Neo-realism and Neo-liberalism Introduction to International Relations IF Gao Xiaolei I34020.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IR2501 Theories of International Relations
Advertisements

POSC 2200 – Theoretical Approaches
Theories of International Relations
What is Game Theory? It is part of the theory of purposeful behavior commonly known as rational choice theory. It specifically focuses on situations with.
Dr. Bezen Balamir Coşkun
RealPolitik or Power Politics
The Prisoners’ Dilemma and IR theories International Relations.
Fundamental Question What is the fundamental difference between international politics and those that occur within states? It is the lack of institutions.
Outline Prisoners’ Dilemma Security Dilemma Structural realism (Waltz)
Realist and Neorealist Theories of War
Realism.
International Relations Grand Debates
Neo-realists – neo-liberals The debate to date. Neo-realism Neo-Liberalist.
International Relations I
Plan for Today: 1. Wrap-up of points from Sagan & Waltz debate. 2. Evaluation of decisionmaking approaches. 3. Introduction to constructivism.
Institutions and their role in shaping European Security
IR 501 Lecture Notes (2) Realism
Neo-Liberal Institutionalism. The Prisoners’ Dilemma Player 2 Player 1.
Realism. Assumptions  States: unitary, rational actors -Treaty of Westphalia (1648)  Anarchy: no central government  Survival: primary objective 
Alternatives to Realism: Pluralist Liberalism and Globalism.
Institutions and Environmental Cooperation. Today Types of global environmental problems The role of international institutions (regimes): realist vs.
States and International Environmental Regimes. Today: Examine IR theories that focus on states as units of analysis in explaining cooperation Are these.
International Relations
The Cold War The Forces…. The Cold War was a bipolar war between the United States and Soviet Union The Cold War was a bipolar war between.
Liberalism: Conclusion Lecture 14. The Question of the Month How Can Countries Move from Anarchy, War of All Against All, to Cooperation? Security Dilemma.
INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS THEORY INTRODUCTION HC 35.
Plan for Today: Neoliberal Institutionalism & Concluding Liberalism 1. Complete group activity reporting. 2. Survey neoliberal solutions to the Prisoner’s.
INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS THEORIES: PLURALISM OR LIBERALISM
1 Chapter 11 Oligopoly. 2 Define market structures Number of sellers Product differentiation Barrier to entry.
Theories in International Relations: Neo-Liberalism
Homework 1. What is this study based on? How did the group determine levels of corruption? 2. How have the countries at the top of the list (least corrupt.
IR theories: Institutionalism
Plan for Today: Forms of Liberalism in IR 1.Introducing major shared principles of liberalism – domestic and international. 2.Summary introduction to liberal.
POSC 1000(056) Introduction to Politics Politics and Governance the Global Level/Conclusions and Exam Advice Russell Alan Williams.
1 Understanding Global Politics Lecture 4: Neo-Realism/ Structural Realism.
First Quiz ‘’As has so often been the case in political science, the emergence of a new subject area [International Political Economy] was a reponse both.
Political Concepts An Introduction To Political Theory and Statehood.
Neoliberal institutionalism 1975 Keohane and Nye-power and interdependence 1984-Keohane After Hegemony.
Neo-Liberal Institutionalism Idealism tainted by Realism.
Plan for Today: Forms of Liberalism in IR  Delving in detail into newer forms of liberalism: 1.“English school”. 2.Liberal Interdependence. 3.Neoliberal.
Introducing the IR Paradigms
International Relations
THE COLD WAR. Background As a result of the WWII, the European multipolar system was destroyed. Polarity in international relations??? – Various ways.
Security situation in the Central Europe after 1989 Richard Turcsanyi.
Introducing the IR Paradigms 1: Liberalism(s) in IR Prepared for Junior International Politics Class at NENU, Fall 2015.
International Relations and the International System since 1989  The collapse of the Cold War world  Realist approaches to the post Cold War international.
‘Anarchy is What States Make of It’
Liberal alternatives International Security in the Modern World Masaryk University in Brno 1-2 July 2012 Věra Stojarová.
1 Understanding Global Politics Lecture 6: Neo-liberalism.
NEO-REALISM AND NEO-LIBERALISM THEORIES
The Great Debates in International Relations 1 st Great Debate (20s & 30s) 2 nd Great Debate (50s-80s) 3 rd Great Debate (80s & on)
PLS 341: American Foreign Policy Theories in IR The Liberalisms and Idealisms.
Liberalism, Neo-Liberalism and Neo-Realism
CONCEPTS IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS.  Concept: is a general notion or an idea of something.  Cold war: is a state of diplomatic tension between East.
Introduction to Political Science (IRE 101) Week 3 Political Theories
The Political Economy of International Trade Cooperation
International Relations
Outline Prisoners’ Dilemma Security Dilemma Structural realism (Waltz)
Alternatives to Realism: Pluralist Liberalism and Globalism
** Emergence of Realism
Introduction to International Relations
Economics September Lecture 16 Chapter 15 Oligopoly
World Politics Under a system of Anarchy
CREATE REPLACEMENT FOR SYRIA EXERCISE AT START OF CLASS
Realism Oliver-Daddow compares the neo-liberalism and neo-realism. There is three assumptions in both sides that state is central actor, states are sovereign.
Theories of International Relations
IR Theory No Limits Debate.
Assume Anarchy? Peter J. Boettke Constitutional Economics
Presentation transcript:

Neo-realism and Neo-liberalism Introduction to International Relations IF Gao Xiaolei I34020

Contents  Major Points of Neo-Neo Debate Different consequence of anarchy Gains and cheating in cooperation Effects of institutions  Personal View on The Debate

Different Consequence of Anarchy Common Point: World system is anarchic, lacking of common power or central authority to enforce rules to maintain order in international system. Disagree on the consequence of anarchy  Neo-realism States struggle for survival; world is full of danger and conflicts; self-help; cannot depend on others for security  Neo-liberalism Emphasize on interdependence and cooperation; Anarchy can be mitigated by international regimes and institutions Cooperation is easy where states have mutual interests

Gains and Cheating in Cooperation  Neo-realism Difficult to cooperate because of two barriers: relative gain and cheating Reasons: Prisoners’ Dilemma: relative gains of cheating are much bigger than absolute gains States would not like to cooperate for fear of others cheating

Gains and Cheating in Cooperation  Neo-liberalism Cooperation is easy to achieve where states have mutual interests Reasons: If states have mutual interests, cooperation can maximize absolute gains If potential absolute gains are substantial, relative gains will have little impact In terms of Prisoners’ Dilemma, the result can be different if the game is infinite or it is linked to a wide variety of other games with the same players.

Effects of Institutions  Neo-realism Institutions have little effect on states behavior. Institutions reflect the distribution of international power To keep the order in international system, super power states would tolerate free riders to some extent and provide public goods to reduce the against behavior of other states.

Effects of Institutions  Neo-liberalism Institutions can independently change states behavior Reasons: Institutions can make hard cooperation among states become possible by offering not only one mechanism for cooperation Institutions can mitigate fears of cheating in cooperation by providing enough information to show that interest is evenly distributed

Personal View  Neo-realism Vietnam War Occurred during Cold War period in The U.S. government viewed American involvement in the war as a way to prevent a Communist takeover of South Vietnam. If one state went Communist, other states in the region would follow. Then US would lose its dominant position in Cold War. So US spent a lot into Vietnam War. Korea also benefited from this war because US covered nearly 1 billion dollars of Korea’s cost in the war.

Reference Robert O. Keohane; Lisa L. Martin, “The Promise of Institutionalist Theory” Vol. 20, No. 1. (Summer, 1995) John. J Mearsheimer, False Promise of International Institutions, Vol.19, No.3 Charles Lipson, “International Cooperation in Economic and Security Affairs,” World Politics, Vol. 37 (October 1984) Kenneth N. Waltz, Theory of International Politics (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1979) Duncan Snidal, "Relative Gains and'the Pattern of International Cooperation," American Political Science Review, Vol. 85, No. 3 (September 1991)