Mai Hong Ngoc Pham Thi Mai Duyen Can Tho, 8/2013 PREFERENCES TOWARDS ORAL ERROR CORRECTION OF NON-ENGLISH-MAJORED STUDENTS AT CAN THO UNIVERSITY.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hello I'll tackle this question from an ecological perspective. First, I'll (very broadly) describe an ecological perspective/approach: relationships between.
Advertisements

Oral Production and Error Correction Amongst Arab Learners of English
Interactional corrective feedback in L1 & L2 learning Krakow 2006 Mina Drever, consultant, Training and Development Agency for schools, London.
Corrective Feedback – pronunciation errors How effective it is in learning L2 oral communication Nguyễn Thị Tố Hạnh.
What role do individual differences play in the way L2 learners respond to corrective feedback? Rod Ellis University of Auckland.
Oral Feedback in Classroom SLA
Presented by Sarah Waters and Kate Lunde. To study corrective feedback as an analytic teaching strategy. To determine which types of corrective feedback.
THEORY OF SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNING
The Proficiency Orientation of Existing Methodologies
Chapter 3: The Direct Method
The Direct Method Group 2 Members: Julie Huang
Topic: Learning and teaching activities
1 FUNCTIONS OF ROLE PLAY IN THE LITERATURE CLASS FOR EFL STUDENTS AT HUCFL Tran Thi Thanh Ngoc, M.Ed Tran Thi Thanh Ngoc, M.Ed Tran Thi Thu Suong, M.Ed.
Motivating Students Abigail Bruhlmann English Language Fellow June 2014.
Direct Method Dr. Chen Chinfen. Background  Founded by Francois Gouin, in 1860, he observed hundreds of French students learning a foreign language and.
The Direct Approach This approach was developed initially as a reaction to the grammar-translation approach in an attempt to integrate more use of.
Presentation skills. How to prepare a presentation How to prepare a presentation? What should you pay attention to during a presentation?
Oral Corrective Feedback: Teachers’ Concerns Vs. Researchers’ Orientation Sajjad Sepehrinia Mostafa Mehdizadeh Kashan Language Academy 05/02/1393.
High School EFL Classroom Observation. The observer  The lesson  The teacher The teacher  The learners The learners.
Corrective Feedback and Learner Uptake Negotiation of Form in Communicative Classrooms Roy Lyster & Leila Ranta 1997.
Resume = This is My Story!. Resume Overview and Fundamentals 1. A resume is an aid in marketing/selling yourself (a 1-2 page autobiography). 2. Are obvious.
10/20/2015Dr. Hanaa El-Baz 1 Methodology L7 Lecture Error Correction and feedback.
 decimals/cc-7th-fracs-to-decimals/v/converting-fractions-to-decimals-example.
Tony Lynch University of Edinburgh. Feedback in SLA (Lyster & Ranta 1997)  Explicit correction  Recast  Clarification request  Metalinguistic feedback.
Guidelines for EFL Teachers in Reading and Writing Instruction Reading.
Speaking- Choose and Give Reasons
LAUSD Student Data ELD Implementation Report 2006.
GRAMMAR CORRECTION Penny Ur Various issues 1.Does it help? 2.What different kinds of correction are there? And which is the most effective? 3.What.
ELPS Student Expectations Learning Strategies ELPS 1A-1H Listening ELPS 2A-2I Speaking ELPS 3A-3J Reading ELPS 4A-4K Writing ELPS 5A-5G ELPS Index.
Developing an oral communication strategy inventory Yasuo Nakatani The Modern Language Journal 90,ii, 2006.
The Direct Method 1. Background It became popular since the Grammar Translation Method was not very effective in preparing students to use the target.
ERROR CORRECTION. How to respond calm calm consistent consistent brief brief and respectful and respectful.
ESL 11B Class structure and student requirements.
ERRORS and CORRECTION Many Ts nowadays regard Ss errors as evidence that progress is being made. Errors often show us that a S is experimenting with language,
1 ACCURACY AND CORRECTING MISTAKES Penny Ur 2006.
Input, Interaction, and Output Input: (in language learning) language which a learner hears or receives and from which he or she can learn. Enhanced input:
Oral Corrective Feedback in Second Language Classrooms
Module 6 Note Taking and Revision Strategies Some keys for successful learning Part 4.
CISELT TRAINING ERRORS AND MISTAKES CTLI 27 JUNE 2015.
Test Title Test Content.
GGGE 6533: LANGUAGE LEARNING STRATEGIES INSTRUCTION SUCCESSFUL ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNING INVENTORY (SELL-IN) PREPARED FOR: PROF. DR. MOHAMED AMIN BIN EMBI.
Advantages and Disadvantages of Different Error Correction Techniques
Peer Editing: Exchange papers with Partner
Corrective feedback L2 in the classroom
ELT for a Day 2017: Current Trends Saturday 20th May 2017
Theories of Language Acquisition
Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching
Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching
Teresa R. Bell Brigham Young University SWCOLT 2017
The Silent Way Reporter: N98C0010 邱稚嵐.
The Silent Way.
CHAPTER 22 Public Relations Project
BORROWED NOUNS MERYEM US.
Defense Language Institute Foreign Language Center
Advantages and Disadvantages of Different Error Correction Techniques
Giving explicit feedback on spoken errors - the more the better
شرح مفردات مفاهيم التربية الإسلامية الصف العاشر ج1
THE GRAMMAR TRANSLATION METHOD
Lesson Plan activities
Journal Entry #14 Title: Character Foil
Title: My own sign Journal Entry #79
Cecilia Lemos – ABA, Recife, Brazil
Teacher Feedback Anna Martinović University of Zadar
How to correct student errors
PROYECTO: Mi horario Student Instructions
Journal Entry #79 Title: Free-Write Friday
TITLE OF THE PRESENTATION
Prepare for Learning Teachers will strategically work with their students to develop a climate that is conducive to learning. It will include consideration.
PASSWORD: workshopsfeb2019
Types of Errors And Error Analysis.
Presentation transcript:

Mai Hong Ngoc Pham Thi Mai Duyen Can Tho, 8/2013 PREFERENCES TOWARDS ORAL ERROR CORRECTION OF NON-ENGLISH-MAJORED STUDENTS AT CAN THO UNIVERSITY

1. Research aims 3. Research results 4. Recommendations 2. Research questions Contents

1. Research aims  Find out the types of oral errors that students expect to be corrected  Find out the error correction techniques that students expect to receive

1.Which types of oral errors do students expect to be corrected? 2.What are students’ preferences towards teacher’s error correction techniques? 2. Research questions

3. Research results Question 1: Which types of oral errors do students expect to be corrected?  Types of errors students expect to be corrected: 1.Pronunciation errors 2.Grammatical errors

Correction techniques Percentage GrammarPronunciation 1. No correction Recast Explicit correction Disapproval gesture Asking the original question Clarification request Asking another question using the correct form Elicitation Indicating the error for the student to self-correct Metalinguistic clues Question 2: What are students’ preferences towards teacher’s error correction techniques? 3. Research results

 Most favored error correction techniques: Explicit correction and Metalinguistic clues  Least favored error correction techniques: No correction and Disapproval gesture

1.Pay much attention to treating students’ errors 2.Take priority to correct students’ pronunciation and grammatical errors 3.Use Explicit correction and Metalinguistic clues to correct students’ errors 4.Not use Disapproval gesture or Asking the original question to correct students’ errors 4. Recommendations

 Title: Preferences towards oral error correction of non-English- majored students at Can Tho University  Research questions: 1.Which types of oral errors do students expect to be corrected? 2.What are students preferences towards teacher’s error correction techniques?  Research results: 1.Types of errors that students expect to be corrected are pronunciation and grammatical errors. 2.The most favorite correction techniques are Explicit correction and Metalinguistic clues.