LIGO-G030251-00-M Advanced LIGO Cost, Schedule and Management Gary H Sanders NSF Review of Advanced LIGO Caltech, June 11, 2003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NSF Experience with Management of Research Infrastructure
Advertisements

LIGO-G M Advanced LIGO Construction Proposal Submission Gary Sanders LIGO Laboratory PAC 12 June 2002, Cambridge.
Project Cost Management Estimation Budget Cost Control
Cost, Schedule & Funding Closeout Jan Joint DOE/NSF CD2/3a Review 1 DOE/NSF Review of the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Project SC 6/7 Cost, Schedule.
LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory1 Adv. LIGO Program Management (PM) Plans, Schedule, Costs, Team Plan, Schedule Costs Team.
LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory1 Adv. LIGO Installation (INS) Plans, Schedule, Costs, Team Plan, Schedule Costs Team.
FRA’s Earned Value Management System Corrective Action Plan Implementation January12, 2010 Dean Hoffer and Mike Rhoades.
LIGO-G M Advanced LIGO Cost, Schedule and Management Gary H Sanders NSF Review of Advanced LIGO Caltech, June 11, 2003.
LIGO-G M Overview of LIGO R&D and Planning for Advanced LIGO Detectors David Shoemaker NSF Operations Review Hanford, 26 February 2001.
LIGO-G D partial ADVANCED LIGO1 Development Plan R&D including Design through Final Design Review »for all long lead or high risk subsystems »LIGO.
LIGO-G M GWIC16-Dec-02 LIGO Status Barry Barish GWIC 16-Dec-02.
FRA’s Earned Value Management System Overview for Self Assessment Surveillance March 07-09, 2011 Dean Hoffer Head, Office of Project Management Oversight.
LIGO-G M April 5, 2006 Interferometer Sensing and Control (ISC) Cost and Schedule Breakout Presentation NSF Review of Advanced LIGO Project Richard.
LIGO- GXXXXXX-XX-X Advanced LIGO Data & Computing Material for the breakout session NSF review of the Advanced LIGO proposal Albert Lazzarini Caltech,
Development plan and quality plan for your Project
U.S. ATLAS Physics and Computing Budget and Schedule Review John Huth Harvard University DOE/NSF Review of U.S. ATLAS and CMS Computing Projects Brookhaven.
October 24, 2000Milestones, Funding of USCMS S&C Matthias Kasemann1 US CMS Software and Computing Milestones and Funding Profiles Matthias Kasemann Fermilab.
© VESP International Pty Limited To Contents Slide CLICK to advance slides/ bullet points within slides Integrated Master Planner An Overview.
LIGO-G P 1 Case Study of PMCS Implementation/Tools - Advanced LIGO An Example Of Implementation In Progress Prepared by Thomas Frey, CCC, PMP.
Project ManagementDay 1 in the pm Project Management (PM) Structures.
NCSX Management Overview Hutch Neilson, NCSX Project Manager NCSX Conceptual Design Review Princeton, NJ May 23, 2002.
August 2 and 3, 2010 Project Cost, Schedule, Risk and Contingency Jay Elias.
LIGO-G M May 31-June 2, 2006 Input Optics (IO) Cost and Schedule Breakout Presentation NSF Review of Advanced LIGO Project David Reitze UF.
Centro de Estudos e Sistemas Avançados do Recife PMBOK - Chapter 4 Project Integration Management.
Software Project Management Lecture # 7. What are we studying today? Chapter 24 - Project Scheduling  Effort distribution  Defining task set for the.
LIGO-G M Management of the LIGO Project Gary Sanders California Institute of Technology Presented to the Committee on Programs and Plans of the.
OFFICE OF SCIENCE 1 3. Cost Estimate Gines, Fisher 2.Are the estimated cost and proposed schedule ranges realistic, consistent with the technical and budgetary.
ISM 5316 Week 3 Learning Objectives You should be able to: u Define and list issues and steps in Project Integration u List and describe the components.
Project Scheduling 1. Why Are Projects Late? An unrealistic deadline established by someone outside the software development group Changing customer requirements.
Project Life Cycle.
HLRF DRAFT Global Design Effort 1 Defining EDR* Work Packages [Engineering Design Report] Ray Larsen SLAC ILC Division for HLRF Team DRAFT April.
Dr. Jana Jagodick Polytechnic of Namibia, 2012 Project Management Chapter 5 Project Integration Management.
OFFICE OF SCIENCE 2.3 Infrastructure and Installation Sims, Edwards 1.Does the conceptual design and planned implementation satisfy the performance specifications.
Felix Sanchez Estimating the Budget and Cost (Part 1) Project Management for ARA Engineers and Scientists Developing a Bottoms Up Estimate.
LIGO-G M Major International Collaboration in Advanced LIGO R&D Gary Sanders NSF Operations Review Hanford February, 2001.
LIGO-G M Management and Operation Plans/Budget Stan Whitcomb NSF Annual Review 8 November 2004 Caltech.
LIGO-G M Planning and Implementation Strategy for Advanced LIGO Gary Sanders LSC Meeting Hanford, August 14, 2001.
LIGO-G M Summary Remarks: Management of LIGO Gary Sanders California Institute of Technology NRC Committee on Organization and Management of Research.
Hall 180 Cryogenic test facility: Project management: Project Change Request, EVM and Interface Sheet L. Serio.
CARRUTHERS LSC 3/20/06 1 LIGO-G M The View from NSF Tom Carruthers LIGO Program Officer National Science Foundation (703)
Fermilab Presentation Greg Bock, Pepin Carolan, Mike Lindgren, Elaine McCluskey 2014 SC PM Workshop July 2014.
LIGO-G M Organization and Budget Gary Sanders NSF Operations Review Caltech, February 26, 2001.
Earned Value as the Main Driver for Integrating Project Management Michael A. Hatfield PMP, CCC David J. Post PE.
February 26, 2001LIGO-G B-P1 LIGO Future Operations (FY ) Budgets, Schedules, and Milestones NSF Review February 26, 2000 Hanford, Washington.
LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory1 Adv. LIGO Installation (INS) Plans, Schedule, Costs, Team Plan, Schedule Costs Team.
Mark Reichanadter LCLS October 9-11, 2007 LCLS BCR Overview and EIR LOIs Project Progress / Status Revised Project Baseline.
LIGO-G M LIGO Status Gary Sanders GWIC Meeting Perth July 2001.
LIGO-G M Overview of LIGO R&D and Planning for Advanced LIGO Detectors Gary Sanders NSF R&D Review Caltech, January 29, 2001.
Power Upgrade Project SNS September 21-22, TBM Cost Estimate Cost Estimate Schedule Approach Tom Mann October 27, 2005.
Keck Next Generation AO Next Generation Adaptive Optics Meeting #2 Caltech November 14, 2006 P. Wizinowich for NGAO Executive Committee.
1 Project Management C13PM Session 2 Project Initiation & Definition Russell Taylor Business Department Staff Workroom
Homestake DUSEL Project Management and Systems Engineering Richard DiGennaro LBNL April 20, 2007.
Nadine Kurita LUSI DOE Review July 23, 2007 PMCS 1 Project Management Cost and Schedule Nadine Kurita ANSI/EIA-748-A Standard.
HP-PPM Work Plan Configuration Options Project & Time Management Version 7 Implementation Project\Work Plan and Time Management\Work Plan Configuraiton.ppt.
LIGO-G M Overview of the LIGO Continuing Operations (FY FY2006) Proposal Gary Sanders LIGO PAC9 Meeting December 2000.
LIGO-G M Advanced LIGO Construction Proposal Submission Gary Sanders LIGO Laboratory LSC Meeting August 2002, Hanford.
ESS | title of presentation | 2012-xx-xx | name of presenter Roles and Responsibilities sub title.
LIGO-G M Managing LIGO: Lessons for a Collaboratory Gary Sanders LIGO/Caltech NEES Awardees Meeting NSF, December 19, 2001.
Cost and Schedule Breakout Session Paul Weinman Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
G R 2004 Plan Update LIGO Systems meeting 22 Jan 04 dhs.
Cost and Schedule Paul Weinman Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
Project Management PTM721S
Systems Analysis and Design in a Changing World, 4th Edition
LSST Project EVMS Performance Overview Kevin E
Management Breakout: MREFC Budget Summary Victor L
Stan Whitcomb LSC meeting Livingston 21 March 2005
Linac Coherent Light Source (LCLS)
X-Ray Endstations Update
PMCS Approach - Past and Current Projects
Preliminary Project Execution Plan
Presentation transcript:

LIGO-G M Advanced LIGO Cost, Schedule and Management Gary H Sanders NSF Review of Advanced LIGO Caltech, June 11, 2003

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory2 Main Points Experienced LIGO Lab team has planned and estimated Advanced LIGO LIGO Lab and LSC have formed a strong partnership Design and development process is already underway in a “project” setting Most of the elements of a formal project are in place Costs are estimated in detail Schedule planning is thorough and will support definition of the final negotiated project Performance measurement infrastructure is in place International partnerships are already being exercised Project Management Plan can be made definitive when financial commitments are complete

LIGO-G M Organization

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory4

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory5 A Development Project Across the LSC Since late 1999, we have planned the Advanced LIGO development program as if it was part of a construction project »Work Breakdown Structure »Cost estimate »Schedule »Management structure »Requirements documented and systems engineering and modeling »Design process established This “projectized” development program has been operating in a serious collaborative manner across the LSC »LSC Working Groups –Advanced detector configurations working group –Core optics working group –Suspensions working group

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory6 LIGO Organization & Support LIGO Laboratory MIT + Caltech ~170 people LIGO Scientific Collaboration 44 member institutions > 400 scientists U.S. National Science Foundation UK Germany Japan Russia India Spain Australia $ SCIENCE Detector R&D DESIGN CONSTRUCTION OPERATION Saulson

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory7 LSC “Project” Participation Lab and LSC scientists/engineers share in leadership roles in the project LSC working groups already coordinate progress in monthly meetings and at LSC face-to-face meetings LSC Executive Committee involved in discussions of all major design choices and decisions Advanced LIGO has become a shared Lab/LSC project

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory8 Advanced LIGO Resource Model Current FY2002 – FY2006 Cooperative Agreement »LIGO Lab operating resources staff and support Advanced LIGO development through Final Design/First article stage »LIGO Lab R&D resources support Advanced LIGO equipment, procurements, incremental staff This request supports fabrication and construction, and incremental staff for construction and installation »From MREFC or R&RA NSF accounts as NSF determines Assume LIGO Lab renewal Cooperative Agreement FY2007 – FY2011 supports staff and infrastructure support for fabrication, construction, installation, commissioning of Advanced LIGO LSC/international partner resources support their development programs International partner capital budgets support portions of the fabrication, construction, installation All of these elements are properly included in the plan shown at this review

LIGO-G M Work Breakdown Structure (WBS)

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory10 l 1.0 Initial LIGO Construction l 2.0 LIGO Laboratory Operations l 3.0 LIGO Laboratory Advanced R&D l 4.0. Advanced LIGO Project (Advanced LIGO) »4.1. Facility Modifications (FAC) »4.2. Seismic Isolation Subsystem (SEI) »4.3. Suspension Subsystem (SUS) »4.4 Prestabilized Laser Subsystem (PSL) »4.5. Input Optics Subsystem (IO) »4.6. Core Optics Components (COC) »4.7. Auxiliary Optics Subsystem (AOS) »4.8. Interferometer Sensing and Controls Subsystem (ISC) »4.9. Data Acquisition, Diagnostics, Network & Supervisory Control (DAQ) »4.10. Support Equipment (SUP) »4.11. Advanced LIGO Construction Project Research and Development (R&D) »4.12. Data Analysis and Computing Subsystem (COMP) »4.13. Installation and Commissioning Task (INS) »4.14. Project Management (PM) Advanced LIGO WBS Based upon existing LIGO Laboratory WBS/account structure

