% Climb
TERPS Volume 3, Chapter 2, Paragraph 2.4 and Appendix 2, Paragraph 4
PANS-Ops Volume 2, Part 1, Section 4, Chapter 6, “Missed Approach”
Intermediate Missed Approach

47. TERPS vs. PANS-Ops Missed Approach Procedures
TERPS Volume 3, Chapter 2, Paragraph 2.4 and Appendix 2, Paragraph 4
PANS-Ops Volume 2, Part 1, Section 4, Chapter 6, “Missed Approach”
Intermediate Missed Approach

48. Instrument Procedure Design and Operational Differences
TERPS vs. PANS-Ops
Instrument Procedure Design and Operational Differences
Presented By
Mr. Guy Gribble
General Manager, International Flight Resources, LLC