FETS meeting, 14th February 2007 Peter Savage The Front End Test Stand Collaboration 1 Finalising the design of the FETS main support stands.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Drawing In One-Point Perspective
Advertisements

FGT installation disks … viewed from the back (From West end looking in towards vertex). SSD cables go in the spaces above and below the rails on the left.
FEA - Stress Levels & Concentration A change in the shape of a component carrying a load will have the effect of increasing the stress, nearly always at.
SPL Intercavity support Conceptual design review 04/11/ A. Vande Craen TE/MSC-CMI.
CMS ZDC Crane Emergency Payload Removal Procedures This document proposes the viability of using a portable hydraulic actuator Hand crane (Davit crane)
North Idaho Emergency Services Academy. Objectives Types of fire service laddersTypes of fire service ladders Ladder termsLadder terms Ladder raising.
PROBLEM 14:-Two objects, a flower (A) and an orange (B) are within a rectangular compound wall, whose P & Q are walls meeting at Flower A is 1.5M.
A change in the shape of a component carrying a load, will have the effect of increasing the stress, nearly always at a concave corner. The degree of concentration.
MICE Hall – South Mezzanine Jason Tarrant - STFC l Contents »Device checks with current South Mezzanine »South Mezzanine change summary »Conclusion.
Pipe Supports and Restraints
By: Joseph Martinez University of Michigan Supervisor: Dave Pushka, NuMI Project 3Q120-M Quadrupole Magnet Transport.
MICE Collaboration Meeting at Frascati, Jun 26~29, 2005 PID Support Design Stephanie Yang.
MICE Alignment and Support Structure Tony Jones and Yury Ivanyushenkov Engineering Department RAL.
Too Big, Too Small, Just Right!
Rolling element bearings A. Lozzi 09
STATUS OF THE CRESCENT FLEX- TAPES FOR THE ATLAS PIXEL DISKS G. Sidiropoulos 1.
1 Telecom Cabling Ladder racks systems and relay racks Ladder racks systems and relay racks.
F.E.T.S. Mechanical Engineering Update by P. Savage 13 th August 2008.
Dimensioning Dimensioning.
SOL-GEL COATING FACILITY CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW October 19, 2005.
Using the Alphabet of lines. Drawing should be near bottom left corner. The front view shows how wide and how tall the object is.
FETS meeting, 1st November 2006 Peter Savage The Front End Test Stand Collaboration 1 The mechanical engineering design of the Mk II emittance measurement.
Chapter 24 Millwork and Cabinet Technology, Cabinet Elevations, and Layout.
MICE Integration Engineering Jason Tarrant - STFC l Contents »Device Interfaces – General »AFC »Spectrometer Solenoids »RFCC »EMR / KL »South Mezzanine.
FETS meeting Beam Profile Measurement Tank By P. Savage 13th June 2007.
F.E.T.S. Mechanical Engineering Update By P. Savage 7th September 2007.
1 Target Station Design Dan Wilcox High Power Targets Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory EuroNu Annual Meeting 2012.
For Sale:  Mobicell – Cell on Weels (COWS)  Dimensions: 8.5 x 4 x 2.5 m  Qty – 10 units.
Progress on Remote Handling Systems TAC 12 Magnus Göhran – WPM 15 th October 2015.
UK Neutrino Factory Meeting Front End Test Stand (F.E.T.S.) Engineering Status by P. Savage 22nd April 2009.
Setting up correctly Different types and their use
RFQ – Design, Components and Fabrication 1 We aim to design and manufacture a Radio Frequency Quadrupole (RFQ).
RFQ Cold model manufacture, June 2006 Peter Savage The Front End Test Stand Collaboration 1 OFC RFQ Cold Model Manufacture The first step is to convert.
Scale & Proportion Too Big, Too Small, Just Right!
Design – investigation – solutions – working drawings.
Layout of the Front-End Test Stand Ajit Kurup UK Neutrino Factory Meeting 12 th January 2005.
FETS-HINS Videoconference 23rd Feb 2007 FETS Mechanical Design Issues by J. Pozimski On behalf of P. Savage.
ESS Bunker A concept for a common beamline interface. ISIS Engineering Group, February 2015 For illustration purposes a conceptual CAD model of the VOR.
CLIC Permanent Magnet Quadrupole update 27 th January 2011 Mechanical Engineering status update N. Collomb1.
ENGINEERING ADVENTUREwww.BLOODHOUNDSSC.com BLOODHOUND SSC AMAD GEARBOX MOUNTING PLATE ASSEMBLY ABH:E0011 The following explains the AMAD gearbox mount.
PROJECTION OF LINE HELP 2016
Potting Bench Plans Matt Howell Brooks County High School ___, Georgia Georgia Agricultural Education Curriculum Office, August, 2004.
1 Implementation at RAL Iouri Ivaniouchenkov on behalf of Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw, Tony Jones, Jim Rochford Engineering Department, RAL MICE Collaboration.
Angular Measurements Angle is defined as the opening between two lines which meet at a point. If a circle is divided into 360 parts, then each part is.
Sanitary Engineering Lecture 10 Revision
1 Target Station Design Dan Wilcox February 2012.
Storage and Warehousing Techniques
CCC Locker Proposal At present the number of lockers available in the men's changing / locker room is insufficient for our needs, and there is a constant.
Front End Test Stand (F.E.T.S.)
F.E.T.S. Mechanical Engineering Update
Cherrill Spencer, SLAC Member of ATF2 Magnet Team
Measuring & Marking Out Produced by Neil Liggett
Status of Questions and Actions from the meeting of 10/2016
Status of the Front End Test Stand April 2007.
UNIT – III Syllabus (a) Projection of planes: Introduction, types of planes, projection of planes, projection of planes perpendicular to both the reference.
Geologic Geometry.
ALL THE BEST !! APPLICATIONS OF PRINCIPLES OF PROJECTIONS OF LINES
Tolerances.
Isotropic View Conceptual Design for MONALISA setup at CERN Magnet
One quarter of RFQ vessel + vacuum pumps and supports
Computer Aided Design I
CHAPTER 3 Dimensioning.
ACCESS EQUIPMENT.
NISSAN Z31 & Z32 OIL PUMP DIFFERENCES
whose P & Q are walls meeting at 900. Flower A is 1
ALL THE BEST !! APPLICATIONS OF PRINCIPLES OF PROJECTIONS OF LINES
Mechanical Engineering progress for the Front End Test Stand
TOLERANCES.
IKON 15 Talal Osman & Iain Sutton
Presentation transcript:

