BUILDING STRONG ® US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Systems-based Budgeting for Inland Navigation Operations and Maintenance Kenneth Ned Mitchell,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Regional Routing Model Review: A) Data Fusion Efforts and Issues Frank Southworth Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, TN NETS Program Review.
Advertisements

1 Permanent International Association of Navigation Congresses - PIANC July 15, 2008 RIS - RIVERS INFORMATION SYSTEM Our Invisible Transportation Network.
FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION POLICY STUDIES AT THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES Freight Capacity for the 21 st Century Federal Role in the Marine Transportation System.
WCSC Mission U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Logistics Network Configuration
TM International Logistics Limited Ports and its infrastructure Roundtable Conference on Coal 28 th October 2013, New Delhi Tamal Roy TM International.
Returning to Our National Waterways Dabney Hegg U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation.
1 Ports and Harbors – Transitions and Challenges Ms. Doris J. Bautch Commissioner, U.S. Section of PIANC U.S. Maritime Administration Presented at the.
Indiana Logistics Summit U.S. Barge Transportation – An Overview.
Department of Industrial Engineering1 Economic Evaluation of the Impact of Waterways on the Port of Cincinnati-Tristate Heather Nachtmann, Ph.D. River.
Freight Facilities and their Intermodal Connections BTS Webinar Series Olu Ajayi Michael Sprung Bureau of Transportation Statistics Research and Innovative.
Characterizing Vessel Travel Times with Waterway Levels in Case Studies Ivy L. Riley Jackson State University Civil and Environmental Engineering Department.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Eastern Shore Community College Workforce Development Center Melfa, Virginia August 16, 2013 “ A Unified Voice.
Waterways 1 Water Transportation History. Water Transportation Propulsion History Human (oars, poles) - - 7,000-10,000 BC Wind (sails) - - 3,000 BC Steamboat.
US Army Corps of Engineers Institute For Water Resources - IWR Navigation Economic Technologies NETS Keith Hofseth 16-May-2006.
Channel Portfolio Tool (CPT)
Developing Navigation Performance Measures Barry Holliday Navigation Program Manager US Army Corps of Engineers Headquarters Washington, DC 14 December.
The SMARTFREIGHT project Hans Westerheim SINTEF ICT.
1 Great Lakes Maritime Task Force 14th Annual Informational Briefing for the Great Lakes Delegation Tom Buck, C.E.O. Carmeuse Lime and Stone April 2, 2009.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Eastern Shore Navigation Partnership Meeting “ A Unified Voice for Navigation, Project Prioritization, and.
Transportation in a Supply Chain
1 Chapter 12: Decision-Support Systems for Supply Chain Management CASE: Supply Chain Management Smooths Production Flow Prepared by Hoon Lee Date on 14.
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS OVERVIEW Lecture 2. n Provide a historical perspective of the evolution of PMS over the last 20 years n Describe the basic.
Dredging, Disposal Management and Impacts on Lake Sediments US Army Corps of Engineers.
The Port of Pittsburgh is the busiest inland river port in the nation and the 11 th busiest port of any kind* TOTAL PORT RANKING* 1 South Louisiana, LA.
Q AVG US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Q AVG US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® USACE Regional Sediment Management Program Linda.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Tonnage Reporting: Getting It Right Waterborne Commerce Statistics Center Navigation and Civil Works Decision.
The Importance of Our Nation’s Waterways Presented to Congressional Waterways Caucus Jim Walker HQUSACE 22 July 2009.
Governor’s Advisory Commission on Coastal Protection, Restoration and Conservation August 20, 2009.
U.S. Foreign Waterborne Commerce and Vessels. OMB Assigns Responsibility for the FWTSP to the Corps FWTSP -- Foreign Waterborne Transportation Statistics.
Project 2020 Strategic Planning Process
e-Navigation and it’s applicability to inland waterways
