Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Echo Company METL Assessment April 15, 2015 1. Overall Assessment Last YearThis Year AcademicNeeded more Practice Needs more Practice MilitaryTrained.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Echo Company METL Assessment April 15, 2015 1. Overall Assessment Last YearThis Year AcademicNeeded more Practice Needs more Practice MilitaryTrained."— Presentation transcript:

1 Echo Company METL Assessment April 15, 2015 1

2 Overall Assessment Last YearThis Year AcademicNeeded more Practice Needs more Practice MilitaryTrained Moral-EthicalTrained Physical FitnessNeeded more Practice Trained 2

3 Academic Assessment Still Needs Practice Strengths – Company Resources – Very High Individual GPAs – Quiet during ESP Weaknesses – Company Resources not properly utilized – A Few Individuals with low GPAs – In Rooms but not studying 3

4 Academic Assessment Cum GPA last year Cum GPA this year Class Absences last year Class Absences this year Number Academically Deficient last year Number Academically Deficient this year 1CN/A2.96---1 2C2.9612.82---1 3C2.8282.93---3 4C2.9083.86---0 Total2.942.972-648-5 4

5 Academic Pillar Strategy ESP checks by Assistant Division Inspectors Mandatory Study Hall for individuals with low GPAs Continue Incentives for Gold Stars/Dean’s List – Friday nights before SMI’s 5

6 Military Assessment Trained Strengths – Kelly Cup (Knobs and Leadership) – Professional Cadre – Parade Results Weaknesses – Class I Offenses 6

7 Military Assessment Avg parade results last year Avg parade results this year Class I Offenses last year Class I Offenses this year Suitability Boards last year Suitability Boards this year 1C--0010 2C--0000 3C--2200 4C--0100 Total5th 2310 7

8 Military Pillar Strategy Parades – Discipline during Practice Parade – Parade Knockout for Merits (Similar to Star of the West) Class I Offenses – Peer Groups for Upperclassmen (Especially 3 rd Class) Suitability Boards – Accountability by Squad Sergeants 8

9 Moral-Ethical Assessment Trained Strengths – Honor Training taken very seriously – Honor Representatives approachable and are often asked questions – Belief that our strict military discipline instilled within the company translates into high moral standards Weaknesses – Outliers within the company – Laziness – Plagiarism 9

10 Moral-Ethical Assessment Number of honor accusations this year Number of honor accusations last year Number of “in violation” honor findings last year Number of “in violation” honor findings this year Number of sexual harassment/ assault incident reports last year Number of sexual harassment/ assault incident reports this year 1C000000 2C100000 3C022000 4C000000 Total122000 10

11 Moral-Ethical Pillar Strategy More training on Plagiarism Clearer expectations for serving punishments – Obligations – Awareness as to what you are signing Further improving relationships with Honor Representatives and the company – More involvement Reinforcing All-In Training 11

12 Physical Effectiveness Assessment Trained Strengths – First semester had Second and Third Highest Individual Scores – PT in the mornings taken seriously – Strong Leaders Weaknesses – Few Individuals – Not a lot of PT outside of Corps PT and Remedial – Gym workouts do not always lead to high PT scores 12

13 Physical Effectiveness Assessment CPFT avg last year CPFT avg this year Number of CPFT failures last year Number of CPFT failures this year Number of H & W failures last year Number of H & W failures this year 1CN/A247-3-4 2C261259-0-1 3C259257-1-0 4C299249-3-0 Total273252-7-5 13

14 Physical Effectiveness Pillar Strategy Afternoon Company Runs Increase participation in Intramural Sports More incentives for maxing PT test 14

15 Company Commander/TAC Comments Company will step up to expectations – Many just need to be challenged Strong sense of pride within company 15

16 G Company METL Assessment 15 April 2015 16

17 Overall Assessment Last YearThis Year AcademicPP MilitaryTT Moral-EthicalPT Physical FitnessPP 17

18 Academic Assessment P Strengths – Cadet tutoring/ writing review – Vastly improved ESP environment from last year – LTC Pickering advising cadets Weaknesses – Class absences – Upperclass cadets use of the Writing and Learning Center – Update company files 18

19 Academic Assessment Cum GPA last year Cum GPA this year Class Absences last year Class Absences this year Number Academically Deficient last year Number Academically Deficient this year 1C3.0122.922140 2C2.8052.81674 3C2.7062.792436 4C2.797-180- Total2.832.84804 19

20 Academic Pillar Strategy Utilize the Merits for A’s on major assignments Company study hall for cadets <2.5 GPA Academic counseling after midterms for cadets with GPA <2.5 GPA – Company Academic advisor or Cadet Academic Officer Division inspectors/ Leadership team patrol divisions periodically to inspect ESP environment 20

21 Military Assessment T Strengths – Accountability – Personal appearance improvement from last year – SMI improvement from last year Weaknesses – MRI’s – On time to formation – Timely turn in of all-ins 21

22 Military Assessment Avg parade results last year Avg parade results this year Class I Offenses last year Class I Offenses this year Suitability Boards last year Suitability Boards this year 1C6.83500 2C6.83210 3C6.83500 4C6.83400 Total6.831610 22

23 Military Pillar Strategy More cadets responsible for MRI’s to cover more days of the week Continue to implement corrective push-ups for cadets late to morning formation Start all-ins 10 minutes before-hand instead of waiting for the horn 23

24 Moral-Ethical Assessment T Strengths – Improved communication between leadership, HA, staff, and company TAC – Balance between discipline and counseling – Eliminated roaching, vast strides towards reducing hazing culture Weaknesses – Alcohol/ Self-control – Sustaining morale – Cultural sensitivity 24

