1 IEEE 802.1 interim, Orlando, Florida, March, 2008new-nfinn-fast-chains-rings-par5c-0308-v1 Fast Recovery for Chains and Rings Proposal for PAR and 5.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /661r1 Submission November 2002 Ziv Belsky, WavionSlide 1 Proposal for the 5 criteria for the HT SG.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /661r0 Submission November 2002 Ziv Belsky, WavionSlide 1 Proposal for the 5 criteria for the HT SG.
PAR for Media Converters r2IEEE interim, October, PAR for Media Converters revision 2 Norman Finn Cisco Systems.
ECMP for 802.1Qxx Proposal for PAR and 5 Criteria Version 2 16 people from ECMP ad-hoc committee.
Migration Considerations and Techniques to MPLS-TP based Networks and Services Nurit Sprecher / Nokia Siemens Networks Yaacov Weingarten / Nokia Siemens.
Extended Service Set (ESS) Mesh Network Daniela Maniezzo.
Doc.: IEEE /0085r2 Submission July 2011 Gerald Chouinard, CRCSlide Response to Comments received on the proposed a PAR and 5C Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE Comment #1 from WG Comment: In Section 5.2.b two examples of spectrum resource measurements are given: PER and.
CSD for P802.1AS-REV WG Wednesday, 05 November 2014.
IEEE 802.1ABrev Extension for Auto Attach Nigel Bragg Dan Romascanu Paul Unbehagen.
21-08-xxxx IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN: mrpm Title: Comments on PAR/5C of MRPM SG Date Submitted: September 7, 2008.
Lesson 11-Virtual Private Networks. Overview Define Virtual Private Networks (VPNs). Deploy User VPNs. Deploy Site VPNs. Understand standard VPN techniques.
IEEE Qbv DRAFT 5C’s for Time Aware Shaper enhancement to 802.1Q
© 2008 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco ConfidentialPresentation_ID 1 Chapter 2: LAN Redundancy Scaling Networks.
Documenting Network Design
© 2008 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco ConfidentialPresentation_ID 1 Chapter 2: LAN Redundancy Scaling Networks.
Doc.: IEEE /0981r1 TGs Reference Architecture Considerations September 6, 2004 Tricci So & W. Steven Conner.Slide 1 TGs ESS Mesh System Reference.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco PublicITE I Chapter 6 1 LAN Switching and Wireless Implement Spanning Tree Protocols (STP) Chapter.
Proposal for device identification PAR. Scope Unique per-device identifiers (DevID) Method or methods for authenticating that device is bound to that.
IEEE SCC41 PARs Dr. Rashid A. Saeed. 2 SCC41 Standards Project Acceptance Criteria 1. Broad market application  Each SCC41 (P1900 series) standard shall.
PAR and CSD for P802.1Qxx WG January PAR (1) 1.1 Project Number: P802.1Qxx 1.2 Type of Document: Standard 1.3 Life Cycle: Full Use 2.1 Title:
Standardization of Mobile Wireless Small Cell Backhaul (SCB) Document Number: IEEE r Date Submitted: Source: Junhyeong.
IEEE MSC April, 2009 AVB Device Discovery, Connection and Control SG Draft 1 A Device Discovery, Connection Management and Control Protocol for P1722 based.
Doc.: IEEE /0498r0 Submission April 2008 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Modifications to the 60GHz PAR & 5 C’s Proposal Date:
Page 1 IEEE Ethernet Working Group - CSD Version 2.3 Items required by the IEEE 802 CSD are shown in Black text, supplementary items required by.
Congestion Management Study Group1 September 2004 PAR Title Information technology -- Telecommunications and information exchange between systems -- Local.
Consolidated comments on LASG 802c PAR and CSD Stephen Haddock March 11,
CSD for P802.1Qcj WG January Project process requirements Managed objects – Describe the plan for developing a definition of managed objects.
Privecsg Privacy Recommendation PAR Proposal Date: [ ] Authors: NameAffiliationPhone Juan Carlos ZúñigaInterDigital
1 Recommendations Now that 40 GbE has been adopted as part of the 802.3ba Task Force, there is a need to consider inter-switch links applications at 40.
Doc.: IEEE l2r Submission September 2012 Norman Finn [Cisco] Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Doc.: IEEE 11-04/0319r0 Submission March 2004 W. Steven Conner, Intel Corporation Slide 1 Architectural Considerations and Requirements for ESS.
1 6/3/2003 IEEE Link Security Study Group, June 2003, Ottawa, Canada Secure Frame Format PAR: 5 Criteria.
Doc.: IEEE /0981r0 TGs Reference Architecture Considerations August 30, 2004 Tricci So.Slide 1 TGs ESS Mesh System Reference Architecture Considerations.
Privecsg Privacy Recommendation PAR Proposal Date: [ ] Authors: NameAffiliationPhone Juan Carlos ZúñigaInterDigital
Privecsg Privacy Recommendation PAR Proposal Date: [ ] Authors: NameAffiliationPhone Juan Carlos ZúñigaInterDigital
Doc.: IEEE sru Submission 11 November 2013 M Ariyoshi, S Kitazawa (ATR)Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
Doc.: IEEE /0860r0 Submission July 2010 Jon Rosdahl, CSRSlide 1 Comments for p New PAR – July 2010 Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE ulp Submission Slide 1 May 2012 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission.
Privecsg Privacy Recommendation PAR Proposal Date: [ ] Authors: NameAffiliationPhone Juan Carlos ZúñigaInterDigital
IEEE Std Proposed Revision Purpose, Scope & 5 Criteria.
Contents of this presentation ● PAR material (Title, Scope, Purpose) ● Material as developed at previous meetings ● Provision for new/revised material.
Contents of this presentation ● PAR material (Title, Scope, Purpose) ● Material as developed at previous meetings ● Provision for new/revised material.
November 99 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Proposal for WPAN High Rate Study Group]
Below 6GHz 11vht PAR&5C's proposal
IEEE P criteria responses
Comments on HT PAR & 5 Criteria
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
P802.1CS Link-local Registration Protocol
Congestion Management Study Group
Review of March 2013 Proposed Pars
Lecture#10: LAN Redundancy
Tailor slide to customer industry/pain points
IEEE SCC41 PARs Date: Authors: August 2009 August 2009
Submission Title: [Proposal on PAR and 5C draft for BAN]
<month year> Denver, March 2006
Privacy Recommendation PAR Proposal
Submission Title: [Proposal on PAR and 5C draft for BAN]
doc.: IEEE <doc#1>
Below 6GHz 11vht PAR&5C's proposal
Jan Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [PAR and CSD document discussion] Date Submitted:
900 MHz ISM Band Date: Authors: January 2010 Month Year
<month year> Denver, March 2006
comments on Pending 802 PARs – July 2011
July doc.: IEEE /0997r0 July Response to Comments received on the proposed a PAR and 5C Date: Authors: Gerald.
Comments for p New PAR – July 2010
Submission Title: BAN closing report for San Diego, CA
TGn Overview Portland, Oregon, US July 2004
Proposed text for Section 6.5 of 5 Criteria
Interest for HDR extension to a
Presentation transcript:

