Particulate Matter and its Sources in Georgia Sangil Lee.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Source Apportionment of PM 2.5 in the Southeastern US Sangil Lee 1, Yongtao Hu 1, Michael Chang 2, Karsten Baumann 2, Armistead (Ted) Russell 1 1 School.
Advertisements

1 Policies for Addressing PM2.5 Precursor Emissions Rich Damberg EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards June 20, 2007.
Perspectives in Designing and Operating a Regional Ammonia Monitoring Network Gary Lear USEPA Clean Air Markets Division.
PM 2.5 in the Upper Midwest Michael Koerber Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium.
Sources of PM 2.5 Carbon in the SE U.S. RPO National Work Group Meeting December 3-4, 2002.
FIRE AND BIOFUEL CONTRIBUTIONS TO ANNUAL MEAN AEROSOL MASS CONCENTRATIONS IN THE UNITED STATES ROKJIN J. PARK, DANIEL J. JACOB, JENNIFER A. LOGAN AGU FALL.
1 Recent PM 2.5 Trends in Georgia André J. Butler Mercer University EVE 290L 14 April, 2008.
Section highlights Organic Aerosol and Field Studies.
Organic Carbon and Elemental Carbon in Atlanta Area Chao Wu.
Evaluation of Secondary Organic Aerosols in Atlanta
Air Quality Impacts from Prescribed Burning Karsten Baumann, PhD. Polly Gustafson.
Discussion Space Research Centre. Urbanization and Industrialization: in 2008, more than half of humans live in cities UN Population Report 2007.
Department of Engineering and Public Policy Carnegie Mellon University Integrated Assessment of Particulate Matter Exposure and Health Impacts Sonia Yeh.
Particle pollution is linked to adverse health effects ~350,000 premature deaths a year within the EU are related to exposure to particulate matter (PM)
Weight of Evidence Checklist Review AoH Work Group Call June 7, 2006 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Satellite-based Global Estimate of Ground-level Fine Particulate Matter Concentrations Aaron van Donkelaar1, Randall Martin1,2, Lok Lamsal1, Chulkyu Lee1.
Health Risks of Exposure to Chemical Composition of Fine Particulate Air Pollution Francesca Dominici Yeonseung Chung Michelle Bell Roger Peng Department.
J. Zhou 1, X. Zhu 1, T. Wang 1, and X. Zhang 2 J. Zhou 1, X. Zhu 1, T. Wang 1, and X. Zhang 2 1 College of Resources and Information Tech., China University.
Air Quality Impact Analysis 1.Establish a relationship between emissions and air quality. AQ past = a EM past + b 2.A change in emissions results in an.
Simulating diurnal changes of speciated particulate matter in Atlanta, Georgia using CMAQ Yongtao Hu, Jaemeen Baek, Bo Yan, Rodney Weber, Sangil Lee, Evan.
Air Quality, Atmospheric Deposition, and Lake Tahoe October 15, 2003 Western Regional Pollution Prevention Network Grannlibakken, Lake Tahoe Jim Pederson.
Investigation of Decadal Changes in Aerosol and Asthma Sponsors: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) NASA Goddard Space Flight Center.
Temporal and Spatial Variations of PM2.5 Mass in Georgia Xiaolu Zhang EAS 6410 Spring 2007.
Angeliki Karanasiou Source apportionment of particulate matter in urban aerosol Institute of Nuclear Technology and Radiation Protection, Environmental.
Study On Ambient Air Monitoring, Emission Inventory and Source Apportionment Methodology Frame Work By A. L. Aggarwal.
Clinton MacDonald 1, Kenneth Craig 1, Jennifer DeWinter 1, Adam Pasch 1, Brigette Tollstrup 2, and Aleta Kennard 2 1 Sonoma Technology, Inc., Petaluma,
PM2.5 Model Performance Evaluation- Purpose and Goals PM Model Evaluation Workshop February 10, 2004 Chapel Hill, NC Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS.
COHA Update Jin Xu. Update 2003 and 2004 back-trajectories – done PMF modeling by groups using 2000 to 2004 IMPROVE data – done Analysis of PMF results.
PM Network Assessment: Speciated Network Planning Prepared for EPA OAQPS Richard Scheffe by Rudolf B. Husar Center for Air Pollution Impact and Trend Analysis,
Jenny Hand CIRA Acadia National Park, ME Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environments (IMPROVE)
Science Investigation Discussion of Results to Date & Future Work Red Deer Particulate Matter Information Session Maxwell Mazur
The Use of Source Apportionment for Air Quality Management and Health Assessments Philip K. Hopke Clarkson University Center for Air Resources Engineering.
RPO Monitoring Issues by Marc Pitchford, Ph.D. WRAP Ambient Monitoring & Reporting Forum Co-chair.
VISTAS Data / Monitoring Overview Scott Reynolds SC DHEC- Larry Garrison KY DNREP Data Workgroup Co-Chairs RPO National Technical Workgroup Meeting – St.
Estimating the Contribution of Smoke and Its Fuel Types to Fine Particulate Carbon using a Hybrid- CMB Model Bret A. Schichtel and William C. Malm - NPS.
Atmospheric Particulate Matter: Chemical Composition and Basics of Concentration Estimation Mike Bergin, Ted Russell, Jim Mullholland, Sangil Lee CEE 6319:
Causes of Haze Assessment (COHA) Update. Current and near-future Major Tasks Visibility trends analysis Assess meteorological representativeness of 2002.
11/17/ Air Quality Modeling Overview of AQ Models Gaussian Dispersion Model Chemical Mass Balance (CMB) Models.
PM Network Assessment: Speciated Network Planning Prepared for EPA OAQPS Richard Scheffe by Rudolf B. Husar Center for Air Pollution Impact and Trend Analysis,
Model Evaluation Comparing Model Output to Ambient Data Christian Seigneur AER San Ramon, California.
Aerosol Composition and Trends Andrew Martahus. Particulate Matter: Solid or Liquid Particles in Air Size and Composition Although particulate matter.
Source Attribution Modeling to Identify Sources of Regional Haze in Western U.S. Class I Areas Gail Tonnesen, EPA Region 8 Pat Brewer, National Park Service.
PM 2.5 Stakeholder Working Group Meeting #1 South Coast Air Quality Management District June 8, 2006.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division 16 October 2012 Integrating source.
PM 2.5 NAAQS October 26, 2004 ARIPPA trinityconsultants.com Presented by: Divya Harrison Trinity Consultants (240)
CE (%) Conclusions and Outlook  Most monitoring sites in GA exceed the annual NAAQS for PM 2.5, coastal sites benefit from land-sea breeze circulation.
SOURCES, COMPOSITION AND HEALTH IMPACTS OF AIRBORNE PARTICULATE MATTER Roy M. Harrison University of Birmingham and UK National Centre for Atmospheric.
Nitrogen= 78% Oxygen=21% CO 2 =0.035% Total= %
1 RPO Data Analysis/Monitoring Grant Guidance Review Extracted from the EPA’s 3/5/02 RPO 4 th Year Policy, Organizational & Technical Guidance.
Air pollution in Stuttgart ? NO 2 O3O3 PM 10. Stuttgart.
Fairbanks PM 2.5 Source Apportionment Using the Chemical Mass Balance (CMB) Model Tony Ward, Ph.D. The University of Montana Center for Environmental Health.
Fairbanks PM 2.5 Source Apportionment Using the Chemical Mass Balance (CMB) Model Tony Ward, Ph.D. The University of Montana Center for Environmental Health.
Ambient Monitoring Data Summary: Dust WRAP Workshop on Fire, Carbon, and Dust May 24, 2006 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Workshop on Air Quality Data Analysis and Interpretation Evaluation of Emission Inventory.
October 1999PM Data Analysis Workbook: Glossary1 Glossary and Acronyms This section provides definitions of acronyms and terms used in the workbook. A.
Garfield County Air Quality Monitoring Network Cassie Archuleta Project Scientist Board of County Commissioners – Regular Meeting.
Correlations between DTT Activity and PM Constituents Wing Tuet April
Study of PM10 Annual Arithmetic Mean in USA  Particulate matter is the term for solid or liquid particles found in the air  The smaller particles penetrate.
IMPROVE/STN Comparison & Implications for Visibility and PM2.5
National Wildlife Refuge
Sunil Kumar TAC, COG July 9, 2007
How Can TEMPO Contribute to Air Pollution Health Effects Research
Air Monitoring Trends in New Jersey
Source Apportionment of PM2.5 With CMB8
PMcoarse , Monitoring Budgets, and AQI
Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Source Attribution AB 617 Community Air Protection Program
Alexey Gusev, Victor Shatalov, Olga Rozovskaya, Nadejda Vulyh
A Review of Time Integrated PM2.5 Monitoring Data in the United States
Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Presentation transcript:

Particulate Matter and its Sources in Georgia Sangil Lee

Particulate Matters PM10 (<10  m) regulated due to its health concerns. PM2.5 (<2.5  m) believed to cause the severe health problems (premature mortality, respiratory, cardiovascular disease). Recently, EPA established annual (15  g/m 3 )and 24 hours (<65  g/m 3 ) NAAQS for PM2.5.

chemical Speciation Trends Network (STN) Characterizing annual, seasonal, and spatial trends of PM2.5. Monitoring air quality and the progress of control programs. Developing emission control strategies. Comparing the chemical speciation data to those from other network studies.

National PM2.5(Annual Mean) Trends 2001~ Georgia, 2001

PM2.5(primary) and Precursor Emissions 1999 PM2.5 SO2 NH3NOxVOCs from

Variation of PM2.5 in Georgia 2002~2003

Correlation of Major Species

Chemical Composition of PM2.5 Rome, FloydDecatur, DekalbAthens, Clarke Columbus, Muscogee Macon, BibbAugusta, Richmond Douglas, CoffeeSavannah, Chatham

Source Apportionment with Chemical Mass Balance Quantify the source contribution to the receptor. C ik =  f ij S jk i = 1,…n (chemical species) j = 1,…,m (sources), k = 1,…,l (samples). C ij : observed conc. of species i in sample k. f ij : fraction of species i in source j. S jk : conc. of from species i in source k. Assumption: 1) compositions of source emissions are constant, 2) chemical species do not react with each other, 3) All sources contributing significantly to the receptor have been included in the calculation, 4) the number of sources is less than or equal to the number of species, 5) the source profiles are sufficiently different from one another, 6) measurement uncertainties are random, uncorrelated, and normally distributed. j = 1 m

Source Profiles for CMB

Summary Metro-areas have higher PM2.5 mass than NAAQS level( >15  g/m 3 ). The higher correlation, the closer location. Sulfate and Organic Carbon in chemical composition. Secondary and Wood Burning in sources.