Working with stakeholders 1 Simon Koblar – Ljubljana, UIRS

Ljubljana context 2 Flat and compact – good for walking and cycling Dormitories and faculties scattered around city 3 concentrations of dormitories Students rarely use car for daily trips Good accessibility by car to faculties we worked with

Stakeholders Key part for implementation Positive and negative experiences 3

List of stakeholders Student dormitories Dormitories student organization Building representatives Champions Event organizers PT operator Social enterprise Tourist board Ljubljana cycling network 4

Student dormitories Key stakeholder – permission to do PTP Public organization Did not allow to knock on doors – students privacy concern Lack of interest from employees 5

Dormitories student organization Key part for communication They informed building representatives about PTP 6

Building representatives Elected student – in charge for communication between residents They shared information about PTP to residents via and/or facebook group 7

Champions Dedicated cyclist – promote cycling among friends Building representatives = champions No financing for champions – poor results 8

Event organizers Faculties Student‘s organizations Commercial companies 9

PT operator Provided travel cards – limited amount Good communication, but they had problems with bureaucracy 10

Social enterprise In the field bike repair Refurbished bikes for prize award 11

Tourist board Provided free city maps 12

Ljubljana cycling network We used their cargo bike 13

Thank you 14 Simon Koblar, Urban planning institute of the Republic of Slovenia