Office of District and School Accountability and Program Management Larry Smith and Taylor L. Young, Ph.D. 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SCHOOL PROFILE. Eisenhower 9 th Grade School Mission We exist to prepare each student academically and socially to be a: Responsible and productive citizen.
Advertisements

Surveys of Enacted Curriculum – English Language Learner Project Jacqueline Iribarren Abby Potter John Smithson Shelley Lee.
Literacy & Our Solution MaxPhonics Max Pre-K Phonics MaxReading MaxMusic MaxBios MaxPlaces MaxVocab.
E NGLISH L ANGUAGE L EARNERS Diverse Learners Spotlight Presentation University of New England By: Erin Dilla.
Portfolio Mid-Year Accountability Status Report March 3 rd, 2013.
Valentine Elementary School San Marino Unified School District Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Spring 2009 California Standards Test.
Michael Toole Southwest Plains Regional Service Center.
Understanding Data for Beginners School Community Council Training October 2013.
Montana’s statewide longitudinal data system Project Montana’s Statewide Longitudinal Data System (SLDS)
Academic Gap Reduction Trends, Kansas Reading Data, Brad Neuenswander, Deputy Commissioner, Kansas State Dept. of Education March 6, 2014 Brad.
1 New York State Growth Model for Educator Evaluation 2011–12 July 2012 PRESENTATION as of 7/9/12.
PUT TITLE HERE Leading Student Achievement Mary Jean Gallagher Assistant Deputy Minister Student Achievement Division Chief Student Achievement Officer.
PROGRESS MONITORING OF ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT Baldwin-Whitehall School District 2nd Quarter Data.
How are we doing? Where are we going? How are we doing? Where are we going?
English Language Arts Single Plan for Student Achievement.
Data-Driven Dialogue Predicting, Exploring, and Explaining Data
OLMOS ELEMENTARY. WHOOOO WE ARE SCHOOL FACTS: ENROLLMENT: 657 RATING: IMPROVEMENT REQUIRED GRADES: PK-5 SPECIAL PROGRAMS: PK, BILINGUAL/DUAL, ALE CAMPUS.
Introduction to GREAT for ELs Office of Student Assessment Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction (608)
1 Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) Steve Martin, CMT Program Manager Bureau of Research, Evaluation, and Student Assessment Connecticut State Department.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.
2014 A - F Letter Grades - AIMS The State of Arizona utilizes AIMS to measure student growth. In measuring student growth, the State of Arizona then identifies.
© 2007 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System, on behalf of the WIDA Consortium WIDA Focus on Growth H Gary Cook, Ph.D. WIDA.
NECAP 2007: District Results Office of Research, Assessment, and Evaluation February 25, 2008.
Accountability Report Dedham Public Schools October 3,
2012 – th Grade SRI Proficiencies – th Grade SRI Proficiencies.
Closing the Achievement Gap Denver Public School Elementary Literacy Program.
1 New York State Growth Model for Educator Evaluation 2011–12 July 2012 PRESENTATION as of 7/9/12.
James A. Farley School Report Card Presentation May 19, 2008 High Achieving School.
GradeCertificated Staffing Total Staffing 4.18**.38** 8.46**.59** 11.70**.79** 2 **p
Earobics Closing the Literacy Gap Through Intervention Pre K - 3.
SPECIAL EDUCATION LITERACY (SPEL) Ronda Hilbert, Special Education Literacy Coach.
Preliminary Data: Not a Final Accountability Document1 SAISD TAKS Performance Board Work Session June 2005 Office of Research, Evaluation,
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for Special Populations Michigan Department of Education Office of Educational Assessment and Accountability Paul Bielawski.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez January 2010.
MOBERLY PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT’S 2008 TERRA NOVA RESULTS FOR SPECIAL EDUCATION NANCY FLEMING DISTRICT TEST COORDINATOR MOBERLY.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.
Today Big theory around second language acquisition (45 min.) Federal ESEA framework (45 min.) Common Core Standards (1 hr.)
Ready At Five & Maryland State Department of Education.
Anderson School Accreditation We commit to continuous growth and improvement by  Creating a culture for learning by working together  Providing.
MCAS Progress and Performance Index Report 2013 Cohasset Public Schools.
GUIDE THE ISS GUIDE TO THE SIOP MODEL AUGUST 1ST, 2013.
1 New York State Growth Model for Educator Evaluation June 2012 PRESENTATION as of 6/14/12.
Performance Wisconsin Student Assessment System
What is AYP? AYP stands for Adequate Yearly Progress
Spring 2016 PARCC and MCAS Results: Newton Public Schools
Bixby North Elementary
Brassfield 5th & 6th Grade Center Bixby Public Schools
What you need to know about SSC,SPSA,LCAP
Examining Your Disaggregated Screening Data
Shelton School District Bilingual Instruction Program
Shelton School District Bilingual Instruction Program
Literacy Plan Hanahan High School.
Professor of Education
Growing Success: Assessment, Evaluation, and Reporting in Ontario Schools. First Edition, Covering Grades 1 to 12 With thanks to Ben Hazzard Program Consultant:
MTE 553 Enthusiastic Studysnaptutorial.com
Milton Public Schools 2013 Accountability Status
Minnesota Reading Corps - A Strong Return on Investment
Specialized Instruction at KMS
Student Achievement Grant
MCAS school accountability report
Data Overview Tapp Middle School 7th Grade
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
Phillipsburg Middle School Identification as a School in Need of  Comprehensive Support and Improvement: Starting Community Conversations March.
Shelton School District Bilingual Instruction Program
Mayra Perez, Ed. D. October 10, 2016
Presentation transcript:

Office of District and School Accountability and Program Management Larry Smith and Taylor L. Young, Ph.D. 1

2

Grade Grade Grade Grade

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

Grade 3 Reading Median percentile of questions answered correctly 60 to 69 Median percentile of questions answered correctly less than 60% Vocabulary Comprehension/ Critical Literacy Literature Research and information Vocabulary Comprehension/ Critical Literacy Literature Research and information All67 All 50 Regular Education 6367Regular Education Special Education ELL Grade 4 Reading Median percentile of questions answered correctly 60 to 69 Median percentile of questions answered correctly less than 60% Vocabulary Comprehension/ Critical Literacy Literature Research and information Vocabulary Comprehension/ Critical Literacy Literature Research and information All67 All Regular Education67 Regular Education Special Education ELL Grade 5 Reading Median percentile of questions answered correctly 60 to 69 Median percentile of questions answered correctly less than 60% Vocabulary Comprehension/ Critical Literacy Literature Research and information Vocabulary Comprehension/ Critical Literacy Literature Research and information All 58 Regular Education 58 Special Education67 Special Education ELL Grade 6 Reading Median percentile of questions answered correctly 60 to 69 Median percentile of questions answered correctly less than 60% Vocabulary Comprehension/ Critical Literacy Literature Research and information Vocabulary Comprehension/ Critical Literacy Literature Research and information All All Regular Education 68 63Regular Education Special Education ELL

The degree to which these trends continue into is directly related to the actions we take today!. 14

 Students who are economically disadvantaged continue to experience significant achievement gaps when compared to students who are not economically disadvantaged.  This widening gap warrants a substantial review of how Title I resources are utilized to directly support the instruction of Literacy across all reporting groups of students but specifically students who are economically disadvantaged, English Language Learners and Special Education.  As the number of English Language Learners and Special Education students completing OCCT’s increase, additional support/interventions will be required to address the growing disproportion of students scoring below proficient. ◦ The one variable that all three groups experience is Literacy Instruction 15