Inland Waterways: The National Perspective Amy Larson Executive Director National Waterways Conference, Inc PNWA Annual Meeting.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® The US Committee on the Marine Transportation System and e-Navigation PIANC Annual Meeting 27 August 2012.
The Federal Resource Management and Ecosystem Services Guidebook Federal Resource Management and Ecosystem Services Guidebook nespguidebook.com.
EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION (E&P) How to Choose and Manage Exploration and Production Projects Supat Kietnithiamorn Kumpol Trivisvavet May 9, 2001 Term.
World Association for Waterborne Transport Infrastructure (PIANC) and the International Environmental Commission Technical Seminar October 28, 2009 Westin.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers USACE Navigation Data/Information Workshop July 7, 2005 Arlene L Dietz, Director, Navigation Data Center.
NOAA Restoration Center Implementing the Gulf Regional Sediment Management Master Plan …responding to an ongoing emergency, improving responses to new.
Opening of the Panama Canal in 2016 Its Anticipated Impact on Global Soy and Grain Transportation Ken Eriksen Senior Vice September.
BUILDING STRONG SM Partnering and Coordination to Accomplish the Navigation Mission.
Harbors Module NH2: Problem Identification, Inventory and Forecast, and Determination of Objectives and Constraints.
Building Strong! May Deep Draft Navigation Module 2011 Planning Associates Class Jeremy LaDart Office of Water Project Review HQUSACE Mission Overview.
Data Capture Initiatives and Stimulus Benefits IMSF Spring Conference New Orleans, LA, USA 5 May 2009 Doug McDonald, US Army Corps of Engineers.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Physical and Numerical Model Study of Montgomery Locks and Dam, Ohio River Allen Hammack, Howard Park, Cecil.
Maximizing the Value of Investments in Tax Administration Terry Lutes Principal, M Group.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® USACE-IOOS Missions, Priorities, Recommendations Linda Lillycrop IOOC Member USACE Liaison, U.S. IOOS US Army.
Harbor Maintenance and Dredging: A Legislative Update CAPT Bill Diehl, USCG (Ret.), P.E. President Greater Houston Port Bureau.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Toke Point Marina Pipeline Maintenance Dredging with Flowlane Disposal at Willapa Harbor, Washington Hiram.
Generalized Model of Lockage Delay Based on Historic Data Michael R. Hilliard, Ph.D. Center for Transportation Analysis Oak Ridge National Laboratory Smart.
1 Coal Handling & Storage Conference 2015 Paul Rohde, Vice President Waterways Council, Inc.
Mark R. Pointon Operations/Navigation COP U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Mark R. Pointon Operations/Navigation COP U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Presentation.
1 Smart Rivers Conference September 15, 2011 New Orleans, Louisiana “Status of Inland Waterways Infrastructure Funding”
Wisconsin’s Chamber Commercial Waterways of the Midwest MACE Transportation Panel November 4, 2015 Doubletree, Minneapolis, MN Jason Culotta Director of.
Dredge Fleet Scheduling Optimization and Sensitivity Analysis Kenneth Ned Mitchell, PhD ERDC Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory Dr. Heather L. Nachtmann.
Office of Major Project Development (OMPD) Overview November 2015.
“If you think we’ve got problems now... and …what can we do about it” Transportation Day-Pittsburgh May 17, 2007 James R. McCarville Port of Pittsburgh.
Blazent / ServiceNow Messaging Guide. Transforming data into actionable intelligence Improve business outcomes by contextualizing data to make informed.
LOGISTICS NETWORK.
Modernization of Navigation Statistics Publishing
Integrated Channel Maintenance Planning in the Lower Columbia River Innovating Dredged Material Management Planning to incorporate Regional Sediment.
“efficient movement of goods across the entire state of Oregon”
Ohio River Basin Energy Commodity Trends
INLAND WATERWAY TRAVEL TIME ATLAS via AIS DATA ANALYSIS
Arkansas’ State Freight Plan
DOMESTIC WATER CARRIERS
Analyzing Lock Maintenance Needs
WRRDA Section 2102, HMT Target Budget Resources, FY15: $1.2 B (est)
Streamlining the Supply Chain More Flow and Less Hold
Navigation Funding for CMANC
Presentation transcript:

