Technology Subcommittee November 2008. Topical Outline Technology Subcommittee Technology Subcommittee RoleRole Work PlanWork Plan ActivitiesActivities.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ESWW4, 5-9 th November 2007 Draft Proposal: Space Weather as part of an Optional Space Situational Awareness Programme A.Glover, E. Daly, R. Marsden, A.
Advertisements

Overview What is the National ITS Architecture? User Services
Interim Guidance on the Application of Travel and Land Use Forecasting in NEPA Statewide Travel Demand Modeling Committee October 14, 2010.
Statewide Mobility Performance Measures Team Meeting Webinar June 17, 2013.
2012 Fall TBWG CBP Washington Updates. Field Operations Facilities Program Management Office 2 TBWG: CBP Washington Updates Agenda LPOE Magnitude of Need.
Innovations in Measuring POE Performance and Service Levels Development and Application of a Level-of-Service (LOS) Methodology TBWG | Montreal 2013Slide.
Wade E. Kline, AICP Community Development Planner.
Border Wait Time Test, Evaluation and Deployment of Automated, Real-Time Technologies Project Briefing– October 22, 2013 Tiffany Julien- FHWA.
1. Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Presentation to RCC Stakeholder Dialogue Session January 17, 2014 Transport Canada John Hnatyshyn Department.
Transportation Border Working Group Membership Survey Hugh Conroy and Walter Steeves in association with the TBWG Steering Committee Toronto.
Integrated Corridor Management Overview and Status Mike Freitas ICM Initiative Coordinator U.S. DOT ITS Joint Program Office.
NEW YORK CITY TRAFFIC CONGESTION MITIGATION COMMISSION NYSDOT Comments on New York City Traffic Congestion Mitigation Plan Bob Zerrillo, Director, Office.
Transportation Border Working Group Montreal October 22 and 23, 2013 CBSA Project Update.
Operations / ITS Provisions in SAFETEA-LU What’s in There and What’s Not Jeff Lindley Operations / ITS Discipline Meeting August 16, 2005.
Border Architecture US/Mexico Presented to Border Partnership Working Group 11 January 2006.
Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation Transportation Working Group ITS Experts Group Chicago, Illinois September 2002 Walter Kulyk, P.E. Director, Office of.
The Planning Perspective Presented by Joel Eisenfeld – KFH Group.
Beyond the Border Action Plan Border Infrastructure Investment Plan (BIIP)
Traffic Incident Management – a Strategic Focus Inspector Peter Baird National Adviser: Policy and Legislation: Road Policing.
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) UN/CEFACT Single Window Repository September 2005 Tom Butterly Deputy Chief, Global Trade Solutions.
Transport Investing in Regions SEATS Meeting 17 February 2012.
US NITRD LSN-MAGIC Coordinating Team – Organization and Goals Richard Carlson NGNS Program Manager, Research Division, Office of Advanced Scientific Computing.
1 State of Good Repair Research Vincent Valdes Associate Administrator for Research, Demonstration, and Innovation July 9, 2009.
Overview of Project Main objective of study is to assess the impact of delay at border crossings and resulting changes in user benefits and broad macroeconomic.
Lead the Way APTA Transit Standards Development “BUS RAPID TRANSIT”
PROJECT DESCRIPTION BORDER WAIT TIME WORKING GROUP.
Envisioned Role for NTI Concerning ITS Deployment in Egypt by Dr. Mahmoud EL-HADIDI Professor of Telecommunications at Cairo U & Consultant at NTI 3 rd.
Beyond the Border Action Plan: Implementing a Shared Canada – U.S. Vision for Perimeter Security and Economic Competitiveness Alan Langford – Customs and.
Mid Wales LTP Stakeholder Workshop 3 rd October Presentation by Ann Elias and Janice Hughes.
Border Information Flow Architecture Pilot Project Funding Program Transportation Border Working Group, Québec October 27, 2010.
Bi-national Collaboration in Delivering Port-of-Entry Highway Infrastructure Improvements Case Study: Pembina-Emerson Port-of-Entry and Innovations in.
TSM&O FLORIDA’S STATEWIDE IMPLEMENTATION Elizabeth Birriel, PEElizabeth Birriel, PE Florida Department of TransportationFlorida Department of TransportationTranspo2012.
Roles and Responsibilities
Dixie Regional ITS Architecture Project Summary July 31, 2006.