FETS meeting, 14th February 2007 Peter Savage The Front End Test Stand Collaboration 1 Finalising the design of the FETS main support stands

FETS meeting, 14th February 2007 Peter Savage The Front End Test Stand Collaboration 2 FETS main support stands Deciding now is going to be a best guess and there will never be a perfect solution given the range of size of components that make up the FETS. Rail system does not need to be specified now. Decisions: Rail pitch - Wide enough to provide useful space between rails for items such as vacuum pumps. Not so wide that working on the FETS is uncomfortable and that the structure is weak. Rail height – that defines beam height to some degree. Tall enough to provide useful space beneath rails. Suggest use of false floor in any case to run power and pipes so no need for concern re. beam height relative to a person. Length of each section and how many sections (6 x 2m) – spare bench offline? Some other length stands to provide flexibility? Misc - Bolted to the floor + wheels for when unloaded?

FETS meeting, 14th February 2007 Peter Savage The Front End Test Stand Collaboration 3 Previous support stand - why change the design? Leg pitch too narrow to span trench Rail pitch too narrow for our FETS needs No room beneath rails to mount equipment No possibility of sliding equipment along the stand. Lack of convenient mounting points for services. Do we need detachable top structure?

FETS meeting, 14th February 2007 Peter Savage The Front End Test Stand Collaboration 4 Support stand basics 3 Shown here are three arbitrary cylinders of diameter 300, 600 and 1000mm with their centre i.e. the beam centre at 1500mm above the ground. 1500mm 800mm Beam 2000mm

FETS meeting, 14th February 2007 Peter Savage The Front End Test Stand Collaboration 5 Support stand populated with realistic equipment 3 Profile Measurement Tank RFQ

FETS meeting, 14th February 2007 Peter Savage The Front End Test Stand Collaboration 6 Conclusion If we can decide on the main parameters for the support stands soon then engineering drawings for manufacture can be produced in the near future. Getting the stands built and aligned in place in R8 will not only give us the base upon which equipment can be mounted, but will define the boundaries that equipment must fall within and will hence aid the design process.