25 Moral-Ethical Assessment Number of honor accusations this year Number of honor accusations last year Number of “in violation” honor findings last year Number of “in violation” honor findings this year Number of sexual harassment/ assault incident reports last year Number of sexual harassment/ assault incident reports this year 1C1100 2C0000 3C0000 4C1100 Total2200 25

26 Moral-Ethical Pillar Strategy Morale boosting events – Golf grill out Increasing incentives Alcohol briefs after parade on Fridays 26

27 Physical Effectiveness Assessment P Strengths – 100% pass rate for seniors – Cadets on remedial have shown improvement – Utilization of Deas Hall(gym, pool and cardio equipment) Weaknesses – Morale at PT – Accountability for PT 27

28 Physical Effectiveness Assessment CPFT avg last year CPFT avg this year Number of CPFT failures last year Number of CPFT failures this year Number of H & W failures last year Number of H & W failures this year 1C23500 2C21932 3C22164 4C24030 Total229126 28

29 Physical Effectiveness Pillar Strategy Look into other options for stationary PT to add variety. Repetition of the same exercises causes lack of interest. Encourage more participation in intramurals 29

30 Company Commander/TAC Comments Pleased with improvements on SMI, personal appearance, accountability Still concerned with morale Less issues with company, more major issues with select few individuals – Hazing, alcohol, substance abuse 30

31 BD Company METL Assessment 15APR2015 31

32 Overall Assessment Last YearThis Year AcademicCompany Avg GPA: 2.70 (P) Company Avg GPA: 3.07 (12JAN2015) (T) MilitaryMajor Disciplinary Issues (U) Few, Isolated Disciplinary Issues (P) Moral-Ethical(P)(T) Physical Fitness12 Deficient (MAY2014) (U) 9 Deficient (APR2015) (P) 32

33 Academic Assessment Strengths – 55-60%: Dean’s List and/or Gold Stars – Traditionally strict ESP environment – Highly proactive Academic Officer – 12JAN2015: 3.07 avg GPA (4/21 Corps | 1/5 Battalion) Weaknesses – End of SY1314: 2.78 Cumulative GPA Class of 2017: 2.4 Cumulative GPA 12 th of 21 33

34 Academic Assessment Cum GPA last year Cum GPA this year (Fall Term) Class Absences last year Class Absences this year Number Academically Deficient last year Number Academically Deficient this year 1C+3.03.23 (3.5)---5.92---1 2C+3.03.11 (3.2)---4.92---2 3C~2.42.74 (2.9)---3.72---5 4C---2.7 (2.7)---6.36---4 Total12 34

35 Academic Pillar Strategy Academic Major Accountability Program 4C + <2.0 UC Study Hall in Jenkins Hall Strict ESP Environment Emphasis on Merits (OPD) for A’s Sophomore Privileges based on Academic Merits – i.e. untuck, flip flops, socks, etc. Fall Semester: – Huge improvement from Class of 2017 (~2.4 -> 2.969) 35

36 Military Assessment Strengths – Traditionally strong performance at Parade – Stellar Cadre (2 SL’s competitive for Regimental and Battalion Command) – Strong performance at Kelly Cup – Recipient of 4C Retention Award for SY1314 Weaknesses – Class of 2018: Lost 3 4C 36

37 Military Assessment Avg parade results last year Avg parade results this year Class I Offenses last year Class I Offenses this year Suitability Boards last year Suitability Boards this year 1C--- 4 0 2C--- 0 0 3C--- 1 1 4C--- 0 0 Total51 37

38 Military Pillar Strategy Strict formations Strict and daily cadet-run MRI’s (Command Team, Platoon Leadership) Strict PAI for formations, pre-parade Enforcement of 0% Tolerance – Hazing/4C System Violations, SH/SA, AVs 1SG and Cadre spread throughout 4C area 38

39 Moral-Ethical Assessment Strengths – Positive class relationships – Class of 2016 Weaknesses – Class of 2017’s knob year 39

40 Moral-Ethical Assessment Number of honor accusations this year Number of honor accusations last year Number of “in violation” honor findings last year Number of “in violation” honor findings this year Number of sexual harassment/ assault incident reports last year Number of sexual harassment/ assault incident reports this year 1C000000 2C000000 3C100000 4C100020 Total200020 40

41 Moral-Ethical Pillar Strategy Proactive Honor Representatives – Bohrn & Cole Heavy restrictions and enforcement of regulations on Class of 2017 – Set attainable goals; remarkable improvement achieved in conduct and academics 41

42 Physical Effectiveness Assessment Strengths – Cadet Jenkins (BD): +420 CPFT (1/2201) – Focused Regimental PT atmosphere Weaknesses – Traditional and historical weakness – Intramural participation – Lack of incentives 42

43 Physical Effectiveness Assessment CPFT avg last year CPFT avg this year Number of CPFT failures last year Number of CPFT failures this year Number of H & W failures last year Number of H & W failures this year 1C---245---1 0 2C---253---3 0 3C---249---1 1 4C---253---3 0 Total---250---8 1 43

44 Physical Effectiveness Pillar Strategy Regimental PT: CO, XO, 1SG, PLs, PSGs in front – Focused atmosphere – Accountability Company “attitude” towards deficient cadets + takeout/junk food PT Mentorship 44

45 Company Commander/TAC Comments Main focuses: – Restoring high academic status – Cracking whip with Class of 2017 – MRI/SMI performance – Maintenance of positive command climate – Professional Cadre & retention of 4C – 0% tolerance re: alcohol, SA/SH, hazing – Edinburgh Tattoo 45


Download ppt "Echo Company METL Assessment April 15, 2015 1. Overall Assessment Last YearThis Year AcademicNeeded more Practice Needs more Practice MilitaryTrained."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google