1 Critical Retail Issues RMS Update RMS Meeting Results 2/01 RMS Formed 3/01 RMS Identified “pent-up” issues Tx Set transaction development Service Order.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Market True-Up Discussion RMS Meeting 03/13/02 Draft Only for Discussion Purposes.
Advertisements

Profiling Working Group May 15, PWG Report By Ernie Podraza of Reliant Energy ERCOT PWG Chair for WMS Meeting June 18, 2003.
Retail Market Subcommittee Update to TAC February 5, 2004.
AMS DATA WORKSHOP III TDSP UPDATE September 19,
1.  An inadvertent issue begins upon the discovery of an Inadvertent Gain or Move-In transaction submission. Upon identification of an Inadvertent Gain.
1 Pre-TX Set 1.5 Data Clean Up. 2 Pre-TX SET 1.5 Data Clean-up Process In-Review - currently 12 (Original Quantity = 863) –June RMS, count 207 In-Review.
Retail Sub-Committee Update Robert Connell June 14, 2002.
1 Load Research Sampling (LRS) Project Summary 12/16/2004.
Retail Market Update June 5, New meter is requested for a specific customer’s location. 2.Application is filed by customer and/or the customer’s.
1 Update to RMS February 03, January Meeting Update RMGRR126, Additional ERCOT Validations for Customer Billing Contact Information File RMGRR128,Reinstate.
Role of Account Management at ERCOT PRR 672 Collaborative Analysis Presentation to RMS November 8, 2006 DRAFT ONLY.
1 Update to RMS December 8, Texas SET 4.0 Change Controls
ERCOT MARKET EDUCATION
1 Update from ERCOT Retail Market Services to RMS Additional Material February 12, 2004.
RMS Update to TAC January 3, Goals Update ► Complete and improve SCR745, Retail Market Outage Evaluation & Resolution, implementation and reporting.
1 MIMO/Stacking (Including Tx SET Version 2.0) Post Implementation Success Report.
1 Commercial Operations Sub-Committee Update to TAC October 5, 2007.
1 RMS Update - ERCOT June 10, Supporting Reports Section.
Retail Market Subcommittee Update to TAC Kathy Scott February 27,
09/15/10 RMS RMS Market Reports – Recommendations Karen Farley Manager, Retail Customer Choice.
Rob Connell May 1, 2002 Retail Sub-Committee Update.
1 Supporting materials for RMS Provided by Retail Customer Choice (RCC) team.
10/13/10 RMS RMS Market Reports – Recommendations Karen Farley Manager, Retail Customer Choice.
RMS Update to TAC April 7, RMS Voting Items  RMGRR032- Transaction Timing Matrix Corrections Includes updates to Appendix D to correct examples.
1 Update to RMS January 6, December Meeting Update NPRR668, Updates to TX SET Implementation Guide Process—TX SET Comments (Vote) RMGRR128, Reinstate.
Report to RMS January 14, TTPT Key Dates and Deadlines as of 1/14/03 1/05/04 - Mandatory Connectivity Kick Off Call & Penny Tests begin 1/12/03.
1 RMS TAC Update April 3, Test Plan Flight Dates It is the practice of RMS to approved the dates for future testing flights. This enables new.
1 RMS Update - ERCOT May 14, Supporting Reports Section.
1 MVI/MVO Workshop June 3 – 12, 2002 Workshop Results.
Load Profiling Working Group RMS Presentation 8/01/2002 by Ernie Podraza Reliant Energy Retail Group Chair PWG.
Retail Market Subcommittee Update to COPS Kathy Scott March 17,
1 RMS Update on Move-In / Move-Out Task Force November 14, 2002.
ERCOT MARKET EDUCATION Retail 101. Retail Transaction Processing.
MARS 867_03F ROR vs. Settlement vs. 810 Scenarios ERCOT September 2008.
RMS/COPS Workshop VI 1 October 06, Antitrust Admonition ERCOT strictly prohibits Market Participants and their employees who are participating in.
Profiling Working Group October 16, PWG Update Report By Ernie Podraza of Reliant Energy ERCOT PWG Chair for RMS Meeting October 16, 2003.
MARS Taskforce RMS Update November 10, Conference Call concerning Settlement Estimates TDSPs held a conference call on October 28, 2010, where we:
1 Linked-Service Address Discussion Thursday - April 8, 2004 (Updated 4/12/04 to include meeting results) Airport Hilton - Austin.
Tuesday, October 6, 2015 (following RMS) COPS-RMS-WORKSHOPShttp://
1 Update on the 867_03 Contingency Plan Nancy Hetrick February 25, 2003.
RMS Update to TAC October 5, RMS Activity Summary 2008 Test Flight Schedule Update on TAC directive relating to identifying issues with net metering.
1 Transaction or Issue Clean Up. 2 Customer Protection and 814_08 Issue (Phase 2 – Potentially Late 08s) Background Completed Items Next Steps.
Retail Market Subcommittee Update to COPS Kathy Scott February 11,
1 Supporting materials for RMS Provided by Retail Customer Choice (RCC) team.
1 TX SET Update to RMS November 12, RMGRR Activity RMGRR065 – Disconnect and Reconnect for Non-Payment Updates and Corrections – –Normal Timeline.
Demand Response Task Force. 2 2 Outline  Overview of ERCOT’s role in the CCET Pilot  Overview of Stakeholder Process – What’s been done to date?  Questions.
February 19, 2009 ERCOT Follow up on questions from 2/11 discussion on proposed Expedited Switch rulemaking changes…
1 TX SET Mass Transition Project RMS Update March 15, 2006.
Update to RMS December 18, Project(PR) 010_03 SCR756 Part B – High Level Timeline DRAFT:  Planning Phase: ~ (End of 2013) ◦ Business requirements.
Market Metrics Working Group RMS Update: June 13, 2007.
Retail Market Update August 6, Load Profile Guides In accordance with section § (e) (3) and PUCT Project 25516, Load Profiling and Load Research.
Update to RMS January 10, Project(PR) 010_03 SCR756 Part B – High Level Timeline DRAFT:  Planning Phase: ~ (End of 2013) ◦ Business requirements.
1 Move-In Move-Out Task Force Update to RMS May 15, 2003.
RMS Update to TAC October 2, RMS Update to TAC TAC Confirmation Vote Request Kyle Patrick of Reliant Energy and Independent Power Marketer segment.
TX SET Update to RMS Wednesday, May 9, Elimination of the Drop to AREP o RULEMAKING TO AMEND COMMISSION SUBSTANTIVE RULES CONSISTENT WITH §25.43,
February 2, 2016 RMS Meeting 1. * Reasons: * Per the ERCOT Board Report dated 8/5/14 there were 6.6M Advanced Metering System (AMS) Electric Service Identifiers.
RMS Update to TAC November 1, RMS Activity Summary RMGRR057, Competitive Metering Working Group Name Change (VOTE) Update on RMS Working Group and.
COMET Working Group Progress Report. Purpose of Report Provide Team Updates Potential Future Voting Items Draft Competitive Meter Ownership Timeline.
Retail Market Subcommittee Update to TAC March 4, 2004.
COMET Working Group Progress Report. Contents of Report Provide COMET Recommendations, with May 6 revisions (Vote) –Competitive Meter Approval Process.
MMWG Performance Measures Questionnaire. Performance Measure Reporting Requirements The reporting requirements allowed the commission to obtain information.
1 Customer Objections in Complete Status (CCO Clean-up Phase 3) Background Next Steps.
Mass Transition—Timelines & Volume Limitation RMGRR116—Acquisition Transfer Non-standard Metering Future Meetings 1.
Update to RMS February 2, 2016 TX SET. Texas SET January Meeting Update Elections – Chair: Diana Rehfeldt, TNMP – Vice Chair: Kyle Patrick, NRG TMTP Changes.
1.  What is the purpose of DEVs? Data Extract Variances (DEVs) are used to synchronize the data among all Market Participants (MP)  What is a DEV? It's.
1 Supporting materials for RMS Provided by Retail Customer Choice (RCC) team.
Settlement Timeline Workshop
Pro-Active Transaction Resolution Measures
Pro-Active Transaction Resolution Measures
Usage Billing Issues.
Presentation transcript:

1 Critical Retail Issues RMS Update RMS Meeting Results 2/01 RMS Formed 3/01 RMS Identified “pent-up” issues Tx Set transaction development Service Order Workshops Outage workshops 4/01 RMS Identified Pilot Open Critical Issues Workshops initiated to resolve issues Permits/Inspections Critical Care Move In/Move Out Service Order/Notification Retail Metering 5/01 Approved Pilot Work arounds Identified Market Open Critical Issues RMS workshops initiated to resolve issues 6/01 RMS Approved 62 Resolved Critical Issues Began the Prioritizing process Developed Protocol Change Requests Developed ERCOT System Change Requests Developed Tx Set Transaction Change Requests

2 Analysis of the 62 Critical Issues –12 - Business process definition requiring no system change –24 - Business system change required by point-to-point MPs –26 - Business system change required by all MPs, ERCOT included Analysis of the 26 change issues effecting ERCOT –10 - Priority 1 - essential for Market Open – 8 - Priority 2 - important for Market Open – 8 - Priority 3 - after Market Open Analysis of the 10 Priority 1 issues –4 - Retail Metering, not Protocol changes required –3 - Permit/Inspections, will require Protocol changes –3 - Move In/Move Out, will require Protocol changes Critical Retail Issues RMS Update Issue Analysis All interested MPs were involved in the workshop process. 62 Critical Issues were identified and a resolution consensus was gained on practically every issue

3 Subtractive/Additive Metering Data Requirement –ERCOT TDSPs sending netted 15 minute interval data –Non-ERCOT TDSPs sending all 15 minute interval data Solution = Adopt ERCOT TDSP methodology Mid Cycle Meter Read with Profile Change –Caused by change in IDR, Demand, or TOU status –4 Options considered, no good compromise solution determined Solution = Change the meter on cycle read date Meter Reads required on Historical Usage Request –Present interpretation requires both meter read and consumption Solution = Drop requirement to provide meter read Consumption Discrepancy –Interval data does not match consumption data Solution = Revise Tx SET transaction to allow for adjustment Critical Retail Issues RMS Update Retail Metering

4 Pending order waiting completion of City Inspection –TDSPs agree to pend order Solution = Develop a new transaction to provide electronic notification Move In Un-executable –Need a means to notify CR/Customer if a problem exists Solution = Provide notification on new transaction Cancel Move In Request –Permit is no longer needed or required Solution = Provide notification means to keep record accurate Critical Retail Issues RMS Update Permits/Inspections

5 Existing Process Creates Service Gaps –Option 1 - No change, deal with customer problems –Option 2 - CR manages and communicates problem –Option 3 - ERCOT manages and communicates problem Timing Requirement when CSA in effect –Service not disconnected at Move Out Solution = Clarify timing requirement, ERCOT ensures switch in 1 business day Same CR on a new Move In –CR responsible for final bill determination Solution = Change existing reject code reason Critical Retail Issues RMS Update Move In/Move Outs CR2 6/1 CR1 6/15 CR2 6/30 Customer B Move In # 1 Customer A Move Out Customer B Move In # 2