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory11

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory12 Current status of Advanced LIGO organization – Project Manager just hired Org follows WBS

LIGO-G M Project Planning

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory14 Basic Elements of Project Planning Are in Place Elements of the PMCS (EVMS) Estimates / Budget Generation Accounting / Procurement Planning, Scheduling, and Performance Measurement Doc. Control / QAQC / Change Requests ActualsChanges

LIGO-G M Cost Estimate

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory16 Estimates Performed To a Standard Guidance provided to estimators on »Basis of Estimate (BOE) »Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) »Costing Methodology »Cost Database »Collection of Information »Confidence of Cost Estimate »Cost Book »Schedule Integration »Direct Labor Rates »Contract Labor »Risk Analysis »Risk Assessment Methodology »Escalation

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory17

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory18 Note: the value “40111” is common.

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory19 This value is used as a unique resource ID and populates the resource dictionary for planning. This value is used as a FTE value for making head counts and evaluating resource usage.

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory20

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory21

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory22

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory23

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory24

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory25

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory26

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory27 Activity Sheet Header

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory28 Activity Sheet Takeoff Area

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory29 Cost Extension Area

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory30 Risk and Cost Totals

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory31 Labor Summary (FTEs)

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory32

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory33

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory34

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory35 Summary (Base Year Estimate)

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory36 Total Cost Profile

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory37 Request Profile

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory38 Bottom Up and Top Down Staffing Model

LIGO-G M Schedule

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory40 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory41 Level 4

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory42 Level 5

LIGO-G M Performance Measurement

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory44 Planning for Performance Measurement At what level do you cost load the schedule? »WBS Level is where we collect actual cost. »Cost Book Activity Sheet is where we load the estimate. »Schedule Activity level is where we measure progress that determines the earned value. Performance Evaluation is executed at the rollup level for the WBS. »BCWS – baseline plan »BCWP - performance »ACWP – actual costs »Schedule Variance »Cost Variance WBS Grouping { { { WBS Level Cost Book Activity Sheet Level Schedule Task Level

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory45 Planning for Performance Measurement

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory46 Planning for Performance Measurement

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory47 Planning for Performance Measurement

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory48 Progress Data Collection Primavera Project Planner Post Office. »A built in feature within the application creates a mail attachment that contains the activities to be updated. Excel spreadsheets can be easily imported.

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory49

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory50 Milestone Model

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory51

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory52

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory53

LIGO-G M Support of PPARC Proposal

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory55 Real World Example – PPARC Proposal Support

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory56 PPARC Proposal Example Using the schedule, we coded the tasks that represent the collaborator’s scope. Using the cost book Access database, we cost loaded the schedule and generated cost profiles.

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory57 PPARC Proposal Example Using the cost loaded schedule, we exported the cost profile data to a spread sheet in base year dollars. Using MS Excel, we generated a cost profile by GB Fiscal Years and applied an escalation rate.

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory58 More to come on partners and management Principal fiduciary management will come from the LIGO Laboratory Advanced LIGO will be implemented with full LSC participation Capital partners (UK GEO, German GEO, ACIGA) will have a role in the projects management »Possible Institutional Board »Details to be worked out as commitments defined »Discussions between LIGO Lab and UK GEO/PPARC regarding nature and level of formal agreement Basic project management will follow the LIGO model

LIGO-G M LIGO Laboratory59 Summary Experienced LIGO Lab team has planned and estimated Advanced LIGO LIGO Lab and LSC have formed a strong partnership Design and development process is already underway in a “project” setting Most of the elements of a formal project are in place Costs are estimated in detail Schedule planning is thorough and will support definition of the final negotiated project Performance measurement infrastructure is in place International partnerships are already being exercised Project Management Plan can be made definitive when financial commitments are complete