Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Tango Company METL Assessment for SY

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Tango Company METL Assessment for SY"— Presentation transcript:

1 Tango Company METL Assessment for SY 2016-2017
April 24, 2017 “ALL THE WAY!” Company Mission: To produce principled leaders across the four developmental pillars of The Citadel experience: academic, military, physical effectiveness, and moral-ethical.

2 Overall Assessment Last Year (2015-2016) This Year Academic
Partially Trained Military Moral-Ethical Physical Fitness

3 Academic Assessment Partially Trained Strengths Weaknesses
Strong company Academic Adviser Class absences are down Academic team availability Company attained semester GPA above 3.00 Weaknesses Cadets in academic danger could be counseled better ESP environment could be better

4 Academic Assessment Cum GPA last year Cum GPA this year
Class Absences last year (Ex/Un) Class Absences this year (SY) Number Academically Deficient last year Number Academically Deficient this year (Y/R) 1C 3.27 Not available 102/51 91/15 1/0 2C 2.80 112/44 63/18 4 3C 2.70 53/67 75/6 2 4/0 4C 2.89 2.690* 36/23 42/4 3 5/2 Total 2.92 2.944* 303/185 271/43 9 11/2** * Source: Office of Associate Dean for Undergraduate Studies for Fall 2016 semester, January 2017 ** Source: CAS Academic At-Risk Report of 24 April 2017

5 Academic Pillar Strategy
Provide an environment conducive for academic success Find ways to help cadets learn and use effective study habits Proactive vs. Reactive Academic standing vs. Special Leave

6 Military Assessment Partially Trained Strengths Weaknesses
Professional Cadre Morning Room Inspections Improved performance in parades this year Weaknesses Rank-holders understand their roles and responsibilities, execute correctly, and follow-up Effective use of the chain of command Occasional accountability lapses for formations

7 Military Assessment Avg. parade results last year
Avg. parade results this year Class I Offenses last year Class I Offenses this year Suitability Boards last year Suitability Boards this year 1C N/A 2 4 3 2C 15 1 3C 4C Total 13th of 21 Avg.~ 58 pts (12th) 9 26

8 Military Pillar Strategy
Use of non-judicial punishments, i.e., push-ups, pull-ups, restriction/delay of General Leave eligibility “Punishment should be swift and certain!” Get upper class leaders more involved in SMI preparation (common areas, Quadrangle) Constantly reinforce the necessity of the use of the chain of command

9 Moral-Ethical Assessment
Partially Trained Strengths Honor Representatives Senior Mentor System Weaknesses Raising performance to “next level”

10 Moral-Ethical Assessment
Number of honor accusations this year Number of honor accusations last year Number of “in violation” honor findings last year Number of “in violation” honor findings this year Number of sexual harassment/ assault incident reports last year assault incident reports this year 1C 2C 1 * 1 3C 4C Total 2 3 * Resigned

11 Moral-Ethical Pillar Strategy
Reinforce the left and right limits of knob and upper class interaction Continue to stress high standards Senior mentors actually mentor Honor Reps maintain open and clear lines of communication with the company

12 Physical Effectiveness Assessment
Partially Trained Strengths PT Accountability PT Planning Training of incoming Athletic Officer Weaknesses Getting people out of their rooms on time NCOs running stationary PT

13 Physical Effectiveness Assessment
CPFT average last year CPFT average this year Number of CPFT failures last year Number of CPFT failures this year (SY) Number of Ht & Wt failures last year Number of Ht & Wt failures this year (SY) 1C 240 209 2 3 2C 266 220 5 4 3C 242 217 7 1 4C 255 225 Total 250 16 12 8 9

14 Physical Effectiveness Pillar Strategy
Develop an environment that promotes fitness and healthy lifestyles Emphasize wider participation in Intramurals Encourage cadets to work out on their own outside of Corps PT

15 Company Commander/TAC Comments
Co Cdr: Better year than expected. Effectively laid the groundwork for improvement in coming years. Good progress on eliminating bad habits (accountability and parade performance) TAC: Better company than I expected, better cadets than I expected, better year than I expected, good potential to move performance level to upper 50% of cadet companies


Download ppt "Tango Company METL Assessment for SY"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google