Completed forms may be placed in the box at the back of the room or mailed to C/SAC, Office of Staff Development. Questions? See Dixie at the registration.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2013 RCAS Summative Assessment Report Preliminary Dakota State Test of Educational Progress (D-STEP) Information August 6,2013.
Advertisements

Title I/AYP Presentation Prepared by NHCS Title I Department for NHCS PTA September 22, 2010.
Bureau of Indian Education
School Accountability Ratings What Are Our District’s Accountability Ratings? What do they mean?
Presented to the State Board of Education August 22, 2012 Jonathan Wiens, PhD Office of Assessment and Information Services Oregon Department of Education.
No Child Left Behind Act January 2002 Revision of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Education is a state and local responsibility Insure.
‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
1 Test Data Review and Adequate Yearly Progress. 2.
Pitt County Schools Testing & Accountability The ABC’s of Public Education.
Data 101 Presented by Janet Downey After School Program Specialist Riverside Unified School District.
1 Prepared by: Research Services and Student Assessment & School Performance School Accountability in Florida: Grading Schools and Measuring Adequate Yearly.
Data for Student Success Comprehensive Needs Assessment Report “It is about focusing on building a culture of quality data through professional development.
School District of University City Jackson Park Elementary School SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Joylynn Wilson, Superintendent Monica Hudson, Principal.
Catherine Cross Maple, Ph.D. Deputy Secretary Learning and Accountability
Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.
Cambrian School District Academic Performance Index (API) Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Program Improvement (PI) Report.
Introduction to Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Michigan Department of Education Office of Psychometrics, Accountability, Research, & Evaluation Summer.
ESEA NCLB  Stronger accountability  More freedom for states and communities  Use of proven research-based methods  More choices.
Questions & Answers About AYP & PI answered on the video by: Rae Belisle, Dave Meaney Bill Padia & Maria Reyes July 2003.
Springfield Public Schools Adequate Yearly Progress 2010 Overview.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress Fresno Unified School District 2005 Data Review.
San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.
SCHOOL ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT ALBUQUERQUE PUBLIC SCHOOLS RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY DEPARTMENT.
Instruction, Assessment & Student Achievement Presented: September 23, 2013 Bessie Weller Elementary School.
A Parent’s Guide to Understanding the State Accountability Workbook.
DLT September 28, State Indicators and Rating for OFCS (have) Key Factors and Points to Keep in Mind (have) This power point presentation (will.
Standards The Achievement Gap The Debate Continues.
Helping EMIS Coordinators prepare for the Local Report Card (LRC) Theresa Reid, EMIS Coordinator HCCA May 2004.
Annual Student Performance Report October Overview NCLB requirements related to AYP 2012 ISAT performance and AYP status Next steps.
1 No Child Left Behind for Indian Groups 2004 Eva M. Kubinski Comprehensive Center – Region VI January 29, 2004 Home/School Coordinators’ Conference UW-Stout.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.
No Child Left Behind Tecumseh Local Schools. No Child Left Behind OR... 4 No Educator Left Unconfused 4 No Lawyer Left Unemployed 4 No Child Left Untested.
No Child Left Behind Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Know the Rules Division of Performance Accountability Dr. Marc Baron, Chief Nancy E. Brito, Instructional.
School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
AYP and Report Card. AYP/RC –Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. –Understand the purpose and role of the Report Card in Oregon.
District Improvement….. Outcomes  Why we are in District Improvement.  What is DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT?  How we got this rating.  What does this mean.
Annual Student Performance Report September
August 1, 2007 DELAWARE’S GROWTH MODEL FOR AYP DETERMINATIONS.
Making Sense of Adequate Yearly Progress. Adequate Yearly Progress Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) is a required activity of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
AERA March 25, 2008 Delaware’s Growth Model and Results from Year One.
NCLB / Education YES! What’s New for Students With Disabilities? Michigan Department of Education.
Parkway District Improvement…. 10/16/ Outcomes  Why we are in District Improvement.  What is DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT?  How we got this rating. 
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
Using Assessments to Plan for Learning MEAP and MME Data Collection.
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) /22/2010.
Accountability Scorecards Okemos Board of Education September 2013.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez January 2010.
NCLB. Introduction Increased federal mandates and requirements on states Increased federal funding to states by almost 25% from the previous year Movement.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.
Updates on Oklahoma’s Accountability System Jennifer Stegman, Assistant Superintendent Karen Robertson, API Director Office of Accountability and Assessments.
Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction November 2004 No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 Implementation of the.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). What is Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)? As a condition of receiving federal funds under No Child Left Behind (NCLB), all.
Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]
Determining AYP What’s New Step-by-Step Guide September 29, 2004.
Kansas State Department of Education Kansas Student Population Trends (Percent of K-12, September Unaudited Enrollment, Public Schools) 1.
NYS School Report Card & Spring 2014 NYS Assessment Results Orchard Park Central School District Board of Education Presentation August 26, 2014.
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]
AYP and Report Card.
Michigan School Report Card Update
Online Data Workshop SIP Office of Curriculum and Instruction Office of School Improvement.
Education Briefings for Candidates for Office In 2008
Education Briefings for Candidates for Office In 2008
Adequate Yearly Progress: What’s Old, What’s New, What’s Next?
Presentation transcript:

Completed forms may be placed in the box at the back of the room or mailed to C/SAC, Office of Staff Development. Questions? See Dixie at the registration table in the back of the room.

6  Barb Rowenhorst  ESA 7  Janet Hensley  TIE Rapid City

Which data is important to us? How shall we prepare for our retreat? How will we organize data for our retreat?

To analyze your school’s effectiveness and set goals for improvement. To develop reading and math goals on your building improvement plan. To plan for a school improvement “kick-off” at your building.

11 DakotaSTEP Standards Retreat Strategies School Improvement and Why Identify Areas of Need Assm’t

12 DakotaSTEP Basic Information Basic Information

13  Reading: 3-8 and 11  Math: 3-8 and 11  Science: 5, 8 and 11 Not reported on AYP Report Card

14  Available to the parents, community, media  South Dakota Department of Education Website  “Accessing the State Report Card” Handout

 Making Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) according to the federal definition requires achieving all of several specific objectives.  Reading achievement  Math achievement  Student testing participation rate  Student attendance rate (elementary/middle school)  Graduation rate (high school)

A great deal of “Making AYP" depends on the performance of the following “all group” and the ten designated subgroups. All - All Students Combined Subgroups: White Students Black or African American Students Asian/Pacific Islander Students Native American Students Hispanic Students Economically Disadvantaged (Free & Reduced Lunch) Students with Disabilities Limited English Proficiency Gender Migrant Students

18 K School YearReadingMathReadingMath %65%66%54% %65%72%54% %72% 63% %72%77%63% %79%83%72% %86%89%81% %93%94%90% %

20 Data analysis is a critical component of No Child Left Behind (NCLB). NCLB is an opportunity to use data to transform teaching and learning. State Accreditation- Data Retreat Required Previously – only schools in improvement Accreditation – every school in the district

DakotaSTEP Department of Education Website 2008 “District” Report Card

23

25 Page 1

26

27  1st year not meeting AYP = Alert  2nd consecutive year = school improvement level 1  3rd year = level 2  4th year = level 3  5th year = level 4  6th year = level 5 If AYP is met 2 consecutive years, then you start over with a blank slate.

28

29

30

Page 8

32

33

DakotaSTEPMulti-Year Proficiency Levels Line Graphs

37 K School YearReadingMathReadingMath %65%66%54% %65%72%54% %72% 63% %72%77%63% %79%83%72% %86%89%81% %93%94%90% %

AMO AMO CI 2-Yr Avg. SH CI

Look at ALL years ◦ Look at ALL proficiency levels ◦ Look at ALL Subgroups ◦ Watch number of students who were tested

 “School” 2008 Data Reports  BLT Website – Posted

46  Broad math and reading statements, tied to content area or academic indicators, based upon identified needs SMART GOAL: Specific Measurable Attainable Results oriented Timely

47 GOAL: (action verb)(object) so that(which & how many students) will demonstrate (level of quality) as evidenced by(measurement device) (performance or behavior) (by when)

48 GOAL: To improve reading achievement K-5 43% of 3 rd -5 th grade students will demonstrateproficient or advanced levels as evidenced byDakota STEP test on grade level reading content standards by Spring 2009 by meeting AMO, Safe Harbor, or Confidence Interval allowance so that

 Kick-Off

Marzano’s Research Students come in at 50% Leave at the end of the year Average School Average Teacher 50% Highly Ineffective School Highly Ineffective Teacher 50%3% Highly Effective School Ineffective Teacher 50%37% Ineffective School Highly Effective Teacher 50%63% Highly Effective School Highly Effective Teacher 50%96% Highly Effective School Average Teacher 50%78%

53 Create an Account ONLY

Continue to develop and refine… School AYP Data Discussion Guide Building Improvement Plan Write SMART Goals for Reading & Math Plan for School Improvement Kick-off Create escWorks Account Air conditioning:  Civic Center

 Thanks for all you do!  Have a super year!