BUILDING STRONG ® US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Systems-based Budgeting for Inland Navigation Operations and Maintenance Kenneth Ned Mitchell, PhD Engineer Research and Development Center Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory Vicksburg, Miss. Smart Rivers 2011 Conference New Orleans, Louisiana Sept. 15 th, 2011

BUILDING STRONG ® Scarce O&M Funding Fiscal constraints are forcing the Corps to make difficult decisions concerning allocation of limited Operations and Maintenance (O&M) funds across the vast portfolio of inland navigation projects. This is driving the push towards system-based methods to ensure that limited resources are optimally distributed and benefits to the Nation are maximized.

BUILDING STRONG ® Waterborne Commerce Data  The Corps’ Waterborne Commerce Statistics Center (WCSC) collects and collates data from several sources concerning historical commercial use of US waterways. ► Dock-level, origin-to-destination routing (Corps-use-only) ► Includes tons, commodity types, vessel counts, drafts ► Aggregated data already published at project/port level  The richness of this dataset allows the performance of navigation projects to be objectively compared and also allows for rigorous, systems-based optimization strategies to be developed.

BUILDING STRONG ® Channel Portfolio Tool (CPT) CPT is a web-based decision-support package for Corps personnel at all levels to quantify the direct impacts of dredging and other O&M (in)activity on commercial shipping.

BUILDING STRONG ® Spatial Join to Waterway Network CPT spatially joins the docks in the WCSC database with the respective sub-reaches. Full network connectivity, ensuring that all transited channels are appropriately credited. Shortest-path routing used for domestic and inland river traffic transiting multiple projects.

BUILDING STRONG ® Ranking System Components Components of larger system can be compared to one another.

BUILDING STRONG ® Ranking System Components They can also be consolidated to see overall system performance.

BUILDING STRONG ® Visualizing System Utilization Ohio River traffic Both directions, 2009

BUILDING STRONG ® Visualizing System Utilization Upbound traffic, 2009

BUILDING STRONG ® Visualizing System Utilization Downbound traffic, 2009

BUILDING STRONG ® Visualizing System Utilization Docking cargo, 2009

BUILDING STRONG ® Visualizing System Utilization Coal sources, 2008

BUILDING STRONG ® Visualizing System Utilization Coal sinks, 2008

BUILDING STRONG ® Visualizing System Utilization Coal sources & sinks, 2008

BUILDING STRONG ® Visualizing Commodity Flows Lower Miss. River Outbound petroleum, 2009

BUILDING STRONG ® Understanding Navigation Systems Lower Miss. River Inbound corn, 2009 Corps O&M activities must be coordinated in order to realize system-level efficiencies and maximize benefits to the Nation.

BUILDING STRONG ® Optimization Strategies Application of Operations Research (OR) concepts to the Corps’ O&M budgeting process allows for improved system-level efficiencies to be realized. For Navigation O&M, there are interdependencies which arise due to commercial tonnage shared across projects → transportation system issues.

BUILDING STRONG ® Cargo Shared Across Projects

BUILDING STRONG ® System Connectivity Analysis Duluth- Superior Indiana Harbor Two Harbors, MN St. Clair River Detroit Presque Isle, MI Burns Harbor Conneaut ClevelandAshtabula Duluth-Superior66.0 M7.2 M-23.0 M4.9 M 14.6 M1.4 M28 k626 k Indiana Harbor7.2 M37.1 M7.4 M k - TwoHarbors_MN M28.0 M M M361 k - St. Clair River23.0 M M k Detroit4.9 M M M9.4 M Presque_Isle_MI4.9 M M17.1 M - 40 k173 k574 k Burns Harbor14.6 M M Conneaut1.4 M M k M - - Cleveland28 k37 k361 k k M - Ashtabula626 k k k M Total domestic tonnage drafting >27 ft,

BUILDING STRONG ® Systems-based Budgeting Dredging Costs $ 10 M$ 20 M$ 30M$ 40 M$ 50 M Duluth-Superior $ 6.0 M11111 Indiana Harbor$ 12.5 M00111 Two Harbors_MN$ 212 k11111 St. Clair River$ 17 M00011 Detroit$ 7.5 M01001 Presque_Isle_MI$ 1.5 M01111 Burns Harbor$ 2.5 M11111 Conneaut$ 2.5 M00101 Cleveland$ 9.0 M00001 Ashtabula$ 20 M00000 Restored Tonnage39.2 M63.8M90.3 M107.9 M M $/tonRank $0.092 $0.345 $0.011 $0.748 $0.436 $0.093 $0.174 $0.457 $2.039 $ TonnageRank 66.0M1 37.1M2 28.0M3 23.1M4 17.5M5 17.1M6 14.9M7 5.5M8 4.4M9 4.2M10 Note that a prioritized listing of projects is no longer completely straightforward. Certain projects seem to get funded regardless of budget ceiling, and for this example at least, they correlate fairly well with the “$/ton” heuristic.

BUILDING STRONG ® System Connectivity Analysis Presently exploring system optimization approaches for O&M budgeting of inland waterways using binary programming. Problem formulation will use results from the Corps’ Asset Management initiative to minimize the system-level risk to cargo flows.

BUILDING STRONG ® Navigation Systems Analysis The Waterborne Commerce data via the CPT gives the Corps a straightforward O&M budget formulation capability and allows for more advanced navigation systems analysis. These efforts are drawing interest from other Federal agencies (e.g. CMTS) as well as the Transportation Research Board (TRB).

BUILDING STRONG ® System-based Budgeting for Inland Navigation Operations and Maintenance Questions? Dr. Ned Mitchell U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory