School Development External Review “Building a Learning Community”

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
[Imagine School at North Port] Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team School Accreditation.
Advertisements

St. Louis Public Schools Curriculum Management Audit Speaker Dr. James Scott Lead Auditor for the St. Louis Public Schools Curriculum Management Audit.
NCLB Consolidated Monitoring Integrated Approach to Title III Monitoring.
Session Objectives Begin to understand the goals, purpose and rationale for Program Reviews Learn about the components of implementing Program Reviews.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Forsyth County Schools February 15, 2012.
Session 4: Classroom MBI Team Training Presented by the MBI Consultants.
Goals-Based Evaluation (GBE)
School Community Councils Working Together for School Improvement.
Section 1 Demographic Information Podcast Script Laura LaMore, Consultant, OSE-EIS July 13,
Service Agency Accreditation Recognizing Quality Educational Service Agencies Mike Bugenski
Muscogee County School District Division of Academics (DOA) District Accreditation Module 4: Quality Assurance.
Learning Walk High Levels of Learning for All Students Quality Instruction in Every Classroom Skillful Leadership Throughout the School and District.
Enter System Name AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Catalyst High School May 11,12,13, 2014.
Staff Development ED 571: School and Home-Based Programs for Children with Autism.
Commit” ” to Program Reviews Rhonda Back Program Review Director Bath County Public Schools Kentucky Association of School Councils September 17, 2014.
Psychological Services Program Department Learning Services Created November 2011 London District Catholic School Board.
District Accreditation as a Quality System Presented by Mary Beth Huber On behalf of the Calcasieu Parish SACS CASI Steering Committee.
SAISD Office for Professional Learning Advisory Board March 2, 2005 Navarro Academy March 2, 2005 Navarro Academy 623 S. Pecos.
St. Budweiser Lutheran School Lutheranville, USA April 2015.
“ Building a Learning Community” School Development.
The Role of an Elementary Student Program Support Teacher SPST Building Inclusive Catholic Communities Revised July 2010.
WHAT IS “CLASS”? A BRIEF ORIENTATION TO THE CLASS METHODOLOGY.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Performance and Development Culture Preparing for P&D Culture accreditation April 2008.
Quality Assurance Review for Staff of Pre-five Services Glasgow © COLEG.
1 District Accreditation as a Quality System Part I: Broward County Grades K-12 Preparation Presented by Dr. Linda D. Harper on behalf of the Broward County.
School Community Councils Working Together for School Improvement.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
On-Site School Review Leadership Meeting An asset-building model of school improvement... Presenters: ___________________________ The High-Performing School.
School Development Internal Review Building a Professional Learning Community.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
1 DRAFT Monitoring/Evaluation Overview September 20, 2010 Title III Director’s Fall Meeting.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT ON AREA 1, 2 AND 3 Prepared By: Nor Aizar Abu Bakar Quality Academic Assurance Department.
AdvancED District Accreditation Process © 2010 AdvancED.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Bibb County Schools February 5-8, 2012.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Requirements for Documenting Provision of Related Services.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems Brevard Public Schools District Accreditation.
Preparing to Use This Power Point with Staff: Materials/Resources: Print power point if needed Print slide 10 for questions Use: This is a PowerPoint called.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Murray County Schools February 26-29, 2012.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Rapides Parish School District February 2, 2011.
ADEPT 1 SAFE-T Judgments. SAFE-T 2 What are the stages of SAFE-T?  Stage I: Preparation  Stage II: Collection of evidence  Stage.
1 Monitoring/Evaluation Program Overview December 3, 2008 Title III Director’s Meeting.
 IB PYP Authorization Visit March 1 st and 2 nd.
Ensuring Success For Each Student AdvancED District Accreditation Process Five-Year External Review March 13 – 16, 2016 Produced by Mr. Tony Pickett, Assistant.
Kimberly B. Lis, M.Ed. University of St. Thomas Administrative Internship II Dr. Virginia Leiker.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation AUTEC School 4-8 March 2012.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Center Grove High School 10 November 2010.
Welcome to PD Forum FY 11. Professional Development Support Structure SchoolsDistrict Support Department PD Team (Administrator, PD Contact, & PD Team.
The Nebraska Frameworks External Visitation Team Exit Report.
School Development Implementation and Monitoring “Building a Learning Community”
 This policy applies to all campuses, one elementary school and one high school.  All district employed library media specialists are to adhere to the.
Turning Around Chronically Low- Performing Schools Nelson Colbert, Science Instructional Specialist Richmond Public Schools Richmond, VA.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Sugar Grove Elementary September 29, 2010.
Mediation as it relates to students with disabilities COMM 522: Mediation Theory and Practice Instructor: Dr. Brian L. Heisterkamp By Cynthia J. Spence.
Michele Winship, Ph.D.  Compliance with HB 153/SB 316 requirements?  Seek out and get rid of “bad” teachers? OR  Improve teaching.
Scottsbluff ESU #13 Oral Exit Report February 1, 2012 Quality Assurance Review Team Education Service Unit Accreditation.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
PILOT SCHOOL PRINCIPAL EVALUATION
Advancing Student and Educator Growth through Peer Feedback
SCHOOL and DISTRICT ACCREDITATION
نام پروژه : سازمان یادگیرنده نام استاد : دکتر میریانی
ESEA Consolidated Monitoring
Aspiring School Leaders Information Session
WHAT TO EXPECT: A CROWN CORPORATION’S GUIDE TO A SPECIAL EXAMINATION
Professional Review Panel
Roles and Responsibilities
REACH Accreditation Preparing Your School for a Team Visit
Suicide Prevention Education
Presentation transcript:

School Development External Review “Building a Learning Community”

Learning Communities are… …organizations where people continually expand their capacity to create the results they truly desire, where new and expansive patterns of thinking are nurtured, where collective aspiration is set free, and where people are continually learning to see the whole together. (Senge, 1990)

School Development Model

External Review Provides feedback on the validity of the school’s internal review Provides feedback on the extent to which the school development plan responds to the identified needs It is a peer validation of the school’s internal review process and the school development plan.

External Review Conducted by a team external to the school Involves a school visit Provides a report to the school, school council, district and department Makes recommendations for change where deemed appropriate Conducted at the end of the internal review process; every 3-4 years

Procedures for External Review PHASE 1: Ensure the school is prepared for an External Review Internal Review completed Supporting data stored and available to external team 1 year and 3-4 year plan completed

PHASE 2: Select facilitator, date(s) of review, and external team members Facilitator is usually the School Development Program Specialist or SEO Determine dates (facilitator in consultation with administration) Select external team (facilitator in consultation with administration)

PHASE 3: Tour of School Usually completed the evening before the External Review begins Conducted by an administrator Followed by brief training session for external team Concludes with an interview of principal

PHASE 4: Interviews Confidential and conducted within the professional code of ethics Always 2 interviewers present 30 – 45 minutes long Teachers and support staff interviewed individually; parents and students in groups Interviews are voluntary Set script of questions

PHASE 5: Oral Report Purpose: to ensure the information in the report is accurate and reflective of the data Consists of commendations and recommendations on the Internal Review results and School Development Plan Presented electronically to the staff at the end of the External Review process

All notes, files and data collected by the external review team during the process are destroyed at the end of the review

PHASE 6: External Review Written Report Celebrates the school’s accomplishments while making recommendations for change, where appropriate Intended to validate and refine the School Development plan and process Completed within 2-3 weeks of the oral report by the facilitator

Sent electronically to school principal and to district office Not a public document; consideration of recommendations in the report belong to the school and school district