| The Planning and roll-out of accessible and human-centred public transport services in Europe The cities’ perspective Karen Vancluysen, Polis.
TBWG – The Ottawa Update Canada Border Services Agency Buffalo, New York April 9, 2014 Jay LaFrance.
Mobility Services for All Americans (MSAA) Yehuda Gross ITS Mid-West State Chapter February 7, 2006.
Cross-Border Coordination FHWA’s Role in Border Planning Lisa M. Dye International Transportation Program Engineer Federal Highway Administration Border.
United We Ride: Where are we Going? December 11, 2013 Rik Opstelten United We Ride Program Analyst.
California Department of Transportation Transportation Management Systems (TMS) and their role in addressing congestion Discussion Materials Lake Arrowhead.
The Fully Networked Car Geneva, 4-5 March Ubiquitous connectivity to improve urban mobility Hermann Meyer ERTICO.
US DOT Planning for Operations Initiative – An Update AASHTO SCOH Annual Meeting June 14-17, 2009 Manchester, NH Rick Backlund – FHWA Office of Operations.
Traffic Monitoring Guide 2012 Update May 9, 2013 DBP Roadway Transportation Data Business Plan presented to Data Palooza U.S. Department of Transportation.
Guidance and Support of ITS Programs Michael Freitas May 2000 US Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration.
Border Information Flow Architecture (BIFA) Presented to TBWG November 8-9, 2005 Toronto Fleet and Freight Management Commercial Vehicle Administration.
MIT - October 1, 2004Jeffrey D. Ensor 1 RSTP Planning for Operations Jeffrey D. Ensor Malaysia Transport Group M.I.T. October 1, 2004.
Competitive and Efficient Freight Transportation
Presented to: TBWG Fall Plenary, November 2, 2011 By: Marc Aubin, Highway and Border Policy Cross-Border Passenger Bus Services Study.
A Vehicle Manufacturer’s Perspective on VII Christopher Wilson ITS Oregon- Feb 1, 2005 Christopher Wilson.
Michele Mueller Senior Project Manager Applying Intelligent Transportation Systems to Cross Border Issues TC / FHWA Regional Roundtable Mike Barnet Senior.
Camden County Travel Management Coordination Center Project Update Camden County WIB Board Meeting – March 26, 2008.
Integrated Corridor Management Initiative ITS JPO Lead: Mike Freitas Technical Lead: John Harding, Office of Transportation Management.
DRAFT STRATEGIC PLAN 2015 FOR ADULT EDUCATION AND LITERACY Anson Green Director Adult Education and Literacy Texas Workforce Commission.
Border Technology Update BORDER INFORMATION FLOW ARCHITECTURE WORKING GROUP Presented to Transportation Border Working Group (TBWG) 29 April 03 Washington,
For Presentation at 28 th APEC Transportation Working Group Meeting Vancouver, Canada Walter Kulyk Director, Office of Mobility Innovation Federal Transit.
Safety Data Initiatives in Reauthorization – What Can We Expect? Kathy Krause, FHWA Office of Safety 30 th Annual International Traffic Records Forum July.
FHWA Update SHRP2 Implementation and Other Agency TSMO R&D Efforts Tracy Scriba, FHWA 12/8/15 1.
The TBWG/Bi-National Planning: A TC Perspective Jacques Rochon, Director, Highway Policy Transport Canada, December 4, 2002.
Leadership Guide for Strategic Information Management Leadership Guide for Strategic Information Management for State DOTs NCHRP Project Information.
GRTC Bus Rapid Transit Project July 17, Agenda 1.BRT Concept 2.Project Goals 3.Project Benefits 4.Project Corridor 5.Proposed Multimodal Access.
ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION AND CONGESTION MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGIES DEPLOYMENT (ATCMTD) PROGRAM 1 Bob Arnold, Director Office of Transportation Management,
Border Wait-Time Emissions Analysis Study 1 Project Briefing Travis Black Federal Highway Administration November 14, 2012.
Scoping the Framework Guidelines on Interoperability Rules for European Gas Transmission Geert Van Hauwermeiren 20 th Madrid Forum, 26 Sept 2011.
Transportation Border Working Group - Vancouver October 21 and 22, 2014 CBSA Infrastructure Project Update.
April 29, 2009 – Chicago Draft TBWG Action Plan: Subcommittee Activities.
ITS Session TBWG, Boston, April 13-14, 2010
Project Overview – Phase 1
Border Crossing Best Practices Guidebook
VERMONT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY LEADERS
Beyond the Border Action Plan
Presentation transcript:

Technology Subcommittee November 2008

Topical Outline Technology Subcommittee Technology Subcommittee RoleRole Work PlanWork Plan ActivitiesActivities Border Wait Time Measurement and Management Border Wait Time Measurement and Management White Paper on Current State of PracticeWhite Paper on Current State of Practice Bi-national /Interagency ProjectBi-national /Interagency Project Discussion Discussion

Technology Subcommittee The Technology Subcommittee facilitates discussion of the role of intelligent transportation systems (ITS) and other technology in improving the efficiency of goods and people movement across the US/Canada border. The subcommittee, through working with border stakeholders, promotes the use of the Border Information Flow Architecture (BIFA), as a tool for ensuring institutional agreement and technical integration for ITS & other technology projects at major land border crossings.

Work Plan The work plan for the subcommittee centers on encouraging border infrastructure planners to consider technology and operations solutions for common border problems (e.g. congestion). The group will engage border stakeholders to identify opportunities for coordination and information sharing, sponsor technology projects and engage in activities that demonstrate how the BIFA can be used in planning along the border, in programming/budgeting/identifying border projects, and for project implementation.

Desired Outcomes Identification of technologies and agencies that use technologies at or near the border Identification of technologies and agencies that use technologies at or near the border Fully coordinated border ITS/technology deployments Fully coordinated border ITS/technology deployments Integration of technology considerations into the planning process Integration of technology considerations into the planning process Interoperability of technologies Interoperability of technologies Reduced technology investment cost Reduced technology investment cost Enhanced information exchange, coordination and communication Enhanced information exchange, coordination and communication

Proposed Activities ACTIVITY 1 – Using Technology the Measure Border Wait Times ACTIVITY 1 – Using Technology the Measure Border Wait Times ACTIVITY 2 – Integration of Technology and Operations Considerations into the Planning Process ACTIVITY 2 – Integration of Technology and Operations Considerations into the Planning Process ACTIVITY 3- Promote the use and Maintenance of the Border Information Flow Architecture ACTIVITY 3- Promote the use and Maintenance of the Border Information Flow Architecture

Measuring and Managing Border Wait Times

Some key points along the route A Trip origin Diversion option to alternate crossing Final approach to border crossing End of queue Customs plaza entrance Exit, secondary B C D E G Exit, primary F P S H Trip destination

Measurement Approaches Queue Length Measurement Estimate number of vehicles in the queue.Estimate number of vehicles in the queue. Measure length of queue, mix of vehicle types (cars/trucks) and traffic pattern (number and configuration of lanes) Measure length of queue, mix of vehicle types (cars/trucks) and traffic pattern (number and configuration of lanes) Determine rate of exit from queue (processing time).Determine rate of exit from queue (processing time). Estimate how long it will take for the next vehicle arriving at end of queue to reach the PIL.Estimate how long it will take for the next vehicle arriving at end of queue to reach the PIL. Pros:Pros: Provides estimate for next vehicle entering the queue. Provides estimate for next vehicle entering the queue. Cons:Cons: Records processing times of each PIL lane. Records processing times of each PIL lane.

Measurement Approaches Record Travel Time Between Two points Identifies unique vehicles at two (or more) points and measures travel time.Identifies unique vehicles at two (or more) points and measures travel time. Pros:Pros: Record of actual vehicle crossing. Record of actual vehicle crossing. Cons:Cons: Possible stops at duty free, etc. need to be accounted for. Possible stops at duty free, etc. need to be accounted for. Calculation may already be out-of-date by the time the vehicle reaches the PIL. Calculation may already be out-of-date by the time the vehicle reaches the PIL. Need large sample size to smooth out outliers and give readings representative of whole population. Need large sample size to smooth out outliers and give readings representative of whole population.

Measurement Approaches Global Positioning System (GPS) Records position of vehicle and time at several locations along the queue.Records position of vehicle and time at several locations along the queue. Analyzes vehicle log to calculate time between points.Analyzes vehicle log to calculate time between points. Pros:Pros: Record of actual vehicle crossing. Record of actual vehicle crossing. Cons:Cons: Accuracy of Geo-fencing. Accuracy of Geo-fencing. Need large sample size to smooth out outliers. Need large sample size to smooth out outliers. Delay between measurement and communication to service provider Delay between measurement and communication to service provider

Joint Border Wait Time Project Objectives Objectives Identify technology based solutions for:Identify technology based solutions for: Improving the monitoring, measurement and prediction of Border Wait Times (BWT). Improving the monitoring, measurement and prediction of Border Wait Times (BWT). Improving the integrity of the real time information reported on the public websites.Improving the integrity of the real time information reported on the public websites. Reducing demands on port operations and personnel resources.Reducing demands on port operations and personnel resources.

Joint Border Wait Time (BWT) Project US CBP/CBSA/US Department of Transportation /Transport Canada agreed to analyze the business requirements and site specifics, to develop possible solutions that could be pilot tested beginning in May US CBP/CBSA/US Department of Transportation /Transport Canada agreed to analyze the business requirements and site specifics, to develop possible solutions that could be pilot tested beginning in May Locations (TBD) Locations (TBD) The recommendations will consider cost benefits, scope of technology, and specific site challenges. The recommendations will consider cost benefits, scope of technology, and specific site challenges.

Measurement vs Distribution Data Information

BWT Project - Key Next steps Secure Funding Commitments Secure Funding Commitments Determine Sites w/Funding and Time Constraints Determine Sites w/Funding and Time Constraints Outreach with Stakeholders Outreach with Stakeholders

ACTIVITY 2 – Integration of Technology and Operations Considerations into the Planning Process -Planning for Operations Over the next 12 months, the technology subcommittee will conduct a series of discussions, the first of which is to be held at the November 2008 TBWG meeting, on integrating technology and operations considerations into the border planning process. The planned discussions will result in recommended actions and activities that will raise awareness of the role of intelligent transportation systems (ITS) and technology in improving the efficiency of goods and people movement across the US/Canada border, motivate action (e.g. update of key planning documents), and provide a model for integrating technology deployment as part of facility modernization or infrastructure improvement. Over the next 12 months, the technology subcommittee will conduct a series of discussions, the first of which is to be held at the November 2008 TBWG meeting, on integrating technology and operations considerations into the border planning process. The planned discussions will result in recommended actions and activities that will raise awareness of the role of intelligent transportation systems (ITS) and technology in improving the efficiency of goods and people movement across the US/Canada border, motivate action (e.g. update of key planning documents), and provide a model for integrating technology deployment as part of facility modernization or infrastructure improvement.

ACTIVITY 3- Promote the use and Maintenance of the Border Information Flow Architecture

DISCUSSION AND QUESTIONS