Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

U.S. ATLAS Physics and Computing Budget and Schedule Review John Huth Harvard University DOE/NSF Review of U.S. ATLAS and CMS Computing Projects Brookhaven.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "U.S. ATLAS Physics and Computing Budget and Schedule Review John Huth Harvard University DOE/NSF Review of U.S. ATLAS and CMS Computing Projects Brookhaven."— Presentation transcript:

1 U.S. ATLAS Physics and Computing Budget and Schedule Review John Huth Harvard University DOE/NSF Review of U.S. ATLAS and CMS Computing Projects Brookhaven National Laboratory NOVEMBER 14-17, 2000

2 November 14-17, 2000 J. Huth U.S. ATLAS Physics and Computing Project Status 2 Overall Budget Breakout

3 November 14-17, 2000 J. Huth U.S. ATLAS Physics and Computing Project Status 3 Budget and Guidance

4 November 14-17, 2000 J. Huth U.S. ATLAS Physics and Computing Project Status 4 DOE Profile and Guidance

5 November 14-17, 2000 J. Huth U.S. ATLAS Physics and Computing Project Status 5 Cumulative Profile

6 November 14-17, 2000 J. Huth U.S. ATLAS Physics and Computing Project Status 6 Profile Comments Details of profile still in progress – Understand thoroughly all components Years 01, 02 and 03 short relative to guidance – Impact on software particularly severe – DOE funded portion short in all years but 04 (Labs)  Consequence of Regional Center ramp in 05 and 06 – NB – this assumes that NSF funds for Tier 2’s come from other sources than guidance  In years 04, 05 and 06, could be directed to Tier 2’s

7 November 14-17, 2000 J. Huth U.S. ATLAS Physics and Computing Project Status 7 FY 01 and 02 Requests

8 November 14-17, 2000 J. Huth U.S. ATLAS Physics and Computing Project Status 8 FTE Count

9 November 14-17, 2000 J. Huth U.S. ATLAS Physics and Computing Project Status 9 Build to Cost: Identified Areas Overall: scale back on requirements – Software:  Degree of grid automation  Overall requirements »(e.g. carrying two vs. one DB product)  Shifting personnel »(e.g. CERN location of SW pros) – Hardware  Reduction of scope of RC…  Delay of purchases – Moore’s law  Alternative data-analysis strategies Comment: user part of facilities is conservative N.B. – the quantitative implications are still under study

10 November 14-17, 2000 J. Huth U.S. ATLAS Physics and Computing Project Status 10 Summary Functional Organization – Software effort backbone of Intl. ATLAS – Regional Center operational, in use by users International ATLAS planning on track – Software agreements, facilities planning Grid tasks beginning – U.S. ATLAS Testbed Funding profile must be addressed

11 November 14-17, 2000 Schedule Milestones

12 November 14-17, 2000 Summary Information FY 01 & FY 02

13 November 14-17, 2000 J. Huth U.S. ATLAS Physics and Computing Project Status 13 NSF and DOE Split

14 November 14-17, 2000 J. Huth U.S. ATLAS Physics and Computing Project Status 14 Cost Categories Advanced Information Technology Professional Information Technology Professional I Information Technology Professional II Information Technology Technician Student Travel Stores Space Power Low value materials High value materials Licenses Maintenance Consulting Technical services Administrative service

15 November 14-17, 2000 J. Huth U.S. ATLAS Physics and Computing Project Status 15 Functional Overview Cost/Schedule Control System Institutions Terminal Escalation Procedure MS Project 98 Baseline (Resource Loaded Schedules) Cost Reporting (WBS Level 5) Report Generator Update Procedure ACCESS Database CSSR Procedure WBS WBS Dictionary Estimate - Labor - Material - Travel Rates Contingency Cost Books MOUs Project/NSF/Base/ Infrastructure Funding Source CSSR at WBS Level 3 WBS Level 5 BCWS/BCWP Cumulative Cost Monthly Cost Reports Escalation Rates DOE Reports Schedules S/S Mgr. Status Data Baseline MS Project 98 Statused (Resource Loaded Schedules) Projections Procedure FY Funding by Institution Status Sheets 123 4 5 67 8 9 10 11 1213 14 15 16 17 18

16 November 14-17, 2000 J. Huth U.S. ATLAS Physics and Computing Project Status 16 Change Control

17 November 14-17, 2000 J. Huth U.S. ATLAS Physics and Computing Project Status 17 Grid vs. Athena Services Craig Tull NERSC/LBL Athena and Grids: http://documents.cern.ch/age?a00380

18 November 14-17, 2000 J. Huth U.S. ATLAS Physics and Computing Project Status 18 Calren Esnet, Abilene, Nton Abilene Esnet, Mren UC Berkeley LBNL-NERSC Esnet NPACI, Abilene Brookhaven National Laboratory Indiana University Boston University Argonne National Laboratory Initial Participants HPSS sites U Michigan University of Texas at Arlington SUNY Albany


Download ppt "U.S. ATLAS Physics and Computing Budget and Schedule Review John Huth Harvard University DOE/NSF Review of U.S. ATLAS and CMS Computing Projects Brookhaven."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google