1 IEEE interim, Orlando, Florida, March, 2008new-nfinn-fast-chains-rings-par5c-0308-v1 Fast Recovery for Chains and Rings Proposal for PAR and 5 Criteria Version 1 Norman Finn Cisco Systems

2 IEEE interim, Orlando, Florida, March, 2008new-nfinn-fast-chains-rings-par5c-0308-v1 Background

3 IEEE interim, Orlando, Florida, March, 2008new-nfinn-fast-chains-rings-par5c-0308-v1 Background  IEEE defines a complex MAC that can be used to create a closed ring of bridges. An ring offers: Recovery in 10s of milliseconds from a failure of a link. Fairness of access by data streams to best-effort bandwidth regardless of the streams’ path lengths around the ring. Ring topology discovery. Customer address hiding (satisfied by 802.1ah). Bandwidth allocation (likely satisfied by 802.1Qav, 802.1Qaz).  The addition of these three features to 802.1Q bridged LANs would enhance their viability in the metropolitan Ethernet space, due to the widespread deployment of ring topologies.  This PAR addresses the first feature: the rapid recovery of connectivity. (See for more.)

4 IEEE interim, Orlando, Florida, March, 2008new-nfinn-fast-chains-rings-par5c-0308-v1 Project Authorization Request

5 IEEE interim, Orlando, Florida, March, 2008new-nfinn-fast-chains-rings-par5c-0308-v1 Title  PAR for an amendment to an existing Standard 802.1Q  P802.1Qbb (or Qbc, etc., as appropriate)  IEEE Standard for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks---Virtual Bridged Local Area Networks - Amendment: Fast Recovery for Chains and Rings

6 IEEE interim, Orlando, Florida, March, 2008new-nfinn-fast-chains-rings-par5c-0308-v1 Scope  This standard specifies protocols, procedures, and managed objects to support the rapid restoration of connectivity across a physical bridged network topology that includes chains or rings of bridges in a manner that interoperates with the Multiple Spanning Tree Protocol.

7 IEEE interim, Orlando, Florida, March, 2008new-nfinn-fast-chains-rings-par5c-0308-v1 Purpose  Under certain failure scenarios in networks that include long chains or rings of bridges, the Multiple Spanning Tree Protocol (MSTP) defined in Clause 13 of IEEE Std Q-2005 can interrupt the network’s connectivity for several seconds while determining the new active topologies. By configuring a subset of bridges in such a network with knowledge of the network’s intended physical connectivity, these interruptions can be minimized in a manner that interoperates with MSTP.

8 IEEE interim, Orlando, Florida, March, 2008new-nfinn-fast-chains-rings-par5c-0308-v1 Need  IEEE bridged networks are being deployed by providers of wide-area commercial Ethernet services using pre-existing physical topologies that often include long chains or rings of bridges. Such topologies highlight a weakness of MSTP—certain failure scenarios can cause MSTP to interrupt network connectivity for several seconds. The existence of several proprietary solutions to this problem indicates that a standard solution is in order.

9 IEEE interim, Orlando, Florida, March, 2008new-nfinn-fast-chains-rings-par5c-0308-v1 Stakeholders  Vendors, users, administrators, designers, customers, and owners of bridged networks.

10 IEEE interim, Orlando, Florida, March, 2008new-nfinn-fast-chains-rings-par5c-0308-v1 Other standards with a similar scope  There are no standards solving this problem for IEEE 802.1Q bridges. ITU-T Draft Recommendation G.8032 addresses the problem of a single closed ring of ITU-T defined Ethernet switches, which are similar to IEEE 802.1Q bridges, but not in the context of MSTP.

11 IEEE interim, Orlando, Florida, March, 2008new-nfinn-fast-chains-rings-par5c-0308-v1 Five Criteria

12 IEEE interim, Orlando, Florida, March, 2008new-nfinn-fast-chains-rings-par5c-0308-v1 Broad Market Potential  Broad sets of applicability. The commercial provision of Ethernet services across metropolitan or larger networks is a large and growing business. Metropolitan networks are not, of course, the only ones among the millions of bridged networks that can benefit from optimization for ring topologies.  Multiple vendors and numerous users. Multiple bridge vendors offer similar, proprietary solutions to many customers.  Balanced costs (LAN versus attached stations). This project does not materially alter the existing cost structure of bridged networks. A standards project authorized by IEEE 802 shall have a broad market potential. Specifically, it shall have the potential for:

13 IEEE interim, Orlando, Florida, March, 2008new-nfinn-fast-chains-rings-par5c-0308-v1 Compatibility  IEEE 802 defines a family of standards. All standards shall be in conformance with the IEEE Architecture, Management, and Interworking documents as follows: 802. Overview and Architecture, 802.1D, 802.1Q, and parts of 802.1f. If any variances in conformance emerge, they shall be thoroughly disclosed and reviewed with 802. This PAR is for an amendment to 802.1Q, thus ensuring compatibility.  Each standard in the IEEE 802 family of standards shall include a definition of managed objects that are compatible with systems management standards. Such a definition will be included.

14 IEEE interim, Orlando, Florida, March, 2008new-nfinn-fast-chains-rings-par5c-0308-v1 Distinct Identity  Substantially different from other IEEE 802 standards. This project will amend the only IEEE 802 standard defining VLAN bridged networks.  One unique solution per problem (not two solutions to a problem). There are no other standard solutions to the ring recovery problem in an MSTP network.  Easy for the document reader to select the relevant specification. This project will amend the only IEEE 802 standard defining VLAN bridged networks. Each IEEE 802 standard shall have a distinct identity. To achieve this, each authorized project shall be:

15 IEEE interim, Orlando, Florida, March, 2008new-nfinn-fast-chains-rings-par5c-0308-v1 Technical Feasibility  Demonstrated system feasibility. Several bridge vendors offer products that offer capabilities substantially the same as those defined by this project.  Proven technology, reasonable testing. Several bridge vendors offer products that offer capabilities substantially the same as those defined by this project. Compliance with the project can be tested using straightforward extensions of existing test tools for bridged networks.  Confidence in reliability. The reliability of the modified protocols will be not be measurably worse than that of the existing MSTP. For a project to be authorized, it shall be able to show its technical feasibility. At a minimum, the proposed project shall show:

16 IEEE interim, Orlando, Florida, March, 2008new-nfinn-fast-chains-rings-par5c-0308-v1 Economic Feasibility  Known cost factors, reliable data. This project introduces no hardware costs beyond the minimal and well-known resources consumed by extending an existing software protocol.  Reasonable cost for performance. The cost of upgrading software and configuring a priori knowledge of the overall system topology is reasonable for the significant reduction in the time required to recover from a network failure.  Consideration of installation costs. The cost of installing enhanced software, in exchange for improved network performance, is familiar to vendors and users of bridged networks. For a project to be authorized, it shall be able to show economic feasibility (so far as can reasonably be estimated) for its intended applications. At a minimum, the proposed project shall show: